Chapter published in:Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar
Edited by Lotte Sommerer and Elena Smirnova
[Constructional Approaches to Language 27] 2020
► pp. 278–315
Paradigms lost – paradigms regained
Paradigms as hyper-constructions
Based on Diewald (2009, 2015a, 2017), it is claimed that the notion of paradigm needs to be introduced into constructional accounts, as otherwise the essence of grammaticalization cannot be properly captured in construction grammar. It is suggested to define grammatical paradigms as a new node type, a “hyper-construction”, which represents the categorical, non-gradient specifics of grammatical meaning. This line of argumentation is supported by a discussion of changes in the German and English modality, tense, determiner, and number paradigms. Independent arguments for the psychological reality of paradigms come from the study of implicational relations in inflectional morphology and diachronic phenomena such as layering, suppletion, and paradigm pressure.
Keywords: paradigm, paradigmatic relation, paradigmaticization, grammaticalization, grammatical category, gradience, hyper-construction, constructional link, constructional network, inheritance
Published online: 13 May 2020
Cited by 3 other publications
Diewald, Gabriele, Volodymyr Dekalo & Dániel Czicza
Diewald, Gabriele & Katja Politt
Hilpert, Martin, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.