Taking the feminist ethics of care and Taylor’s philosophy of the self as a point of departure, I pose the question whether emotions, as they postulate it, can be assumed to be “authentic” and in that capacity provide moral guidance. Relying on well-known sociological texts by Arlie Hochschild, Norbert Elias and Eva Illouz, I show that the violence-monopolizing nation-state along with the capitalist system of production and consumption have worked together to make us abandon, suppress, marginalize and modify what we possibly could refer to as “authentic” emotions. As a result, our emotional lives, if still open to “authentic” feelings at all, hang suspended between these and the cultural codes and rules prescribing what we should feel. Put even stronger, emotional ambivalence or schizophrenia is a typical phenomenon of our times, and thus emotions cannot be constitutive of our morals. I also point out that what Jaggar calls recalcitrant (and I call subversive) emotions are as constructed as conformist emotions. Taking side with Jaggar against Taylor, I suggest that the emancipatory potential of the (constructed) subversive emotions should be measured against the standard of human rights, rather than, as Taylor argues, in terms of everyday moral concerns.
2016. Conclusion. In Angry Abolitionists and the Rhetoric of Slavery, ► pp. 243 ff.
Ismer, Sven
2014. Von der imaginierten zur emotional erlebten Nation: Partizipation und Verschmelzung in der Fußballberichterstattung. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 39:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
Terpe, Sylvia
2013. Steven L. Gordon: Social Structural Effects on Emotions. In Hauptwerke der Emotionssoziologie, ► pp. 149 ff.
Terpe, Sylvia
2022. Steven L. Gordon: Social Structural Effects on Emotions. In Schlüsselwerke der Emotionssoziologie, ► pp. 223 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.