Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage

A methodological analysis of theory and research

| VU University Amsterdam
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027238979 | EUR 110.00 | USD 165.00
 
PaperbackAvailable
ISBN 9789027239013 | EUR 36.00 | USD 54.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027291851 | EUR 110.00/36.00*
| USD 165.00/54.00*
 
Cognitive linguists have proposed that metaphor is not just a matter of language but of thought, and that metaphorical thought displays a high degree of conventionalization. In order to produce converging evidence for this theory of metaphor, a wide range of data is currently being studied with a large array of methods and techniques. Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage aims to map the field of this development in theory and research from a methodological perspective. It raises the question when exactly evidence for metaphor in language and thought can be said to count as converging. It also goes into the various stages of producing such evidence (conceptualization, operationalization, data collection and analysis, and interpretation). The book offers systematic discussion of eight distinct areas of metaphor research that emerge as a result of approaching metaphor as part of grammar or usage, language or thought, and symbolic structure or cognitive process.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“The level of detail and the attempts to cut through the almost impenetrable tangle of terms and assumptions in recent metaphor research mean that this is going to be an important book for researchers from all traditions. Steen’s desire that metaphor research should be transparent, consistent and replicable is to be commended. The book will be much cited.”
“This volume is a must-have for anyone interested in metaphor research. It offers authoritative, up-to-date coverage of theory and research on metaphor, while preserving a rich, usage-based perspective. It covers the major theories of metaphor, including conceptual metaphor, blending, structure-mapping and categorization-based approaches, and does so in a clear, highly readable fashion. A particularly valuable feature for instructors and students is a set of tables in which Steen systematizes and compares positions and predictions across the major theories of metaphor.”
“Reading of this monograph will leave no doubt as to the fact that the author was able to present his claims in a systematic and efficient manner. The architecture of the book consequently builds its arguments, the coverage of the field (albeit restricted to just one approach, cognitive linguistics) is most comprehensive, the conclusions are logically driven and clearly stated. This book is an important step in increasing the level of methodological rigor in metaphor research, and, more broadly, in cognitive linguistics. With this excellent book cognitive linguistics becomes more methodologically self-aware however in its level of formalization still remains far-apart from formal approaches.”
“Gerard Steen’s important and provocative book addresses the problem of how to reliably identify metaphors and adequately account for their symbolic and conceptual structure, as well as their production and comprehension. Steen’s research agenda is ambitious. He develops a multidimensional procedural approach to metaphor identification and description that, at each stage, is guided by transparent intersubjective verifiable principles. This monograph is a most welcome contribution to the study of metaphor. It is bound to stimulate discussion about the empirical validity of current conceptual metaphor theories.”
“Steen's detailed discussion of research into metaphor in language and thought is extremely timely in its tackling of methodological issues that have often been neglected in the excitement of rapid theoretical developments in the field. [...] For me, the complexity of the prose, both at the level of sentence and of argumentation, meant that the book is not an easy read- perhaps this is inevitable given the range of topics covered and the ambitious depth. However, this is a minor criticism of what is a significant contribution in the field, one that will form core reading for current and future researchers of metaphor.”
Cited by

Cited by 127 other publications

No author info given
2014.  In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], Crossref logo
No author info given
2015.  In Organizational Knowledge Dynamics [Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management, ],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2017.  In Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising [Figurative Thought and Language, 2], Crossref logo
No author info given
2018.  In Attention to Metaphor [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 7], Crossref logo
No author info given
2018.  In Event Structure Metaphors through the Body [Figurative Thought and Language, 4], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In Contested body: Metaphors of dominion in Romans 5–8 [HTS Religion & Society Series, 7], Crossref logo
No author info given
2022.  In Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 23], Crossref logo
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2018. Metaphoric moral framing and image-text relations in the op-ed genre. Information Design Journal 24:1  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
A'Beckett, Ludmilla
2014. Review of Cameron & Maslen (2010): Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. Metaphor and the Social World 4:1  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2014. The JOURNEY metaphor and moral political cognition. Pragmatics & Cognition 22:3  pp. 373 ff. Crossref logo
Aksan, Yeşim & Dilek Kantar
2008. No Wellness Feels Better than This Sickness: Love Metaphors from a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Metaphor and Symbol 23:4  pp. 262 ff. Crossref logo
Alemán, Araceli
2022. LITERALIZACIÓN DE LA METÁFORA VACUNA EN EL IMAGINARIO DISTÓPICO DE FERNANDA GARCÍA LAO. Perífrasis. Revista de Literatura, Teoría y Crítica 13:26  pp. 30 ff. Crossref logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017.  In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 152 ff. Crossref logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Pride. International Journal of Language and Culture 4:1  pp. 6 ff. Crossref logo
Barnabé, Aurélie
2013. De l’expérience kinesthésique à la structuration prépositionnelle du schème-image du chemin. Corela :11-1 Crossref logo
Beger, Anke
2015.  In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4],  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Brdar, Mario, Rita Brdar-Szabó & Benedikt Perak
2020.  In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],  pp. 46 ff. Crossref logo
Bruhn, Mark J.
2011. Harmonious Madness: The Poetics of Analogy at the Limits of Blending Theory. Poetics Today 32:4  pp. 619 ff. Crossref logo
Burgers, Christian, Margot van Mulken & Peter Jan Schellens
2011. Finding Irony: An Introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol 26:3  pp. 186 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Jun, Yuesheng Gu & Yanpei Liu
2012. Grid Service Concurrency Control Protocol. Journal of Networks 7:4 Crossref logo
Ciolăneanu, Roxana
2019.  In The Role of Language and Symbols in Promotional Strategies and Marketing Schemes [Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services, ],  pp. 193 ff. Crossref logo
Ciolăneanu, Roxana
2021.  In Handbook of Research on Translating Myth and Reality in Women Imagery Across Disciplines [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ],  pp. 64 ff. Crossref logo
David, Oana
2021.  In Give Constructions across Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 29],  pp. 25 ff. Crossref logo
Denroche, Charles
2018. Text metaphtonymy. Metaphor and the Social World 8:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla & Markus Egg
2020.  In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Dobrić, Nikola & Franzisca Weder
2016. Media conceptualizing illnesses – the case of the flu. Continuum 30:1  pp. 126 ff. Crossref logo
Dorst, Aletta G
2015. More or different metaphors in fiction? A quantitative cross-register comparison. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 24:1  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Dorst, Aletta G.
2011. Personification in discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures and communicative functions. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 20:2  pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo
Dorst, Aletta G.
2021.  In Analysing Religious Discourse,  pp. 235 ff. Crossref logo
Dunn, Jonathan
2010. Gradient Semantic Intuitions of Metaphoric Expressions. Metaphor and Symbol 26:1  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Dunn, Jonathan
2015. Three Types of Metaphoric Utterances That Can Synthesize Theories of Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 30:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Díaz-Peralta, Marina
2018. Metaphor and ideology: Conceptual structure and conceptual content in Spanish political discourse. Discourse & Communication 12:2  pp. 128 ff. Crossref logo
Egan, Thomas
2013. Review of Brdar, Gries & Fuchs (2011): Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion. Functions of Language 20:2  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
Falck, Marlene Johansson
2010. Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic Viewby Cornelia Müller. Metaphor and Symbol 25:2  pp. 114 ff. Crossref logo
Ferentzy, Peter & Nigel E. Turner
2012. Morals, medicine, metaphors, and the history of the disease model of problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues :27 Crossref logo
Ferentzy, Peter & Nigel E. Turner
2013.  In The History of Problem Gambling,  pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Forceville, Charles J.
2019. Andreas Musolff (2016), Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios . Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1  pp. 210 ff. Crossref logo
Gathigia, Moses Gatambuki, Daniel Ochieng Orwenjo & Ruth Wangeci Ndungu
2018. Foodsemic metaphors of love in Gĩkũyũ: Insights from cognitive semantics. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:2  pp. 341 ff. Crossref logo
Gentner, Dedre & Brian Bowdle
2008.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought,  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2011. Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes 48:8  pp. 529 ff. Crossref logo
Group, Pragglejaz
2007. MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Grujic, Tatjana
2020. Pristupi pojmovnoj metafori. Forum 2:1-2  pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
H. Smith, Thomas
2015.  In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4],  pp. 215 ff. Crossref logo
Hampl, Marek
2022. The use of the PATH and FORCE image schemas in Barack Obama’s counterterrorism discourse against ISIL. Critical Discourse Studies 19:3  pp. 274 ff. Crossref logo
Hart, Gwen
2015.  In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3],  pp. 265 ff. Crossref logo
Haught, Catrinel
2013. A Tale of Two Tropes: How Metaphor and Simile Differ. Metaphor and Symbol 28:4  pp. 254 ff. Crossref logo
Herrmann, J. Berenike & Tony Berber Sardinha
2015.  In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4],  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Hodiamont, Didier, Hans Hoeken & Margot van Mulken
2018.  In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18],  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Imperiale, Maria Grazia & Alison Phipps
2022. Cuts destroy, hurt, kill: a critical metaphor analysis of the response of UK academics to the UK overseas aid budget funding cuts. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 17:1  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
2010. Review of Gilquin (2010): Corpus, cognition and causative constructions. Studies in Language 34:4  pp. 922 ff. Crossref logo
Julich, Nina
2018.  In Sensory Perceptions in Language, Embodiment and Epistemology [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 42],  pp. 133 ff. Crossref logo
King, Daniel & Dedre Gentner
2022. Verb Metaphoric Extension Under Semantic Strain. Cognitive Science 46:5 Crossref logo
Kochańska, Agata & Iwona Kokorniak
2021. Introduction. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:1  pp. i ff. Crossref logo
Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona
2018. Address inversion in Swahili: Usage patterns, cognitive motivation and cultural factors . Cognitive Linguistics 29:3  pp. 545 ff. Crossref logo
Krisnawati, Ekaning
2014. Metaphors in Indonesian Soccer News. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:1 Crossref logo
Krisnawati, Ekaning, Heriyanto Darsono, Rosaria Mita Amalia, Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna & Kasno Pamungkas
2021. Metaphors in Indonesian Nature Tourism Discourse: Disclosing Cognition about Nature. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 29:4  pp. 2469 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Hongying
2022. La traducción inglesa y española de la metáfora EL SER HUMANO ES UN ANIMAL en Wei cheng: un estudio contrastivo desde la perspectiva cognitiva. Estudios de Traducción 12  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther
2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7:2  pp. 215 ff. Crossref logo
Liljegren, Andreas
2012. Key Metaphors in the Sociology of Professions: Occupations as Hierarchies and Landscapes. Comparative Sociology 11:1  pp. 88 ff. Crossref logo
Littlemore, Jeannette, Phyllis Trautman Chen, Almut Koester & John Barnden
2011. Difficulties in Metaphor Comprehension Faced by International Students whose First Language is not English. Applied Linguistics 32:4  pp. 408 ff. Crossref logo
Low, Graham
2015.  In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3],  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Lu, Xiaofei & Ben Pin-Yun Wang
2017. Towards a metaphor-annotated corpus of Mandarin Chinese. Language Resources and Evaluation 51:3  pp. 663 ff. Crossref logo
Lynch, Heather Lynn & Teresa Renae Fisher-Ari
2018. What We Learned about Using Metaphors in College Teaching: Methods and Meanings. College Teaching 66:2  pp. 60 ff. Crossref logo
Manna, Raffaele, Antonio Pascucci, Maria Pia di Buono & Johanna Monti
2021.  In Formalising Natural Languages: Applications to Natural Language Processing and Digital Humanities [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1389],  pp. 123 ff. Crossref logo
Marhula, Joanna
2018. “It’s like herding butterflies”. Metaphor and the Social World 8:1  pp. 64 ff. Crossref logo
Marhula, Joanna & Maciej Rosiński
2019.  In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22],  pp. 184 ff. Crossref logo
Martin, Paul C.
2013. THE EXPLORATORY AND REFLECTIVE DOMAIN OF METAPHOR IN THE COMPARISON OF RELIGIONS. Zygon® 48:4  pp. 936 ff. Crossref logo
Meyers, Charlène
2019. Difficulties in Identifying and Translating Linguistic Metaphors: A Survey and Experiment among Translation Students. English Studies at NBU 5:2  pp. 308 ff. Crossref logo
Musolff, Andreas
2012. The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies 9:3  pp. 301 ff. Crossref logo
Musolff, Andreas
2015. Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1  pp. 41 ff. Crossref logo
Musolff, Andreas
2021.  In National Conceptualisations of the Body Politic [Cultural Linguistics, ],  pp. 51 ff. Crossref logo
Nacey, Susan, Tina Krennmayr, Aletta G. Dorst & W. Gudrun Reijnierse
2019.  In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22],  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Ntabo, Victor Ondara, Naom Moraa Nyarigoti & Moses Gatambuki Gathigia
2019. Interpreting the Human Being Metaphors in Ekegusii Pop Songs Using the Cognitive Semantics Framework . Issues in Language Studies 7:2  pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Onysko, Alexander
2016. Enhanced creativity in bilinguals? Evidence from meaning interpretations of novel compounds. International Journal of Bilingualism 20:3  pp. 315 ff. Crossref logo
Onysko, Alexander
2017. Conceptual metaphor variation in meaning interpretation. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:1  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Patterson, Katie J.
2016. The Analysis of Metaphor: To What Extent Can the Theory of Lexical Priming Help Our Understanding of Metaphor Usage and Comprehension?. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45:2  pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo
Philip, Gill
2016. Review of Miller & Monti (2014): Tradurre Figure / Translating Figurative Language. Metaphor and the Social World 6:1  pp. 156 ff. Crossref logo
Pihlaja, Stephen
2013. ‘It’s all red ink’: The interpretation of biblical metaphor among Evangelical Christian YouTube users. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 22:2  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Pinero-Pinero, Gracia, Marina Díaz-Peralta & María J. García-Domínguez
2014. Metaphors of Irregular Immigration in the Spanish Language Press in the United States. Studia Neophilologica 86:1  pp. 51 ff. Crossref logo
Plug, Leendert, Basil Sharrack & Markus Reuber
2011. Metaphors in the description of seizure experiences: Common expressions and differential diagnosis. Language and Cognition 3:2  pp. 209 ff. Crossref logo
Popova, Yanna
2010.  In The Encyclopedia of the Novel, Crossref logo
Price, Hazel & Jack Wilson
2019. Relevance theory and metaphor: An analysis of Tom Waits’ ‘Emotional Weather Report’. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:1  pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
RASSE, CARINA, ALEXANDER ONYSKO & FRANCESCA M. M. CITRON
2020. Conceptual metaphors in poetry interpretation: a psycholinguistic approach. Language and Cognition 12:2  pp. 310 ff. Crossref logo
Rasulić, Katarina
2017. A metaphor biangle. Metaphor and the Social World 7:1  pp. 130 ff. Crossref logo
Reda Ali Hassan, Mahmoud
2018. Pragmatic Investment of Figurative and Non-Figurative Designations: The Case of the Egyptian Revolution in Arabic and English Contexts. Journal of Universal Language 19:2  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
2018. DMIP: A Method for Identifying Potentially Deliberate Metaphor in Language Use. Corpus Pragmatics 2:2  pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
2018. On metaphorical views, dynamite, and doodlings. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2  pp. 431 ff. Crossref logo
Ritchie, L. David & Mariko Thomas
2015. A “bright blue ball”, “brushed with clouds” or “parched, scorched, and washed away”?. Metaphor and the Social World 5:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ritchie, L. David & Min Zhu
2015. “NixonStonewalledthe Investigation”: Potential Contributions of Grammatical Metaphor to Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Analysis. Metaphor and Symbol 30:2  pp. 118 ff. Crossref logo
Roldán-Riejos, Ana & Georgina Cuadrado
2015. Metaphor and Figurative Meaning Construction in Science and Technology (English and Spanish). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 212  pp. 271 ff. Crossref logo
Roldán-Riejos, Ana & Paloma Úbeda-Mansilla
2013. Análisis del uso de la metáfora en el contexto de la ingeniería . EDU REVIEW. International Education and Learning Review / Revista Internacional de Educación y Aprendizaje 1:1 Crossref logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Lorena Pérez Hernández
2011. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Myths, Developments and Challenges. Metaphor and Symbol 26:3  pp. 161 ff. Crossref logo
Schilperoord, Joost
2018.  In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18],  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Schmidt, Goran & Ivana Marinić
2016. Metaphor-based calques in Croatian mass media. ExELL 4:1  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Schröder, Ulrike
2015. Society and culture as container. International Journal of Language and Culture 2:1  pp. 38 ff. Crossref logo
Skorczynska, Hanna & Kathleen Ahrens
2015. A corpus-based study of metaphor signaling variations in three genres. Text & Talk 35:3 Crossref logo
Sokolova, Svetlana
2021. When three is company: The relation between aspect and metaphor in Russian aspectual triplets. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:1  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
Spooren, Wilbert
2018.  In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Steen, Gerard
2008. The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 23:4  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Steen, Gerard
2009.  In Metaphor and Discourse,  pp. 25 ff. Crossref logo
Steen, Gerard
2011. Metaphor, Language, and Discourse Processes. Discourse Processes 48:8  pp. 585 ff. Crossref logo
Steen, Gerard
2011. The language of knowledge management: A linguistic approach to metaphor analysis. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 28:2  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Steen, Gerard J.
2018.  In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18],  pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo
Stickles, Elise, Oana David, Ellen K. Dodge & Jisup Hong
2016. Formalizing contemporary conceptual metaphor theory. Constructions and Frames 8:2  pp. 166 ff. Crossref logo
Stockwell, Peter
2008. Review Article: The year's work in stylistics 2007. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 17:4  pp. 351 ff. Crossref logo
Strugielska, Ariadna
2015.  In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3],  pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo
Sullivan, Karen
2014. Visibility and economy as dimensions of metaphoric language. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 23:4  pp. 347 ff. Crossref logo
Tabbert, Ulrike
2016.  In Language and Crime,  pp. 157 ff. Crossref logo
Tang, Xuri, Weiguang Qu, Xiaohe Chen & Shiwen Yu
2010.  In 2010 International Conference on Asian Language Processing,  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Tay, Dennis
2012. Applying the Notion of Metaphor Types to Enhance Counseling Protocols. Journal of Counseling & Development 90:2  pp. 142 ff. Crossref logo
Tay, Dennis
2016. Metaphor and Psychological Transference. Metaphor and Symbol 31:1  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Thalhammer, Elmar J.
2015.  In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4],  pp. 101 ff. Crossref logo
Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel
2016. Refining the understanding of novel metaphor in specialised language discourse. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 22:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel & Pamela Faber
2010. Strategies for the Semi-Automatic Retrieval of Metaphorical Terms. Metaphor and Symbol 26:1  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
van Poppel, Lotte
2021. The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 35:1  pp. 177 ff. Crossref logo
van Weelden, Lisanne, Alfons Maes, Joost Schilperoord & Reinier Cozijn
2011. The Role of Shape in Comparing Objects: How Perceptual Similarity May Affect Visual Metaphor Processing. Metaphor and Symbol 26:4  pp. 272 ff. Crossref logo
van Weelden, Lisanne, Alfons Maes, Joost Schilperoord & Marc Swerts
2012. How Object Shape Affects Visual Metaphor Processing. Experimental Psychology 59:6  pp. 364 ff. Crossref logo
Van Weelden, Lisanne, Fons Maes & Joost Schilperoord
2018.  In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18],  pp. 147 ff. Crossref logo
Wan, Wan
2015.  In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3],  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Wan, Wan & Graham Low
2015.  In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Wan, Wan & Sarah Turner
2018. Applying metaphor analysis to academic literacy research. Metaphor and the Social World 8:2  pp. 286 ff. Crossref logo
Williams Camus, Julia T.
2015.  In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4],  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Wilson, Deirdre & Patricia Kolaiti
2017.  In Implicitness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 276],  pp. 147 ff. Crossref logo
Wyrwa, Anna
2019.  In Languages – Cultures – Worldviews,  pp. 293 ff. Crossref logo
Yilmaz, Seda & Selda Polat
2012. Metaphor Perceptions of Primary School Administrators and Teachers Towards the Instituon They Work for. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 55  pp. 669 ff. Crossref logo
Šipka, Danko
2019.  In Lexical Layers of Identity, Crossref logo
Šorm, Ester & Gerard J. Steen
2018.  In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18],  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2007037108 | Marc record