Chapter 7
Interrogatives in surprise contexts in English
Verbal reactions to surprising situations or surprising information often include interrogative structures rather than exclamatives, contrary to what is assumed in traditional grammars. In such contexts, interrogatives combine requests for information and the expression of surprise (possibly associated with other emotions). Based on enacted data drawn from film scripts, our claim is that different (more or less canonical) forms of interrogatives imply varying levels of cognitive integration: clarification requests, ordinary (non-inferential) questions and inferential questions are on a continuum from less to more cognitively integrated information. Different forms of interrogatives may thus correspond to different speaker-addressee relations and pragmatic patterns. The overall frequency of interrogatives and variety of forms and patterns used may reflect the fact that surprise is more cognitive than other emotions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Questions, speech acts and mirativity
- 2.1Questions and speech acts: The standard view and a refinement
- 2.2Surprise-related interrogatives and mirativity
- 3.Clarification requests
- 4.Ordinary questions
- 5.Inferential questions
- 6.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgments
-
Notes
-
References
-
Tools
-
Corpus data
References (45)
References
Beyssade, C., & Marandin, J.-M. (2009). Commitment: une attitude dialogique. Langue française, 162, 89–107.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, J., Peterson, T., & Craig, K. (2016). Belief, evidence, and interactional meaning in Urama. Oceanic Linguistics, 55 (2): 432–448.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caponigro, Ivano and Jon Sprouse. (2007). Rhetorical questions as questions. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, Barcelona, 121–133.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Celle, A. (2009). Question, mise en question: la traduction de l’interrogation dans le discours théorique. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée XIV/1: 39–52.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Celle, A. (2018) Questions as indirect speech acts. In Ayoun D., A. Celle & L. Lansari (Eds.), Tense, aspect, modality, evidentiality: crosslinguistic perspectives. (p. 213–238) Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Celle, A., Jugnet, A., Lansari, L., & L’Hôte E. (2017). Expressing and Describing Surprise. In A. Celle & L. Lansari (Eds.), Expressing and Describing surprise (p. 215–244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Celle, A., & Lansari, L. (2009). La référence à l’avenir en anglais contemporain: vers une énonciation médiatisée. Faits de langue, 33, Le futur, 103–110.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Celle, A., & Lansari, L. (2016). L’inattendu et le questionnement dans l’interaction verbale en anglais: les questions en why-would et leurs réponses. In O. Galatanu, A.-M. Cozma & A. Bellachhab (Eds.), Représentations du sens linguistique: les interfaces de la complexité (pp. 235–248). Bruxelles: P.I.E. Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, S. (1997). Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33–52.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, S. (2001). The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 369–382.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, J. (2007). The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedman, V. (2003). Evidentiality in the Balkans with special attention to Macedonian and Albanian. In Aikhenvald A. & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in Evidentiality (pp. 189–218). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ginzburg, J., & Sag, I. (2001). Interrogative Investigations. Stanford: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ginzburg, J. (2012). The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greed, T. (2014). The expression of knowledge in Tatar. In Aikhenvald, A. & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds), The Grammar of Knowledge, A Cross-Linguistic Typology (pp. 69–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guentchéva, Z. (2017). An enunciative account of admirativity in Bulgarian. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, Special Issue, The Linguistic Expression of Mirativity, 15/2: 540–575.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gunlogson, C. A. (2002). Declarative Questions. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XII (pp. 124–143). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage J. (2012). Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1): 1–29.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Higginbotham, J. (1996). The Semantics of Questions. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, R. (1994). The contrast between interrogatives and questions. Journal of Linguistics 30, 411–439.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. (1999). Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75(1): 1–33.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendrick, K. H. (2015). Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics 1, 164–190.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LaPolla, R. J. (2016). On categorization: Stick to the facts of the languages. Linguistic Typology: 20(2): 365–375.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Littell, P., Matthewson, L. & Peterson T. (2010). On the Semantics of Conjectural Questions. In T. Peterson & U. Sauerland (Eds.), Evidence from Evidentials (pp. 89–104). University of British Columbia: Working Papers in Linguistics (UBCWPL).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthewson, L. (2011). On apparently non-modal evidentials. In O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (Eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8, pp. 333–357.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, W. U., Reisenzein R. and A. Schützwohl. (1997). Toward a Process Analysis of Emotions: The Case of Surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21/3: 251–274.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miceli, M. & C. Castelfranchi. (2015). Expectancy and Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noh, E. J. (1998). Echo Questions: Metarepresentation and Pragmatic Enrichment. Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 603–628.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olbertz, H. (2012). The place of exclamatives and miratives in grammar: a functional discourse grammar view. Revista LinguíStica /Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Volume 8/1: 76–98.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pesetsky D. (1987). “Wh-in-Situ: movement and unselective binding”. In Reuland E., ter Meulen A. (Eds.), The Representation of (in)Definiteness (pp. 98–129). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Purver, M., Ginzburg, J., & Healey, P. (2001). On the Means for Clarification in dialogue. Proceedings of the 2nd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and dialogue (pp. 116–125). Aalborg, Denmark: Association for Computational Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peterson, T. (2017). Grammatical evidentiality and the unprepared mind. In Celle A. & L. Lansari (Eds.), Expressing and Describing Surprise. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 51–89.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierrehumbert, J. and J. Hirschberg. (1990). The meaning of intonation contours in the interpretation of discourse. In: Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J., Pollack, M. E. (Eds.), Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 271–312.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reisenzein, R. (2000). Exploring the Strength of Association between the Components of Emotion Syndromes: The Case of Surprise. Cognition and Emotion 14/1: 1–38.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rett, J. (2011). Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 34:411–442.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Riou, M. (2015). The Grammar of Topic Transition in American English Conversation, Topic transition design and management in typical and atypical conversations (schizophrenia), PhD Dissertation, Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
San Roque, L., S. Floyd, E. Norcliffe. (2017). Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua, 186–187, 120–143. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scherer, K., E. Clark-Polner, M. Mortillaro. (2011). In the eye of the beholder? Universality and cultural specificity in the expression and perception of emotion. International Journal of Psychology, 46(6): 401–435.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siemund P. (2017). Interrogative clauses in English and the social economics of questions. Journal of Pragmatics 199, 15–32. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soriano, C., Fontaine, J. R. J. & Scherer, K. R. (2017). Surprise in the GRID. In Celle A. & L. Lansari (Eds.), Expressing and Describing Surprise (pp. 173–196). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stein, N. L. & Hernandez, M. W. (2007). Assessing Understanding and Appraisals During Emotional Experience. J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment (pp. 298–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stivers, T. (2010). An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10): 2620–2626.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zanuttini, Raffaella, and Paul Portner. (2003). Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1):39–81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tools
Antoine Widlöcher, Yann Mathet. The Glozz platform: a corpus annotation and mining tool. Concolato, Cyril and Schmitz, Patrick. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (DocEng’12), Sep 2012, Paris, France. pp.171–180, 2012.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corpus data
Jörg Tiedemann, 2009, News from OPUS – A Collection of Multilingual Parallel Corpora with Tools and Interfaces. In N. Nicolov and K. Bontcheva and G. Angelova and R. Mitkov (eds.), Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (vol V), pages 237–248, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
ITUARTE, AITOR LIZARDI
2022.
Clause type vs speech act: Knowledge confirmation questions in Basque.
Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Trotzke, Andreas & Anna Czypionka
2022.
The pragmatics of surprise-disapproval questions: An empirical study.
Linguistics Vanguard 8:s2
► pp. 239 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.