Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage

A methodological analysis of theory and research

Author
Gerard J. Steen | VU University Amsterdam
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027238979 | EUR 110.00 | USD 165.00
 
Paperback – Available
ISBN 9789027239013 | EUR 36.00 | USD 54.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027291851 | EUR 110.00/36.00*
| USD 165.00/54.00*
 
Google Play logo
Cognitive linguists have proposed that metaphor is not just a matter of language but of thought, and that metaphorical thought displays a high degree of conventionalization. In order to produce converging evidence for this theory of metaphor, a wide range of data is currently being studied with a large array of methods and techniques. Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage aims to map the field of this development in theory and research from a methodological perspective. It raises the question when exactly evidence for metaphor in language and thought can be said to count as converging. It also goes into the various stages of producing such evidence (conceptualization, operationalization, data collection and analysis, and interpretation). The book offers systematic discussion of eight distinct areas of metaphor research that emerge as a result of approaching metaphor as part of grammar or usage, language or thought, and symbolic structure or cognitive process.
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 10] 2007.  xvi, 430 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.10
Table of Contents
“The level of detail and the attempts to cut through the almost impenetrable tangle of terms and assumptions in recent metaphor research mean that this is going to be an important book for researchers from all traditions. Steen’s desire that metaphor research should be transparent, consistent and replicable is to be commended. The book will be much cited.”
“This volume is a must-have for anyone interested in metaphor research. It offers authoritative, up-to-date coverage of theory and research on metaphor, while preserving a rich, usage-based perspective. It covers the major theories of metaphor, including conceptual metaphor, blending, structure-mapping and categorization-based approaches, and does so in a clear, highly readable fashion. A particularly valuable feature for instructors and students is a set of tables in which Steen systematizes and compares positions and predictions across the major theories of metaphor.”
“Reading of this monograph will leave no doubt as to the fact that the author was able to present his claims in a systematic and efficient manner. The architecture of the book consequently builds its arguments, the coverage of the field (albeit restricted to just one approach, cognitive linguistics) is most comprehensive, the conclusions are logically driven and clearly stated. This book is an important step in increasing the level of methodological rigor in metaphor research, and, more broadly, in cognitive linguistics. With this excellent book cognitive linguistics becomes more methodologically self-aware however in its level of formalization still remains far-apart from formal approaches.”
“Gerard Steen’s important and provocative book addresses the problem of how to reliably identify metaphors and adequately account for their symbolic and conceptual structure, as well as their production and comprehension. Steen’s research agenda is ambitious. He develops a multidimensional procedural approach to metaphor identification and description that, at each stage, is guided by transparent intersubjective verifiable principles. This monograph is a most welcome contribution to the study of metaphor. It is bound to stimulate discussion about the empirical validity of current conceptual metaphor theories.”
“Steen's detailed discussion of research into metaphor in language and thought is extremely timely in its tackling of methodological issues that have often been neglected in the excitement of rapid theoretical developments in the field. [...] For me, the complexity of the prose, both at the level of sentence and of argumentation, meant that the book is not an easy read- perhaps this is inevitable given the range of topics covered and the ambitious depth. However, this is a minor criticism of what is a significant contribution in the field, one that will form core reading for current and future researchers of metaphor.”
Cited byCited by 134 other publicationsA'Beckett, Ludmilla2014. Review of Cameron & Maslen (2010): Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. Metaphor and the Social World 4:1 ► pp. 127 ff. Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed2014. The JOURNEY metaphor and moral political cognition. Pragmatics & Cognition 22:3 ► pp. 373 ff. 2018. Metaphoric moral framing and image-text relations in the op-ed genre. Information Design Journal 24:1 ► pp. 42 ff. Aksan, Yeşim & Dilek Kantar2008. No Wellness Feels Better than This Sickness: Love Metaphors from a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Metaphor and Symbol 23:4 ► pp. 262 ff. Alemán, Araceli2022. LITERALIZACIÓN DE LA METÁFORA VACUNA EN EL IMAGINARIO DISTÓPICO DE FERNANDA GARCÍA LAO. Perífrasis. Revista de Literatura, Teoría y Crítica 13:26 ► pp. 30 ff. Athanasiadou, Angeliki2017. Pride. International Journal of Language and Culture 4:1 ► pp. 6 ff. 2017. Chapter 6. If-clauses and their figurative basis. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 152 ff. Barnabé, Aurélie2013. De l’expérience kinesthésique à la structuration prépositionnelle du schème-image du chemin. Corela :11-1 Beger, Anke2015. Metaphors in psychology genres. In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4], ► pp. 53 ff. Brdar, Mario, Rita Brdar-Szabó & Benedikt Perak2020. Separating (non-)figurative weeds from wheat. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 46 ff. Bruhn, Mark J.2011. Harmonious Madness: The Poetics of Analogy at the Limits of Blending Theory. Poetics Today 32:4 ► pp. 619 ff. Burgers, Christian, Margot van Mulken & Peter Jan Schellens2011. Finding Irony: An Introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol 26:3 ► pp. 186 ff. Chen, Jun, Yuesheng Gu & Yanpei Liu2012. Grid Service Concurrency Control Protocol. Journal of Networks 7:4 Ciolăneanu, Roxana2019. From Courtship to Marriage in Marketing. In The Role of Language and Symbols in Promotional Strategies and Marketing Schemes [Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services, ], ► pp. 193 ff. 2021. How Language Use “Translates” Women. In Handbook of Research on Translating Myth and Reality in Women Imagery Across Disciplines [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 64 ff. Danyleiko, Olha2022. Война и Мир в структуре концептуальных метафор раннего периода гибридной войны в Украине (2014–2019): хронотопическая метафорическая модель. Russian Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 115 ff. David, Oana2021. Chapter 1. Metaphor meets grammar in a radial network of give verbs in Romance. In Give Constructions across Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language, 29], ► pp. 25 ff. Denroche, Charles2018. Text metaphtonymy. Metaphor and the Social World 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla & Markus Egg2020. Drawing attention to metaphor. In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 1 ff. Dobrić, Nikola & Franzisca Weder2016. Media conceptualizing illnesses – the case of the flu. Continuum 30:1 ► pp. 126 ff. Dorst, Aletta G2015. More or different metaphors in fiction? A quantitative cross-register comparison. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 24:1 ► pp. 3 ff. 2011. Personification in discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures and communicative functions. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 20:2 ► pp. 113 ff. 2021. Metaphor. In Analysing Religious Discourse, ► pp. 235 ff. Dunn, Jonathan2010. Gradient Semantic Intuitions of Metaphoric Expressions. Metaphor and Symbol 26:1 ► pp. 53 ff. 2015. Three Types of Metaphoric Utterances That Can Synthesize Theories of Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Díaz-Peralta, Marina2018. Metaphor and ideology: Conceptual structure and conceptual content in Spanish political discourse. Discourse & Communication 12:2 ► pp. 128 ff. Egan, Thomas2013. Review of Brdar, Gries & Fuchs (2011): Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion. Functions of Language 20:2 ► pp. 283 ff. Falck, Marlene Johansson2010. Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic Viewby Cornelia Müller. Metaphor and Symbol 25:2 ► pp. 114 ff. Ferentzy, Peter & Nigel E. Turner2012. Morals, medicine, metaphors, and the history of the disease model of problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues :27 2013. The History of Gambling and Its Intersection with Technology, Religion, Medical Science, and Metaphors. In The History of Problem Gambling, ► pp. 5 ff. Forceville, Charles J.2019. Andreas Musolff (2016), Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios . Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 210 ff. García Negroni, María Marta & Beatriz Hall2023. Posicionamientos subjetivos y diálogo académico: el caso de los enunciados metafóricos . Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93 ► pp. 103 ff. Gathigia, Moses Gatambuki, Daniel Ochieng Orwenjo & Ruth Wangeci Ndungu2018. Foodsemic metaphors of love in Gĩkũyũ: Insights from cognitive semantics. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:2 ► pp. 341 ff. GEN KAYA, Sıla2022. OLAY YAPISI METAFORLARININ BİR GÖRÜNÜMÜ: ZORLUKLAR HAREKETİN ENGELLERİDİR. Çukurova Üniversitesi Türkoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi Gentner, Dedre & Brian Bowdle2008. Metaphor as Structure-Mapping. In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ► pp. 109 ff. Gibbs, Raymond W.2011. Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes 48:8 ► pp. 529 ff. Group, Pragglejaz2007. MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Grujic, Tatjana2020. Pristupi pojmovnoj metafori. Forum 2:1-2 ► pp. 27 ff. H. Smith, Thomas2015. Dynamical systems metaphors. In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4], ► pp. 215 ff. Hampl, Marek2022. The use of the PATH and FORCE image schemas in Barack Obama’s counterterrorism discourse against ISIL. Critical Discourse Studies 19:3 ► pp. 274 ff. Hart, Gwen2015. Beyond “elicit and run” metaphor research. In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3], ► pp. 265 ff. Haught, Catrinel2013. A Tale of Two Tropes: How Metaphor and Simile Differ. Metaphor and Symbol 28:4 ► pp. 254 ff. Herrmann, J. Berenike2022. Operationalisierung der Metapher zur quantifizierenden Untersuchung deutschsprachiger literarischer Texte im Übergang vom Realismus zur Moderne. In Digitale Literaturwissenschaft [Germanistische Symposien, ], ► pp. 629 ff. Herrmann, J. Berenike & Tony Berber Sardinha2015. Metaphor in specialist discourse. In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4], ► pp. 3 ff. Hodiamont, Didier, Hans Hoeken & Margot van Mulken2018. Chapter 7. Conventionality in visual metaphor. In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18], ► pp. 163 ff. Imperiale, Maria Grazia & Alison Phipps2022. Cuts destroy, hurt, kill: a critical metaphor analysis of the response of UK academics to the UK overseas aid budget funding cuts. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 17:1 ► pp. 61 ff. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo2010. Review of Gilquin (2010): Corpus, cognition and causative constructions. Studies in Language 34:4 ► pp. 922 ff. Julich, Nina2018. Metaphors for Musical Motion—Beyond Time Is Motion. In Sensory Perceptions in Language, Embodiment and Epistemology [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 42], ► pp. 133 ff. KALIN SALI, Mesout2022. Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde kullanılan ders materyalindeki kavramsal metaforların tespitine yönelik bir çalışma. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi King, Daniel & Dedre Gentner2022. Verb Metaphoric Extension Under Semantic Strain. Cognitive Science 46:5 Kochańska, Agata & Iwona Kokorniak2021. Introduction. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:1 ► pp. i ff. Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona2018. Address inversion in Swahili: Usage patterns, cognitive motivation and cultural factors. Cognitive Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 545 ff. Krisnawati, Ekaning2014. Metaphors in Indonesian Soccer News. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:1 Krisnawati, Ekaning, Heriyanto Darsono, Rosaria Mita Amalia, Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna & Kasno Pamungkas2021. Metaphors in Indonesian Nature Tourism Discourse: Disclosing Cognition about Nature. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 29:4 ► pp. 2469 ff. Li, Hongying2022. La traducción inglesa y española de la metáfora EL SER HUMANO ES UN ANIMAL en Wei cheng: un estudio contrastivo desde la perspectiva cognitiva. Estudios de Traducción 12 ► pp. 163 ff. Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7:2 ► pp. 215 ff. Liljegren, Andreas2012. Key Metaphors in the Sociology of Professions: Occupations as Hierarchies and Landscapes. Comparative Sociology 11:1 ► pp. 88 ff. Littlemore, Jeannette, Phyllis Trautman Chen, Almut Koester & John Barnden2011. Difficulties in Metaphor Comprehension Faced by International Students whose First Language is not English. Applied Linguistics 32:4 ► pp. 408 ff. Low, Graham2015. A practical validation model for researching elicited metaphor. In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3], ► pp. 15 ff. Lu, Xiaofei & Ben Pin-Yun Wang2017. Towards a metaphor-annotated corpus of Mandarin Chinese. Language Resources and Evaluation 51:3 ► pp. 663 ff. Lynch, Heather Lynn & Teresa Renae Fisher-Ari2018. What We Learned about Using Metaphors in College Teaching: Methods and Meanings. College Teaching 66:2 ► pp. 60 ff. Manna, Raffaele, Antonio Pascucci, Maria Pia di Buono & Johanna Monti2021. The Use of Figurative Language in an Italian Dream Description Corpus. In Formalising Natural Languages: Applications to Natural Language Processing and Digital Humanities [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1389], ► pp. 123 ff. Marhula, Joanna2018. “It’s like herding butterflies”. Metaphor and the Social World 8:1 ► pp. 64 ff. Marhula, Joanna & Maciej Rosiński2019. Chapter 9. Linguistic metaphor identification in Polish. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 184 ff. Martin, Paul C.2013. THE EXPLORATORY AND REFLECTIVE DOMAIN OF METAPHOR IN THE COMPARISON OF RELIGIONS. Zygon® 48:4 ► pp. 936 ff. Meyers, Charlène2019. Difficulties in Identifying and Translating Linguistic Metaphors: A Survey and Experiment among Translation Students. English Studies at NBU 5:2 ► pp. 308 ff. Musolff, Andreas2012. The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies 9:3 ► pp. 301 ff. 2015. Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1 ► pp. 41 ff. 2021. Cultural Conceptualisations of the Nation as a Body or Person: Scenario Analysis of Metaphor Interpretations. In National Conceptualisations of the Body Politic [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 51 ff. Nacey, Susan, Tina Krennmayr, Aletta G. Dorst & W. Gudrun Reijnierse2019. Chapter 3. What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it mostly does). In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 42 ff. Ntabo, Victor Ondara, Naom Moraa Nyarigoti & Moses Gatambuki Gathigia2019. Interpreting the Human Being Metaphors in Ekegusii Pop Songs Using the Cognitive Semantics Framework . Issues in Language Studies 7:2 ► pp. 73 ff. Onysko, Alexander2016. Enhanced creativity in bilinguals? Evidence from meaning interpretations of novel compounds. International Journal of Bilingualism 20:3 ► pp. 315 ff. 2017. Conceptual metaphor variation in meaning interpretation. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:1 ► pp. 7 ff. Patterson, Katie J.2016. The Analysis of Metaphor: To What Extent Can the Theory of Lexical Priming Help Our Understanding of Metaphor Usage and Comprehension?. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45:2 ► pp. 237 ff. Philip, Gill2016. Review of Miller & Monti (2014): Tradurre Figure / Translating Figurative Language. Metaphor and the Social World 6:1 ► pp. 156 ff. Pihlaja, Stephen2013. ‘It’s all red ink’: The interpretation of biblical metaphor among Evangelical Christian YouTube users. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 22:2 ► pp. 103 ff. Pinero-Pinero, Gracia, Marina Díaz-Peralta & María J. García-Domínguez2014. Metaphors of Irregular Immigration in the Spanish Language Press in the United States. Studia Neophilologica 86:1 ► pp. 51 ff. Plug, Leendert, Basil Sharrack & Markus Reuber2011. Metaphors in the description of seizure experiences: Common expressions and differential diagnosis. Language and Cognition 3:2 ► pp. 209 ff. Popova, Yanna2010. Figurative Language and Cognition. In The Encyclopedia of the Novel, Price, Hazel & Jack Wilson2019. Relevance theory and metaphor: An analysis of Tom Waits’ ‘Emotional Weather Report’. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:1 ► pp. 61 ff. RASSE, CARINA, ALEXANDER ONYSKO & FRANCESCA M. M. CITRON2020. Conceptual metaphors in poetry interpretation: a psycholinguistic approach. Language and Cognition 12:2 ► pp. 310 ff. Rasulić, Katarina2017. A metaphor biangle. Metaphor and the Social World 7:1 ► pp. 130 ff. Reda Ali Hassan, Mahmoud2018. Pragmatic Investment of Figurative and Non-Figurative Designations: The Case of the Egyptian Revolution in Arabic and English Contexts. Journal of Universal Language 19:2 ► pp. 53 ff. Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen2018. DMIP: A Method for Identifying Potentially Deliberate Metaphor in Language Use. Corpus Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 129 ff. 2018. On metaphorical views, dynamite, and doodlings. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 431 ff. Ritchie, L. David & Mariko Thomas2015. A “bright blue ball”, “brushed with clouds” or “parched, scorched, and washed away”?. Metaphor and the Social World 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Ritchie, L. David & Min Zhu2015. “NixonStonewalledthe Investigation”: Potential Contributions of Grammatical Metaphor to Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Analysis. Metaphor and Symbol 30:2 ► pp. 118 ff. Roldán-Riejos, Ana & Georgina Cuadrado2015. Metaphor and Figurative Meaning Construction in Science and Technology (English and Spanish). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 212 ► pp. 271 ff. Roldán-Riejos, Ana & Paloma Úbeda-Mansilla2013. Análisis del uso de la metáfora en el contexto de la ingeniería . EDU REVIEW. International Education and Learning Review / Revista Internacional de Educación y Aprendizaje 1:1 Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Lorena Pérez Hernández2011. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Myths, Developments and Challenges. Metaphor and Symbol 26:3 ► pp. 161 ff. Schilperoord, Joost2018. Chapter 2. Ways with pictures. In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18], ► pp. 11 ff. Schmidt, Goran & Ivana Marinić2016. Metaphor-based calques in Croatian mass media. ExELL 4:1 ► pp. 15 ff. Schröder, Ulrike2015. Society and culture as container. International Journal of Language and Culture 2:1 ► pp. 38 ff. Skorczynska, Hanna & Kathleen Ahrens2015. A corpus-based study of metaphor signaling variations in three genres. Text & Talk 35:3 Sokolova, Svetlana2021. When three is company: The relation between aspect and metaphor in Russian aspectual triplets. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:1 ► pp. 107 ff. Spooren, Wilbert2018. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18], ► pp. 1 ff. Steen, Gerard2008. The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 23:4 ► pp. 213 ff. 2009. Three Kinds of Metaphor in Discourse: A Linguistic Taxonomy. In Metaphor and Discourse, ► pp. 25 ff. 2011. Metaphor, Language, and Discourse Processes. Discourse Processes 48:8 ► pp. 585 ff. 2011. The language of knowledge management: A linguistic approach to metaphor analysis. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 28:2 ► pp. 181 ff. Steen, Gerard J.2018. Chapter 8. Conclusion. In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18], ► pp. 185 ff. Stickles, Elise, Oana David, Ellen K. Dodge & Jisup Hong2016. Formalizing contemporary conceptual metaphor theory. Constructions and Frames 8:2 ► pp. 166 ff. Stockwell, Peter2008. Review Article: The year's work in stylistics 2007. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 17:4 ► pp. 351 ff. Strugielska, Ariadna2015. A hybrid methodology of linguistic metaphor identification in elicited data and its conceptual implications. In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3], ► pp. 65 ff. Sullivan, Karen2014. Visibility and economy as dimensions of metaphoric language. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 23:4 ► pp. 347 ff. Tabbert, Ulrike2016. Deixis and metaphor. In Language and Crime, ► pp. 157 ff. Tang, Xuri, Weiguang Qu, Xiaohe Chen & Shiwen Yu2010. 2010 International Conference on Asian Language Processing, ► pp. 95 ff. Tay, Dennis2012. Applying the Notion of Metaphor Types to Enhance Counseling Protocols. Journal of Counseling & Development 90:2 ► pp. 142 ff. 2016. Metaphor and Psychological Transference. Metaphor and Symbol 31:1 ► pp. 11 ff. Thalhammer, Elmar J.2015. They have to die for the goals. In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4], ► pp. 101 ff. Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel2016. Refining the understanding of novel metaphor in specialised language discourse. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 22:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel & Pamela Faber2010. Strategies for the Semi-Automatic Retrieval of Metaphorical Terms. Metaphor and Symbol 26:1 ► pp. 23 ff. van Poppel, Lotte2021. The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 177 ff. van Weelden, Lisanne, Alfons Maes, Joost Schilperoord & Reinier Cozijn2011. The Role of Shape in Comparing Objects: How Perceptual Similarity May Affect Visual Metaphor Processing. Metaphor and Symbol 26:4 ► pp. 272 ff. van Weelden, Lisanne, Alfons Maes, Joost Schilperoord & Marc Swerts2012. How Object Shape Affects Visual Metaphor Processing. Experimental Psychology 59:6 ► pp. 364 ff. Van Weelden, Lisanne, Fons Maes & Joost Schilperoord2018. Chapter 6. How visual form affects metaphoric conceptualization. In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18], ► pp. 147 ff. Vesić Pavlović, Tijana2018. The role of path metaphors in conceptualising life in English and Serbian: a corpus-based analysis. Brno studies in English :1 ► pp. [63] ff. Wan, Wan2015. Developing critical thinking in academic writing through a metaphor elicitation technique. In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3], ► pp. 213 ff. Wan, Wan & Graham Low2015. Introduction. In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3], ► pp. 1 ff. Wan, Wan & Sarah Turner2018. Applying metaphor analysis to academic literacy research. Metaphor and the Social World 8:2 ► pp. 286 ff. Williams Camus, Julia T.2015. Metaphor, news discourse and knowledge. In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4], ► pp. 245 ff. Wilson, Deirdre & Patricia Kolaiti2017. Chapter 7. Lexical pragmatics and implicit communication. In Implicitness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 276], ► pp. 147 ff. Wyrwa, Anna2019. Traces of Speaker’s Worldview in Translations of EU Parliamentary Debate. In Languages – Cultures – Worldviews, ► pp. 293 ff. Yilmaz, Seda & Selda Polat2012. Metaphor Perceptions of Primary School Administrators and Teachers Towards the Instituon They Work for. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 55 ► pp. 669 ff. Šipka, Danko2019. Lexical Layers of Identity, Šorm, Ester & Gerard J. Steen2018. Chapter 3. VISMIP. In Visual Metaphor [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 18], ► pp. 47 ff. [no author supplied]2014. Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157], 2015. Knowledge Metaphors. In Organizational Knowledge Dynamics [Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management, ], ► pp. 1 ff. 2017. Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising [Figurative Thought and Language, 2], 2018. Attention to Metaphor [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 7], 2018. Event Structure Metaphors through the Body [Figurative Thought and Language, 4], 2021.  Contested body: Metaphors of dominion in Romans 5–8 [HTS Religion & Society Series, 7], 2022. Motion Metaphors in Music Criticism [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 10], 2022. Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 23], This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects

Linguistics

Cognition and language
Cognitive linguistics

Main BIC Subject

CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2007037108 | Marc record