Recent years have seen an increasing interest in applying Construction Grammar to additional language (AL) acquisition as well as in constructionist approaches to language contact and multilingualism, in particular Diasystematic Construction Grammar (DCxG; Höder, 2018). This paper combines both perspectives by proposing a usage-based constructionist model of AL acquisition as emerging multilingualism. In line with earlier work on DCxG, we assume that multilingual speakers store and process all of their languages in terms of constructions that are organized into one common constructicon. From that perspective, AL learning amounts to an extension and reorganization of the constructicon, resulting not only in the gradual entrenchment of new constructions that represent (a learner variety of) the AL, but also in modifications of previously acquired constructions and the links between them. The model is illustrated by examples from different kinds of AL acquisition scenarios and also discussed in relation to current key concepts within non-constructionist research in the field of AL acquisition.
Boas, H. C., & Höder, S. (2018). Construction grammar and language contact. An introduction. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in contact. Constructional perspectives on contact phenomena in Germanic languages (pp. 5–36). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J. L. (2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cappelle, B. (2017). What’s pragmatics doing outside constructions? In I. Depraetere, & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics. Drawing a line (pp. 115–151). Cham: Springer.
Cook, V. J. (1991). The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multicompetence. Second Language Research, 7, 103–117.
Cook, V. J. (1993). Wholistic multi-competence – jeu d’esprit or paradigm shift? In B. Kettemann, & W. Wieden (Eds.), Current issues in European second language acquisition research (pp. 3–8). Tübingen: Narr.
Cook, V. J., & Li Wei (Eds.). (2016). The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dąbrowska, E. (2019). Individual differences in grammatical knowledge. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, vol. 3: Key topics (pp. 231–250). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
De Knop, S., & Gilquin, G. (2016). Exploring L2 constructionist approaches. In S. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 3–8). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Diessel, H. (2013). Construction Grammar and first language acquisition. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 347–364). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diessel, H. (2019). Usage-based Construction Grammar. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, vol. 2: A survey of linguistic subfields (pp. 50–80). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Divjak, D., & Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2019). Frequency and entrenchment. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, vol. 1: Foundations of language (pp. 61–86). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Eckman, F. R. (2010). Linguistic typology and second language acquisition. In J. J. Song (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology (pp. 618–633). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition. Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164–194.
Ellis, N. C. (2013). Construction grammar and second language acquisition. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 365–378). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2014). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (pp. 75–93). New York: Routledge.
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2019). Second language acquisition. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, vol. 2: A survey of linguistic subfields (pp. 182–207). Berlin: de Gruyter.
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century. A global perspective. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
García, O., & Li Wei. (2014). Translanguaging: language, bilingualism and education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gardner-Chloros, P. (2009). Code-switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2013). Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2019). Explain me this. Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36, 3–15.
Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, M. (2006). Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42, 25–70.
Hendrikx, I. (2019). The acquisition of intensifying constructions in Dutch and English by French-speaking CLIL and non-CLIL students: Cross-linguistic influence and exposure effects. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvain. Ph.D. dissertation.
Hilpert, M. (2019). Construction grammar and its application to English. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hilpert, M., & Diessel, H. (2017). Entrenchment in Construction Grammar. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 57–74). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton/Washington: American Psychological Association.
Höder, S. (2019). Phonological schematicity in multilingual constructions: a diasystematic perspective on lexical form. Word Structure, 12, 334–352.
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York, Abingdon: Routledge.
Johansson, S. (2008). Contrastive analysis and learner language: A corpus-based approach. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). London: Routledge.
Li, Wei. (2011). Moment Analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 5, 1222–1235.
Li, Wei. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39, 9–30.
Loenheim, L. (2019). Att tolka det sammansatta. Befästning och mönster i första- och andraspråkstalares tolkning av sammansättningar (Meijerbergs arkiv för svensk ordforskning 43). Göteborg: Meijerbergs institut för svensk etymologisk forskning, Göteborgs universitet.
MacWhinney, B. (2017). Entrenchment in second-language learning. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 343–366). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton/Washington: American Psychological Association.
Matras, Y. (2009). Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matthews, D., & Krajewski, G. (2019). First language acquisition. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, vol. 2: A survey of linguistic subfields (pp. 159–181). Berlin: de Gruyter.
May, S. (Ed.). (2013). The multilingual turn. The implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education. New York/London: Routledge.
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London. Routledge.
Ortega, L. (2019). SLA and the study of equitable multilingualism. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 23–38.
Pavlenko, A. (2003). “I never knew I was a bilingual”: Reimagining teacher identities in TESOL. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 2, 251–268.
Peirce, B. N. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 9–31.
Perani, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2005). The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 202–206.
Ringbom, H. (1978). The influence of the mother tongue on the translation of lexical items. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 3, 80–101.
Römer, U., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2014). Second language learner knowledge of verb-argument constructions. Effects of language transfer and typology. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 952–975.
Sabino, R. (2018). Languaging without languages. Beyond metro-, multi-, poly-, pluri- and translanguaging (Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture 18). Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Schmid, H.-J. (2015). A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 3, 3–25.
Schmid, H.-J. (2016). Why cognitive linguistics must embrace the social and pragmatic dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously. Cognitive Linguistics, 27, 543–557.
Schmid, H.-J. (2017). A framework for understanding linguistic entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 9–36). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton/Washington: American Psychological Association.
Selinker, L. (1969). Language transfer. General Linguistics, 9, 67–92.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–232.
Steinkrauss, R., & Schmid, M. S. (2017). Entrenchment and language attrition. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 367–384). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton/Washington: American Psychological Association.
Theakston, A. L. (2017). Entrenchment in first language learning. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 315–342). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton/Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Volodina, E.et al. (2016). SweLL on the rise: Swedish Learner Language corpus for European Reference Level studies. In N. Calzolariet al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016), Portorož, Slovenia, May23–28, 2016.
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact. Findings and problems (Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York 1). New York.
Hendrikx, Isa, Kristel Van Goethem & Natacha Buntinx
2024. Intensification strength in speech: language-specific preferences and differences between native and learner language. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 13
Coussé, Evie, Steffen Höder, Benjamin Lyngfelt & Julia Prentice
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.