Allauzen, A., & Bonneau-Maynard, H. (2008). Training and evaluation of POS taggers on the French
MULTITAG corpus. In N. Morales, J. Tejedor, J. Garrido, et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Sixth Language Resources and Evaluation
(LREC’08). [URL]
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Bolly, C. (2008). Les unites phraséologiques (UP): un phénomène ‘complexe’?
Etude des sequences (semi-)figées construites avec les verbs
‘prendre’ et ‘donner’. De la description en français L1 à l’acquisitions en L2. Doctoral Dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain.
Grevisse, M., & Goosse, A. (1993). Le bon usage. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.
Heyvaert, P. (2016). How elites talk about their political career: Metaphors
in spontaneous and informal political discourse. Paper presented at the 11th conference of the association for
Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM), Berlin, Germany.
Krennmayr, T. (2008). Using dictionaries in linguistic metaphor
identification. In N.-L. Johannesson & D. Minugh (Eds.), Selected papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor
Festivals (pp. 97–115). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Krennmayr, T. (2011). Metaphor in newspapers. Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. [URL]
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical
data. Biometrics 33(1), 159–174.
Ly, A. (2011). Combattre le changement climatique: Réflexions sur les
métaphores du climat au Parlement européen. Signes, Discours et Sociétés 7. [URL]
Nicaise, L. (2011). On going beyond the literal: Translating metaphorical
conceptualizations in financial discourse. Meta 562, 407–423.
Pasma, T. (2011). Metaphor and register variation: The personalization of Dutch
news discourse. Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. [URL]
Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2014). Deliberate metaphors in political discourse: The case of
citizen discourse. Metaphorik.de 25, 7–41.
Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2015). Folle machine ou solide relation « living apart together
» ?Mots. Les langages du politique 109.
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words
in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1), 1–39.
Schmid, H. (1994). Probabilistic part of speech tagging using decision
trees. In Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in
Language Processing (pp. 44–49). Manchester, UK.
Schmid, H. (1995). Improvements in Part-of-Speech tagging with an
application to German. Proceedings of the ACL SIGDAT-Workshop. Dublin, Ireland.
Steen, G. J., Biernacka, E., Dorst, A. G., Kaal, A. A., López-Rodríguez, I., & Pasma, T. (2010). Pragglejaz in practice: Finding metaphorically used words
in natural discourse. In: G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2022. Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (pims): A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to Bridge Theory and Practice. Cognitive Semantics 8:2 ► pp. 294 ff.
Johansson Falck, Marlene & Lacey Okonski
2023. Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (PIMS): The Case of Spatial and Abstract Relations. Metaphor and Symbol 38:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
KALIN SALI, Mesout
2022. Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde kullanılan ders materyalindeki kavramsal metaforların tespitine yönelik bir çalışma. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :31 ► pp. 77 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.