Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch

Cited by 74 other publications

No author info given

2014.  In Auxiliary Selection in Spanish [Studies in Language Companion Series, 155],

No author info given

2015.  In Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 17],

No author info given

2017.  In Pivotal Constructions in Chinese [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 8],

No author info given

2019.  In Encoding Motion Events in Mandarin Chinese [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 11],

No author info given

2019. Introduction. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 263 ff.

AKITA, KIMI

2014. <i>Construction Morphology</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 31:1 ► pp. 275 ff.

AKITA, KIMI & TAKESHI USUKI

2016. A constructional account of the ‘optional’ quotative marking on Japanese mimetics. Journal of Linguistics 52:2 ► pp. 245 ff.

Andrason, Alexander

2018. From Coordination to Verbal Serialization – the PÓJŚĆ (Serial Verb) Construction in Polish . Research in Language 16:1 ► pp. 19 ff.

Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea

2015.  In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 1 ff.

BERGS, ALEXANDER

2010. Expressions of futurity in contemporary English: a Construction Grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 217 ff.

Boas, Hans C.

2020.  In The Handbook of English Linguistics, ► pp. 277 ff.

Boas, Hans C. & Francisco Gonzálvez-García

2014.  In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 1 ff.

Boas, Hans C. & Steffen Höder

2018.  In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 5 ff.

Booij, Geert

2010. Construction Morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:7 ► pp. 543 ff.

Busso, Lucia

2021. Constructional creativity in a Romance language. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34

Busso, Lucia, Alessandro Lenci & Florent Perek

2020. Valency coercion in Italian. Constructions and Frames 12:2 ► pp. 171 ff.

Canakis, Costas

2015. Non-quantifying líγo constructions in Modern Greek. Constructions and Frames 7:1 ► pp. 47 ff.

Diewald, Gabriele

2020.  In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27], ► pp. 278 ff.

Diewald, Gabriele & Katja Politt

2021. Grammatical categories as paradigms in construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34

Doğruöz, A. Seza

2014. On the borrowability of subject pronoun constructions in Turkish–Dutch contact. Constructions and Frames 6:2 ► pp. 143 ff.

Endresen, Anna & Laura A. Janda

2020. Taking Construction Grammar One Step Further: Families, Clusters, and Networks of Evaluative Constructions in Russian. Frontiers in Psychology 11

Fried, Mirjam

2015.  In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18], ► pp. 139 ff.

Gabrielatos, Costas

2019. If-Conditionals and Modality: Frequency Patterns and Theoretical Explanations. Journal of English Linguistics 47:4 ► pp. 301 ff.

Gabrielatos, Costas

2020.  In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216], ► pp. 141 ff.

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco

2011. Review of Leino (2008): Constructional Reorganization. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 419 ff.

Hamunen, Markus Veli Juhani

2017. On the grammaticalization of Finnish colorative construction. Constructions and Frames 9:1 ► pp. 101 ff.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Tuomas Huumo

2015.  In Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical [Constructional Approaches to Language, 16], ► pp. 1 ff.

Hilpert, Martin

2017.  In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7], ► pp. 217 ff.

Höder, Steffen

2014. Phonological elements and Diasystematic Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 6:2 ► pp. 202 ff.

Iakovleva, Irina

2015. Russian pseudosynonymous prepositional constructions: semantics and acquisition. Russian Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 117 ff.

Inbar, Anna

2020.  In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210], ► pp. 623 ff.

Janda, Laura A., Mihail Kopotev & Tore Nesset

2020. Constructions, their families and their neighborhoods: the case of durak durakom ‘a fool times two’. Russian Linguistics 44:2 ► pp. 109 ff.

Jääskeläinen, Anni

2016. Mimetic schemas and shared perception through imitatives. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39:2 ► pp. 159 ff.

Kaltenböck, Gunther

2016.  In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 341 ff.

Kerins, John & Allan Ramsay

2012. Developing a visual temporal modeller: applying an extensible nlp system to support learners’ understanding of tense and aspect in English. ReCALL 24:1 ► pp. 40 ff.

Kiyama, Naoki

2017. When tense meets constructional meaning. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:2 ► pp. 273 ff.

Lauwers, Peter

2010. Comment dissocier des locutions prépositives quasi-synonymiques? Essai d’analyse collostructionnelle. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 55:1 ► pp. 55 ff.

Lauwers, Peter

2014.  In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 79 ff.

Lauwers, Peter

2014.  In Word Classes [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 332], ► pp. 203 ff.

Lindström, Jan K.

2014. On the place of turn and sequence in grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 24:3 ► pp. 507 ff.

Lyngfelt, Benjamin

2013. Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. xvii + 586.. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36:3 ► pp. 381 ff.

Masini, Francesca & Valentina Benigni

2012. Phrasal lexemes and shortening strategies in Russian: the case for constructions. Morphology 22:3 ► pp. 417 ff.

Mousavi, S. Hamzeh & Mohammad Amouzadeh

2020. ‘I hear the smell of roses’. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 397 ff.

Negro Alousque, Isabel

2019. A Case for Construction Grammar: Wh-XVPY Constructions. English Studies 100:2 ► pp. 206 ff.

Nikanne, Urpo

2008.  In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Nikiforidou, Kiki

2009.  In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Nikiforidou, Kiki

2015. Grammatical constructions and cross-text generalizations. Constructions and Frames 7:2 ► pp. 181 ff.

Nikiforidou, Kiki

2018. Genre and constructional analysis. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3 ► pp. 543 ff.

Nikiforidou, Kiki & Kerstin Fischer

2015. On the interaction of constructions with register and genre. Constructions and Frames 7:2 ► pp. 137 ff.

Nolan, Brian

2014. Theoretical and computational considerations of linking constructions in Role and Reference Grammar. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 410 ff.

Paszenda, Joanna

2017.  In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 241 ff.

Payne, Doris L.

2008. Review of Fried & Boas (2005): Grammatical Constructions. Back to the Roots. Studies in Language 32:1 ► pp. 211 ff.

Perek, Florent

2018. Recent change in the productivity and schematicity of the way-construction: A distributional semantic analysis . Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14:1 ► pp. 65 ff.

Perek, Florent & Amanda L. Patten

2019. Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3 ► pp. 354 ff.

Quochi, Valeria

2016.  In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19], ► pp. 39 ff.

Rocci, Andrea

2017.  In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 275 ff.

RUIZ DE MENDOZA-IBÁÑEZ, FRANCISCO & ALBA LUZONDO-OYÓN

2016. Figurative and non-figurative motion in the expression of result in English. Language and Cognition 8:1 ► pp. 32 ff.

Sambre, Paul & Cornelia Wermuth

2015.  In Handbook of Terminology [Handbook of Terminology, 1], ► pp. 101 ff.

Schulze, Mathias & Nikolai Penner

2008. Construction grammar in ICALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21:5 ► pp. 427 ff.

Sommerer, Lotte

2021. Why we avoid the ‘Multiple Inheritance’ issue in usage-based cognitive construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34

Spronck, Stef

2020.  In Language, Culture and Identity – Signs of Life [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 13], ► pp. 75 ff.

Szczesniak, Konrad

2019. Variation motivated by analogy with fixed chunks. Constructions and Frames 11:1 ► pp. 79 ff.

Szymańska, Izabela

2011.  In New Perspectives in Language, Discourse and Translation Studies [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 215 ff.

Thomou, Paraskevi

2016. Metaphor and metonymy interaction patterns in Modern Greek. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 3:2 ► pp. 299 ff.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs

2008. Review of Fischer (): Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Functions of Language 15:2 ► pp. 293 ff.

Trijp, Remi van

2021. Making good on a promise. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34

V. Zhukovska, V.

2019. SEMANTICS OF GRAMMATICAL CONSTRUCTION: CORPUS AND QUANTITATIVE ASPECT. Studia Philologica :2 ► pp. 28 ff.

Veselovská, Kateřina

2014.  In Language Use and Linguistic Structure, ► pp. 269 ff.

Västi, Katja & Seppo Kittilä

2014. Semantic roles and verbless constructions. Studies in Language 38:3 ► pp. 512 ff.

Västi, Katja & Seppo Kittilä

2016.  In Advances in Research on Semantic Roles [Benjamins Current Topics, 88], ► pp. 79 ff.

Watkowska, Dorota

2020. A Corpus-based Study on Question Tags in ELF. An Attempt to Determine an Emergent Construction. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :29/2 ► pp. 135 ff.

Ziem, Alexander & Alexander Lasch

2018. Konstruktionsgrammatische Zugänge zu narrativen Texten. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 48:2 ► pp. 389 ff.

Östman, Jan-Ola

2018.  In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 181 ff.

Östman, Jan-Ola

2021. Constructions as Discourse-Restrained Flexible Prototypes. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.