Chapter published in:
Perception Metaphors
Edited by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19] 2019
► pp. 253274


Aikhenvald, A. Y.
(2006) Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Storch, A.
(2013) Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & A. Storch (Eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture (pp. 1–46). Leiden: Brill.Crossref link
Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(2012) Some truths and untruths about final intonation in conversational questions. In J. P. de Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 123–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Crossref link
Curl, T. S.
(2006) Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1257–1280.Crossref link
Edwards, D.
(2000) Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 347–373.Crossref link
Evans, N., & Wilkins, D.
(2000) In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3): 546–592.Crossref link
Geluykens, R.
(1988) On the myth of rising intonation in polar questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(4), 467–485.Crossref link
Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B.
(2017) Transcribing for social research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Crossref link
Heritage, J.
(2002) Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In C. E Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2013) Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 551–578.Crossref link
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G.
(2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 15–38.Crossref link
Hoey, E. M., & Kendrick, K. H.
(2017) Conversation analysis. In P. Hagoort & A. M. B. De Groot (Eds.), Research Methods in Psycholinguistics and the Neurobiology of Language. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kendrick, K. H.
(2006) Linguistic Form and Social Action: The Use of “See” in Conversational Interaction (Master’s thesis). University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Linguistics.
Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P.
(2016) Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19.Crossref link
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Levinson, S. C.
(2013) Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 101–130). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A.
(2014) Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29(4), 407–427.Crossref link
Pollner, M.
(1987) Mundane reason: Reality in everyday life and sociological discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Pomerantz, A.
(1980) Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3), 186–198.Crossref link
(1984) Giving a source or basis: the practice in conversation of telling “how I know”. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 607–625.Crossref link
(1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human studies, 9(2), 219–229.Crossref link
(1989) Giving evidence as a conversational practice. In D. T. Helm, W. T. Anderson, A. J. Meehan & A. W. Rawls (Eds.), The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order (pp. 103–115). New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.Crossref link
Sacks, H.
(1992) Lectures on conversation. (G. Jefferson, Ed.) (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson, S., Van Putten, S., & Majid, A.
(2015) Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(1), 31–60.Crossref link
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., & Majid, A.
(2018) Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 371–406. Crossref link
Schegloff, E. A.
(1996) Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216.Crossref link
(2005) On complainability. Social Problems, 52(4), 449–476.Crossref link
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Crossref link
Schutz, A.
(1962) Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected Papers I (pp. 3–47). Springer Netherlands.Crossref link
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T.
(Eds.) (2013) The handbook of conversation analysis. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Sidnell, J.
(2007) ‘Look’-prefaced turns in first and second position: launching, interceding and redirecting action. Discourse Studies, 9(3), 387–408.Crossref link
Stokes, D., & Biggs, S.
(2014) The dominance of the visual. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its modalities. Oxford Scholarship Online.Crossref link
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Crossref link
Vázquez Carranza, A.
(2014) Sequential markers in Mexican Spanish talk: A conversation-analytic study (Ph.D. thesis). University of Essex.
(2015) Análisis de oye como marcador secuencial y de acción en la conversación. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada, 61, 73–103.
Viberg, Å.
(1983) The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics, 21, 123–162.Crossref link
Wierzbicka, Anna
(2010) Experience, evidence, and sense: The hidden cultural legacy of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Crossref link