Chapter published in:
Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages
Edited by Benjamin Lyngfelt, Lars Borin, Kyoko Ohara and Tiago Timponi Torrent
[Constructional Approaches to Language 22] 2018
► pp. 1940
References

References

Boas, H. C.
(2003) A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2010) Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) What happened to Frame Semantics? Plenary Talk at Eighth International Conference on Construction Grammar, Osnabrueck.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, M., Ruppenhofer, J., & Ziem, A.
(2014) FrameNet as a repository of constructions: A case study of non-local argument realization. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Construction Grammar, Osnabrueck.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1968) The Case for Case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp.1–88). London: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
(1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.Google Scholar
(1988) The Mechanisms of Construction Grammar. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the BerkeleyLinguistics Society (pp.35–55). Berkeley.
(2002) Mini-grammars of some time-when expressions in English. In J. Bybee & M. Noonan (Eds.), Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse (pp.31–59). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) The Articulation of lexicon and constructicon. In S. Fujii, T. Morita, & C. Sakuta (Eds.), [Abstracts to] Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Construction Grammar (pp.53–63).Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C. F.
(2010) A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp.791–816). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C.
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language 64(3), 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Lee-Goldman, R. R., & Rhomieux, R.
(2012) The FrameNet Constructicon. In I. A. Sag & H. C. Boas (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp.283–322). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Petruck, M. R. L., Ruppenhofer, J., & Wright, A. C.
(2003) FrameNet in Action: The Case of Attaching. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 297–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M.
(2015) Construction Grammar. In T. Kiss, & A. Alexiadou (Eds.), Syntax – Theory and Analysis: An International Handbook (2nd ed.), (pp.974–1003). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2014) Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, P.
(2002) English Subjectless Tag Sentences. Language, 78(3), 453–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J.
(1999) Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the What’s X doing Y? Construction, Language 75(1), 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kay, P., & Sag, I. A.
(2012) Cleaning up the Big Mess: Discontinuous Dependencies and Complex Determiners. In I. A. Sag & H. C. Boas (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp.211–238). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. A., & Lambrecht, K.
(1996) Toward a Construction-Based Model of Language Function: The Case of Nominal Extraposition. Language, 72(2), 215–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, L. A., & Ruppenhofer, J.
(2001) Beyond Alternations: A Constructional Account of the Applicative Pattern in German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Petruck, M. R. L.
(2014) The Sisterhood of Frame Semantics and Construction Grammar. Paper presented at Eighth International Conference on Construction Grammar, Osnabrueck.Google Scholar
Petruck, M. R. L., & de Melo, G.
(2012) Precedes: A Semantic relation in FrameNet. Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Resources for Public Security Applications (pp.45–49), Eighth Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Petruck, M. R. L., & Ziem, A.
(2014) Semantic Relations for Frames and Constructions: Perspective_on. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Construction Grammar, Osnabrueck.Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R., Baker, C., & Scheffczyk, J.
(2016) FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. Retrieved from https://​framenet​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu​/fndrupal​/the​_book.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Herbst, Thomas
2020. Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language. Constructions and Frames 12:1  pp. 56 ff. Crossref logo
Perek, Florent & Amanda L. Patten
2019. Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3  pp. 354 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.