Representing Wine – Sensory Perceptions, Communication and Cultures

| Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
| Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
| Lund University
ISBN 9789027204455 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
ISBN 9789027261915 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
Wine culture is a complex phenomenon of increasing importance in modern society, and it combines the joys of wine appreciation with the frustrations of trying to verbally communicate sensory impressions. While wine appreciation is traditionally characterized as joyously convivial in its social dimension, sensory impressions remain eminently private. This contrast explains why the language used to represent wine, or winespeak, is the object of increasing crossdisciplinary interest.

This book analyzes the many different forms / many of the different forms of representing wine in present-day society, with a special emphasis on winespeak, starting from the premise that such study demands a genre approach to the many different communities involved in the wine world: producers/ critics/ merchants/ consumers. By combining the methodologies of Cognitive Linguistics and discourse analysis, the authors analyze extensive real-life corpora of wine reviews and multimodal artifacts (labels, advertisements, documentaries) to reflect on the many inherent difficulties but also to highlight the rich and creative figurative strategies employed to compensate for the absence of a proper wine jargon of a more unambiguous nature.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Winespeak
Chapter 2. Exploring sensory meanings
Chapter 3. From tasting to reviewing
Chapter 4. Descriptors of wine across the senses
Chapter 5. Metaphor
Chapter 6. The grading and evaluation of presence
Chapter 7. Rhetorical strategies to achieve credibility in wine assessment
Chapter 8. The market individuation of wine
Chapter 9. Advertising wine
Chapter 10. Documenting wine in film
Chapter 11. Final remarks
Representing Wine is an interesting piece of research that certainly holds a great number of insights into wine language, metaphor theory, and how the process of drinking is put into words.”


Anishchanka, A., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D.
(2015) Usage-related variation in the referential range of blue in marketing context. Functions of Language, 22(1), 20–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1976) De anima (Hicks, Robert, Trans.). New York: Arno.Google Scholar
Barrós-Loscertales, A., González, J., Pulvermüller, F., Ventura-Campos, N., Bustamante, J. C., Costumero, V., Parcet, M. A., & Ávila, C.
(2012) Reading salt activates gustatory brain regions: fMRI evidence for semantic grounding in a novel sensory modality. Cerebral Cortex, 22(11), 2554–2563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L.
(1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.Google Scholar
(2010) Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 716–724. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, C.
(1994) Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman, & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Benczes, R., Barcelona Sánchez, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
(Eds.) (2011) Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K.
(2010) Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112(3), 115–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, M. E. L., & Pickering, M. J.
(2013) Perspective taking in language: Integrating the spatial and action domains. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K.
(2000) Genres in conflict. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Analysing professional genres (pp. 147–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Binder, J. R., & Desai, R.
(2011) The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Binder, J. R.
(2016) In defense of abstract conceptual representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1096–1108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, M.
(1979) More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolognesi, M., & Strik-Lievers, F.
(2018) How language and image construct synaesthetic metaphors in print advertising. Visual Communication. Crossref.Google Scholar
Bosker, B.
Brisard, F.
(2002) The English present. In F. Brisard (Ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (pp. 259–97). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bushdid, C., Magnasco, M. O., Vosshall, L. B., & Keller, A.
(2014) Humans can discriminate more than 1 trillion olfactory stimuli. Science, 343, 1370–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R.
(2003) Metaphor and genre. The presence and role of metaphor in the building review. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 145–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Re-viewing space. Figurative language in architects’ assessment of built space. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 2095–2114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Cutting across the senses. Imagery in winespeak and audiovisual promotion. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 73–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2014) Exploring the combination of language, images and sound in the metaphors of TV commercials. Atlantis, 36(2), 31–51.Google Scholar
(2016) Genre and metaphor. Use and variation across usage events. In E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 193–205). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2017) From the glass through the nose and the mouth: Motion in the description of sensory data about wine in English and Spanish. Terminology, 23(1), 65–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R., & Díaz Vera, J.
(Eds) (2013) The embodied soul. Explorations into human sentience – Imagination, (e)motion and perception. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R., & Paradis, C.
(2013) Perceptual landscapes from the perspective of cultures and genres. In R. Caballero, & J. Díaz Vera (Eds.), The embodied soul. Explorations into human sentience – Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 77–105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Making sense of sensory perceptions across languages and cultures. Functions of Language, 22(1), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Verbs in speech framing expressions: Comparing English and Spanish. Journal of Linguistics, 53(2), 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R., & Suárez-Toste, E.
(2008) Translating the senses. Teaching the metaphors in winespeak. In F. Boers, & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 241–260). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010) A genre approach to imagery in winespeak. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 265–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, N.
(1996) Theorizing the moving image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charters, S.
(2007) On the evaluation of wine quality. Questions of taste. In B. C. Smith (Ed.), The philosophy of wine (pp. 157–182). Oxford: Signal Books.Google Scholar
Charles Spence and Qian Janice Wang
(2015) Wine and music (II): can you taste the music? Modulating the experience of wine through music and sound Flavour (2015) 4:33 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Classen, C.
(1993) Worlds of sense. Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Classen, C., Howes, D., & Synnott, A.
(1994) Aroma. The cultural history of smell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cook, G.
(2001) The discourse of advertising. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, B.
(2009) Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language, 16(1), 44–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croijmans, I., & Majid, A.
(2016) Language does not explain the wine-specific memory advantage of wine experts. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the Cognitive science Society (pp. 141–146). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Cruse, A.
(2002) The construal of sense boundaries. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique, 12, 101–19.Google Scholar
Danesi, M.
(2006) Brands. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2011) What’s in a brand name? A note on the onomastics of brand naming. Names: A Journal of Onomastics, 59, 175–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Day, S.
(1996) Synaesthesia and synaesthetic metaphors. Psyche, 2(32). Accessed at http://​psyche​.cs​.monash​.edu​.au​/v2​/psyche​-2​-32​-day​.html
Dean, D. L., & Forbes, S. L.
(2016) Are customers having e-conversations about your wine? The importance of online discussion forums as electronic word of mouth for wine marketers. In G. Szolnoki, L. Thach, & D. Kolb (Eds.), Successful social media and ecommerce strategies in the wine industry (pp. 115–132). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demattè, M. L., Sanabria, D., & Spence, C.
(2006) Cross-modal associations between odors and colours. Chemical Senses, 31(6), 531–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J.
(2003) Discourse and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 47–87). Mahwah & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. D. & Newton, N.
(Eds.) (2005) Consciousness and emotion, vol. 1: Agency, conscious choice, and selective perception. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R.
(2016) How to build a hot brand. Meininger Online. Available at https://​www​.meininger​.de​/de​/node​/756768. Last accessed 11/09/2017.
Fairclough, N.
(2003) Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forceville, C.
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. G. Kristensen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2007) Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. The Public Journal of Semiotics, I(1), 15–34.Google Scholar
(2008) Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In E. F. McQuarrie, & B. J. Phillips (Eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric (pp. 272–310). Armonk NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
(2009) The role of non-verbal sound and music in multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 383–400). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Concluding observations and further research. Course in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor, lecture 8/8, in https://​semioticon​.com​/sio​/files​/downloads​/2013​/11​/Cybercourse​-Lecture8​.pdf
(2016) Visual and multimodal metaphor in film: Charting the field. In K. Fahlenbrach (Ed.), Embodied metaphors in film, television, and video games (pp. 17–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
(Eds.) (2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C., & Jeulink, M.
(2011) The flesh and blood of embodied understanding: The Source-Path-Goal schema in animation film. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(1), 37–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M.
(1969) L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Freedman, A., & Medway, P.
(Eds.) (1994) Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P.
(2014) The geometry of meaning. Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gasnier, V.
(2006) A taste for wine. London & New York: DK.Google Scholar
George Lakoff and Mark Turner
1989More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(2005) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.
(Ed.) (2016) Mixing metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gluck, M.
(2003) Wine language. Useful idiom or idiot-speak? In J. Aitchinson, & D. Lewis (Eds.), New media language (pp. 107–115). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goatly, A.
(1997) The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., & Pulvermüller, F.
(2006) Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. NeuroImage, 32, 906–912. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goode, J.
(2016a) I taste red: The science of tasting wine. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2016b) The social licence of wine. Paper presented at the 16th Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference (July 2016).
Grady, J.
(1997)  theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, K. M.
(1999) ‘Oiling the wheels of social life’: Myths and marketing in Champagne during the Belle Époque. French Historical Studies, 22(2), 211–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermuller, F.
(2004) Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hekkert, P.
(2006) Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science, 48, 157–172.Google Scholar
Herdenstam, A.
(2004) Sinnesupplevelsens estetik. Vinprovaren, i gränslandet mellan konsten och vetenskapen. Stockholm: Stockholm dialoger.Google Scholar
Hodge, R.
(1990) Literature as discourse. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hommerberg, C.
(2011) Persuasiveness in the discourse of wine: The rhetoric of Robert Parker. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.Google Scholar
Hommerberg, C., & Paradis, C.
(2014) Constructing credibility through representations in the discourse of wine: Evidentiality, temporality and epistemic control. In D. Glynn, & M. Sjölin (Eds.), Subjectivity and epistemicity. Stance strategies in discourse and narration (pp. 187–214). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Howes, D.
(2003) Sensual relations: Engaging the senses in culture and social theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Cultural synaesthesia: Neurological vs. anthropological approaches to the study of intersensoriality. Intellectica, 55, 156–87.Google Scholar
(2013) Postscript to Sensuous Cognition: The language of the senses. In R. Caballero, & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), 293–298.Google Scholar
Huang, H. W., Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D.
(2010) Imagine that! ERPs provide evidence for distinct hemispheric contributions to the processing of concrete and abstract concepts. NeuroImage, 49, 1116–1123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2007) Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaszczolt, K. M.
(2009) Representing time: An essay on temporality as modality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, H., & Robinson, J.
(2013) The world atlas of wine. 7th edition. London: Mitchell Beazley.Google Scholar
Keller, A.
(2016) Philosophy of olfactory perception. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerren, A., Kyusakova, M., & Paradis, C.
(2013) From culture to text to interactive visualization of wine reviews. In F. T. Marchese, & E. Banissi (Eds), Knowledge visualization currents: From text to art to culture (pp. 85–110). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, M.
(2010) Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 97–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M.
(2015) True taste: The seven essential wine words. Kennebunkport: Cider Mill Press.Google Scholar
Kremer, L., & Ronneberger-Sibold, E.
(Eds.) (2007) Names in commerce and industry: Past and present. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
Lacey, S., Stilla, R., & Sathian, K.
(2012) Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language, 120(3), 416–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1986) Abstract motion. Proceedings of the twelfth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 12, 455–471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Investigations in cognitive grammar. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langewiesche, W.
(2000) The million-dollar nose. The Atlantic Monthly, 42–70. http://​www​.theatlantic​.com​/magazine​/archive​/2000​/12​/the​-million​-dollar​-nose​/378450/. Date of access 2 September, 2016.
Lehrer, A.
(1975) Talking about wine. Language, 51(4), 901–923. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1978) Structures of the lexicon and transfer of meaning. Lingua, 45, 95–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1983) Wine and Conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Reprinted and expanded in 2009 by Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A.
(2014) Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language, 29, 407–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, P.
(1998) Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text, 18(2), 143–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy. Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M., & Connell, L.
(2011) A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 381–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynott, D., & Connell, L.
(2009) Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 558–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: the relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 516–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, N.
(2003) When words get in the wine: The search for adjectives. National Post at http://​www​.winexmagazine​.com​/wine​/info​/national​-post1. Accessed on 10 November 2011.
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C.
(Eds.) (2011) The senses in language and culture [Special Issue]. The Senses & Society, 6, 1. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., & Burenhult, N.
(2014) Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition, 130, 266–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Burenhult, N., Stensmyr, M., de Valk, J., Hansson, B. S.
(2018) Olfactory language and abstraction across cultures. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society, 373, 1752. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T.
(2004) The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Motivation in grammar (pp. 221–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McCarthy, E., & Ewing-Mulligan, M.
(2006) Wine for dummies. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
McCoy, E.
(2005) The emperor of wine: The rise of Robert M. Parker Jr. and the reign of American taste. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, E., & Phillips, B.
(Eds.) (2008) Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric. Armonk NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Messaris, P.
(1997) Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Morgan, G., & Tresidder, R.
(2016) Contemporary wine studies. Dancing with Bacchus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morrot, G., Brochet, F., & Dubourdieu, D.
(2001) The colour of odors. Brain and Language, 79, 309–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Negro Alousque, I.
(2015) Visual wine metaphor and metonymy in ads. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 125–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noble, A., Arnold, R., Buechsenstein, J., Leach, E., Schmidt, J., & Stern, P.
(1987) Modification of a standardized system of wine aroma terminology. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 38(2), 107–109.Google Scholar
Nossiter, J.
(2004) Mondovino. Goatworks Films & Films de la Croisade.Google Scholar
O’Hara-Plotnik, A.
(2016) Wine label design is more important than you think. Eater (Oct 12). Available at http://​www​.eater​.com​/drinks​/2016​/10​/12​/13247718​/wine​-label​-design​?platform​=hootsuite. Last accessed 11/09/2017.
Oberfeld, D., Hecht, H., Allendorf, U., & Wickelmaier, F.
(2009) Ambient lighting modifies the flavor of wine. Journal of Sensory Studies, 24, 797–832. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Old, M.
(2013) Wine: A tasting course. London & New York: DK.Google Scholar
Olofsson, J., Hurley, R. S., Bowman, N. E., Bao, X., Mesulam, M., & Gottfried, J. A.
(2014) A designated odor–language integration system in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(45), 14864–14873. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B.
(1995) Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 393–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Discourse analysis. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G.
(Eds.) (1999) Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.
(Eds.) (2003) Pragmatic inferencing in metonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C.
(2001) Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(1), 47–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004/2011) Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(4), 245–264. Reprinted in P. Hanks & R. Giora (Eds.), Metaphor and figurative language: Critical concepts in linguistics, (pp. 137–156). Amsterdam: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2005) Ontologies and construals in lexical semantics. Axiomathes, 15, 541–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 317–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009a) This beauty should drink well for 10–12 years: A note on recommendations as semantic middles. Text & Talk, 29(1), 53–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Prime time: The middle construction in wine drinking recommendations. In R. Bowen, M. Mobärg, & S. Ohlander (Eds.), Corpus and discourse – and stuff (pp. 243–251). Gothenburg Studies in English 96. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
(2010) Touchdowns in winespeak: ontologies and contruals in use and meaning-making. In M. Goded Rambaud & A. Poves Luelmo. (Eds.), Proceedings for the 1st congress on linguistic approaches to food and wine descriptions (p. 57–72). Madrid: UNED University Press.Google Scholar
(2015a) Meanings of words. Theory and application. In U. Hass, & P. Storjohann (Eds.), Handbuch wort und wortschatz (Handbücher Sprachwissen-HSW Band 3) (pp. 274–294). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Conceptual spaces at work in sensuous cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances. In P. Gärdenfors, & F. Zenker (Eds.), Applications of conceptual spaces: Geometric knowledge representation (pp. 33–55). Dordrecht: Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C., & Willners, C.
(2011) Antonymy: From conventionalization to meaning-making. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(2), 367–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M.
(2013) Describing sensory perceptions: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor & Symbol, 28(1), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C., & Hommerberg, C.
(2016) We drink with our eyes first. The web of sensory perceptions, aesthetic experiences and mixed imagery in wine reviews. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 177–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parker, R. M.
(2008) Parker’s Wine Buyer’s Guide. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Peynaud, E.
(1987) The taste of wine. London: Macdonald Orbis.Google Scholar
Pérez Sobrino, P.
(2017) Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, B., & McQuarrie, E.
(2004) Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4(1/2), 111–34.Google Scholar
Plümacher, M., & Holz, P.
(Eds.) (2007) Speaking of colours and odors. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popova, Y.
(2003) ‘The fool sees with his nose’: Metaphorical mappings in the sense of smell in Patrick Süskind’s Perfume. Language and Literature, 12, 135–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Image schemas and verbal synaesthesia. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 1–26). Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J.
(1996) Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: SAGE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prial, F. J.
Pulvermüller, F.
(2003) The neuroscience of language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V., & Hubbard, E.
(2001) Synaesthesia –A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
Rohrer, T.
(2007) Embodiment and experientialism. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 25–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rolls, E.
(2008) Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion. Acta Physiologica Hungarica, 95, 131–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rouby, C., Schaal, B., Dubois, D., Gervais, R., & Holley, A.
(Eds.) (2002) Olfaction, taste and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez, F. J.
2000 “The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy”, in Barcelona, A. (ed). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 109–132.Google Scholar
San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., Dirksmeyer, T., Enfield, N. J., Floyd, S., Hammond, J., Rossi, G., Tufvesson, S., van Putten, S., & Majid, A.
(2015) Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics 26(1), 31–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, L. M., & Batra, R.
(Eds.) (2003) Persuasive imagery. A consumer perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shen, Y.
(1997) Cognitive constraints on poetic figures. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(1), 33–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y. & Gadir, O.
(2009) Target and source assignment in synaesthetic possessive constructions. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 357–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, G. M.
(2015) Neuroenology: How the brain creates the taste of wine. Flavour, 4(19). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M.
(2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23, 193–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Cultural’ concepts and the language-culture nexus. Current Anthropology, 45(5), 621–652. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Old wine, new ethnographic lexicography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 481–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sjöblom, P.
(2016) Commercial names. In C. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of names and naming (pp. 453–464). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sjöblom, P., Ainiala, T., & Hakala, U.
(2013) Names in the economy: Cultural prospects. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Spence, C., Velasco, C., & Knoeferle, K.
(2014) A large sample study on the influence of the multisensory environment on the wine drinking experience. Flavour, 3(8). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spence, C., & Wang, Q.
(2015a) Wine and music (I): On the crossmodal matching of wine and music. Flavour, 4(34). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Wine and music (II): Can you taste the music? Modulating the experience of wine through music and sound. Flavour, 4(33). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015c) Wine and music (III): So what if music influences the taste of the wine? Flavour, 4(36). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spence, C. et al.
(2015) On tasty colours and colourful tastes? Assessing, explaining, and utilizing crossmodal. Flavour volume 4, Article number 23 (2015) doi:  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, F.
(2015) Synaesthesia: A corpus-based study of cross-modal directionality. Functions of Language, 22(1), 69–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, F., & Winter, B.
(2018) Sensory languages across lexical categories. Lingua, 204, 45–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suárez-Toste, E.
(2007) Metaphor inside the wine cellar. On the ubiquity of personification schemas in winespeak., 12, 53–64.Google Scholar
(2013) One man’s cheese is another man’s music: Synaesthesia and the bridging of cultural differences in the language of sensory perception. In R. Caballero, & J. E. Díaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition. Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 169–191). Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Babel of the senses: On the roles of metaphor and synesthesia in wine reviews. Terminology, 23(1), 89–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1996) Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. I, Conceptual Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Temmerman, R., & Dubois, D.
(Eds.) (2017) Food and terminology. Expressing sensory experience in several languages. Special issue of Terminology, 23(1).Google Scholar
Teng, N. Y., & Sun, S.
(2002) Grouping, simile, and oxymoron in pictures: a design-based cognitive approach. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 295–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tent, J.
(2017) Out-of-the-blue names of paint colours. Names, 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, P.
(2004) Agency and consciousness in discourse. Self-other dynamics as a complex system. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.
(2007) Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.
(2005) Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trosborg, A.
(2000) Analysing professional genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, S.
(1945) Romanticism and synaesthesia: A comparative study of sense transfer in Keats and Byron. PMLA, 60(3), 811–827. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T.
(2008) Discourse and practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.
(1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Velasco-Sacristán, M., & Fuertes-Olivera, P.
(2006a) Towards a critical cognitive-pragmatic approach to gender metaphors in advertising English. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(11), 1982–2002. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Velasco-Sacristán, M. & Fuertes-Olivera, P.
(2006b) Olfactory and olfactory-mixed metaphors in print ads of perfumes. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 217–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Å.
(1983) The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics, 21(1), 123–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Verbs of perception. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals (pp. 1294–1309). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Warren, B.
(2006) Referential metonymy. Scripta Minora Regiae Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis. Kungliga Humanistiska vetenskapssamfundet i Lund.Google Scholar
Willander, J., & Larsson, M.
(2006) Smell your way back to childhood: Autobiographical odor memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(2), 240–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B.
(2016a) The sensory structure of the English lexicon. PhD dissertation University of California, Merced. http://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/885849k9
(2016b) Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(8), 975–988. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., Perlman, M., & Majid, A.
(2018) Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage. Cognition, 179, 213–220.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
(1953) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1977) Remarks on colour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whittock, T.
(1990) Metaphor and film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wochele, H., Kuhn, J., & Stegu, M.
(Eds.) (2012) Onomastics goes business: Role and relevance of brand, company and other names in economic contexts. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N.
(2010) An odor is not worth a thousand words: From multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 219–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, N.
(2003) Synesthetic metaphor: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics, 32, 19–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubek, J., Denkiewicz, M., Dębska, A., Radkowska, A., Komorowska-Mach, J., Litwin, P., Stępień, M., Kucińska, A., Sitarska, E., Komorowska, K., Fusaroli, R., Tylén, K., & Rączaszek, L.
(2016) Performance of language-coordinated collective systems: A study of wine recognition and description. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zucco, G. M.
2007The unique nature of a memory system. In Plümacher, M. & Holz, P. (eds.). Speaking of colours and odors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 155–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R.
(2009) Mental simulation in language comprehension and social cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1142–1150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

BAŞ, Melike
2021. tat- Eyleminin Anlam Genişlemesi Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Akademik Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi 5:2  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
2020. Soundscapes in English and Spanish: a corpus investigation of verb constructions. Language and Cognition 12:4  pp. 705 ff. Crossref logo
Truong, Hang, Roberto Burro & Ivana Bianchi
2021. The sensorial experience of wine for nonexperts: How the terms frequently used in Italian guidebooks are understood by standard consumers in Vietnam. Journal of Sensory Studies 36:4 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2019029458 | Marc record