A force-recipient account
The objective of this book is to develop a force-recipient account of English resultatives. Within this approach the post-verbal NP is a recipient of a verbal force, whether it is a subcategorized object or not, and the verbal force being exerted onto the post-verbal NP is responsible for bringing about the change as specified by the result phrase. It is shown that many apparent puzzles posed by English resultatives are due to the complex interplay between the verb meaning and the constructional meaning, or between the verb meaning and the semantics of the result phrase. Thus the proposed account can provide answers to the question “Which resultatives are possible and which are not?” in a coherent way. Also, the proposed account reveals that English resultatives are not a monolithic phenomenon, and that some “resultatives” cited in the literature as such are not resultatives at all. This book is of interest not only to practitioners of Construction Grammar but also to everyone interested in English resultatives.
[Constructional Approaches to Language, 26] 2020. xx, 549 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction
Part I. A force-recipient account
Chapter 2. The status of the post-verbal NP
Chapter 3. Force transmission as essential to resultatives
Part II. So-called idiomatic cases
Chapter 4. He laughed his head off
Chapter 5. They beat the hell out of me
Part III. Resultatives and domains
Chapter 6. Resultatives with verbs of eating and drinking I
Chapter 7. Resultatives with verbs of eating and drinking II
Chapter 8. He laughed himself silly
Part IV. ‘Change verb’ resultatives and how to accommodate them
Chapter 9. ‘Change verb’ resultatives
Chapter 10. What are spurious resultatives?
Chapter 11. Resultatives with open/shut
Part V. On the result component
Chapter 12. To result phrases vs. into result phrases
Chapter 13. Adjectival result phrases vs. prepositional result phrases
Chapter 14. Consequences of the AP/PP distinction
Part VI. Still further issues surrounding adjectival result phrases
Chapter 15. Maximal end-point constraint reconsidered
Chapter 16. Selectional restrictions on adjectival result phrases
Chapter 17. Temporal dependence reconsidered
Part VII. Resultatives that are not based on force-transmission
Chapter 18. Princess Anne rides to victory
Chapter 19. Resultatives with free
Part VIII. Putative resultatives
Chapter 20. Follow and disappear
Chapter 21. Verbs of sound emission followed by a path PP
Chapter 22. Reconsidering the parallel between change of state and change of location
Part IX. Still another putative constraint
Chapter 23. Unique path constraint reconsidered
Chapter 24. To one’s death
Chapter 25. Summary and conclusion
Index of constructions
“English Resultatives: A force-recipient account presents a masterly synthesis of the English resultative construction, based on detailed corpus analysis of British and American English. Iwata presents a force dynamic analysis of English resultative constructions that addresses many of the issues found with earlier accounts. In Iwata’s analysis, schematic construction meanings interact with rich verb meanings to account for the distributional patterns of verbs in resultative constructions and the semantic interpretation of particular verbs in the resultative construction. English Resultatives will serve as the reference point for future research on the resultative construction in English and other languages.”
William A. Croft, University of New Mexico, USA
(1976) Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2012) Resultative constructions. In R. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect (pp.908–933). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Beavers, J., & Koonz-Garboden, A.
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Weitham, S.
(1968) On the nature of the ‘lexical item.’ CLS, 4: 1–13.
Boas, H. C.
(2000) Resultative constructions in English and German. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
(2003) A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
(2014) Cognitive construction grammar. In T. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.233–252). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(1971) The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(1979) Theory of complementation in English syntax. New York: Garland.
(1988) The story of over: Polysemy, semantics, and the structure of the lexicon. New York: Garland.
(2014) Conventional combinations in pockets of productivity: English resultatives and Dutch ditransitives expressing excess. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman, & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar (pp.251–281). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Carlson, G., & Storto, G.
Carrier, J., & Randall, J. H.
(1989) From conceptual structure to syntax: Projecting from resultatives. Ms. Harvard University and Northeastern University.
(1992) The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 23: 173–234.
Carston, R., & Wearing, C.
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2011) Hyperbole in English: A corpus-based study of exaggeration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Colston, H. L.
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B.
Condoravdi, C., & Gawron, J. M.
(1996) The context-dependency of implicit arguments. In M. Kanazawa, C. Piñon, & H. de Swart (Eds.), Quantifiers, deduction, and context (pp.1–32). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
(1979) Idiomaticity as a problem of pragmatics. In H. Parret, M. Sbisá & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics (pp.139–151). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(1990) Possible verbs and event structure. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies on linguistic categorization (pp.48–73). London: Routledge.
(1991) Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1998) Event structure in argument linking. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors (pp.21–63). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
(1986) Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2000) Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Culicover, P. W.
(2013) Grammar and complexity: Language at the intersection of competence and performance. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Davis, W. A.
(1984) Towards an integrated theory of adverb position in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
(2002) The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Espinal, M. T., & Mateu, J.
(1992) The syntax and semantics of middle constructions: A study with special reference to German. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(1986) On the middle construction in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
(1977) Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (pp.76–138). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
(1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, (pp.111–138). Seoul: Hanshin.
(1997) Lectures on deixis. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Fillmore, C., & Atkins, B. T.
(1992) Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer & E. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp.75–102). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Fillmore, C., Johnson, C., & Petruck, M.
(1976) The verb-particle combination in English. Tokyo: Taishukan.
(2000) Oriented adverbs: Issues in the lexical semantics of event adverbs. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Tübingen.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Colston, H. L.
Goldberg, A. E.
(1991b) A semantic account of resultatives. Linguistic Analysis, 21: 66–96.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1998) Patterns of experience in patterns of language. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp.203–220). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2004) Argument realization: The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In J-O Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp.17–43). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. E., & Jackendoff, R.
(1970) How abstract is surface structure? CLS, 6: 270–281.
(1972) Some observations on the syntax and semantics of instrumental verbs. CLS, 8: 83–97.
(1994) Constructing lexicon-grammars. In B. T. S. Atkins & A. Zampolli (Eds.), Computational approaches to the lexicon (pp.213–263). Oxford University Press.
(1976) Lexical structures in syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
(2012) The hell in English grammar. In N. Le Querler, F. Neveu, & E. Roussel (Eds.), Relations, connexions, dependances: Hommage au Professeur Claude Guimier (pp.101–126). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
Hale, K., & Keyser, S. J.
(1987) A view from the middle. Lexicon Project Working Papers, 10: Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1994) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hay, J., Kennedy, C., & Levin, B.
(1999) Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘degree achievements.’ Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, IX: 127–144. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
(2012) Valency constructions and clause constructions or how, if at all, valency grammarians might sneeze the foam off the cappuccino. In H-J. Schmid & S. Handl (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage patterns (pp.225–255). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2014) The valency approach to argument structure constructions. In T. Herbst, H-J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions – collocations – patterns (pp.167–216). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Himmelmann, N., & Schultze-Berndt, E.
Hoeksema, J., & Napoli, D. J.
Horrocks, G., & Stavrou, M.
(1998) A lexical network approach to verbal semantics. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
(2004a) He jumped to his feet: Internal motion and internal path. Tsukuba English Studies 22: A festschrift in honor of Minoru Nakau, 89–99. University of Tsukuba.
(2006b) Where there’s a sound, there’s motion: Two types of path PPs that appear after verbs of sound emission. Paper read at the Fourth International Conference on Construction Grammar, held at University of Tokyo, Japan.
(2008c) Another look at the maximal end-point constraint on resultatives. Paper read at the Fifth International Conference on Construction Grammar, held at University of Texas, Austin.
(2010) Why can we say ‘Bob shot him to death’ but not ‘*Bob shot him into death’? Paper read at the Sixth International Conference on Construction Grammar, held at Charles University. Czech Republic.
(2011) He laughed his head off: A lexical-constructional account. Paper read at the Fourth International Conference on the Linguistics of Contemporary English, held at Osnabrueck University. Germany.
(2012) Kekkahyougen-ni oite doushi-ni kouzokusuru meishiku-ga hatasu yakuwari (The role played by the post-verbal NP in resultatives). Paper read at the 84th General Meeting of the English Literature Society in Japan, held at Senshu University, Ikuta campus.
(2014b) Construction grammar. In A. Carnie, Y. Sato, & D. Siddiqi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of syntax, 647–669. London: Routledge.
(2014d) Where does Princess Anne rode (the horse) to victory come from? Paper read at the Eighth International Conference on Construction Grammar, held at Osnabrueck University. Germany.
(2015a) Resultatives and domains: The cases of fake reflexives with eat and drink . Paper read at the Sixth Biennial International Conference on the Linguistics of Contemporary English, held at University of Wisconsin-Madison. US.
(2015b) Keiyoushi kekka-ku to zenchishi kekka-ku (Adjectival result phrases vs. prepositional result phrases). Paper read at the 33rd General Meeting of the English Linguistic Society of Japan, held at Kansai Gaidai University, Nakamiya Campus.
(1983) Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1990) Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1933) Essentials of English grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Kayne, S. R.
(1985) Principles of particle construction. In J. Guéron, H-G. Obenauer, & J-Y. Pollock (Eds.), Grammatical representation (pp.101–140). Dordrecht: Foris.
Kennedy, C., & McNally, L.
(1999) From event structure to scale structure: Degree modification in deverbal adjectives. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, IX: 163–180. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
(1992) Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In I. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical Matters (pp.29–53). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Kuno, S., & Takami, K.
Kusayama, M., & Miyata, A.
(2000) Doushi-to kekkahyougen-no imikankei (The semantic relation between verb meaning and resultatives). Report of the special research Project for the typological investigation of languages and cultures of the East and West 2000, Part II (pp.841–868). University of Tsukuba.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(2005b) Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & M. Sandra Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp.101–159). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(1993) English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1999) Objecthood: An event structure perspective. CLS, 35: 223–247.
Levin, B., & Rapoport, R.
(1988) Lexical subordination. CLS, 24: 275–289.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M.
(1995) Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1996) Lexical semantics and syntactic structure. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (pp.487–507), Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
(1999) Two structures for compositionally derived events. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, IX: 199–223.
(1981) A lexico-semantic analysis of verb-particle constructions with up and out. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego. Available from IULC (1983).
(1982) What goes up doesn’t necessarily come down: The ins and outs of opposites. CLS, 18: 305–323.
Maienborn, C., & Schäfer, M.
(2011) Grammaticalising constructions: To death as a peripheral degree modifier. Folia Linguistica Historica, 32: 115–148.
Martínez-Manrique, F., & Vicente, A.
Mateu, J., & Espinal, M. T.
(1996b) How abstract is subjective motion? A comparison of coverage path expressions and access path expressions. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, language, and discourse (pp.359–374), Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
(2006) Constraints on the co-occurrence of spatial and non-spatial paths in English: A closer look at the Unique Path Constraint. A plenary talk given at the Fourth International Conference on Construction Grammar, held at University of Tokyo, Japan.
(1988) The syntax of adjunct predicates. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Meinard, M. E. M.
(1998) Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(1998) Some notes on prepositional resultatives. Tsukuba English Studies, 17: 319–340.
Napoli, D. J., & Hoeksema, J.
Nemesi, A. L.
(1992) Two kinds of indexicality. Proceedings of the Semantics and Linguistic Theory, II: 283–301. Columbus: Ohio State University.
(2004) Deferred interpretation. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp.344–364). Blackwell.
(2010) Eigo kekka koubunn no koyuusei to ruikeiteki tokusei (Some peculiarities and typological properties of resultatives in English). Paper read at the Twenty-Eighth Conference of the English Linguistic Society of Japan, held at Nihon University, Tokyo.
Paradis, C., Löhndorf, S., van de Weijer, J., & Willners, C.
Partee, B. H.
(1989) Binding implicit variables in quantified contexts. CLS, 25: 342–365.
Petruck, M. R. L.
(1996) Frame semantics. In J. Verschueren, J-O. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics 1996 (pp.1–11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1974) On raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1991b) The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17: 409–441.
(1995) The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Rappaport Hovav, M.
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B.
(1998) Building verb meanings. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), Projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors (pp.97–134). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
(1979) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1982) Objectionable objects. Linguistic Inquiry, 13: 685–689.
(1988) Predicative APs. Linguistic Inquiry, 19: 703–710.
Robenalt, C., & Goldberg, A. E.
(1983) The syntactic forms of predication. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
(2011) Secondary predicates. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics Vol.2: An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp. 1442–1462). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rotstein, C., & Winter, Y.
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M., Johnson, C., & Scheffczyk, J.
(2016) FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. Berkeley: International Computer Science Institute. Technical report (available at http://framenet.icsi.bekeley.edu)
(1976) The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: The grammar of causative constructions (pp.1–40). New York: Academic Press.
(1983) Resultatives. In M. Rappaport, A. Zaenen, & L. Levin (Eds.), Papers in lexical-functional grammar (pp.143–157). Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp.57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2000a) Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol.1, Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2000b) Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol.2, Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Taylor, J. R.
(2002) Cognitive grammar. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2003) Linguistic categorization, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2004) On ‘syntactic’ versus ‘semantic’ telicity: Evidence from in and on . In H. Cuyckens, W. de Mulder, & T. Montelmans (Eds.), Adpositions of movement, (pp.145–166). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Titone, D. A. & Connine, C. M.
(2003) On the motion uses of English verbs of sound. Unpublished BA thesis, Osaka City University, Japan.
(2003a) Kouirensa to koubun II: Kekka koubun (Action chain and construction II: Resultative construction),” In Y. Nakamura (Ed.), Ninchi bunpouron II (Cognitive grammar II) (pp.89–135). Tokyo: Taishukan:.
(2003b) Three kinds of resultatives: To death, to one’s death & dead . In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita (pp.747–761). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
van der Leek, F.
Verspoor, C. M.
(1997) Contextually-dependent lexical semantics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
(1997) Resultative predicates and control. Texas Linguistic Forum, 38: 307–321.
(2012) Resultatives and the problem of exceptions. In Ik-Hwan Lee et al. (Eds.) Issues in English linguistics (Papers from the 1st World Congress of Scholars of English Linguistics, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea, June 30, 2012) (pp.119–131). Hankookmunhwasa, Seoul.
(1971) In a manner of speaking. Linguistic Inquiry, 11: 223–233.
(2008) No time for goodbye. New York: Bantam Books.
(2006) Ricochet. New York: Pocket Books.
(1989) Elizabeth Cole. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
(2002) Utopia. New York: Ballantine Books.
(2000) Darkest fear. New York: Dell Publishing.
(2002) Back spin. London: Orion.
(1992) The black echo. New York: Warner Books.
(2008) Trunk music. New York: Grand Central Publishing.
(1987) The monkey’s raincoat. New York: Bantam Books.
(2005) Eleven on top. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Gardner, E. S.
(1952) Top of the heap. New York: Dorchester Publishing Co.
(1960) The case of the fan dancer’s horse. New York: Pocket Books.
(1974) The case of the postponed murder. New York: Pocket Books.
(2005) Body double. New York: Ballantine Books
(2006) Vanish. New York: Ballantine Books.
(1990a) C Is for Corpse. London: Pan Books.
(1990b) E is for evidence. London: Pan Books.
(1990c) G is for gumshoe. London: Pan Books.
(1988) To kill a mockingbird. New York: Warner Books.
(1990) Family pictures. New York: Harper and Row.
(1985) There’s nothing to be afraid of. New York: St. Matin’s Press.
(1925/2008) Wild geese. New Canadian Library.
(2001) Total recall. New York: Dell Publishing.
(2004) My sister’s keeper. New York: Washington Square Press.
Robertson, M. E.
(1989) Family life. New York: Penguin Books.
Sayers, D. L.
(1995) Lord Peter. New York: Harper Paperbacks.
(1963) The girls of slender means. New York: Knopf.
(1976/2001) Yankee stranger. New York: Buccaneer Books.
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2019056152