Using the schemas of force dynamics to examine how the emotions are conceptualized in natural language, this essay conducts detailed analysis of the relationship between the metaphors of cause as force, and force (qua opponent) as a source domain of emotions. The author’s main thesis is that the emotions provide the best representation of force dynamics in the space of conceptualization, for the metaphors relative to them always display a tendency towards inaction, which corresponds to the rational self (Agonist), and an entity exerting force (Antagonist), which is the cause of emotions.
In this respect Kövecses essay links closely with Albertazzi’s (and its development of Talmy’s theory of force dynamics) and Wildgen’s (generic space as the space of force). It also exemplifies the construal structures described by Langacker. It is, in particular, the essay in the book that conducts closest examination of the key role performed by metaphor in the conceptualization expressed by natural language.
Muhammad Arif, Nor Hafuza, Hasmidar Hassan & Maizura Osman
2024. Metafora Api dalam Teks Melayu sebagai Satu Manifestasi Nilai: Analisis Model Hibrid Baharu. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 32:S1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Skichko, Anastasiia S., Sandrine Peraldi & Stephen Lucek
2023. “PEOPLE MATTER. FREEDOM MATTERS. PEACE MATTERS”: CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR ANALYSIS OF VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY’S SPEECHES. Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 2:26/2 ► pp. 173 ff.
2022. Putting humour to work: To make sense of and constitute organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews 24:4 ► pp. 535 ff.
Havlíčková Kysová, Šárka
2021. Conceptual metaphor theory cannot be just conceptual. Theatralia :1 ► pp. 267 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.