Reduction or expansion? A bit of both
A case study on the development of German degree modifiers
This paper presents a diachronic analysis of the German quantifier/degree-modifier constructions ein bisschen (‘a bitDIM’) and ein wenig (‘a little’). On the basis of data from two historical corpora, we examine to what extent these constructions followed a grammaticalization path comparable to the one Traugott (e.g. 2008a) observed for their English counterparts. Quantitative analyses on their gradual context expansion are combined with qualitative analyses on potential bridging contexts for reanalysis. Their combined histories suggest that the older German modifiers may have served as attractor sets for an increasingly strengthened mid-level quantifier/degree-modifier schema, promoting the emergence of younger modifiers. These observations stress the crucial role that network links between constructions can play in grammaticalization.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.
Reduction and expansion in a construction grammar framework for grammaticalization
- 3.English quantifier/degree-modifier constructions
- 4.German quantifier/degree-modifier constructions: An overview
- 5.Studying the German degree modifiers: Corpus data and methods
- 6.Quantitative corpus analyses
- 6.1Token frequency
- 6.2Parts of speech modified by the constructions
- 6.3
Determiner variation
- 7.Bridging contexts and motivations for innovation
- 8.Layering, attractor sets and constructional levels
- 9.Conclusion and outlook
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
Corpora and sources
-
References
References
Corpora and sources
DeReKo
German Reference Corpus (Deutsches Referenzkorpus), available via COSMAS II,
[URL]
DTA
German Text Archive (Deutsches Textarchiv),
[URL]
DWDS
Digital Dictionary of the German Language (Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache),
[URL]
MED
Middle English Dictionary, University of Michigan,
[URL]
MHDBDB
Middle High German Conceptual Database (Mittelhochdeutsche Begriffsdatenbank),
[URL].
PCEEC
Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, compiled by
T. Nevalainen,
H. Raumolin-Brunberg,
J. Keränen,
M. Nevala,
A. Nurmi, &
M. Palander-Collin (
2006), distributed through the Oxford Text Archive
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H.
(
2008)
Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
(Eds.) (
2000)
Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brems, L.
(
2007)
The grammaticalization of small size nouns: Reconsidering frequency and analogy.
Journal of English Linguistics, 35(4), 293–324.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brems, L.
(
2011)
Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. L.
(
2003a)
Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In
M. Tomasello (Ed.),
The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Volume 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. L.
(
2003b)
Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In
B. D. Joseph, &
R. Janda (Eds.),
The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Malden: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. L.
(
2010)
Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.
(
1994)
The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W.
(
2000)
Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W.
(
2001)
Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Clerck, B., & Brems, L.
(
2016)
Size nouns matter: a closer look at mass(es) of and extended uses of SNs.
Language Sciences, 53, 160–176.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Clerck, B., & Colleman, T.
(
2013)
From noun to intensifier: massa and massa’s in Flemish varieties of Dutch.
Language Sciences, 36, 147–160.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Delorge, M., Plevoets, K., & Colleman, T.
De Smet, H.
(
2009)
Analyzing reanalysis.
Lingua, 119, 1728–1755.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Smet, H.
(
2014)
Does innovation need reanalysis? In
E. Coussé, &
F. von Mengden (Eds.),
Usage-based approaches to language change (pp. 23–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, H.
(
2007)
Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change.
New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 108–127.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, H.
(
2015)
Usage-based construction grammar. In
E. Dąbrowska, &
D. Divjak (Eds.),
Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 296–322). Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, H., & Hilpert, M.
(
2016)
Frequency effects in grammar. In
M. Aronoff (Ed.),
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durrell, M., Ensslin, A., & Bennett, P.
(
2007)
The GerManC Project.
Sprache und Datenverarbeitung, 31, 71–80.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, O.
(
2011)
Grammaticalization as analogically driven change? In
H. Narrog, &
B. Heine (Eds.),
Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 31–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, T.
(
1979)
On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
1995)
Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
2006)
Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartmann, S., Pleyer, M., Winters, J., & Zlatev, J.
Eds. forthcoming
Interaction and iconicity in the evolution of language Special issue of Interaction Studies
Haspelmath, M.
(
1999)
Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37(6), 1043–1068.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F.
(
1991)
Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M.
(
2014)
Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M.
(
2015)
From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis.
Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 113–147.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M., & Gries, S. T.
(
2009)
Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language Acquisition.
Literary and Linguistic Computing, 24(4), 385–401.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, N. P.
(
2004)
Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In
W. Bisang,
N. P. Himmelmann, &
B. Wiemer (Eds.),
What makes grammaticalization? (pp. 21–42). Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J.
(
1987)
Emergent grammar.
Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 139–157.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott E. C.
(
2003)
Grammaticalization. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kluge, F.
(
2012)
Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache: Bearbeitet von Elmar Seebold. 25th edition. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krug, M. G.
(
2000)
Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krug, M. G.
(
2003)
Frequency as a determinant in grammatical variation and change. In
G. Rohdenburg, &
B. Mondorf (Eds.),
Determinants of grammatical variation in English (pp. 7–67). Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W.
(
2000)
A dynamic usage-based model. In
M. Barlow, &
S. Kemmer (Eds.),
Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W.
(
2008)
Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, C.
(
2015)
Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd edition. Berlin: Language Science Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, C.
(
2016)
Grammaticalization and automation. Paper presented at the 23rd LIPP-Symposium: Grammatikalisierung in interdisziplinärer Perspektive, Munich, Germany.
[URL]
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.
Pfeifer, W.
(
1993)
Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poplack, S.
(
2011)
Grammaticalization and linguistic variation. In
H. Narrog, &
B. Heine (Eds.),
Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 209–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preziosi, M. A., & Coane, J. H.
Sweetser, E.
(
1988)
Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In
S. Axmaker,
A. Jaisser, &
H. Singmaster (Eds.),
Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: General session and parasession on grammaticalization (pp. 389–405). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tabor, W., & Traugott, E. C.
Tiefenbach, H.
(
1987)
-chen und ‑lein. Überlegungen zu Problemen des sprachgeographischen Befundes und seiner sprachhistorischen Deutung.
Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 54(1), 2–27.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M.
(
2003)
Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C.
(
1988)
Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In
S. Axmaker,
A. Jaisser, &
H. Singmaster (Eds.),
Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: General session and parasession on grammaticalization (pp. 406–416). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C.
(
2007)
The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization.
Cognitive Linguistics, 18(4), 523–557.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C.
(
2008a)
Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In
R. Eckhart,
G. Jäger, &
T. Veenstra (Eds.),
Variation, selection, development (pp. 219–250). Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C.
(
2008b)
The Grammaticalization of NP of NP Patterns. In
A. Bergs, &
G. Diewald (Eds.),
Constructions and language change (pp. 23–45). Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C.
(
2010)
Grammaticalization. In
S. Luraghi, &
V. Bubenik (Eds.),
Continuum companion to historical linguistics (pp. 269–283). London: Continuum Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.
(
2002)
Regularities in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(
2013)
Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trousdale, G., & Norde, M.
(
2013)
Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies.
Language Sciences, 36, 32–46.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verveckken, K. D.
(
2012)
Towards a constructional account of high and low frequency binominal quantifiers in Spanish.
Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2), 421–478.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verveckken, K. D.
(
2015)
Binominal quantifiers in Spanish: conceptually-driven analogy in diachrony and synchrony. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia
2020.
Mortal hurryandmortal fine: on the rise of intensifyingmortal.
Studia Neophilologica 92:3
► pp. 271 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021.
Morphosyntactic vagueness and directionality.
Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1
► pp. 95 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lorenz, David
2023.
Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases(it) Could/Might Be.
Journal of English Linguistics 51:2
► pp. 133 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.