Texas German and English word order constructions in contact
After reviewing previous accounts of Texas German (TxG) syntax, I define the basic word order constructions of English and German and identify which are identical across the languages (i.e. diaconstructions). Next, I analyze 300 TxG utterances and determine whether their syntax corresponds more closely to German, English, or German-English diaconstructions. Finally, I discuss sentences exhibiting unusual word order and how they demonstrate the need for a (Diasystematic) Construction Grammar approach.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous accounts of Texas German word order
- 2.1Texas German(s)
- 2.2German word order
- 2.3Word order in TxG
- 3.Word order in (Diasystematic) Construction Grammar
- 4.German word order constructions and German-English diaconstructions
- 4.1.German word order constructions
- 4.2English-German word order diaconstructions
- (A)Subject precedes verb
- (B)All verbs occur together
- (C)Finite verbs precede non-finite verb forms
- (D)Polar questions require do support
- 5.Analysis of TxG word order
- 5.1Data selection and limitations
- 5.2.TxG clauses with German-origin verbs
-
Müssen (‘to have to’)
-
Dass (‘that’)
-
Weil (‘because’)
- Because
- 5.3TxG utterances with English verbs
- Infinitival clauses
- Polar questions
- Subordinate clauses
- Main clauses
- 5.4.Summary of TxG word order
- 5.5.(Diasystematic) constructional account of divergent TxG syntax
- Multiple lexical transference
- (Inaccurate) complex German structures
- Transferring complex verb constructions with lexicogrammatical interference
- Loan Translation of more general and ‘central’ constructions
- Multiple transference and interference in a single clause
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References
Backus, A., & Dorleijn, M.
(
2009)
Loan translations versus code-switching. In
B. Bullock, &
A. Toribio (Eds.),
The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-Switching (pp. 75–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L., & Gildea, S.
Berman, C.
(
2003)
Clausal Syntax of German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H. C.
(
2003)
A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H. C.
(
2009a)
The Life and Death of Texas German. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H. C.
(
2009b)
Case loss in Texas German: The influence of semantic and pragmatic factors. In
J. Barðdal, &
S. Chelliah (Eds.),
The Role of Semantics and Pragmatics in the Development of Case (pp. 347–373). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H. C., & Sag, I.
(Eds.) (
2012)
Sign-based Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H. C., & Pierce, M.
Boas, H. C., Ewing, K., Moran, C., & Thompson, J.
(
2004)
Towards determining the influence of internal and external factors on recent developments in Texas German phonology.
Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 10(1), 47–59.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, H. C., Pierce, M., & Brown, C. L.
(
2014)
On the variability of Texas German wo as a complementizer.
STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 67(4), 589–611.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burridge, K.
(
1992)
Creating Grammar: examples from Pennsylvania German. In
K. Burridge, &
W. Enninger (Eds.),
Diachronic Studies on the Languages of the Anabaptists (pp. 199–242). Bochum: Universitätsverlag Brockmeyer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clyne, M.
(
1994)
What can we learn from Sprachinseln?: Some observations on Australian German. In
K. Mattheier, &
N. Berend (Eds.),
Sprachinseln (pp. 105–122). Frankfurt: Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clyne, M.
(
2003)
Dynamics of Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W.
(
2001)
Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, M. S.
(
2013 )
Order of subject, object, and verb. In
M. Dryer, &
M. Haspelmath (Eds.),
The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (Retrieved from
[URL], Accessed on 2017–07–28.)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duden
(
2006)
Duden: Die Grammatik.
Dudenredaktion (Ed.). Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dux, R.
2017).
Classifying language contact phenomena: English verbs in Texas German.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 29(4), 379–430.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Eisenberg, P., & Gallmann, P.
(
2016)
Der Duden in 12 Bänden: 4 – Die Grammatik. Mannheim, Germany: Bibliographisches Institut & FA Brockhaus AG.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eisenberg, P.
(
2006)
Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik: Band 2: Der Satz. Stuttgart: Metzler.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C.
(
1988)
Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone
.
Language, 64(3), 501–538.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuchs, K.
(
2018)
Word order in dependent clauses in Texas German.
Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 84, 1-19.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuller, J.
(
1997)
Pennsylvania Dutch with a Southern touch: a theoretical model of language contact and change (PhD dissertation). University of South Carolina –Columbia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gilbert, Glenn
(
1972)
Linguistic Atlas of Texas German. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A.
(
1995)
Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A.
(
2006)
Constructions at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grewendorf, G.
(
1989)
Ergativity in German. Dordrecht: Foris.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haider, H.
(
1986)
Fehlende Argumente: Vom Passiv zu kohärenten Infinitiven.
Linguistische Berichte, 101, 3–33.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Höder, S.
This volume).
Grammar is community-specific: Background and basic concepts of Diasystematic Construction Grammar.
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G.
(Eds.) (
2013)
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopp, H., & Putnam, M. T.
Hopper, P., & Traugott, E. C.
(
1993)
Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Imo, W.
(
2016)
Grammatik: Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Metzler.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, J.
(
1986)
The syntax of focus and adverbials in German. In
W. Abraham, &
S. De Meij (Eds.),
Topic, Focus, and Configurationality. Papers from the 6th Groningen Grammar Talks, Groningen 1984 (pp. 103–127). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kathol, A.
(
2000)
Linear Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keel, W. D.
(
2014)
German settlement varieties in Kansas. In
A. W. Farris-Trimble, &
J. A. Barlow (Eds.),
Perspectives on Phonological Theory and Development : In Honor of Daniel A. Dinnsen (pp. 155–172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kloss, H.
(
1977)
Die deutsche Schriftsprache bei den Amischen. In
L. Auberger,
H. Kloss, &
H. Rupp (Eds.),
Deutsch als Muttersprache in Kanada: Berichte zur Gegenwartslage (pp. 97–98). Wiesbaden: Steiner.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuningas, J., & Leino, J.
(
2006)
Word orders and Construction Grammar. In
M. Suominen,
A. Arppe,
A. Airola,
O. Heinämäki,
M. Miestamo,
U. Määttä,
J. Niemi,
K. K. Pitkänen, &
K. Sinnemäki (Eds.),
A Man of Measure; Festschrift in Honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th Birthday (pp. 301–309). Turku, Finland: The Linguistic Association of Finland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Louden, M.
(
1992)
German as an object-verb language: A unification of typological and generative approaches. In
I. Rauch,
G. F. Carr, &
R. L. Kyes (Eds.),
On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods (pp. 217–231). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meurers, W. D.
(
2000)
Lexical generalizations in the syntax of German non-finite constructions. Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340
(p. 145). Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, S.
(
2005)
German: A grammatical sketch. In
A. Alexiadou, &
T. Kiss (Eds.),
Syntax – ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, 2nd Edition. Berlin: de Gruyter
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nützel, D.
(
1998)
Morphosyntactic variation and change in Haysville (Indiana) East Franconian. (PhD dissertation) Purdue University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierce, M., Boas, H. C., & Roesch, K.
Reis, M
(
1980)
On justifying topological frames: ‘positional field’ and the order of non-verbal constituents in Berman.
Documentation et Recherche en Linguistique Allemande Contemporaire, 22/23, 59–85.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Riehl, C. M.
(
2004)
Sprachkontaktforschung Tübingen: Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Rimsdijk, H.
(
1985)
Zum Rattenfängereffekt bei Infinitiven in deutschen Relativsätzen. In
W. Abraham (Ed.),
Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uszkoreit, H.
(
1987)
Word order and Constituent Structure in German. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webelhuth, G.
(
1992)
Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wöllstein-Leisten, A., Heilmann, A., Stepan, P., & Vikner, S.
(
1997)
Deutsche Satzstruktur – Grundlagen der syntaktischen Analyse. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ziem, A., & Boas, H. C.
(
2017)
Towards a constructicon for German. In
Proceedings of the AAAI 2017 Spring Symposium on Computational Construction Grammar and Natural Language Understanding (
Technical Report SS-17–02) (pp. 274–277). Stanford University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Boas, Hans C. & Heike Wiese
2023.
„Ein Land – eine Sprache?“. In
Deutsche Sprache der Gegenwart,
► pp. 71 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.