Chapter published in:
Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar
Edited by Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson and Joel Olofsson
[Constructional Approaches to Language 21] 2018
► pp. 137168

Corpora and sources

DeReKo German Reference Corpus (Deutsches Referenzkorpus), available via COSMAS II, https://​cosmas2​.ids​-mannheim​.de​/cosmas2​-web/
DTA German Text Archive (Deutsches Textarchiv), http://​www​.deutschestextarchiv​.de/
DWDS Digital Dictionary of the German Language (Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache), http://​dwds​.de/
Internet Archive www​.archive​.org
MED Middle English Dictionary, University of Michigan, http://​quod​.lib​.umich​.edu​/m​/med/
MHDBDB Middle High German Conceptual Database (Mittelhochdeutsche Begriffsdatenbank), http://​mhdbdb​.sbg​.ac​.at/.
PCEEC Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, compiled by T. Nevalainen, H. Raumolin-Brunberg, J. Keränen, M. Nevala, A. Nurmi, & M. Palander-Collin (2006), distributed through the Oxford Text Archive


Baayen, R. H.
(2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
(Eds.) (2000) Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.
Barðdal, J.
(2008) Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Brems, L.
(2007) The grammaticalization of small size nouns: Reconsidering frequency and analogy. Journal of English Linguistics, 35(4), 293–324. Crossref link
(2011) Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. Berlin: De Gruyter. Crossref link
(2012) The establishment of quantifier constructions for size nouns: A diachronic case study of heap(s) and lot(s) . Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 13(2), 202–231. Crossref link
Bybee, J. L.
(2003a) Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Volume 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2003b) Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In B. D. Joseph, & R. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Malden: Blackwell. Crossref link
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.
(1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Croft, W.
(2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
(2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
De Clerck, B., & Brems, L.
(2016) Size nouns matter: a closer look at mass(es) of and extended uses of SNs. Language Sciences, 53, 160–176. Crossref link
De Clerck, B., & Colleman, T.
(2013) From noun to intensifier: massa and massa’s in Flemish varieties of Dutch. Language Sciences, 36, 147–160. Crossref link
Delorge, M., Plevoets, K., & Colleman, T.
(2014) Competing “transfer” constructions in Dutch. The case of ont-verbs. In D. Glynn, & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy (pp. 39–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
De Smet, H.
(2009) Analyzing reanalysis. Lingua, 119, 1728–1755. Crossref link
(2014) Does innovation need reanalysis? In E. Coussé, & F. von Mengden (Eds.), Usage-based approaches to language change (pp. 23–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Diessel, H.
(2007) Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 108–127. Crossref link
(2015) Usage-based construction grammar. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 296–322). Berlin: De Gruyter. Crossref link
Diessel, H., & Hilpert, M.
(2016) Frequency effects in grammar. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Crossref link
Durrell, M., Ensslin, A., & Bennett, P.
(2007) The GerManC Project. Sprache und Datenverarbeitung, 31, 71–80.
Fischer, O.
(2010) An iconic analogical approach to grammaticalization. In J. Conradie, R. Johl, M. Beukes, O. Fischer, & C. Ljungberg (Eds.), Signergy (pp. 279–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2011) Grammaticalization as analogically driven change? In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 31–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2013) An inquiry into unidirectionality as a foundational element of grammaticalization: On the role played by analogy and the synchronic grammar system in processes of language change. Studies in Language, 37(3), 515–533. Crossref link
Givón, T.
(1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haiman, J.
(1994) Ritualization and the development of language. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (pp. 3–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Hartmann, S., Pleyer, M., Winters, J., & Zlatev, J.
Eds. (forthcoming). Interaction and iconicity in the evolution of language. Special issue of Interaction Studies .
Haspelmath, M.
(1998) Does grammaticalization need reanalysis? Studies in Language, 22(2), 315–351. Crossref link
(1999) Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37(6), 1043–1068. Crossref link
Heine, B.
(2002) On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F.
(1991) Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hilpert, M.
(2014) Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
(2015) From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 113–147. Crossref link
Hilpert, M., & Gries, S. T.
(2009) Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language Acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 24(4), 385–401. Crossref link
Himmelmann, N. P.
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? (pp. 21–42). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hoffmann, S.
(2004) Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized? On the limits of corpus data – and the importance of intuition. In H. Lindquist, & C. Mair (Eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English (pp. 171–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Hopper, P. J.
(1987) Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 139–157.Crossref link
(1991) On some principles of grammaticalization. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Volume 1 (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott E. C.
(2003) Grammaticalization. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Kluge, F.
(2012) Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache: Bearbeitet von Elmar Seebold. 25th edition. Berlin: De Gruyter. Crossref link
Krug, M. G.
(2000) Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter. Crossref link
(2003) Frequency as a determinant in grammatical variation and change. In G. Rohdenburg, & B. Mondorf (Eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English (pp. 7–67). Berlin: De Gruyter. Crossref link
Langacker, R. W.
(2000) A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Lehmann, C.
(2015) Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd edition. Berlin: Language Science Press. Crossref link
(2016) Grammaticalization and automation. Paper presented at the 23rd LIPP-Symposium: Grammatikalisierung in interdisziplinärer Perspektive, Munich, Germany. http://​www​.christianlehmann​.eu​/publ​/lehmann​_automation​.pdf
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.
(Eds.) (2003) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Pfeifer, W.
(1993) Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Poplack, S.
(2011) Grammaticalization and linguistic variation. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 209–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Preziosi, M. A., & Coane, J. H.
(2017) Remembering that big things sound big: Sound symbolism and associative memory. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(10).
Sweetser, E.
(1988) Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: General session and parasession on grammaticalization (pp. 389–405). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Tabor, W., & Traugott, E. C.
(1998) Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In A. G. Ramat, & P. J. Hopper (Eds.), The limits of grammaticalization (pp. 227–270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Crossref link
Tiefenbach, H.
(1987) -chen und ‑lein. Überlegungen zu Problemen des sprachgeographischen Befundes und seiner sprachhistorischen Deutung. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 54(1), 2–27.
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Traugott, E. C.
(1988) Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: General session and parasession on grammaticalization (pp. 406–416). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
(2007) The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(4), 523–557. Crossref link
(2008a) Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In R. Eckhart, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation, selection, development (pp. 219–250). Berlin: De Gruyter.
(2008b) The Grammaticalization of NP of NP Patterns. In A. Bergs, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp. 23–45). Berlin: De Gruyter.
(2010) Grammaticalization. In S. Luraghi, & V. Bubenik (Eds.), Continuum companion to historical linguistics (pp. 269–283). London: Continuum Press.
(2014) Towards a constructional framework for studying language change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 3–21. Crossref link
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.
(2002) Regularities in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Trousdale, G., & Norde, M.
(2013) Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies. Language Sciences, 36, 32–46. Crossref link
Verveckken, K. D.
(2012) Towards a constructional account of high and low frequency binominal quantifiers in Spanish. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2), 421–478. Crossref link
(2015) Binominal quantifiers in Spanish: conceptually-driven analogy in diachrony and synchrony. Berlin: De Gruyter. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia
2020. Mortal hurry and mortal fine: on the rise of intensifying mortal. Studia Neophilologica  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.