Construal operations in linguistics and artificial intelligence
This essay deals with one of the fundamental aspects of the semantics of cognitive linguistics, namely the nature of construal operations, and this entails reference to the conceptualization of the described situation in the mind of the language user. In expounding the conceptualist approach to semantics, the essay highlights its differences with respect to formal semantics and develops the arguments of Langacker’s and Marconi’s essay by analysing particular forms of imagery (scanning, scalar adjustment, profile-base, attention). In doing so, it also elaborates a number of general points concerning the two different types of approach to semantics made in Albertazzi’s Introduction — which like this essay also conducts a critique of the use by artificial intelligence of certain phenomenological concepts. Croft and Wood’s use of phenomenological instruments, moreover, displays numerous points of contact with the contributions in the book by Albertazzi (fictive motion), Wildgen (Gestalt concepts), Violi (context and comparison) and Peruzzi (conceptual universals). In dealing with the problem of the universality of construal operations, Croft and Wood also make explicit mention of Langacker’s work, with reference both to his essay in this book and previous publications.
Cited by
Cited by 18 other publications
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2023.
What’s really in a frame? The case of public marriage proposals.
Discourse Studies ► pp. 146144562311547 ff.

Bartlett, Justin J.
2022.
An Expected Error: An Essay in Defence of Moral Emotionism.
Axiomathes 32:2
► pp. 271 ff.

Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
2004.
Cognitive Linguistics,

Croft, William, Chiaki Taoka & Esther J. Wood
2001.
Argument linking and the commercial transaction frame in English, Russian and Japanese.
Language Sciences 23:4-5
► pp. 579 ff.

Ebensgaard Jensen, Kim
2017.
Corpora and Cultural Cognition: How Corpus-Linguistic Methodology Can Contribute to Cultural Linguistics. In
Advances in Cultural Linguistics [
Cultural Linguistics, ],
► pp. 477 ff.

Gaballo, Viviana
2022.
Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Conceptualization of Specialized Terms in Corporate Culture. In
Language Use, Education, and Professional Contexts [
Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 21 ff.

Gardenfors, Peter
2020.
An Epigenetic Approach to Semantic Categories.
IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems 12:2
► pp. 139 ff.

2019.
Using Event Representations to Generate Robot Semantics.
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 8:4
► pp. 1 ff.

2021.
Causal Reasoning and Event Cognition as Evolutionary Determinants of Language Structure.
Entropy 23:7
► pp. 843 ff.

Gärdenfors, Peter, Jürgen Jost & Massimo Warglien
2018.
From Actions to Effects: Three Constraints on Event Mappings.
Frontiers in Psychology 9

Hoye, Leo Francis Paul
2016.
Situatedeness and the Making of Meaning: Pragmatics, Pragmemes, and Modality. An Essay. In
Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [
Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9],
► pp. 421 ff.

Kecskes, Istvan
2019.
English as a Lingua Franca,

Mealier, Anne-Laure, Grégoire Pointeau, Peter Gärdenfors & Peter Ford Dominey
2016.
Construals of meaning.
Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 17:1
► pp. 48 ff.

Paradis, Carita
2004.
Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets, and Active Zones.
Metaphor and Symbol 19:4
► pp. 245 ff.

2005.
Ontologies and Construals in Lexical Semantics.
Axiomathes 15:4
► pp. 541 ff.

2008.
Configurations, construals and change: expressions of DEGREE.
English Language and Linguistics 12:2
► pp. 317 ff.

Ponsford, Dan
2022.
Meaning differences between the inputs to syntactic blends.
Linguistics 0:0

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.