Cover not available
Part of
Constructions in Spanish
Edited by Inga Hennecke and Evelyn Wiesinger
[Constructional Approaches to Language 34] 2023
► pp. 2–26

Chapter 1
Construction Grammar meets
Hispanic linguistics

| University of Tübingen
| University of Tübingen

This chapter offers an introduction to the topic and to the individual contributions of the present volume. First, it presents an evaluation of the general potential of combining (usage-based and cognitively oriented) Construction Grammar with Hispanic (and Romance) linguistics. Further, it aims at highlighting the innovative perspective of Construction Grammar(s) in comparison to more traditional approaches for the linguistic phenomena covered in this volume. The chapter concludes with a brief overview of the structure of the book as well as of the individual contributions.

Keywords: Construction Grammar, Hispanic linguistics, word-level constructions, phrase-level constructions, sentence-level constructions, historical linguistics, language learning, interactional linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Constructions in Spanish
  • 2.Constructionist and traditional perspectives on Spanish
    • 2.1Word-level constructions
    • 2.2Phrase-level constructions with idiomatic meanings
    • 2.3Sentence-level constructions with grammatical, discourse-pragmatic or speech-act functions
    • 2.4Extending the scope
      • 2.4.1Historical linguistics and diachronic Construction Grammar
      • 2.4.2Language learning and teaching and Construction Grammar(s)
      • 2.4.3Interactional linguistics and Construction Grammar(s)
  • 3.Conclusion and contributions of the present volume
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.34.01hen
References
Acedo-Matellán, V., & Pineda, A.
(2019) Light verb constructions in Basque and Romance. In A. Berro Urrizelki, B. Fernández, & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Basque and Romance. Aligning Grammars (pp. 176–220). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Alba-Salas, J.
(2019) Caerle/venirle/(entrarle) en Nagrado: sobre el origen y la expansión de un subesquema construccional obsoleto. Scriptum Digital, 8, 53–88.Google Scholar
Almela, R., Ramón Trives, E., & Wotjak, G.
(Eds (2005) Fraseología contrastiva: con ejemplos tomados del alemán, español, francés e italiano (pp. 91–109). Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar
Alvar, M., & Pottier, B.
(1983) Morfología histórica del español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Arnon, I., & Christiansen, M. H.
(2017) The role of multiword building blocks in explaining L1–L2 differences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 621–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Audring, J., & Masini, F.
(2019) Introduction: Theory and theories in Morphology. In J. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theories (pp. 1–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L., & Gildea, S.
(Eds (2015) Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B. K., & Plauché, M. C.
(2005) The convergent evolution of radial constructions. French and English deictics and existentials. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G.
(Eds (2008) Constructions and language change. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C.
(2010) The syntax-lexicon continuum in Construction Grammar. A case study of English communication verbs. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 24, 54–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Coercion and leaking argument structures in Construction Grammar. Linguistics, 49(6), 1271–1303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Lexical and phrasal approaches to argument structure: Two sides of the same coin. Theoretical Linguistics, 40(1–2), 89–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C., & Gonzálvez-García, F.
(2014a) Applying constructional concepts to Romance languages. In H. C. Boas, & F. Gonzálvez-García (Eds.), Romance perspectives on Construction Grammar (pp. 1–35). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
(Eds (2014b) Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, G.
(2010) Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Construction Morphology, a brief introduction. Morphology, 22(3), 343–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I.
(2012) Mood: Indicative vs. Subjunctive. In J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea, & E. O'Rourke. (Eds.), The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics (pp. 373–394). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouveret, M.
(2021) Give Constructions across languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouveret, M., & Legallois, D.
(Eds (2012) Constructions in French. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J., & Traugott, E. C.
(2005) Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briz, A.
(1993) Los conectores pragmáticos en español coloquial (I): su papel argumentativo. Contextos, XI(21/22), 145–188.Google Scholar
(1996) El español coloquial – situación y uso. Madrid: Acro Libros.Google Scholar
Bustos Plaza, A.
(2008) Relaciones de dependencia sintáctica y semántica en combinaciones verbonominales lexicalizadas. In C. Mellado Blanco (Ed.), Colocaciones y fraseología en los diccionarios (pp. 53–67). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2005) Combinaciones verbonominales y lexicalización. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bürgel, C., Gévaudan, P., & Siepmann, D.
(Eds (2021) Sprachwissenschaft und Fremdsprachendidaktik: Konstruktionen und Konstruktionslernen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.
(1994) The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cano Aguilar, R.
(2004) La morfología histórica del español en los últimos cien años. Lexis, 28(1–2), 71–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claes, J.
(2014) Sociolingüística comparada y gramática de construcciones: Un acercamiento a la pluralización de haber en las capitales antillanas. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 338–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corpas Pastor, G.
(1997) Manual de fraseología española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Coseriu, E.
(1977) Inhaltliche Wortbildungslehre (am Beispiel des Typs coupe-papier). In H. E. Brekle, & D. Kastovsky (Eds.), Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung (pp. 48–61), Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann.Google Scholar
(1982) Les procédés sémantiques dans la formation des mots. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 35, 3–16.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
(2018) Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coussé, E., Andersson, P., & Olofsson, J.
(Eds (2018) Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dankel, P., & Soto Rodríguez, M.
(2018) Patrones prosódicos en construcciones enumerativas – una visión desde la perspectiva del contacto Español – Quechua. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 32(2), 35–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Knop, S., & Gilquin, G.
(2016) Exploring L2 constructionist approaches. In S. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 3–18). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Knop, S., Mollica, F., & Kuhn, J.
(Eds (2013) Konstruktionsgrammatik und Romanische Sprachen. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Della Putta, P.
(2016) Do We also Need to Unlearn Constructions? The Case of Constructional Negative Transfer from Spanish to Italian and Its Pedagogical Implications. In S. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 237–268). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demonte, V., & Fernández Soriano, O.
(2014) Evidentiality and illocutionary force: Spanish matrix que at the syntax-pragmatics interface. In A. Dufter, & Á. S. Octavio de Toledo (Eds.), Left sentence peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, variationist, and typological perspectives (pp. 217–252). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Deppermann, A.
(2006) Construction Grammar – Eine Grammatik für die Interaktion? In A. Deppermann, R. Fiehler, & T. Spranz-Fogasy (Eds.), Grammatik und Interaktion (pp. 43–65). Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
(2011) Konstruktionsgrammatik und Interaktionale Linguistik: Affinitäten, Komplementaritäten und Diskrepanzen. In A. Lasch, & A. Ziem (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III: Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze (pp. 205–238). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
De Smet, H., & Fischer, O.
(2017) The role of analogy in language change: Supporting constructions. In M. Hundt, S. Mollin, & S. E. Pfenninger (Eds.), The changing English language. Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 240–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H.
(2019a) Usage-based Construction Grammar. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. A survey of linguistic subfields (pp. 50–80). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b) The grammar network. How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G.
(2011) Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics, 49(2), 365–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovol’skij, D.
(2016) Грамматика конструкций и фразеология. Вопросы языкознания, 3, 7–21.Google Scholar
Dobrovolsk’ij D.
(2011) Phraseologie und Konstruktionsgrammatik. In A. Lasch, & A. Ziem (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III: Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze (pp. 111–130). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Dressel, D. & Teixeira Kalkhoff, A. M.
(2019) Co-constructing utterances in face-to-face-interaction: a multimodal analysis of collaborative completions in spoken Spanish. Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 2(2) DOI logo.Google Scholar
Döhla, H. -J. & Hennemann, A.
(Eds (2021) Konstruktionsgrammatische Zugänge zu romanischen Sprachen. Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, D.
(1998) Subordinación y recursividad en la conversación: Las secuencias integradas por intercambios ecoicos. Diálogos Hispánicos, 22. Special issue La pragmática lingüística del español. Recientes desarrollos, 277–314.Google Scholar
Ehmer, O.
(2016) Adverbial patterns in interaction. In O. Ehmer, & D. Barth-Weingarten (Eds.), Special Issue of Language Sciences, 58, 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Makrokonstruktionen. Komplexe Adverbialstrukturen zwischen lokaler Emergenz und Sedimentierung im gesprochenen Französisch. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T.
(2009) Constructing a second language. Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enghels, R., & Comer, M.
(2018) Evaluating grammaticalization and constructional accounts: The development of the inchoative construction with put verbs in Spanish. In E. Coussé, P. Andersson, & J. Olofsson (Eds.), Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar (pp. 107–133). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C.
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K.
(2006) Konstruktionsgrammatik und Interaktion. In K. Fischer, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik. Von der Anwendung zur Theorie (pp. 133–150). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
(2015) Kognitive Routinen oder soziale Praktiken: Gesprächsanalyse und das Verhältnis von Kognition und Interaktion. In A. Ziem, & A. Lasch (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik IV. Konstruktionen als soziale Konventionen und kognitive Routinen (pp. 245–257). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, C.
(2017 [2000]) Lingüística pragmática y análisis del discurso. 3ª. ed. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Garachana Camarero, M.
(Ed (2020a) La evolución de las perífrasis verbales en español. Una aproximación desde la gramática de construcciones diacrónica y la gramaticalización. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020b) ¿Es necesaria una gramática de construcciones diacrónica? In M. Garachana Camarero (Ed.), La evolución de las perífrasis verbales en español. Una aproximación desde la gramática de construcciones diacrónica y la gramaticalización (pp. 45–72). Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Page, M.
(1996) Sobre las variantes fraseológicas en español. Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos, 20(3), 477–490.Google Scholar
Girón Alconchel, J. L., & Sáez Rivera, D. M.
(Eds (2014) Procesos de gramaticalización en la historia del español. Frankfurt a. M.: Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2019) Explain me this. Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N.
(2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González Rey, M. I.
(Ed (2015): Special Issue Phraseology, Phraseodidactics and Construction Grammar(s). Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3).Google Scholar
Granvik, A.
(2018) The development of the conditional caso construction in Spanish. In E. Coussé, P. Andersson, & Olofsson, J. (Eds.), Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar (pp. 205–239). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gras, P.
(2011) Gramática de Construcciones en Interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
(2016) Revisiting the functional typology of insubordination. Insubordinate que-constructions in Spanish. In N. Evans, & H. Watanabe (Eds.), Insubordination (pp. 113–144). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gras, P., & Sansiñena Pascual, M. S.
(2015) An interactional account of discourse-connective que-constructions in Spanish. Text & Talk, 35(4), 505–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S.
(2005) Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, B., & Gries, S. T.
(2018) Syntax from and for discourse II: More on complex sentences as meso-constructions. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 6(1), 115–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennecke, I.
(2020) Internal constituent variability and semantic transparency in N Prep N constructions in Romance languages. In S. Schulte im Walde, & E. Smolka (Eds.), The role of constituents in multiword expressions: An interdisciplinary, cross-lingual perspective (pp. 129–154). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Herbst, T.
(2016) Foreign language learning is construction learning – what else? Moving towards Pedagogical Construction Grammar. In S. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 21–52). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A., Cadierno, T., & Ibarretxe-Atuñano, I.
(2016) Learning the Placement Caused Motion Construction in L2 Spanish. In S. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp. 185–210). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2011) Was ist Konstruktionswandel? In A. Lasch, & A. Ziem (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III. Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze (pp. 59–76). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
(2017) Historical Sociolinguistics and Construction Grammar. From mutual challenges to mutual benefits. In T. Säily, A. Nurmi, M. Palander-Collin, & A. Auer (Eds.), Exploring future paths for Historical Sociolinguistics (pp. 217–237). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, N.
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang (Ed.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, T.
(2017) Construction Grammars. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 310–329). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, T., & Bergs, A.
(2018) A Construction Grammar approach to genre. CogniTextes, 18, [URL] [20/12/2022]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G.
(Eds (2013): The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hummel, M.
(2012) Einzelaspekt: Modus. In J. Born, R. Folger, C. F. Laferl, & B. Pöll. (Eds.), Handbuch Spanisch (pp. 324–329). Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
(2001) Der Grundwert des spanischen Subjunktivs. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Hüning, M., & Schlücker, B.
(2015) Multi-word expressions. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-Formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe (pp. 450–467). Berlin/München/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Fagard, B.
(2011) A diachronic approach to variation and change in the typology of motion event expression. Faits de Langues, 38(2), 151–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imo, W.
(2007) Construction Grammar und Gesprochene-Sprache-Forschung. Konstruktionen mit zehn matrixsatzfähigen Verben im gesprochenen Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 1, 69–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwata, S.
(2020) English resultatives. A force-recipient account. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kabatek, J.
(Ed (2008) Sintaxis histórica del español y cambio lingüístico: Nuevas perspectivas desde las tradiciones discursivas. Madrid/Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
(Ed (2016) Lingüística de corpus y lingüística histórica iberorrománica. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalkhoff, A. M.
(2015) Co-constructions syntaxiques du dialogue en français, espagnol et allemand parlés. In S. Diao-Klaeger, & B. Thörle (Eds.), Linguistique interactionnelle contrastive : Grammaire et interaction dans les langues romanes (pp. 95–106). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, G.
(2010) Comment clauses as constructions. Vienna English Working Papers, 19(1–2), 21–46.Google Scholar
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J.
(1999) Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language, 75, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, P.
(1997) Diskurstraditionen: Zu ihrem sprachtheoretischen Status und ihrer Dynamik. In B. Frank (Ed.), Gattungen mittelalterlicher Schriftlichkeit (pp. 43–79). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
(2012) Es gibt keine Konstruktionsbedeutung ohne Bedeutungswandel. Valenz – Konstruktion – Diachronie. In S. Dörr, & T. Städtler (Eds.), Ki bien voldreit raisun entendre. Mélanges en l’honneur du 70e anniversaire de Frankwalt Möhren (pp. 147–174). Strasbourg: Éditions de linguistique et de philologie.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legallois, D., & Patard, A.
(Eds (2017) Les constructions comme unités de la langue : illustrations, évaluation, critique. Numéro spécial de Langue Française, 194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C.
(1982) Thoughts on grammaticalization. A programmatic sketch. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, M. A., & E. Montolío Durán
(Eds (1998) Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Martínez Vázquez, M.
(Ed (2003) Gramática de construcciones. Contrastes entre el inglés y el español. Huelva: Grupo de Gramática Contrastiva.Google Scholar
Masini, F.
(2009) Phrasal lexemes, compounds and phrases: a constructionist perspective. Word Structure, 2, 254–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a) Grammatica delle Costruzioni. Un’introduzione. Roma: Carocci editore.Google Scholar
(2016b) Binominal constructions in Italian of the N1-di-N2 type: Towards a typology of Light Noun Constructions. Language Sciences, 53, 99–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Competition between morphological words and multiword expressions. In F. Rainer, F. Gardani, W. U. Dressler, & H. C. Luschützky (Eds.), Competition in inflection and word-formation (pp. 281–305). Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, A.
(1948 [1912]) L’évolution des formes grammaticales. In A. Meillet (Ed.), Linguistique historique et linguistique générale (pp. 130–148). Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Melis, C., & Flores, M.
(2012) Emergence and grammaticalization of constructions within the se me network of Spanish. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and language change. New reflections (pp. 249–270). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellado Blanco, C.
(2015) El valor de ‘construcción’ de los somatismos reflexivos de daño físico en alemán y la búsqueda de equivalencias en español. In R. S. Monteiro Plantin (Ed.), Certas Palavras não Leva o Vento (pp. 85–108). Fortaleza: Parole.Google Scholar
(2019) Phrasem-Konstruktionen kontrastiv Deutsch-Spanisch: Ein korpusbasiertes Beschreibungsmodell anhand ironischer Vergleiche. Yearbook of Phraseology, 10, 65–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Esquemas fraseológicos y construcciones fraseológicas en el contínuum léxico-gramática. In E. Tabares, C. Sinner, & E. T. Montoro (Eds.), Clases y categorías en la fraseología de la lengua española (pp. 13–36). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mellado Blanco, C., & Gutiérrez Rubio, E.
(Eds (2020) Gramática de construcciones y fraseología en las lenguas románicas. Thematic issue of Romanica Olomucensia, 32(1), [URL] [20/12/2022].Google Scholar
Mellado Blanco, C., & Iglesias Iglesias, N. M.
(2011) Significado y análisis de corpus en la fraseografía bilingüe español-alemán. In S. Roiss, C. Fortea Gil, Á. Recio Ariza, B. Santana López, P. Zimmermann, & I. Holl (Eds.), En las vertientes de la traducción e interpretación del/al alemán (pp. 119–133). Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Mellado Blanco, C., & López Meirama, B.
(2019) Entre miradas de asombro: aportaciones de la Lingüística de Corpus al estudio de una construcción con la preposición entre. In M. Blanco Domínguez, H. Olbertz, & V. Vázquez Rozas (Eds.), Corpus y construcciones: perspectivas hispánicas (pp. 81–120). Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Mellado Blanco, C., Mollica, F., & Schafroth, E.
(Eds (2022) Konstruktionen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik: Phrasem-Konstruktionen monolingual, bilingual und multilingual. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miranda, N. S., & Salomão, M. M.
(2009) Construções do Português do Brasil: da Gramática ao Discurso. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Octavio de Toledo y Huerta, Á. S.
(2018) ¿Tradiciones discursivas o tradicionalidad? ¿Gramaticalización o sintactización? Difusión y declive de las construcciones modales con infinitivo antepuesto. In J. L. Girón Alconchel, F. J. Herrero Ruiz de Loizaga, & D. M. Sáez Rivera (Eds.), Procesos de textualización y gramaticalización en la historia del español (pp. 79–134). Madrid/Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oesterreicher, W.
(2003) Sprachwandel – Corpusbefunde, Sprachregeln, kognitive Konstanten. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 53, 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) La historicidad del lenguaje: Variación, diversidad y cambio lingüístico. In J. J. de Bustos Tovar, & J. L. Girón Alconchel (Eds.), Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española. Madrid, 29 de septiembre-3 de octubre de 2003 (pp. 137–158). Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid/Arco/Asociación de Historia de la Lengua Española.Google Scholar
Östman, J. -O.
(2005) Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In J. -O. Östman, & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars. Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 121–144). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) From Construction Grammar to construction discourse … and back. In J. Bücker, S. Günthner, & W. Imo (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik V. Konstruktionen im Spannungsfeld von sequenziellen Mustern, kommunikativen Gattungen und Textsorten (pp. 15–43). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Perek, F.
(2015) Argument structure in usage-based Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portolés, J.
(1998): Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Quochi, V.
(2016): Development and representation of Italian light-fare constructions. In J. Yoon, & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to Construction Grammar (pp. 39–64). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Ramalle, T. M.
(2008a) Estudio sintáctico y discursivo de algunas estructuras enunciativas y citativas del español. Revista española de lingüística aplicada, 21, 269–288.Google Scholar
(2008b) Marcas enunciativas y evidenciales en el discurso periodístico. In I. Olza, M. Casado Velarde, & R. González Ruiz (Eds.), Actas del XXXVII Simposio de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (SEL) (pp. 735–744). Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
Rothe, W.
(1967) Strukturen des Konjunktivs im Französischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schemann, H., Mellado Blanco, C., Buján, P., Iglesias Iglesias, N., Larreta, J. P., & Mansilla, A.
(2013) Idiomatik Deutsch-Spanisch. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. -J.
(2020) The dynamics of the linguistic system. Usage, conventionalization and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selig, M., Morlicchio, E., & Dittmar, N.
(Eds (2016) Gesprächsanalyse zwischen Syntax und Pragmatik. Deutsche und italienische Konstruktionen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Sommerer, L., & Smirnova, E.
(Eds (2020) Nodes and networks in diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steyer, K.
(Ed (2018) Sprachliche Verfestigung. Wortverbindungen, Muster, Phrasem-Konstruktionen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(2003) Constructions in grammaticalization. In B. Joseph, & R. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 624–647). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Modeling language change with constructional networks. In S. Pons Bordería, & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), Beyond grammaticalization and discourse markers. New issues in the study of language change (pp. 17–50). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, G.
(2008) Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the English impersonal construction. In S. M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Minkova (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV. Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change (pp. 301–326). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela Manzanares, J., & Rojo López, A. M.
(2008) What can language learners tell us about constructions? In S. De Knop, & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar. Volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 197–229). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wandruszka, U.
(2000) Über die Bedeutung des romanischen Konjunktivs und die Geburt des Nebensatzes. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 116(1), 56–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiesinger, E.
(2020) ¿Esto se echa para atrás? Aproximación a los verbos sintagmáticos en el español peninsular a base de un estudio de corpus de [V para atrás]. In C. Mellado Blanco, & E. Gutiérrez Rubio (Eds.), Gramática de construcciones y fraseología en las lenguas románicas. Thematic issue of Romanica Olomucensia, 32(1), 201–230, [URL] [20/12/2022].
(2021a) Verb-particle constructions in Spanish. An extended usage-based and cognitively oriented Construction Grammar framework. Habilitation thesis, University of Regensburg.
(2021b) The Spanish verb-particle construction [V para atrás]: Disentangling constructional contact and change. In H. C. Boas, & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions in Contact 2: Language change, multilingual practices, and additional language acquisition (pp. 140–187). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in prep.). Einführung in die Konstruktiongrammatik für RomanistInnen. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Ziem, A.
(2015) Desiderata und Perspektiven einer ‘Social Construction Grammar’. In A. Ziem, & A. Lasch (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik IV. Konstruktionen als soziale Konventionen und kognitive Routinen (pp. 1–12). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
(2018) Construction Grammar meets Phraseology: eine Standortbestimmung. Linguistik online, 90(3), [URL] [20/12/2022]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziem, A., & Lasch, A.
(2013) Konstruktionsgrammatik. Konzepte und Grundlagen gebrauchsbasierter Ansätze. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zuloaga, A.
(1980) Introducción al estudio de las expresiones fijas. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar