Tense and aspect marking in (Low) German perfect constructions based on variety contact
Synchronic variability is an essential characteristic of all human languages. However, issues of linguistic variation have only recently become a popular topic within the framework of construction grammar (cf. Hoffmann 2011), cognitive sociolinguistics (Geeraerts et al. 2010) and variety contact (Höder 2014). This paper investigates synchronic variation of perfect auxiliary constructions with the verb anfangen (‘to start/to begin’) in variety contact of Low- and High German in the Westphalian and Emslandic areas. Based on qualitative and quantitative data analysis, we provide a model of the constructions within Cognitive Linguistics in the form of a two-dimensional geometric analysis of aspectual construals (Croft 2012) and Construction Grammar (Goldberg 1995).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Introduction to the German split auxiliary system
- 3.Situation of Low German in Westphalia and Emsland
- 4.Method – Field research and survey design
- 5.Qualitative characterization of the phenomenon in contact
- 5.1.The phenomenon in the dialect variety
- 5.2.The phenomenon in the (regional) standard variety
- 6.Quantitative empirical analysis
- 7.Aspectual contours of lexical and grammatical aspect
- 8.Modeling in the framework of Construction Grammar
- 9.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgment
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References (60)
Abraham, W.
(
1993)
Ergativa sind Terminativa.
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 12(2), 157–184.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abraham, W., & Conradie, C. J.
(
2001)
Präteritumschwund und Diskursgrammatik.
Präteritumschwund in gesamteuropäischen Bezügen: areale Ausbreitung, heterogene Entstehung, Parsing sowie diskursgrammatische Grundlagen und Zusammenhänge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Atlas Alltagssprache
Retrieved from
[URL] [last access: 2015.02.19].
Berend, N.
(
2005)
Regionale Gebrauchsstandards – Gibt es sie und wie kann man sie beschreiben? In
L. M. Eichinger, &
W. Kallmeyer (Eds.),
Standardvariation. Wie viel Variation verträgt die deutsche Sprache? (pp. 143–170). Berlin, New York: Walter De Gruyter (Jahrbuch/Institut für Deutsche Sprache, 2004).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickel, B.
(
1997)
Aspectual scope and the difference between logical and semantic representation.
Lingua, 102(2–3), 115–131.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bühler, K.
(
1999 [1934])
Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache.
Ungekürzter Neudr. der Ausg. Jena, Fischer, 1934, 3. Aufl. Stuttgart: Lucius und Lucius (UTB für Wissenschaft, 1159).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burzio, L.
(
1986)
Italian Syntax. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Pub. Co.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. L., & Perkins, R. D., & Pagliuca, W.
(
1994)
The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chambers, J. K., & Trudgill, P.
(
1998)
Dialectology.2nd ed. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press (
Cambridge textbooks in linguistics
).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. A.
(
1991)
Grounding in communication. In
L. B. Resnick,
J. M. Levine, &
S. D. Teasley (Eds.),
Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, B.
(
1976)
Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W.
(
2001)
Radical construction grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W.
(
2003)
Typology and universals. 2 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W.
(
2012)
Verbs. Aspect and causal structure .Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Ö., & Hedin, E.
(
2000)
Current relevance and event reference. In
Ö. Dahl (Ed.),
Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe., (pp. 385–401). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter (
Empirical approaches to language typology. EUROTYP 20–26).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dammel, A., Nowak, J., & Schmuck, M.
(
2010)
Strong-Verb Paradigm Leveling in Four Germanic Languages. A Category Frequency Approach.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 22(4), 337–359.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dentler, S.
(
1997)
Zur Perfekterneuerung im Mittelhochdeutschen. Die Erweiterung des zeitreferentiellen Funktionsbereichs von Perfektfügungen. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis (
Göteborger germanistische Forschungen, 37).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diedrichsen, E.
(
2002)
Zu einer semantischen Klassifikation der intransitiven haben- und sein-Verben im Deutschen. In
G. Katz,
S. Reinhard, &
P. Reuter (Eds.),
Sinn und Bedeutung VI. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Gesellschaft für Semantik (pp. 37–52). University of Osnabrück (Publications of the Institute of Cognitive Science).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, D.
(
1991)
Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection.
Language, 67(3), 547–619.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duden
(Ed.) (
2006)
Duden – Die Grammatik. Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch. 7., völlig neu erarb. und erw. Aufl. Mannheim, Leipzig, Wien: Dudenverlag. (Duden, Bd4).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Engerer, V.
(
2010)
Zur zeitlichen Evaluierung von Phasenverben. Das Problem der leeren Mitte oder: Wie viele Intervalle braucht die Semantik von Phasenverben? Hermes, 44, 153–167.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J.
(
1976)
Frame semantics and the nature of language.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 20–32.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fishman, J. A.
(
1972)
Language in sociocultural change. Stanford: Stanford University Press (Language science and national development).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, J.
(
2016)
Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. 3. ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D., & Kristiansen, G.
(
2015)
Variationist linguistics. In
E. Dabrowska (Ed.),
Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 366–389). Berlin: de Gruyter (
Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 39), checked on 9/30/2015.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y.
(Eds.) (
2010)
Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. New York: de Gruyter (
Cognitive linguistics research, 45).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gillmann, M.
(
2015)
Auxiliary selection in closely related languages: the case of German and Dutch. In
R. Kailuweit, &
M. Rosemeyer (Eds.),
Auxiliary selection revisited. Gradience and gradualness (pp. 333–358). Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter (
linguae & litterae, 44).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
1995)
Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (Cognitive theory of language and culture).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
2003)
Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
2006)
Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grewendorf, G.
(
1989)
Ergativity in German. Dordrecht: Foris.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gronvik, O.
(
1986)
Über den Ursprung und die Entwicklung der aktiven Perfekt- und Plusquamperfektkonstruktionen des Hochdeutschen und ihre Eigenart innerhalb des germanischen Sprachraumes. Oslo: Solum Forlag.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hansen-Jaax, D.
(
1995)
Transfer bei Diglossie. Synchrone Sprachkontaktphänomene im Niederdeutschen. Hamburg: Kovac.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, K.
(
2011)
The grammaticalization of tense and aspect. In
H. Narrog, &
B. Heine (Eds.),
The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 580–594). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Henry, A.
(
2012)
Variation and Syntactic Theory. In
J. K. Chambers,
P. Trudgill, &
N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.),
The handbook of language variation and change. 2nd ed. (pp. 267–282). Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. (Blackwell handbooks in linguistics).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Höder, S
(
2011)
Niederdeutsch und Hochdeutsch – ein Fall von Diasystematisierung.
Jahrbuch des Vereins für niederdeutsche Sprachforschung, 134, 113–136.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoffmann, T.
(Ed.) (
2011)
Variation, change and constructions in English. Berlin: de Gruyter (
Cognitive linguistics Special issue, 22 (1)).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P. J. & Thompson, S. A.
(
1980)
Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse.
Language and Speech, 56(2), 251–299.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keller, F. & Sorace, A.
(
2003)
Gradient auxiliary selection and impersonal passivization in German: an experimental investigation.
Journal of Linguistics, 39(1), 57–108.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, W.
(
1994)
Time in language. London, New York: Routledge (
Germanic linguistics).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, C.
(
1982)
Directions for interlinear morphemic translations.
Folia Linguistica, 16, 199–224.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W.
(
1966)
The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Möller, F., & Windzio, M.
(
2008)
Plattdeutsch im 21. Jahrhundert.
Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven. Leer: Schuster (
Schriften des Instituts für Niederdeutsche Sprache, 34).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paradis, M.
(
1985)
On the Representation of two Languages in One Brain.
Language Sciences, 7(1), 1–39.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perlmutter, D.
(
1978)
Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In
A. C. Woodbury,
F. Ackerman,
C. Chiarello,
O. D. Gensler,
J. J. Jaeger,
J. Kingston et al. (Eds.),
Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (p. 157–189). Berkeley: University of California.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pustejovsky, J.
(
1992)
The syntax of event structure. In
S. Pinker, &
B. C. Levin (Eds.),
Lexical & conceptual semantics
(pp. 47–81). Cambridge: Blackwell (Cognition special issues).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pütz, M.
(
2008)
Sprachrepertoire / Linguistic repertoire. In
U. Ammon,
N. Dittmar,
K. Mattheier, &
P. Trudgill (Eds.),
Sociolinguistics. An international handbook of the science of language and society = Soziolinguistik : ein internationales Handbuch zur Wissenschaft von Sprache und Gesellschaft. 2., vollständig neu bearb. und erw. Aufl. (pp. 226–232). Berlin: de Gruyter (
Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 3.1).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rampton, B.
(
2010)
Speech community. In
J. Jaspers,
J.-O. Östman, &
J. Verschueren (Eds.),
Society and language use (pp. 274–303). Amsterdam: John Benjamins (
Handbook of pragmatics highlights, 7).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooij, J. D.
(
1988)
Van hebben naar zijn. Het gebruik van hebben en zijn in de voltooide tijden (actief) van zijn, gaan, vergeten en verliezen in standaardtaal, ouder Nederlands en dialect. Amsterdam: P.J. Meertens-Inst. voor Dialectologie Volkskunde en Naamkunde.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(
1974)
A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation.
Language, 50(4), 696–735.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K. et al.
(
2009)
Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).
Gesprächsforschung, 10, 353–402.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shannon, T.
(
1995)
Toward a Cognitive Explanation of Perfect Auxiliary Variation. Some modal and aspectual effects in the history of Germanic.
American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures, 7(2), 129–163.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sorace, A.
(
2000)
Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs.
Language, 76(4), 859–890.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stellmacher, D.
(
1987)
Wer spricht Platt? Zur Lage des Niederdeutschen heute. Eine kurzgefasste Bestandsaufnahme. Bremen: Schuster, Leer (
Schriften des Instituts für Niederdeutsche Sprache, 14).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, J. R.
(
2003)
Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinreich, U.
(
1953)
Languages in contact. The Hague: de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Welke, K.
(
2005)
Tempus im Deutschen. Rekonstruktion eines semantischen Systems. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Beyer, Klaus
2024.
A Diasystematic Approach to Multilingual Ecology: The Case of Mbum Speakers in Ngaoundéré, Cameroon. In
Multilingualism in Its Multiple Dimensions [Working Title],
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Gillmann, Melitta & Alexander Werth
2021.
Polysemie und morphosyntaktische Variation.
Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 143:4
► pp. 513 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.