Germanic Future Constructions
A usage-based approach to language change
| Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies
This study offers a Construction Grammar approach to the historical development and modern usage of future constructions in English, German, Dutch, Danish, and Swedish. On the basis of corpus data, constructions such as English be going to or German werden are analyzed as symbolic units that convey a range of temporal and modal meanings. A special focus lies on the main verbs that occur with these constructions. Statistical co-occurrence patterns between constructions and lexical items guide the semantic analyses in this study: It is argued that a construction that conventionally occurs with main verbs such as write or speak differs functionally from a construction that typically occurs with verbs such as rain or increase. The same approach is also applied historically: If a construction co-occurs with different main verbs at subsequent stages in time, this is seen as a sign of semantic change.
[Constructional Approaches to Language, 7] 2008. ix, 205 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgments
|
ix
|
|
Chapter 1. Introduction
|
1–12
|
|
Chapter 2. Theory and methodology
|
13–48
|
|
Chapter 3. Comparing future constructions in a single language
|
49–87
|
|
Chapter 4. Cross-linguistic comparisons
|
89–123
|
|
Chapter 5. Collexemes and grammaticalization paths
|
125–155
|
|
Chapter 6. The futurate present
|
157–179
|
|
Chapter 7. Conclusions
|
181–186
|
|
References
|
187–195
|
|
Notes
|
197–201
|
|
Index
|
203–205
|
“[...] a new approach to a well-studies phenomenon that offers many new insights into grammaticalization of future constructions. The combination of corpus linguistic methods and construction grammar theory thus is an approach that holds great potential for grammaticalization studies in general, and it can only be hoped that this approach is applied to many other phenomena in the near future.”
Thomas Hoffmann, University of Regensburg, on eLanguage, July 2010
“[...] Its strength is undoubtedly grounded in a superb handling of corpus linguistics, the presentation of a well-founded point of departure, impressive proposals to account for the manny illuminating findings, and - last but not least - in Hilpert's constant, nevertheless highly relevant appeal to the clustering of the synchronic and diachronic dimension of linguistic data.”
Wolfgang Schulze, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, in Cognitive Linguistics, October 2010
“[...] valuable insights into the mechanism of grammatical change based on a new, promising method of linguistic analysis [...] I hope that the methodology described in the book will become a standard tool for students of grammatical meaning and grammatical change.”
Bernd Heine, Universität zu Köln, in Studies in Language Vil. 33:3 (2009).
“Situated at the crossroads of construction grammar, historical linguistics and comparative/contrastive linguistics, Hilpert's monograph is especially noteworthy because it extends the range of research topics dealt with so far from synchronic, particularist studies (of primarily present-day English) to diachronic, comparative ones (of various Germanic languages) and thus adds important new facets to the agenda of cognitively oriented and empirically minded construction grammar as wel as to its existing inventory of corpus methods.”
Beate Hampe, Erfurt University, in the Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics Vol. 7 (2009).
Cited by
Cited by 69 other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157],
No author info given
2017.
In Pivotal Constructions in Chinese [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 8],
Anishchanka, Alena V. & Weiwei Zhang
2012. Review of Philip (2011): Colouring Meaning: Collocation and Connotation in Figurative Language.
Metaphor and the Social World 2:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Bernolet, Sarah & Timothy Colleman
2016.
In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19],
► pp. 165 ff.
Boas, Hans C. & Francisco Gonzálvez-García
2014.
In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15],
► pp. 1 ff.
Bochnak, M. Ryan
2019. Future reference with and without future marking.
Language and Linguistics Compass 13:1 ► pp. e12307 ff.
BREMS, LIESELOTTE
2010. Size noun constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: lexical and grammaticalized uses.
English Language and Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Budts, Sara & Peter Petré
2020.
In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],
► pp. 318 ff.
Buerki, Andreas
2020.
In Formulaic Language and Linguistic Change,
Cappelle, Bert & Ilse Depraetere
2016. Modal meaning in Construction Grammar.
Constructions and Frames 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Cappelle, Bert & Ilse Depraetere
2016. Short-circuited interpretations of modal verb constructions.
Constructions and Frames 8:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Coussé, Evie
2014. Lexical expansion in the HAVE and BE perfect in Dutch.
Diachronica 31:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Coussé, Evie
2018.
In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20],
► pp. 93 ff.
Culicover, Peter W.
2017. Syntactic Change in the Parallel Architecture: The Case of Parasitic Gaps.
Cognitive Science 41 ► pp. 213 ff.
Daugs, Robert
2020.
In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216],
► pp. 17 ff.
Davidse, Kristin & Hendrik De Smet
2020.
In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics,
► pp. 211 ff.
Enghels, Renata & Marie Comer
2018.
In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],
► pp. 107 ff.
Enghels, Renata & Marie Comer
2020.
In Changes in Meaning and Function [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 25],
► pp. 22 ff.
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis, Eliese-Sophia Lincke, Kiki Nikiforidou & Anna Piata
2020. On the polysemy of motion verbs in Ancient Greek and Coptic.
Studies in Language 44:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Ghafar Samar, Reza & Tej Bhatia
2017. The future of ‘future’.
Asia-Pacific Language Variation 3:2 ► pp. 130 ff.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2018.
In Speaking in a Second Language [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 17],
► pp. 127 ff.
Glynn, Dylan
2011. Review of Gaëtanelle Gilquin. Corpus, cognition and causative constructions. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010, xvii + 326 pp., ISBN: 9789027223135..
Language and Cognition 3:2 ► pp. 331 ff.
Glynn, Dylan
2014.
In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43],
► pp. 307 ff.
GRIES, STEFAN TH. & MARTIN HILPERT
2010. Modeling diachronic change in the third person singular: a multifactorial, verb- and author-specific exploratory approach.
English Language and Linguistics 14:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis
2014. On the pragmatics of subjectification: The grammaticalization of verbless allative futures (with a case study in Ancient Egyptian).
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Hartmann, Stefan
2021. Diachronie der Zukunft.
Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 143:3 ► pp. 364 ff.
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Fang Wu
2020. Where do demonstratives come from?.
STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3 ► pp. 403 ff.
Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog & Haiping Long
2016. Constructional change vs. grammaticalization.
Studies in Language 40:1 ► pp. 137 ff.
Herbst, Thomas
2020. Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language.
Constructions and Frames 12:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
Hilpert, Martin
2015. Hendrik De Smet, Spreading Patterns. Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation
.
English Text Construction 8:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
Hilpert, Martin
2016. Change in modal meanings.
Constructions and Frames 8:1 ► pp. 66 ff.
Hilpert, Martin
2020.
In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96],
► pp. 3 ff.
Hirschmann, Hagen, Anke Lüdeling & Amir Zeldes
2012. Measuring and coding language change.
Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Höder, Steffen
2014.
In The Sociolinguistics of Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 154],
► pp. 137 ff.
Höder, Steffen
2014. Phonological elements and Diasystematic Construction Grammar.
Constructions and Frames 6:2 ► pp. 202 ff.
Johnson, Cynthia A., Peter Alexander Kerkhof, Leonid Kulikov, Esther Le Mair & Jóhanna Barðdal
2019. Argument structure, conceptual metaphor and semantic change.
Diachronica 36:4 ► pp. 463 ff.
Kapatsinski, Vsevolod
2018.
In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4],
► pp. 547 ff.
Kinn, Torodd
2018.
In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],
► pp. 75 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.
In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Li, Yanzhi & Yicheng Wu
2018. The constructionalization and constructional change of noncanonical V-NP expressions in Mandarin
Chinese.
Studies in Language 42:4 ► pp. 886 ff.
Liang, Shichen, Jianyu Zheng, Xuemei Tang, Renfen Hu & Zhiying Liu
2019.
In 2019 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP),
► pp. 267 ff.
Lyngfelt, Benjamin, Tiago Timponi Torrent, Adrieli Laviola, Linnéa Bäckström, Anna Helga Hannesdóttir & Ely Edison da Silva Matos
2018.
In Constructicography [Constructional Approaches to Language, 22],
► pp. 255 ff.
Mousavi, S. Hamzeh & Mohammad Amouzadeh
2020. ‘I hear the smell of roses’.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 397 ff.
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2009.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Pedersen, Johan
2019. Verb-based vs. schema-based constructions and their variability: On the Spanish transitive directed-motion construction in a contrastive perspective
.
Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 473 ff.
Perek, Florent & Martin Hilpert
2017. A distributional semantic approach to the periodization of change in the productivity of constructions.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:4 ► pp. 490 ff.
Petersen, Hjalmar P.
2011. The convergence process between Faroese and Faro-Danish.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 34:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
PETRÉ, PETER
2010. The functions of weorðan and its loss in the past tense in Old and Middle English.
English Language and Linguistics 14:3 ► pp. 457 ff.
PETRÉ, PETER
2016. Grammaticalization by changing co-text frequencies, or why [BE Ving] became the ‘progressive’.
English Language and Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Petré, Peter
2016. Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation.
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30 ► pp. 115 ff.
Rosemeyer, Malte & Mar Garachana
2019. De la consecución a la contraexpectación: la construccionalización de lograr/conseguir + infinitivo
.
Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 383 ff.
Schneider, Agnes
2016.
In New Approaches to English Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 177],
► pp. 141 ff.
Schulze, Rainer & Pascal Hohaus
2020.
In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216],
► pp. 1 ff.
Sun, Linlin & David Correia Saavedra
2020. Measuring grammatical status in Chinese through quantitative corpus analysis.
Corpora 15:3 ► pp. 317 ff.
TAGLIAMONTE, SALI A., MERCEDES DURHAM & JENNIFER SMITH
2014. Grammaticalization at an early stage: futurebe going toin conservative British dialects.
English Language and Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Talavira, Nataliia
2017. English orientating constructions denoting location: classification and article use.
Lingua Posnaniensis 59:2 ► pp. 101 ff.
Talavira, Nataliia, T. Andrienko, S. Potapenko & L. Slavova
2021. Constructionist basis of composing and translating political speeches: A case study of President Trump’s inaugural address.
SHS Web of Conferences 105 ► pp. 03006 ff.
Tang, Xuri
2021. How metaphoremes emerge.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 80 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2012. Geoffrey Leech, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair and Nicholas Smith, Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. xxviii + 341. ISBN 978-0-521-86722-I..
English Language and Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 183 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2015.
In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 18],
► pp. 51 ff.
TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH CLOSS
2017. ‘Insubordination’ in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle.
English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2014. Contentful constructionalization.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 4:2 ► pp. 256 ff.
Trousdale, Graeme
2008. A constructional approach to lexicalization processes in the history of English: Evidence from possessive constructions.
Word Structure 1:2 ► pp. 156 ff.
Trousdale, Graeme
2016. Response to Wärnsby.
Constructions and Frames 8:1 ► pp. 54 ff.
Wang, Huiping & Luyao Wang
2021.
In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12278],
► pp. 747 ff.
Wiliński, Jarosław
2017.
On the brink of-Noun Vs. On the verge of-noun: a distinctive-collexeme analysis.
Research in Language 15:4 ► pp. 425 ff.
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019.
In Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax,
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2015. The constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction.
Studies in Language 39:2 ► pp. 459 ff.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020. A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of
constructionalization.
Diachronica 37:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General