3. Language change, variability, and functional load: Finnish genericity from a constructional point of view

Cited by 8 other publications

Boas, Hans C. & Francisco Gonzálvez-García

2014. Chapter 1. Applying constructional concepts to Romance languages. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 1 ff.

Haas, Florian

2018. “You can’t control a thing like that”. In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 85], ► pp. 171 ff.

Höder, Steffen

2014. Phonological elements and Diasystematic Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 6:2 ► pp. 202 ff.

Höder, Steffen

2014. Constructing diasystems: Grammatical organisation in bilingual groups. In The Sociolinguistics of Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 154], ► pp. 137 ff.

Jensen, Torben Juel & Frans Gregersen

2022. What do(es) you mean? the pragmatics of generic second person pronouns in modern spoken Danish. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 417 ff.

Nyqvist, Eeva-Liisa & Therese Lindström Tiedemann

2023. Svenska generiska pronomen hos finska språkbadselever. En jämförelse mellan två årskurser. Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia 33 ► pp. 14 ff.

Varjo, Mikael & Karita Suomalainen

2018. From zero to ‘you’ and back: A mixed methods study comparing the use of two open personal constructions in Finnish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41:3 ► pp. 333 ff.

Östman, Jan-Ola

2018. Constructions as cross-linguistic generalizations over instances. In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24], ► pp. 181 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.