Cover not available
Part of
Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 145–164

Chapter 8
Taste metaphors in Hieroglyphic Egyptian

This paper aims at giving an overview of the multiple meanings of the Ancient Egyptian verb of gustatory perception ṭp ‘to taste’. Different mappings from physical onto emotional and mental domains are explained by metaphorical meaning extensions. Data from Ancient Egyptian, as a still under-represented language within studies on perceptual language, is analysed by methods from the fields of Ancient Studies and Cognitive Linguistics.
Keywords: sensory perception, senses, taste, perception verbs, cognition, Ancient Egyptian, Afro-Asiatic, hieroglyphs, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Property Selection Processes
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Particularities of the Ancient Egyptian language and script
  • 3.Methodological background: Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Property Selection Processes
  • 4.The sensory modality of taste in Egyptian
    • 4.1The verb ṭp
    • 4.2Prototypical and physical meanings
    • 4.3Emotional meanings
    • 4.4Cognitive meanings
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • Appendix
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.08ste
References (71)
References
Aikhenvald, A. & Storch, A. (Eds.). (2013). Perception and cognition in language and culture. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Allan, K. (2008). Metaphor and metonymy. A diachronic approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. (2013). A new concordance of the Pyramid Texts. Volume II. Providence, RI: Brown University. Retrieved from [URL] (29 April 2017).
(2014). Language, scripts, and literacy. In A. B. Lloyd (Ed.), A companion to Ancient Egypt (pp. 641–662). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blackman, A. M. (1972). Middle-Egyptian Stories. Brussels: Éditions de la Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Brugsch, H. (1851). Sammlung demotisch-griechischer Eigennamen ägyptischer Privatleute aus Inschriften und Papyrusrollen. Berlin: Verlag Rudolph Gaertner.Google Scholar
Buck, A. de. (1951). The Egyptian Coffin Texts IV. Texts of Spells 268–354. Chicago, IL: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Chantrain, G. (2014). The use of classifiers in the New Kingdom. A global reorganization of the classifiers system? Lingua Aegyptia, 22, 39–59.Google Scholar
Classen, C. (1993). Worlds of sense. Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Di Biase-Dyson, C., Kammerzell, F. & Werning, D. A. (2009). Glossing Ancient Egyptian. Suggestions for adapting the Leipzig Glossing Rules. Lingua Aegyptia, 17, 343–366.Google Scholar
Di Biase-Dyson, C. (2016). Wege und Abwege. Zu den Metaphern in der ramessidischen Weisheitsliteratur. Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, 143(1), 22–33.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Metaphor (published 10 April 2017). In J. Stauder-Porchet, A. Stauder & W. Wendrich (Eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. Retrieved from [URL] (14 August 2017).
Ehret, C. (1995). Reconstructing Proto-Afroasiatic (Proto-Afrasian). Vowels, tone, consonants, and vocabulary. Berkeley & Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press Ltd. & London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eicke, S. (2015). Ende mit Schrecken oder Schrecken ohne Ende? Zur Verwendung sprachlicher Ausdrücke für Furcht im Totenbuch. In G. Neunert, H. Simon, A. Verbovsek & K. Gabler (Eds.), Text: Wissen – Wirkung – Wahrnehmung. Beiträge des vierten Münchner Arbeitskreises Junge Aegyptologie (MAJA 4) 29.11. bis 1.12.2013 (pp. 151–166). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
(2017). Affecting the gods: Fear in Ancient Egyptian religious texts. In A. Storch (Ed.), Consensus and dissent. Negotiating emotion in the public space (pp. 229–246). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enmarch, R. (2005). The Dialogue of Ipuwer and the Lord of All. Oxford: Griffith Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Erman, A. (1917). Die Hieroglyphen. Leipzig: G. J. Göschensche Verlagsbuchhandlung.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, A. & Grapow, H. (1926). Wörterbuch der Aegyptischen Sprache Band I. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs Verlag.Google Scholar
(1931). Wörterbuch der Aegyptischen Sprache Band V. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs Verlag.Google Scholar
Evans, N. & Wilkins, D. (2000). In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language, 76(3), 546–592.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, R. O. (1933). The Papyrus Bremner Rhind (British Museum No. 10188). Brussels: Éditions de la Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. H. (1932/1981). Late-Egyptian Stories. Brussels: Éditions de la Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Goldwasser, O. (1992). The Narmer Palette and the “Triumph of Metaphor”. Lingua Aegyptia, 2, 67–85.Google Scholar
(1995). From icon to metaphor. Fribourg: University Press & Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
(2002). Prophets, lovers and giraffes: Wor(l)d classification in Ancient Egypt. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
(2005). Where is metaphor? Conceptual metaphor and alternative classification in the Hieroglyphic script. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(2), 95–113.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldwasser, O. & Grinevald, C. (2012). What are “Determinativesˮ good for? In E. Grossman, S. Polis & J. Winand (Eds.), Lexical semantics in Ancient Egyptian (pp. 17–53). Hamburg: Widmaier.Google Scholar
Helck, W. (1970). Die Lehre des Dw3-ḫtjj. Teil I. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Hénault, C. (2008). Eating beyond certainties. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), From polysemy to semantic change (pp. 291–301). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: Brill.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howes, D. (Ed.). (1991). The varieties of sensory experience. A sourcebook in the anthropology of the senses. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (1999). Polysemy and metaphor in perception verbs: A cross-linguistic study. Doctoral dissertation: University of Edinburgh. Retrieved from [URL] (14 August 2017).
(2002). mind-as-body as a cross-linguistic conceptual metaphor. Miscelánea. A Journal of English and American Studies, 25, 93–119.Google Scholar
(2013). The power of the senses and the role of culture in metaphor and language. In R. Caballero & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition. Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 109–133). Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kammerzell, F. (1999). Klassifikatoren und Kategorienbildung in der ägyptischen Hieroglyphenschrift. Spektrum. Informationen aus Forschung und Lehre, 3, 29–34.Google Scholar
(2005). Old Egyptian and Pre-Old Egyptian. Tracing linguistic diversity in archaic Egypt and the creation of the Egyptian language. In S. Seidlmayer (Ed.), Texte und Denkmäler des ägyptischen Alten Reiches (pp. 165–246). Berlin: Achet.Google Scholar
Köhler, I. (2016). Rage like an Egyptian. Die Möglichkeiten eines kognitiv-semantischen Zugangs zum altägyptischen Wortschatz am Beispiel des Wortfelds [wut]. Hamburg: Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor. A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980/2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lincke, E.-S. (2011). Die Prinzipien der Klassifizierung im Altägyptischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Lincke, E.-S. & Kammerzell, F. (2012). Egyptian classifiers at the interface of lexical semantics and pragmatics. In E. Grossman, S. Polis & J. Winand (Eds.), Lexical semantics in Ancient Egyptian (pp. 55–112). Hamburg: Widmaier.Google Scholar
Loprieno, A. (1995). Ancient Egyptian. A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.) (2011). The senses in language and culture. The Senses & Society, 6(1), 5–18.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, J. A. (1978). Variational semantics in Tibeto-Burman. The “organic” approach to linguistic comparison. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Nyord, R. (2009). Breathing flesh. Conceptions of the body in the Ancient Egyptian Coffin Texts. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
(2012). Prototype structures and conceptual metaphor. Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics in Ancient Egyptian. In E. Grossman, S. Polis & J. Winand (Eds.), Lexical semantics in Ancient Egyptian (pp. 141–174). Hamburg: Widmaier.Google Scholar
(2015). Cognitive Linguistics (published 31 August 2015). In J. Stauder-Porchet, A. Stauder & W. Wendrich (Eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. Retrieved from [URL] (14 August 2017).
Parkinson, R. B. (1991). The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant. Oxford: Griffith Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Peust, C. (1999). Egyptian phonology: An introduction to the phonology of a dead language. Göttingen: Peust & Gutschmidt.Google Scholar
Popova, Y. (2005). Image schemas and verbal synaesthesia. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 395–419). Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Relats-Montserrat, F. (2014). Le signe D19, à la recherche des sens d’un déterminatif (I): la forme d’un signe. Nehet, 1, 129–167.Google Scholar
Sandman, M. (1938). Texts from the time of Akhenaten. Brussels: Éditions de la Fondation Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth.Google Scholar
Schenkel, W. (2012). Tübinger Einführung in die klassisch-ägyptische Sprache und Schrift. Tübingen: pagina.Google Scholar
Schwarz, S. (2005). Schiffe und Schiffsteile als Klassifikatoren in der ägyptischen Hieroglyphenschrift. Unpublished Masters thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Retrieved from [URL] (14 August 2017).
Steinbach, E. (2015). “Ich habe seinen Anblick geschmeckt…”. Verben der Wahrnehmung und die semantischen Beziehungen zwischen Perzeption und Kognition. In G. Neunert, H. Simon, A. Verbovsek & K. Gabler (Eds.), Text: Wissen – Wirkung – Wahrnehmung. Beiträge des vierten Münchner Arbeitskreises Junge Aegyptologie (MAJA 4) 29.11. bis 1.12.2013 (pp. 209–225). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Steinbach-Eicke, E. (forthcoming a.). Experiencing is tasting. Perception metaphors of taste in Ancient Egyptian. In F. Kammerzell, T. S. Richter & D. A. Werning (Eds.), Crossroads: Whence and whither? Egyptian-Coptic linguistics in comparative perspectives, 17–20 February 2016. Hamburg: Widmaier.
(forthcoming b.). Sensory metaphors in Ancient Egyptian, In D. A. Werning & C. Barth (Eds.). Metaphors in ancient civilizations. Berlin: Edition Topoi.
Strik Lievers, F. (2007). Italian perception verbs: a corpus-based study. In A. Sansò (Ed.), Language resources and linguistic theory (pp. 167–179). Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thesaurus Linguae Aegyptiae & Digitalisiertes Zettelarchiv, Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Strukturen und Transformationen des Wortschatzes der ägyptischen Sprache. Retrieved from aaew.bbaw.de/tla/ (14 August 2017).
Trim, R. (2007). Metaphor networks. The comparative evolution of figurative language. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vanhove, M. (2008). Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions. A cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), From polysemy to semantic change (pp. 341–370). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verbovsek, A. & Backes, B. (2015). Sinne und Sinnlichkeit in den ägyptischen Liebesliedern. In R. Landgráfová & H. Navrátilová (Eds.), Sex and the Golden Goddess II. World of the Love Songs (pp. 105–119). Prague: Czech Institute of Egyptology.Google Scholar
Viberg, Å. (1984). The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics 21(1), 123–162.Google Scholar
(2015). Sensation, perception and cognition. Swedish in a typological-contrastive perspective. Functions of Language, 22(1), 96–131.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werning, D. A. (2015). Einführung in die hieroglyphisch-ägyptische Schrift und Sprache. Propädeutikum mit Zeichen- und Vokabellektionen, Übungen und Übungshinweisen. Berlin: eDoc-Server der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin. Retrieved from [URL] (14 August 2017).
(Ed.). (2016). Ancient Egyptian: Glossing of common Earlier Egyptian forms (last modified 24 November 2016). Retrieved from [URL] (14 August 2017).
Westendorf, W. (1965/1977). Koptisches Handwörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. (2015). Amarna Period. Published 24 June 2015. In W. Grajetzki & W. Wendrich (Eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. Retrieved from [URL] (14 August 2017).
Žába, Z. (1956). Les maximes de Ptahhotep. Prague: Éditions de l’Academie Tchécoslovatique des Sciences.Google Scholar
Zandee, J. (1948). De hymnen aan Amon van Papyrus Leiden I 350. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

BAŞ, Melike
2021. tat- Eyleminin Anlam Genişlemesi Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Akademik Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi 5:2 ► pp. 1538 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.