Chapter published in:
Category Change from a Constructional PerspectiveEdited by Kristel Van Goethem, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé and Gudrun Vanderbauwhede
[Constructional Approaches to Language 20] 2018
► pp. 149–178
Chapter 6Category change in the English gerund
Tangled web or fine-tuned constructional network?
This study considers the diachronic categorial shift from nominal (NG) to verbal gerunds (VG) in Middle English in terms of Langacker’s functional account of noun phrases and clauses as ‘deictic expressions’. The analysis shows that the Middle English gerund was essentially formally nominal but functionally hybrid, thus exhibiting ‘form-function friction’. This friction furthered a split in the gerundive system between a verbal component associated with clausal deixis, alongside a nominal component, which specialized in nominal deixis; but this split is not absolute. The constructionist idea of language as a network of (inter)paradigmatically connected constructions helps to explain why the verbal gerund seems to simultaneously drift away from and again partake in the deictic behaviour of the nominal category.
Keywords: Middle English, construction grammar, nominalization, verbalization, gerund
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Goals and methodology
- 3.Gerunds: Nominal and clausal deixis
- 3.1Qualitative analysis: Types of deixis
- 3.2Quantitative analysis: The rise of clausal deixis in bare nominal and verbal gerunds
- 4.Reflections on category change: Is the verbalization of the gerund a case of constructionalization?
- 5.Concluding remarks
-
Notes -
References
Published online: 22 March 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.20.06fon
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.20.06fon
References
Aarts, B.
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G.
Barðdal, J.
Colleman, T., & De Clerck, B.
Croft, W.
Dal, I.
De Smet, H.
De Smet, H., & Heyvaert, L.
De Smet, H., & Van de Velde, F.
Fanego, T.
Fonteyn, L.
Fonteyn, L., & van de Pol, N.
(2016) Divide and conquer: The formation and functional dynamics of the Modern English ing-clause network. English Language and Linguistics. Retrieved from: http://journals.cambridge.org.kuleuven.ezproxy.kuleuven.be/article_S1360674315000258 doi: 
Fonteyn, L., Heyvaert, L., & Maekelberghe, C.
Francis, E. J., & Michaelis, L. A.
Goldberg, A.
Hartmann, S.
Heyvaert, L.
Horn, G. M.
Houston, A.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
Jespersen, O.
Kastovsky, D.
Killie, K., & Swan, T.
Kohnen, T.
Langacker, R. W.
Malouf, R.
PPCEME
=Kroch, A., Beatrice, S., & Delfs, L. (2004) Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Early Modern English. www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCEME-RELEASE-1/.
PPCMBE
=Kroch, A., Santorini, B., & Diertani, A. (2010) Penn parsed corpus of Modern British English. Retrieved from: http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCMBE-RELEASE-1/index.html
Pullum, G. K.
Rohdenburg, G.
Schachter, P.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
Tuggy, D.
Van de Velde, F.
Vosberg, U.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Fonteyn, Lauren & Charlotte Maekelberghe
Maekelberghe, Charlotte
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.