Cover not available
Part of
Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages
Edited by Benjamin Lyngfelt, Lars Borin, Kyoko Ohara and Tiago Timponi Torrent
[Constructional Approaches to Language 22] 2018
► pp. 165–181

Chapter 6
A constructicon for Russian

Filling in the gaps

The Russian Constructicon project currently prioritizes multi-word constructions that are not represented in dictionaries and that are especially useful for learners of Russian. The immediate goal is to identify constructions and determine the semantic constraints on their slots. The Russian Constructicon is being built in parallel with the Swedish Constructicon and will ultimately model the entire Russian language in terms of constructions at all levels from morpheme to discourse. The contents of the Russian Constructicon will serve learners of the language, linguists researching both language-internal and typological phenomena, and will also serve language technology applications such as spell checkers and automated readability assessment tools.
Keywords: Russian, constructions, multi-word, semantic constraints, learners, language technology, typology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.History and partners
  • 3.Russian constructions: What’s missing
  • 4.Status of the project and examples from the Russian constructicon
  • 5.Further research facilitated by the Russian constructicon
  • 6.Applications served by the Russian constructicon
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 17 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.22.06jan
References (53)
References
Apresjan, Ju. D. (1967). Èksperimental’noe issledovanie semantiki russkogo glagola [Experimental research on the semantics of the Russian verb]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Apresjan, Ju. D., & Pall, È. (1982). Russkij glagol – vengerskij glagol [Russian verb – Hungarian verb]. Budapest: Tankönyvkviadó.Google Scholar
Atkins, S. (1992). Tools for computer-aided corpus lexicography: the Hector project. In F. Kiefer, G. Kiss & J. Pajsz (Eds.). Papers in Computational Lexicography: Complex’92, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest (pp.1–60). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Baranov, A. N., Voznesenskaja, M. M., Dobrovol’skij, D. O., Kiseleva, K. L., & Kozerenko, A. D. (2009). Frazeologičeskij ob”jasnitel’nyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka (Phraseological explanatory dictionary). Moscow: ÈKSMO.Google Scholar
Belošapkova, V. A. (1977). Sovremennyj russkij jazyk. Sintaksis [Contemporary Russian. Syntax]. Moscow: Vysšaja škola.Google Scholar
Bystrova, E. A. (1997). Učebnyj frazeologičeskij slovar’ [Academic phraseological dictionary]. Leningrad: Prosveščenie.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endresen, A., Janda, L. A., Reynolds, R., & Tyers, F. M. (2016). Who needs particles? A challenge to the classification of particles as a part of speech in Russian. Russian Linguistics DOI logo.Google Scholar
Evgen’eva, A. P., Ed. (1999). Malyj akademičeksij slovar’ [Small academy dictionary]. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Fedosov, I. V. (2003). Frazeologičeskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Phraseological dictionary of Russian]. Moscow: JuNVES.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1985). Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 11, 73–86.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, C. (1988). Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone . Language 64, 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Bernal, E. & DeCesaris, J. (2008). Border conflicts: FrameNet meets construction grammar. Proceedings of the XIII {EURALEX} International Congress. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [URL]Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalizations in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A. (Ed.) (2013). Cognitive linguistics: The quantitative turn. The essential reader. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. A., & Divjak, D. (2008). Ways of attenuating agency in Russian. In A. Siewierska (Ed.), Impersonal constructions in grammatical theory, a special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 106, 138–179.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A., & Solovyev, V. (2009). What constructional profiles reveal about synonymy: A case study of Russian words for sadness and happiness . Cognitive Linguistics 20, 367–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the what’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75,1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Rundell, M., & Uì Dhonnchadha, E. (2006). Efficient corpus creation for lexicography: Building the new corpus for Ireland. Language resources and evaluation 40, 127–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuz’mič, V. (2000). Žgučij glagol – slovar’ narodnoj frazeologii [Burning verb – a dictionary of folk phraseology]. Moscow: Zelenyj vek.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, J. (2015). Linguistic profiles: Going from form to meaning via statistics (= Cognitive Linguistics Research 53). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991a). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991b). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. II. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Constructional integration, grammaticization, and serial verb constructions. Language and Linguistics 4, 251–278.Google Scholar
Letučij, A. B. & Rakhilina, E. V. (2014). Načal’naja stadija grammatikalizacii značenij glagol’noj množestvennosti v kvazigrammatičeskix konstrukcijax [Early stage of grammaticalization of the meaning of vebal multiplicity in quasi-grammatical constructions]. In A. Moldovan & S. Tolstaja (Eds.), Slavjanskoe jazykoznanie. XV Meždunarodnyj s”ezd slavistov. Minsk, 21–27 avgusta 2103 g. Doklady rossijskoj delegacii [Slavic linguistics. XV International Congress of Slavists. Minsk August 21–27, 2013. Contributions by the Russian participants] (pp.432–451). Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Lubensky, S. (1995). Random House Russian-English Dictionary of Idioms. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Lyashevskaya, O. N. (2016). Korpusnye instrumenty v grammatičeskix issledovanijax russkogo jazyka. Corpus tools for Russian grammar studies. Moscow: LRC Publishing House.Google Scholar
Lyashevskaya, O., & Kashkin, E. (2015). FrameBank: a database of Russian lexical constructions. In M. Yu. Khachay, N. Konstantinova, A. Panchenko, D. I. Ignatov, & G. V. Labunets (Eds.), Analysis of images, social networks and texts. Fourth international conference, AIST 2015, Yekaterinburg, Russia, April 9–11, 2015, Revised selected papers (= Communications in computer and information science, Vol. 542) (pp.337–348). Springer.Google Scholar
Lyashevskaya O. N., & Sharoff, S. A. (2009). Častotnyj slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo jazyka (na materiale Nacional’nogo Korpusa Russkogo Jazyka) [Frequency dictionary of modern Russian (based on the Russian National Corpus)]. Moscow, Azbukovnik.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. H. (2011). Linguistic simplicity and complexity. Why do languages undress? Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meurers, D., Ziai, R., Amaral, L., Boyd, A., Dimitrov, A., Metcalf, V., & Ott, N. (2010). Enhancing authentic web pages for language learners. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA-5) at NAACL-HLT 2010 (pp.10–18). Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mixel’son, M. I. (1896–1912/2004). Bol’šoj tolkovo-frazeologičeskij slovar’ [Big explanatory phrazeological dictionary]. Moscow: ETS Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ovsjannikova, M. A. & Saj, S. S. (2014). Raznye formy, obščie mexanizmy: al’ternacija odno- i dvuxob”ektnoj diatez u russkix glagolov mental’noj sfery [Different forms, common mechanisms: the alternation of single- and double-object diathesis among Russian verbs expressing mental events]. In S. S. Saj, M. A. Ovsjannikova & S. A. Oskol’skaja (Eds.), ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA. Trudy Instituta lingvističeskix issledovanij RAN [Works of the Institute for Linguistic Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences] Russkij jazyk: grammatika konstrukcij i leksiko-semantičeskie podxody [Russian: construction grammar and lexico-semantic approaches] (pp.248–291). St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. (2000). Kognitivnyj analiz predmetnyx imen: Semantika i sočetaemost’ [Cognitive analysis of concrete nouns: Semantics and collocation]. Moskva: Russkie slovari.Google Scholar
(Ed. ) (2010). Lingvistika konstrukcij [The linguistics of constructions]. Moscow: Azbukovnik.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V. & Majsak, T. A. (2007). Glagoly dviženija i naxoždenija v vode: leksičeskie systemy i semantičeskie parametry (Verbs of motion and position in water: lexical systems and semantic parameters). In T. A. Kajsak & E. V. Rakhilina (Eds.), Glagoly dviženija v vode: leksičeskaja tipologija [Verbs of motion in water: lexical typology] (pp.27–75). Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V., Reznikova, T., & Bonch-Osmolovskaya, A. (2012). Towards a typology of pain predicates. Linguistics 50, 421–465.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V. & Letučij, A. B. (2012). Russkie konstrukcii s vremennym značeniem: o granicax nastojaščego vremeni [Russian constructions with temporal meaning: on the borders of present tense]. In V. I. Zabotkina (Ed.), Präsens: Sbornik naučnyx trudov [Präsens: Anthology of scientific works] (pp.224–242). Moscow: OLMA Media Grupp.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V. & Plungian, V. (2013). Time and speed: Where do speed adjectives come from? Russian linguistics 37, 347–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, R. J. (2016). Russian natural language processing for computer-assisted language learning. Doctoral Dissertation, UiT The Arctic University of Norway.Google Scholar
Rоgožnikova, R. P. (2003). Tolkovyj slovar’ sočetanij, èkvivalentnyx slovu [Explanatory dictionary of collocations that are equivalent to a word]. Moscow: AST, Astrel’.Google Scholar
Saj, S. S. (2008). K tipologii antipassivnyx konstrukcij: semantika, pragmatika, sintaksis [Toward a typology of antipassive constructions: semantics, pragmatics, syntax]. PhD dissertation. St. Petersburg: Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
(2014). Leksičeskie mečanismy grammatičeskogo drejfa: konstrukcii s dativnym sub”ektom v russkom jazyke XVIII–XXI vekov [The lexical mechanisms of grammatical drift: constructions with a dative subject in Russian in the XVIII–XXI centuries]. In S. Ju. Dmitrenko & N. M. Zaika (Eds.), ACTA LINGUISTICA PETROPOLITANA. Trudy Instituta lingvističeskix issledovanij RAN [Works of the Institute for Linguistic Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences] Studia typologica octogenario Victori Khrakovskij Samuelis filio dedicate (pp.568–610). St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Sazonova, I. K. (2008). Tolkovo-grammatičeskij slovar’ russkix pričastij [Explanatory and grammatical dictionary of Russian participles]. Moscow: АST-PRESS.Google Scholar
Švedova, N. Ju. (1960). Očerki po sintaksisu russkoj razgovornoj reči [Outlines of the syntax of conversational Russian]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Švedova, N. Ju., Arutjunova, N. D., Bondarko, A. V., Ivanov, V. V., Lopatin, V. V., Uluxanov, I. S., & Filin, F. P. (1980). Russkaja grammatika. II: Sintaksis [Russian grammar. II: Syntax]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Trudgill. P. (2011). Sociolinguistic typology. Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vajjala, S. (2015). Analyzing Text Complexity and Text Simplification: Connecting Linguistics, Processing and Educational Applications. PhD thesis, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, A. A. (1980). Grammatičeskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Grammatical dictionary of Russian]. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Zolotova, G. A. (2006). Sintaksičeskij slovar’: Repertuar èlementarnyx edinic russkogo sintaksisa [Syntactic dictionary: The repertoire of elementary units of Russian syntax]. Moscow: Editorial URSS.Google Scholar
Žolkovskij, A. K., & Mel’čuk, I. A. (1965). O vozmožnom metode i instrumentax semantičeskogo sinteza [On a possible method and means for semantic synthesis]. Naučno-texničeskaja informacija [Scientific and Technical Information], 5, 23–28.Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Bogdanova-Beglarian, Natalia, Olga Blinova, Maria Khokhlova & Tatiana Sherstinova
2024. Towards the Description of Multiword Units in Russian Everyday Speech: State-of-the-Art and the Methodology of Further Research. In Digital Geography [Springer Geography, ], ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Bychkova, Polina & Ekaterina Rakhilina
2023. Chapter 3. Towards pragmatic construction typology. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Coussé, Evie, Steffen Höder, Benjamin Lyngfelt & Julia Prentice
2023. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Constructional Approaches to Nordic Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 37], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Patel, Malin, Armine Garibyan, Elodie Winckel & Stephanie Evert
2023. A reference constructicon as a database. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11:1 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023. Constructionist Approaches, DOI logo
Prentice, Julia, Camilla Håkansson, Therese Lindström Tiedemann, Ildikó Pilán & Elena Volodina
2021. Chapter 12. Language learning and teaching with Swedish FrameNet++. In The Swedish FrameNet++ [Natural Language Processing, 14], ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Endresen, Anna & Laura A. Janda
2020. Taking Construction Grammar One Step Further: Families, Clusters, and Networks of Evaluative Constructions in Russian. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Herbst, Thomas
2020. Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language. Constructions and Frames 12:1 ► pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Herbst, Thomas
2022. Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language. In Construction Grammar across Borders [Benjamins Current Topics, 122], ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Janda, Laura A., Anna Endresen, Valentina Zhukova, Daria Mordashova & Ekaterina Rakhilina
2020. How to build a constructicon in five years. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Ranta, Aarne, Krasimir Angelov, Normunds Gruzitis & Prasanth Kolachina
2020. Abstract Syntax as Interlingua: Scaling Up the Grammatical Framework from Controlled Languages to Robust Pipelines. Computational Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Nesset, Tore & Maria Nordrum
2019. Do Russian paucal numerals govern the genitive? Evidence from stress placement. Russian Linguistics 43:2 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.