The case of Action Research drives a wedge between two opposite views of research methodology: an 'exclusive ' (Platonic/theoretical) one which insists that only objective and quantitative inquiries (as in physics) are genuine scientific research, and an 'inclusive ' (Aristotelian/practical) one that recognizes a need to adapt the research methods of different inquiries to the nature of their problems. The latter approach involves seeing issues of methodology as dependent on half-a-dozen contextual factors, which are crucial to Action Research, yet which the former approach ignores.
2021. Contextualizing Action Research. In Promoting Qualitative Research Methods for Critical Reflection and Change [Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management, ], ► pp. 79 ff.
Blythe, Stuart, Jeffrey T. Grabill & Kirk Riley
2008. Action Research and Wicked Environmental Problems. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 22:3 ► pp. 272 ff.
Ennals, Richard
1997. The new organisation of work: Building coalitions. AI & Society 11:1-2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Grasselli, Nóra Ilona
2009. Lehet akciókutatásból doktorálni? – Eszményképek kontra valóság. Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review► pp. 65 ff.
Helskog, Guro Hansen
2014. Justifying action research. Educational Action Research 22:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Jönsson, Sten & Kari Lukka
2006. There and Back Again: Doing Interventionist Research in Management Accounting [Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 1], ► pp. 373 ff.
Robert MacIntosh & Eikeland, Olav
2007. From epistemology to gnoseology – understanding the knowledge claims of action research. Management Research News 30:5 ► pp. 344 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.