Part of
Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensionsEdited by Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried
[Constructional Approaches to Language 3] 2005
► pp. 147–190
Edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried
[Constructional Approaches to Language 3] 2005
► pp. 147–190
Embodied Construction Grammar in simulation-based language understanding
Cited by
Cited by 141 other publications
Alaçam, Özge, Christopher Habel & Cengiz Acartürk
2015. Switching reference frame preferences during verbally assisted haptic graph comprehension. Cognitive Processing 16:S1 ► pp. 115 ff. 
Arbib, Michael A.
2009. 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, ► pp. 184 ff.
Arbib, Michael A.
2010. From Mirror Writing to Mirror Neurons. In From Animals to Animats 11 [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6226], ► pp. 1 ff.
Arbib, Michael A.
2015. From Action to Typology? A Neuro‐evolutionary Perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass 9:2 ► pp. 102 ff.
Baillie, Jean-Christophe
2016. Artificial Intelligence: The Point of View of Developmental Robotics. In Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence [Synthese Library, 376], ► pp. 415 ff.
Barrès, Victor & Jinyong Lee
2014. Template Construction Grammar: From Visual Scene Description to Language Comprehension and Agrammatism. Neuroinformatics 12:1 ► pp. 181 ff.
Bateman, John A., Mihai Pomarlan, Gayane Kazhoyan, Valerio Basile, Tommaso Caselli & Daniele P. Radicioni
2019. Embodied contextualization: Towards a multistratal ontological treatment. Applied Ontology 14:4 ► pp. 379 ff.
Bergen, Benjamin, Ting-Ting Chan Lau, Shweta Narayan, Diana Stojanovic & Kathryn Wheeler
2010. Body part representations in verbal semantics. Memory & Cognition 38:7 ► pp. 969 ff.
Bergen, Benjamin K., Shane Lindsay, Teenie Matlock & Srini Narayanan
2007. Spatial and Linguistic Aspects of Visual Imagery in Sentence Comprehension. Cognitive Science 31:5 ► pp. 733 ff.
Beuls, Katrien & Remi van Trijp
2016. Computational construction grammar and constructional change. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 1 ff.
Biggs, Alison
2021. The Done‐State Derived Stative: A Case Study in Building Complex Eventualities in Syntax. Syntax 24:3 ► pp. 297 ff.
Binsted, K., B. Bergen, S. Coulson, A. Nijholt, O. Stock, C. Strapparava, G. Ritchie, R. Manurung, H. Pain, A. Waller & D. O'Mara
2006. Computational Humor. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21:2 ► pp. 59 ff.
Borin, Lars, Dana Dannélls & Normunds Grūzītis
2018. Chapter 8. Linguistics vs. language technology in constructicon building and use. In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22], ► pp. 229 ff.
Bourou, Dimitra, Marco Schorlemmer & Enric Plaza
2021. Image Schemas and Conceptual Blending in Diagrammatic Reasoning: The Case of Hasse Diagrams. In Diagrammatic Representation and Inference [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12909], ► pp. 297 ff.
Browse, Sam
2014. Chapter 5. Resonant metaphor in Kazuo Ishiguro’sNever Let Me Go. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 69 ff.
Brunyé, Tad T., Tali Ditman, Caroline R. Mahoney, Jason S. Augustyn & Holly A. Taylor
2009. When You and I Share Perspectives. Psychological Science 20:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Brunyé, Tad T., Eliza K. Walters, Tali Ditman, Stephanie A. Gagnon, Caroline R. Mahoney & Holly A. Taylor
2012. The Fabric of Thought: Priming Tactile Properties During Reading Influences Direct Tactile Perception. Cognitive Science 36:8 ► pp. 1449 ff.
Chang, N. & E. Mok
2006. The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings, ► pp. 1604 ff.
Chang, Nancy, Joachim De Beule & Vanessa Micelli
2012. Computational Construction Grammar: Comparing ECG and FCG. In Computational Issues in Fluid Construction Grammar [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7249], ► pp. 259 ff.
Chen, Kai, Dong Huang, Qingcai Chen & Chao Zhang
2016. 2016 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC), ► pp. 123 ff.
Ciortuz, Liviu & Vlad Saveluc
2011. 2011 13th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing, ► pp. 160 ff.
Coello, Yann & Isabelle Bonnotte
2013. The Mutual Roles of Action Representations and Spatial Deictics in French Language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 66:11 ► pp. 2187 ff.
David, Oana, George Lakoff & Elise Stickles
De Beule, Joachim
2012. A Formal Deconstruction of Fluid Construction Grammar. In Computational Issues in Fluid Construction Grammar [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7249], ► pp. 215 ff.
De Knop, Sabine
2020. From construction grammar to embodied construction practice. Constructions and Frames 12:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
De Knop, Sabine
2022. From construction grammar to embodied construction practice. In Construction Grammar across Borders [Benjamins Current Topics, 122], ► pp. 119 ff.
Knop, Sabine De
2020. The embodied teaching of complex verbal constructions with German placement verbs and spatial prepositions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 131 ff.
De Mulder, Walter & Dejan Stosic
2009. Présentation. Langages n° 173:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Dominey, Peter Ford
2013. The tip of the language iceberg. Language and Cognition 5:2-3 ► pp. 177 ff.
Evans, Vyvyan
2006. Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics 17:4
Fargier, Raphaël, Mathilde Ménoret, Véronique Boulenger, Tatjana A. Nazir, Yves Paulignan & Alessio Avenanti
2012. Grasp It Loudly! Supporting Actions with Semantically Congruent Spoken Action Words. PLoS ONE 7:1 ► pp. e30663 ff.
Fischer, Wolf & Bernhard Bauer
2011. Cognitive-Linguistics-Based Request Answer System. In Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval. Understanding Media and Adapting to the User [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6535], ► pp. 135 ff.
Fonteyn, Lauren
Franceschi, Daniele
2014. Licensing and blocking factors in the use of BEGIN verbs. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 304 ff.
Fujii, Seiko & Russell Lee-Goldman
2020. Argument structure satisfaction via unselected adjuncts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 79 ff.
Gamerschlag, Thomas, Doris Gerland, Rainer Osswald & Wiebke Petersen
2014. General Introduction. In Frames and Concept Types [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 94], ► pp. 3 ff.
Gargett, Andrew & John Barnden
2013. 2013 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, ► pp. 103 ff.
Gargett, Andrew, John Barnden, Chao-Lin Liu, Mitsunori Matsushita, Yasufumi Takama, Min-Yuh Day & Vincent Shin-Mu Tseng
2015. Gen-Meta: Generating metaphors by combining AI and corpus-based modeling. Web Intelligence 13:2 ► pp. 103 ff.
Giovanelli, Marcello
2014. Chapter 10. Conceptual proximity and the experience of war in Siegfried Sassoon’s ‘A Working Party’. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 145 ff.
Goldberg, Adele & Laura Suttle
2010. Construction grammar. WIREs Cognitive Science 1:4 ► pp. 468 ff.
Gould, Kevin M. & Laura A. Michaelis
Hamilton, Craig A.
2014. Chapter 13. The cognitive poetics ofif. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 195 ff.
Harrison, Chloe
2014. Chapter 4. Attentional windowing in David Foster Wallace’s ‘The Soul Is Not a Smithy’. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 53 ff.
Harrison, Chloe, Louise Nuttall, Peter Stockwell & Wenjuan Yuan
2014. Chapter 1. Introduction: Cognitive Grammar in literature. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 1 ff.
Hart, Christopher
2016. The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse studies: Integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse & Society 27:3 ► pp. 335 ff.
Hartung, Franziska, Michael Burke, Peter Hagoort, Roel M. Willems & Kevin Paterson
2016. Taking Perspective: Personal Pronouns Affect Experiential Aspects of Literary Reading. PLOS ONE 11:5 ► pp. e0154732 ff.
Hedblom, Maria M. & Oliver Kutz
2019. Conceptual Puzzle Pieces. In Modeling and Using Context [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11939], ► pp. 98 ff.
Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog
2009. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis,
Hoffmann, Thomas
2019. Language and creativity: a Construction Grammar approach to linguistic creativity. Linguistics Vanguard 5:1
Hong, Jisup
2016. Automatic metaphor detection using constructions and frames. Constructions and Frames 8:2 ► pp. 295 ff.
Huang, Jen-Wei, Bijay Prasad Jaysawal, Kuan-Ying Chen & Yong-Bin Wu
2019. Mining frequent and top-K High Utility Time Interval-based Events with Duration patterns. Knowledge and Information Systems 61:3 ► pp. 1331 ff.
Höffner, Sebastian, Robert Porzel, Maria M. Hedblom, Mihai Pomarlan, Vanja Sophie Cangalovic, Johannes Pfau, John A. Bateman, Rainer Malaka & Katja Hose
2022. Deep understanding of everyday activity commands for household robots. Semantic Web 13:5 ► pp. 895 ff.
Ignatow, Gabe
2014. Ontology and Method in Cognitive Sociology. Sociological Forum 29:4 ► pp. 990 ff.
Ignatow, Gabe
2016. Theoretical Foundations for Digital Text Analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 46:1 ► pp. 104 ff.
Imo, Wolfgang
2015. Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 1:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Iza Erviti, Aneider
2021. From Discourse Markers to Construction Grammar(s) in Discourse. In Discourse Constructions in English [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 7 ff.
Johansson Falck, Marlene
2017. Chapter 2. Embodied motivations for abstract in and on constructions. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 53 ff.
Kang, Xin, Anita Eerland, Gitte H. Joergensen, Rolf A. Zwaan & Gerry T. M. Altmann
2020. The influence of state change on object representations in language comprehension. Memory & Cognition 48:3 ► pp. 390 ff.
Knoeferle, Pia
2019. Predicting (variability of) context effects in language comprehension. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 3:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Knoeferle, Pia & Matthew W. Crocker
2006. The Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking. Cognitive Science 30:3 ► pp. 481 ff.
KOK, KASPER & ALAN CIENKI
2017. Taking simulation semantics out of the laboratory: towards an interactive and multimodal reappraisal of embodied language comprehension. Language and Cognition 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kostakis, Orestis & Panagiotis Papapetrou
2015. Finding the longest common sub-pattern in sequences of temporal intervals. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 29:5 ► pp. 1178 ff.
Kostakis, Orestis, Panagiotis Papapetrou & Jaakko Hollmén
2011. ARTEMIS: Assessing the Similarity of Event-Interval Sequences. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6912], ► pp. 229 ff.
Kostakis, Orestis & Panagotis Papapetrou
2017. On searching and indexing sequences of temporal intervals. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 31:3 ► pp. 809 ff.
Kwiatkowska, Alina
2014. Chapter 14. Representing the represented: Verbal variations onVincent’s Bedroom in Arles. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 213 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2014. Foreword. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. xiii ff.
Lanwer, Jens Philipp
2017. Apposition: A multimodal construction? The multimodality of linguistic constructions in the light of usage-based theory. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1
Lee, Zed, Tony Lindgren & Panagiotis Papapetrou
2020. Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, ► pp. 524 ff.
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
2018. Chapter 5. Describing linguistic objects in a realist way. In Essays on Linguistic Realism [Studies in Language Companion Series, 196], ► pp. 79 ff.
Littlemore, Jeannette
2023. ‘Oscar sent Venice an elephant’: Construction Grammars and Second Language Learning. In Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 231 ff.
Liu, Nian & Benjamin Bergen
2016. When do language comprehenders mentally simulate locations?
. Cognitive Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Luzondo Oyón, Alba
2014. Constraining factors on the family of resultative constructions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
Mairal-Usón, Ricardo
2015. Constructional meaning representation within a knowledge engineering framework. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
McDonough, Terry
Mealier, Anne-Laure, Gregoire Pointeau, Solène Mirliaz, Kenji Ogawa, Mark Finlayson & Peter F. Dominey
2017. Narrative Constructions for the Organization of Self Experience: Proof of Concept via Embodied Robotics. Frontiers in Psychology 8
Mittelberg, Irene
2017. Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1
MÜLLER, STEFAN
2010. Persian complex predicates and the limits of inheritance-based analyses. Journal of Linguistics 46:3 ► pp. 601 ff.
Neary, Clara
2014. Chapter 8. Profiling the flight of ‘The Windhover’. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 117 ff.
Nedelcheva, Svetlana Yordanova & Krysteva, Mariana Todorova
2018. Some Aspects of Semantic Frames and Meaning. ANNUAL JOURNAL OF TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF VARNA, BULGARIA 2:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Nuttall, Louise
2014. Chapter 6. Constructing a text world for The Handmaid’s Tale. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 83 ff.
Oakley, Todd
2014. Afterword: From Cognitive Grammar to systems rhetoric. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 231 ff.
OAKLEY, TODD & VERA TOBIN
2014. The whole is sometimes less than the sum of its parts: toward a theory of document acts. Language and Cognition 6:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
ORDEM, Eser
2020. Acquisition of Object Relative Clauses by Turkish Adult Learners of English. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences 19:1 ► pp. 204 ff.
ORDEM, Eser
2021. THE ADULT SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS’ ACQUISITION AND PRODUCTION OF SUBJECT-OBJECT RELATIVE CLAUSES. Çukurova Üniversitesi Türkoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi 6:1 ► pp. 106 ff.
Paradowski, Michał B.
2011. The Embodied Language: Why Language Should Not Be Conceived of in Abstraction from the Brain and Body, and the Consequences for Robotics. SSRN Electronic Journal
Perak, Benedikt & Tajana Ban Kirigin
2023. Construction Grammar Conceptual Network: Coordination-based graph method for semantic association analysis. Natural Language Engineering 29:3 ► pp. 584 ff.
Pincombe, Mike
2014. Chapter 11. Most and now: Tense and aspect in Bálint Balassi’s ‘Áldott szép pünkösdnek’. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 161 ff.
Pleyer, Michael & Christian W. Schneider
2014. Chapter 3. Construal and comics: The multimodal autobiography of Alison Bechdel’sFun Home. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 35 ff.
Päivärinta, Anne
2014. Chapter 9. Foregrounding the foregrounded: The literariness of Dylan Thomas’s ‘After the funeral’. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 133 ff.
Quaeghebeur, Liesbet
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José, Alba Luzondo Oyón & Paula Pérez Sobrino
2017. Introduction. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58], ► pp. 1 ff.
Sarma, Himangshu, Robert Porzel, Jan D Smeddinck, Rainer Malaka & Arun Baran Samaddar
2018. A Text to Animation System for Physical Exercises. The Computer Journal
Schilling, Malte, Nancy Chang, Katharina J. Rohlfing & Michael Spranger
2020. Simulation across representation: The interplay of schemas and simulation-based inference on different levels of abstraction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43
Schneider, Nathan & Reut Tsarfaty
2013. Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar Luc Steels (editor) Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Sony Computer Science Laboratory, Paris Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company (Constructional Approaches to Language series, edited by Mirjam Fried and Jan-Ola Östman, volume 11), 2012, xi+332 pp; hardbound, ISBN 978-90-272-0433-2, €99.00, $149.00. Computational Linguistics 39:2 ► pp. 447 ff.
Sikos, Jennifer & Sebastian Padó
2018. FrameNet’s Using relation as a source of concept-based paraphrases. Constructions and Frames 10:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
Steels, Luc, Joachim De Beule & Pieter Wellens
2012. Fluid Construction Grammar on Real Robots. In Language Grounding in Robots, ► pp. 195 ff.
Stickles, Elise, Oana David, Ellen K. Dodge & Jisup Hong
2016. Formalizing contemporary conceptual metaphor theory. Constructions and Frames 8:2 ► pp. 166 ff.
Stockwell, Peter
2014. Chapter 2. War, worlds and Cognitive Grammar. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 17 ff.
Sweetser, Eve
2012. Introduction: viewpoint and perspectivein language and gesture, from the Grounddown. In Viewpoint in Language, ► pp. 1 ff.
Tabakowska, Elżbieta
2014. Chapter 7. Point of view in translation: Lewis Carroll’sAlicein grammatical wonderlands. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 101 ff.
TAKAHASHI, HIDEMITSU
2019. <i>Cognitive Linguistics: SAGE Benchmarks in Language and </i><i>Linguistics </i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 36:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Takác, Martin
2009. Construction of Meanings in Biological and Artificial Agents. In Handbook of Research on Agent-Based Societies, ► pp. 139 ff.
Torre, Enrico
2011. Grounding Meaning in Everyday Experience in the World: An Embodied Construction Grammar Analysis of Italian Caused-Motion Constructions. SSRN Electronic Journal
Torrent, Tiago Timponi, Ely Edison da Silva Matos, Ludmila Meireles Lage, Adrieli Laviola, Tatiane da Silva Tavares, Vânia Gomes de Almeida & Natália Sathler Sigiliano
2018. Chapter 4. Towards continuity between the lexicon and the constructicon in FrameNet Brasil. In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22], ► pp. 107 ff.
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023. Constructionist Approaches,
Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel & Pamela Faber
2020. What the analysis of extended meaning of terms can reveal about verb semantic frame structure. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Valenzuela, Javier, Joseph Hilferty & Oscar Vilarroya
2016. Why are embodied experiments relevant to cognitive linguistics?. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 265 ff.
Van Eecke, Paul & Katrien Beuls
2018. Exploring the Creative Potential of Computational Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66:3 ► pp. 341 ff.
van Trijp, Remi, Katrien Beuls, Paul Van Eecke & Andrew Kehler
2022. The FCG Editor: An innovative environment for engineering computational construction grammars. PLOS ONE 17:6 ► pp. e0269708 ff.
WALLES, HAYDEN, ANTHONY ROBINS & ALISTAIR KNOTT
2014. A perceptually grounded model of the singular–plural distinction. Language and Cognition 6:3 ► pp. 327 ff.
Xiang, Mingjian & Esther Pascual
2022. Debate with zhuangzi. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 137 ff.
Yalçın, Alemdar & Nursel Yalçın
2010. How to get best result from a presentation? How to increase effectiveness of a presentation?. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 9 ► pp. 480 ff.
Yang, Cheng-Wei, Bijay Prasad Jaysawal & Jen-Wei Huang
2017. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), ► pp. 293 ff.
Yuan, Wenjuan
2014. Chapter 12. Fictive motion in Wordsworthian nature. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 177 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 9. Characterization of models. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 367 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 10. Characterization of models. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 451 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Index. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 253 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. List of contributors. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. vii ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 6. Characterization of models. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 219 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 2. Profiles. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 31 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 12. Compatibilities and contrasts. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 485 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 7. Characterization of models. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 271 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Abbreviations for models. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. xiii ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Acknowledgements. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Figures and Tables. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. xv ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 17], ► pp. 237 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 3. Features for the characterization of models. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 133 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 11. Statistical analysis of final ratings. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 465 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 5. Characterization of models. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 197 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Acknowledgment. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. xi ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 8. Characterization of models. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 307 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 507 ff.
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 4. Statistical analysis of the questionnaire data. In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], ► pp. 167 ff.
[no author supplied]
2016. Metaphor [Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, ],
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.