Chapter published in:
Visual Metaphor: Structure and process
Edited by Gerard J. Steen
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 18] 2018
► pp. 4788


Alcolea-Banegas, J.
(2009) Visual arguments in film. Argumentation, 23, 259–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andriessen, D., Kliphuis, E., McKenzie, J., Van Winkelen, C.
(2009) Pictures of knowledge management, developing a method for analysing knowledge metaphors in visuals. Electronic Journal of Knowledge, 7(4), 405–415. Retrieved from http://​www​.ejkm​.com​/volume7​/issue4​/p405, last accessed February 2, 2015.
Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L.
(1996) Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation & Advocacy, 33, 1–10.Google Scholar
Blair, J. A.
(1996) The possibility and actuality of visual arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 23–29.Google Scholar
Cameron, L.
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J.
(2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.
(2010) Iconology. In The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Art Terms (2nd ed) (p. 125). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van
(2010) Strategic manoeuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feteris, E., Groarke, L. & Plug, J.
(2011) Strategic maneuvering with visual arguments in political cartoons: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the use of topoi that are based on common cultural heritage. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 59–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, D.
(1996) Can there be Visual Arguments? Argumentation & Advocacy, 33, 11–22.Google Scholar
Forceville, C.
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Londen: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) The identification of target en source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A.
(1997) The language of metaphors. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herrmann, J. B.
(2013) Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. LOT Dissertation Series, 333. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Hermeren, G.
(1969) Representation and meaning in the visual arts. Lund: Scandinavian University Books.
Jensen, K. B.
(2008) Semiotics. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved from http://​www​.communicationencyclopedia​.com​/subscriber​/tocnode​?id​=g9781405131995​_yr2010​_chunk​_g978140513199524​_ss31​-1, last accessed September 16, 2011.
Johnson, R. H.
(2003) Why ‘‘visual arguments’’ aren’t arguments. In: IL at 25. A Conference Celebrating the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the First International Symposium on Informal Logic. Retrieved from http://​web2​.uwindsor​.ca​/faculty​/arts​/philosophy​/ILat25​/edited​_johnson​.doc, last accessed August 22, 2014).
Kaal, A.
(2012) Metaphor in conversation. Oisterwijk: Uitgeverij BOX Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. J.
(2005) Visual metaphors in print advertising for fashion products. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis & K. Kenney (Eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media (pp. 167–177). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2012) Pictorial argumentation in advertising: Visual tropes and figures as a way of creating visual argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies (pp. 239–256). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krennmayr, T.
(2011) Metaphor in newspapers. LOT Dissertation Series, 276. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K.
(2004) Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Leeuwen, T. van
(2001) Semiotics and iconography. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Analysis (pp. 92–118). Londen: Sage.Google Scholar
Lyne, J.
(2008) Rhetoric and Semiotics. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved from http://​www​.communicationencyclopedia​.com​/subscriber​/tocnode​?id​=g9781405131995​_yr2010​_chunk​_g978140513199523​_ss78​-1, last accessed September 16, 2011.
Moriarty, S.
(2005) Visual semiotic theory. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis, & K. Kenney (Eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media (pp. 227–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Müller, M. G.
(2008) Iconography. In W. Donsbach, (Ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved from http://​www​.communicationencyclopedia​.com​/subscriber​/tocnode​?id​=g9781405131995​_yr2010​_chunk​_g978140513199514​_ss1​-1, last accessed 16 September 2011.
Neuendorf, K. A.
(2002) The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Pasma, T.
(2011) Metaphor and register variation: The personalization of Dutch news discourse. Oisterwijk: BOXpress.Google Scholar
Penn, G.
(2000) Semiotic analysis of still images. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook (pp. 227–245). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G.
(2005) Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ripley, M. L.
(2008) Argumentation theorists argue that an ad is an argument. Argumentation, 22: 507–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, G.
(2005) Visual methodologies. In G. Griffin (Ed.), Research methods for English studies (pp. 67–90). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Šorm, E., & Steen, G. J.
(2013) Processing visual metaphor: A study in thinking out loud. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(1): 1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J.
(2007) Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) From linguistic form to conceptual structure in five steps: analyzing metaphor in poetry. In G. Brone & J. Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps (pp. 197–226). Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010) When is metaphor deliberate? In N. -L. Johannesson, C. Alm-Arvius, & D. Minugh (Eds.), Selected Papers from the Stockholm 2008 Metaphor Festival (pp. 43–63).Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J.
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics. Crossref.Google Scholar
Tam, A. M., & Leung, C. H. C.
(2001) Structured natural language descriptions for semantic content retrieval of visual materials. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(11), 930–937.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, L. -l., & Barsalou, L. W.
(2009) Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica 132, 173–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

No author info given
2017.  In Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising [Figurative Thought and Language, 2], Crossref logo
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2021. Reality bites: How the pandemic has begun to shape the way we, metaphorically, see the world. Discourse & Society 32:5  pp. 519 ff. Crossref logo
Bolognesi, Marianna, Benjamin Timmermans & Lora Aroyo
2019.  In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8],  pp. 99 ff. Crossref logo
Bort-Mir, Lorena
2020. Going Up Is Always Good: A Multimodal Analysis of Metaphors in a TV Ad with FILMIP, the Filmic Metaphor Identification Procedure. Complutense Journal of English Studies 28  pp. 177 ff. Crossref logo
Chatti, Sami
2021. Visual metaphtonymy in automobile femvertising. Multimodal Communication 10:2  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Muelas-Gil, María
2021.  In Discourse Studies in Public Communication [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 92],  pp. 60 ff. Crossref logo
Stampoulidis, Georgios & Marianna Bolognesi
2019. Bringing metaphors back to the streets: a corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication  pp. 147035721987753 ff. Crossref logo
Tseronis, Assimakis
2021. From visual rhetoric to multimodal argumentation: exploring the rhetorical and argumentative relevance of multimodal figures on the covers of The Economist. Visual Communication 20:3  pp. 374 ff. Crossref logo
Virág, Ágnes
2020. Multimodal conceptual patterns of Hungary in political cartoons. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1  pp. 222 ff. Crossref logo
Wawrzyniuk, Justyna
2020. “That’s the Metaphor You’re Going for?” Deliberate Metaphor and Humor. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 61:1  pp. 183 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.