Cover not available
Part of
Category Change from a Constructional Perspective
Edited by Kristel Van Goethem, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé and Gudrun Vanderbauwhede
[Constructional Approaches to Language 20] 2018
► pp. 179–205

Chapter 7
The emergence of a new adverbial downtoner

Constructional change and constructionalization of Dutch [ver van X] and [verre van X] ‘far from X’

The English expression far from, denoting spatial or metaphorical distance, has developed into an adverbial downtoner (De Smet, 2012). In this corpus-based study, our first purpose is to analyze to which degree the Dutch counterparts of the English [far from X] construction, that is [ver van X] and [verre van X], have also developed into downtoners. We show that synchronically ver van mostly has a spatial or metaphorical meaning, while verre van is generally used as an adverbial downtoner. As a second objective, we explore the diachronic pathways taken by both constructions and argue that the category change undergone by [verre van X] is part of a true constructionalization process, while [ver van X] has been affected by minor constructional changes only.
Keywords: downtoner, degree adverb, Dutch, category change, constructional change, constructionalization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Downtoners
  • 3.[ver van X] and [verre van X] in present-day Dutch
    • 3.1Method
    • 3.2Semantics
    • 3.3Complementation patterns
  • 4.Diachronic developments
    • 4.1Method
    • 4.2[ver van X]
      • 4.2.1Semantic changes
      • 4.2.2Changes in the complementation types
    • 4.3[verre van X]
      • 4.3.1Semantic changes
      • 4.3.2Changes in the complementation types
    • 4.4Comparison [ver van X] and [verre van X]
  • 5.Category change, constructional change and constructionalization
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Online sources
Published online: 22 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.20.07goe
References (26)
References
Aarts, B. (2007). Syntactic gradience: The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Edinburgh/Harlow/Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G. (2008). Introduction: Constructions and language change. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp. 1–21). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, C., & Kytö, M. (2014). ‘I know you are a bit of a dandy’: Exploring a degree modifier. In M. Hundt (Ed.), Late Modern English syntax (pp. 239–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, D. (2001). Gradience and linguistic change. In L. J. Brinton (Ed.), Historical linguistics 1999 (pp. 119–144). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, H. (2012). The course of actualization. Language, 88(3), 601–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, H., & Fischer, O. (2017). Analogy in language change: Supporting constructions. In M. Hundt, S. E. Pfenninger, & S. Mollin (Eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 240–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J., & van den Toorn, M. C. (19972). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst (Vol. 2). Groningen/Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff uitgevers/ Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2004). On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde, & H. Perridon (Eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Wisang, N. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Horst van der, J. M. (2008). Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis (Vol. 2). Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T., & Rissanen, M. (2002). ‘Fairly pretty or pretty fair?’: On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language sciences, 24(3–4), 359–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, M. (2014). On parents and peers in constructional networks. Paper presented at Cogling-6 . University of Ghent, 11–12 December 2014.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartik, J. (1997). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schäfer, R., & Bildhauer, F. (2012). Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. In N. Calzolari et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010) (pp. 486–493). Valletta: European language resources distribution agency.Google Scholar
Schäfer, R. (2015). Processing and querying large web corpora with the COW14 architecture. In P. Bański, H. Biber, E. Breiteneder, M. Kupietz, H. Lüngen, & A. Witt (Eds.), Proceedings of challenges in the management of large corpora (CMLC-3) (pp. 28–34). Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1988). Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In S. Axmaker, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 406–416). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
(2008). The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp. 23–45). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Goethem, K. (2015). ‘Cette mesure est-elle vraiment clé?’ A constructional approach to categorial gradience. Journal of French Language Studies, 25(1), 115–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Online sources
COW (Corpora from the Web) Available online at: [URL]
CGN (Corpus Gesproken Nederlands) Available online at: [URL]
CHK (Corpus Historische Kranten) Available online at: [URL]
TwNC (Twente News Corpus) Available online at: [URL]
WNT (Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal) Available online at: [URL]
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Brinton, Laurel J. & Tohru Inoue
2020. A far from simple matter revisited. In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214], ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Koutsoukos, Nikos, Kristel Van Goethem & Hendrik De Smet
2018. Asymmetries, mismatches and construction grammar. Constructions and Frames 10:2 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.