Chapter 3
Frame Semantics, Construction Grammar, and Valency Grammar
Article outline
- 3.1Frame Semantics
- 3.1.1Background and introduction to Frame Semantics
- 3.1.2FrameNet classes, Frame Elements, Lexical Units, and the FrameNet
hierarchy
- 3.1.2.1Frames and Lexical Units
- 3.1.2.2Frame Elements and Frame Element relations
- 3.1.2.3Valency data in FrameNet
- 3.1.2.4Frame-to-frame relations and the Frame Grapher
- 3.1.3Comparing Frame Semantics to other approaches to the syntax-semantics
interface
- 3.1.3.1Frame Semantics and semantic roles
- 3.1.3.2Frame Semantics and aspectual approaches
- 3.1.3.3Frame Semantics and Levin
(1993)
- 3.1.3.4FrameNet and WordNet
- 3.1.4Problems with Frame Semantics
- 3.1.5Summary
- 3.2Construction Grammar
- 3.2.1Construction Grammar: An introduction
- 3.2.2Principles of CxG
- 3.2.2.1Definition of “construction” and formalization
- 3.2.2.2Construction Grammar, Usage-based Theory, and Corpus
Linguistics
- 3.2.2.3Constructional inheritance networks
- 3.2.3Constructional approaches to argument realization
- 3.2.3.1Goldberg (1995, 2006): Argument Structure Constructions
- 3.2.3.2Questions about the combination of verbs and
constructions
- 3.2.3.3Constructional and projectionist approaches to argument
structure
- 3.2.3.4Frame Semantics and Construction Grammar
- 3.2.4Change verbs in CxG
- 3.2.5Summary of CxG
- 3.3Valency Grammar
- 3.3.1Introduction and the VDE
- 3.3.2
Faulhaber (2011) and the
idiosyncratic nature of verb valency
- 3.3.3Valency constructions and argument structure constructions
- 3.4Conclusion
-
Notes