Understanding conversational implicatures in L1 and L2: 16. Figurative competence is better developed in L1 than in L2, or is it?

Bromberek-Dyzman, Katarzyna; Ewert, Anna

doi:10.1075/celcr.13.21bro

Part of

Cognitive Processing in Second Language Acquisition: Inside the learner's mind
Edited by Martin Pütz and Laura Sicola
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 13] 2010
► pp. 317–334

16. Figurative competence is better developed in L1 than in L2, or is it?

Understanding conversational implicatures in L1 and L2

Katarzyna Bromberek-Dyzman

Anna Ewert

Published online: 19 March 2010

https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.13.21bro

Cited by (4)

Cited by 4 other publications

Order by:

Lenton-Brym, Ariella P., David A. Moscovitch, Vanja Vidovic, Elizabeth Nilsen & Ori Friedman

2018. Theory of mind ability in high socially anxious individuals. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping 31:5 ► pp. 487 ff.

Mewhort-Buist, Tracy A. & Elizabeth S. Nilsen

2017. Shy individuals’ interpretations of counterfactual verbal irony. Metaphor and Symbol 32:4 ► pp. 262 ff.

García, Omar, Anna B. Cieślicka & Roberto R. Heredia

2015. Nonliteral Language Processing and Methodological Considerations. In Bilingual Figurative Language Processing, ► pp. 117 ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Pragmatic Competence and Relevance [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 245],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.