Cover not available
Part of
Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 127–144

Chapter 7
Sensory experiences, meaning and metaphor

The case of wine

This chapter provides an overview of metaphorical language used to communicate sensory experiences in the context of wine discourse, particularly in the tasting note genre where metaphor provides wine critics with the means to describe what wines feel like in the nose and mouth. Using data from a corpus of tasting notes written in English (2,053 texts and 100,674 words), it examines the language used in the description of wines’ aromas, flavours and mouthfeel in order to better understand the contribution of metaphor in the transfer of the olfactory, gustatory and tactile experiences to readers. The main concern is to explore expressions that cut across sensory modalities, i.e., instantiate synaesthetic metaphor, and point to the possibility of the synaesthetic motivation of a good amount of the language presumably informed by metaphors of the conceptual type.
Keywords: winespeak, metaphor, synaesthesia, tasting note, sensory experience
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Describing wine through metaphor
  • 3.Sensing wine: Cross-sensory metaphors
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.07cab
References (48)
References
Bernstein, L. S. (1998). The official guide to wine snobbery. New York: Quill.Google Scholar
Caballero, R. (2006). Re-viewing space. Figurative language in architects’ assessment of built space. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 2095–2114.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(in press). From the glass through the nose and the mouth: Motion in the description of sensory data about wine in English and Spanish. Terminology.
Caballero, R., & Suárez-Toste, E. (2008). Translating the senses. Teaching the metaphors in winespeak. In F. Boers, & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 241–260). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010). A genre approach to imagery in winespeak. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 265–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R., & Paradis, C. (2013). Perceptual landscapes from the perspective of cultures and genres. In R. Caballero, & J. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition – Explorations into human sentience – Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 77–105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Making sense of sensory perceptions across languages and cultures. In R. Caballero, & C. Paradis (Eds.), Sensory perceptions in language and cognition (pp. 1–19). Special issue of Functions of Language 22 (1).Google Scholar
Croijmans, I., & Majid, A. (2016). Language does not explain the wine-specific memory advantage of wine experts. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the Cognitive science Society (CogSci 2016) (pp. 141–146). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Day, S. (1996). Synaesthesia and synaesthetic metaphors. Psyche, 2(32). Online document. [URL].
Gawel, R. (1997). The use of language by trained and untrained wine tasters. Journal of Sensory Studies, 12, 267–284.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gawel, R., & Oberholster, A. (2001). A mouth-feel wheel: Terminology for communicating the mouth-feel characteristics of red wine. Adelaide: Department of Horticulture, Viticulture and Oenology, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregutt, P. (2003). Scents and nonsense. The Seattle Times Pacific Northwest Magazine. Online document. Date of access: May 12th 2006. [URL]
Hughson, A., & Boakes, R. (2001). Perceptual and cognitive aspects of wine tasting expertise. Australian Journal of Psychology, 53, 103–108.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, M. (2010). Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 97–115.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lawless, H. (1984). Flavour description of white wine by expert and non-expert wine consumers. Journal of Food Science, 49, 120–123.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S., & Majid, A. (2014). Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29, 407–427.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, V. (1999). The word on wine: Wine description. New Statesman, 3, May.Google Scholar
Nedlinko, A. (2006). Viticulture and winemaking terminology and terminography. Terminology, 12(1), 137–164.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noble, A., Arnold, R., Buechsenstein, J., Leach, J., Schmidt, J., & Stern, P. (1987). Modification of a standardised system of wine aroma terminology. American Journal of Oenology and Viticulture, 38(2), 143–146.Google Scholar
Old, M. (2013). Wine: A tasting course. London & New York: DK.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G. (Eds.). (1999). Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K-U., & Thornburg, L. (Eds.). (2003). Pragmatic inferencing in metonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C. (2004). Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets, and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(4), 245–264.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Conceptual spaces at work in sensory cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances. In P. Gärdenfors, & F. Zenker (Eds.), Applications of geometric knowledge representation (pp. 33–55). Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M. (2013). Describing sensory perceptions: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor & Symbol, 28(1), 1–19.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierre, B. (1998). War of the words. Food and Wine Magazine, May.Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V., & Hubbard, E. (2001). Synaesthesia –A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. (2012). The tastes of wine: Towards a cultural history. Rivista di Estetica n.s., 51, 49–94.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y. (1997). Cognitive constraints on poetic figures. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), 33–71.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., & Cohen, M. (1998). How come silence is sweet but sweetness is not silent: A cognitive account of directionality in poetic synaesthesia. Language and Literature, 7(2), 123–140.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., & Eisenman, R. (2008). ‘Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard are sweeter’: Synaesthesia and cognition. Language and Literature, 17(2), 101–121.Google Scholar
Solomon, G. (1990). Psychology of novice and expert wine talk. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 495–517.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997). Conceptual change and wine expertise. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 41–60.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, F. (2015). Synaesthesia: A corpus-based study of cross-modal directionality. Functions of Language, 27, 69–95.Google Scholar
Suárez-Toste, E. (2013). One man’s cheese is another man’s music: Synaesthesia and the bridging of cultural differences in the language of sensory perception. In R. Caballero, & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition. Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 169–191). Berlin: Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Babel of the senses: On the roles of metaphor and synesthesia in wine reviews. Terminology.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I, Conceptual Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tsur, R. (1992). Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ullman, S. (1945). Romanticism and synaesthesia: A comparative study of sense transfer in Keats and Byron. PMLA, 60(3), 811–827.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1957). The principles of semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2003). Synesthetic metaphor: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32, 19–34.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Galac, Ádám
2024. Bold colors, sweeping melodies, offensive smells. International Journal of Language and Culture 11:1 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Tonacci, Alessandro, Giulia Scalzini, Pierina Díaz-Guerrero, Chiara Sanmartin, Isabella Taglieri, Giuseppe Ferroni, Guido Flamini, Luigi Odello, Lucia Billeci & Francesca Venturi
2024. Chemosensory analysis of emotional wines: Merging of explicit and implicit methods to measure emotions aroused by red wines. Food Research International 190 ► pp. 114611 ff. DOI logo
Toratani, Kiyoko
2022. Introduction to the volume. In The Language of Food in Japanese [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 25], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Motion Metaphors in Music Criticism [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 10], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.