Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. (2007). Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(3), 242–275. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ahmad, J. (2012). Intentional vs. Incidental vocabulary learning. ELT Research Journal, 1(1), 71–79.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Althaus, N., & Westermann, G. (2016). Labels constructively shape object categories in 10-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 151, 5–17. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Amrami, A., & Goldberg, Y. (2019). Towards better substitution-based word sense induction. arXiv:1905.12598v2.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116(3), 463–498. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Apresjan, Ju. D. (1974). Regular Polysemy. Linguistics, 12(142). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asher, N. (2011). Lexical meaning in context: A web of words. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asher, N., & Pustejovsky, J. (2013). A Type Composition Logic for Generative Lexicon. In James Pustejovsky, P. Bouillon, H. Isahara, K. Kanzaki, & C. Lee (Eds.), Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory (Vol. 46, pp. 39–66). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asmuth, J., & Gentner, D. (2017). Relational Categories are More Mutable than Entity Categories. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(10), 2007–2025. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics, 38(1), 226–254. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. H., Hendrix, P., & Ramscar, M. (2013). Sidestepping the combinatorial explosion: An explanation of ngram frequency effects based on naïve discriminative learning. Lang Speech, 56(3), 329–347. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, C. (1979). Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 10. 533–81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Balaban, M. T., & Waxman, S. R. (1997). Do Words Facilitate Object Categorization in 9-Month-Old Infants? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64(1), 3–26. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants’ Contribution to the Achievement of Joint Reference. Child Development, 62(5), 875–890. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baltrušaitis, T., Ahuja, C., Morency, L. (2019). Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. February 2019. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bambini, V., Bertini, C., Schaeken, W., Stella, A., & Di Russo, F. (2016). Disentangling Metaphor from Context: An ERP Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(3), 424–434. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barcelona, A. (2000). On the plausibility of claiming a métonymie motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (pp. 31–58). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baroni, M., & Lenci, A. (2010). Distributional Memory: A General Framework for Corpus-Based Semantics. Computational Linguistics, 36(4), 673–721. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baroni, M., & Lenci, A. (2011). How we BLESSed distributional semantic evaluation, 1–10.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baroni, M., Dinu, G., & Kruszewski, G. (2014). Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. Context-predicting semantic vectors. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 238–247. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baroni, M., Evert, S., & Lenci, A. (Eds.). (2008). Lexical semantics: Bridging the gap between semantic theory and computational simulation. Retrieved from [URL]
Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain (Paperback edition). London: PAN Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(04). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1177–1187. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating Abstract Concepts. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding Cognition (pp. 129–163). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, K., & Wilson, C. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition (pp. 245–283). Retrieved from [URL]. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Beigman Klebanov, B., Wee Leong, C., Gutierrez, D., Shutova, E. & Flor, M. (2016). Semantic classifications for detection of verb metaphors. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp. 101–106. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bengio, Y., Schwenk, H., Senécal, J.-S., Morin, F., & Gauvain, J. L. (2006). Neural Probabilistic Language Models. In D. E. Holmes & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Innovations in Machine Learning (Vol. 194, pp. 137–186). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beretta, A., Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2005). The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: An MEG study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 57–65. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. (2012). At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3253–3258. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., & Raven, P. H. (1973). General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology. American Anthropologist, 75(1), 214–242. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bialystok, E. (2011). Reshaping the mind: The benefits of bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 65(4), 229–235. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767–2796. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 19(2), 295–308.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blythe, R. A., Smith, K., & Smith, A. D. M. (2010). Learning Times for Large Lexicons Through Cross-Situational Learning. Cognitive Science, 34(4), 620–642. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolognesi, M. (2011). Il lessico mentale bilingue e gli spazi semantici distribuzionali: E similarità tra i verbi in L1, in L2 e nei corpora. Studi di Glottodidattica, 5(2), 51–72.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolognesi, M. (2014). Distributional Semantics meets Embodied Cognition: Flickr® as a database of semantic features. Selected Papers from the 4th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 18–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolognesi, M. (2016b). Modeling Semantic Similarity between Metaphor Terms of Visual vs. Linguistic Metaphors through Flickr Tag Distributions. Frontiers in Communication, 1. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolognesi, M. (2017a). Flickr® distributional tagspace: Evaluating the semantic spaces emerging from Flickr® tag distributions. In (ed.). M. Jones, Big data in cognitive science. (pp. 144–173). New York, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolognesi, M. (2017b). Using semantic feature norms to investigate how the visual and verbal modes afford metaphor construction and expression. Language and Cognition, 9(3), 525–552. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolognesi, M., & Aina, L. (2019). Similarity is closeness: Using distributional semantic spaces to model similarity in visual and linguistic metaphors. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 15(1), 101–137. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolognesi, M., Burgers, C., & Caselli, T. (2020). On Abstraction: Decoupling conceptual concreteness and categorical specificity. Cognitive Processing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolognesi, M., & Steen, G. (2018). Editors’ Introduction: Abstract Concepts: Structure, Processing, and Modeling. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 490–500. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonnaud, V., Gil, R., & Ingrand, P. (2002). Metaphorical and non-metaphorical links: A behavioral and ERP study in young and elderly adults. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 32(4), 258–268. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2014). Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. New York: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boroditsky, L. (2011). How Language Shapes Thought. Scientific American, 304(2), 62–65. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boroditsky, L., & Prinz, J. (2008). What Thoughts Are Made Of. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied Grounding (pp. 98–116). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 63–85. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F. (2009). Grasping Ideas with the Motor System: Semantic Somatotopy in Idiom Comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19(8), 1905–1914. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bouma, G. (2009). Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. Processing texts automatically. In Proceedings of the Biennial GSCL Conference.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The Career of Metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruni, E., Tran, N. K., & Baroni, M. (2014). Multimodal Distributional Semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 49, 1–47. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2010). Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 359–371. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bullinaria, J. A., & Levy, J. P. (2007). Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 510–526. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bullinaria, J. A., & Levy, J. P. (2012). Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: Stop-lists, stemming, and SVD. Behavior Research Methods, 44(3), 890–907. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B. (2013). There Are Many Ways to See the Forest for the Trees: A Tour Guide for Abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 501–520. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C. (1998). Social Cognition, Joint Attention, and Communicative Competence from 9 to 15 Months of Age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(4), i. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D. (2008). Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought. Language Learning, 58, 63–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D., & Gijssels, T. (2015). What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cassani, G., Grimm, R., Gillis, S., & Daelemans, W. (2016). Constraining the search space in cross-situational word learning: different models make different predictions. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1152–1157). Cognitive Science Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Çetinavcı, B. M. (2014). Contextual Factors in Guessing Word Meaning from Context in a Foreign Language. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2670–2674. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chandler, S. (2017). The analogical modeling of linguistic categories. Language and Cognition, 9(1), 52–87. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chersoni, E., Lenci, A., & Blache, P. (2017). Logical Metonymy in a Distributional Model of Sentence Comprehension. Proceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM 2017), 168–177. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Retrieved from. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1975). The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Church, K. W., & Hanks, P. (1989). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -, 76–83. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, E. (1995). Language acquisitionThe lexicon and syntax. In Speech, Language, and Communication (pp. 304–337). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H. H., & Lucy, P. (1975). Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(1), 56–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2008). A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning – ICML ’08, 160–167. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collobert, R., Weston, J., Bottou, L., Karlen, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Kuksa, P. (2011). Natural Language Processing (almost) from Scratch. ArXiv:1103.0398 [Cs]. Retrieved from [URL]
Connell, L. (2018). What have labels ever done for us? The linguistic shortcut in conceptual processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–11. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: an event-related potential study. Memory & Cognition 30, 958–968. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cox, T. F., & Cox, M. A. A. (2001). Multidimensional Scaling. Chapman & Hall.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crutch, S. J., & Jackson, E. C. (2011). Contrasting Graded Effects of Semantic Similarity and Association across the Concreteness Spectrum. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(7), 1388–1408. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. (2005). Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, 128(3), 615–627. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2010). The differential dependence of abstract and concrete words upon associative and similarity-based information: Complementary semantic interference and facilitation effects. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(1), 46–71. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crutch, S. J., Connell, S., & Warrington, E. K. (2009). The different representational frameworks underpinning abstract and concrete knowledge: Evidence from odd-one-out judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(7), 1377–1390. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crutch, S. J., Ridha, B. H., & Warrington, E. K. (2006). The Different Frameworks Underlying Abstract and Concrete Knowledge: Evidence from a Bilingual Patient with a Semantic Refractory Access Dysphasia. Neurocase, 12(3), 151–163. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daelemans, W. & van den Bosch, A. (2005). Memory-based Language Processing. Studies in natural language processing. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daoutis, C. A., Franklin, A., Riddett, A., Clifford, A., & Davies, I. R. L. (2006). Categorical effects in children’s colour search: A cross-linguistic comparison. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(2), 373–400. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., Thorne, S. L., & Verspoor, M. (2013). Dynamic Systems Theory as a comprehensive theory of second language development. In M. del P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutierrez Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), AILA Applied Linguistics Series (Vol. 9, pp. 199–220). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Grauwe, S., Swain, A., Holcomb, P. J., Ditman, T., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). Electrophysiological insights into the processing of nominal metaphors. Neuropsychologia, 48(7), 1965–1984. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Vega, M., Glenberg, A., & Graesser, A. (2008). Symbols and EmbodimentDebates on meaning and cognition. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Desai, R. H., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Park, H., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2013). A piece of the action: Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors. NeuroImage, 83, 862–869. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale, ed. C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger, Lausanne and Paris: Payot.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dove, G. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110(3), 412–431. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dove, G. (2016). Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1109–1121. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dufter, P., & Schütze, H. (2019). Analytical Methods for Interpretable Ultradense Word Embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08654.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Egorova, N., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2016). Brain basis of communicative actions in language. NeuroImage, 125, 857–867. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elman, J. L. (2009). On the Meaning of Words and Dinosaur Bones: Lexical Knowledge Without a Lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 547–582. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erk, K., & Pado, S. (2010). Exemplar-based models for word meaning in context. In ’Proceedings of ACL, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 92–97.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Falkum, I. L., Recasens, M., & Clark, E. V. (2017). “ The moustache sits down first”: On the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language, 44(1), 87–119. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fellbaum, C. (1998). A Semantic Network of English: The Mother of All WordNets. Computers and the Humanities, 32(2/3), 209–220. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007). Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 182–196. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferretti, T. R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001). Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 516–547. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferry, A. L., Hespos, S. J., & Waxman, S. R. (2010). Categorization in 3- and 4-Month-Old Infants: An Advantage of Words Over Tones. Child Development, 81(2), 472–479. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Finkelstein, L., Gabrilovich, E., Matias, Y., Rivlin, E., Solan, Z., Wolfman, G., & Ruppin, E. (2001). Placing search in context: The concept revisited. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on World Wide Web – WWW ’01, 406–414. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firth, J. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. Tudies in Linguistic Analysis, 1–32.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fitneva, S. A., & Christiansen, M. H. (2011). Looking in the Wrong Direction Correlates With More Accurate Word Learning. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 367–380. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (1999). The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1366–1383. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The processing of familiar and novel senses of a word: Why reading Dickens is easy but reading Needham can be hard. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 595–613. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fulkerson, A. L., & Waxman, S. R. (2007). Words (but not Tones) facilitate object categorization: Evidence from 6- and 12-month-olds. Cognition, 105(1), 218–228. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garcia, J., & Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychon Sci 4, 123–124. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gass, S. (1999). DISCUSSION: Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 319–333. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, D. (1978). On Relational Meaning: The Acquisition of Verb Meaning. Child Development, 49(4), 988. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy*. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relativity and early word learning. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 215–256). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gerlach, P. (2018). The Social Framework of Individual Decisions. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs Jr., R. W., & Gerrig, R. J. (1989). How Context Makes Metaphor Comprehension Seem “Special.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4(3), 145–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W. (1984). Literal Meaning and Psychological Theory*. Cognitive Science, 8(3), 275–304. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W. (2006a). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W. (2006b). Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation. Mind & Language, 21(3), 434–458. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gildea, P., & Glucksberg, S. (1983). On understanding metaphor: The role of context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(5), 577–590. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183–206. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glanzer, M., & Duarte, A. (1971). Repetition between and within languages in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(6), 625–630. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard Words. Language Learning and Development, 1(1), 23–64. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding Figurative Language. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 92–96. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookin, H. (1982). On understanding non-literal speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 85–96. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97(1), 3–18. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goggin, J., & Wickens, D. D. (1971). Proactive interference and language change in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(4), 453–458. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70(2), 109–135. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. Retrieved from [URL]
Grady, J. (2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1595–1614. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. Reprinted from Syntax and semantics 3: Speech arts, Cole et al. “Logic and conversation”, pp. 41–58, (1975), with permission from Elsevier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guida, A., & Lenci, A. (2007). Semantic Properties of Word Associations to Italian Verbs. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 19(2), 293–326.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haastrup, K. (1989). Lexical inferencing procedures, Part 1 and Part 2. Copenhagen: Handelshojskolen i Kobenhavn.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hampe, B. (Ed.). (2017). Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, B., & Hart, D. (2000). Vocabulary Learning in the Content-oriented Second-language Classroom: Student Perceptions and Proficiency. Language Awareness, 9(2), 78–96. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, R. J. (1976). Comprehension of metaphors: A test of the two-stage processing model. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8(4), 312–314. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Z. S. (1954). Distributional Structure. Word, 10(2–3), 146–162. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Z. S. (1973). A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Charles F. Hockett. International Journal of American Linguistics, 39(4), 252–255. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Zellig S., & Mandelbaum, D. G. (1951). Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality. Language, 27(3), 288. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, F., Reichart, R., & Korhonen, A. (2015). SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models With (Genuine) Similarity Estimation. Computational Linguistics, 41(4), 665–695. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoffman, P. (2016). The meaning of ‘life’ and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology. Journal of Neuropsychology, 10(2), 317–343. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoffman, P., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2010). Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Plays an Executive Regulation Role in Comprehension of Abstract Words: Convergent Neuropsychological and Repetitive TMS Evidence. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(46), 15450–15456. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoffman, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T. (2013). Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 718–730. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollis, G. (2019). Learning about things that never happened: a critique and refinement to the Rescorla-Wagner update rule when many outcomes are possible, Memory & Cognition, 1–16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2008). Fast Mapping but Poor Retention by 24-Month-Old Infants. Infancy, 13(2), 128–157. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, T. H. (2014). Social Metaphor Detection via Topical Analysis. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 19(2), 1–16.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: A Review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 181–193. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Humphries, C., Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., & Liebenthal, E. (2006). Syntactic and Semantic Modulation of Neural Activity during Auditory Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(4), 665–679. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Indefrey, P. (2006). A Meta-analysis of Hemodynamic Studies on First and Second Language Processing: Which Suggested Differences Can We Trust and What Do They Mean?: Hemodynamic Studies of L1 and L2 Processing
. Language Learning, 56, 279–304. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Inhoff, A. W., Lima, S. D., & Carroll, P. J. (1984). Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading. Memory & Cognition, 12(6), 558–567. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jung, K., Shavitt, S., Viswanathan, M., & Hilbe, J. M. (2014). Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8782–8787. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kachergis, G., Yu, C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2014). Cross-situational word learning is both implicit and strategic. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kalgren, I., & Sahlgren, M. (2001). From Words to Understanding, 294–308. CSLI publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamin, L. J. (1968). “Attention-like” processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior, 1967: Aversive Stimulation. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiela, D., & Clark, S. (2014). A Systematic Study of Semantic Vector Space Model Parameters. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and Their Compositionality (CVSC), 21–30. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiela, D., Bulat, L., & Clark, S. (2015). Grounding semantics in olfactory perception. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers) (pp. 231–236). Beijing, China: ACL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiela, D., & Clark, S. (2015). Multi-and cross-modal semantics beyond vision: Grounding in auditory perception. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2015) (pp. 2461–2470). Lisbon, Portugal: ACL. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(2), 257–266. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). The Representation of Polysemous Words. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(2), 259–282. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (2002). Paper has been my ruin: Conceptual relations of polysemous senses. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 548–570. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z. (2013). The Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krennmayr, T., Steen, G. (2017). VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus. In: Ide, N., Pustejovsky, J. (eds) Handbook of Linguistic Annotation pp. 1053–1071 Springer, Dordrecht. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krishnakumaran, S., & Zhu, X. (2007). Hunting Elusive Metaphors Using Lexical Resources. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language (pp. 13–20). Rochester, New York. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 119–135. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831–843. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kurzweil, R. (2012). How to create a mind: The secret of human thought revealed. New York: Viking.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lai, V. T., Curran, T., & Menn, L. (2009). Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1284, 145–155. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lai, V. T., & Curran, T. (2013). ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors. Brain and language, 127(3), 484–496. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by (5. [Dr.]). Chicago, Ill.: Univ. of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lapesa, G., & Evert, S. (2014). A Large Scale Evaluation of Distributional Semantic Models: Parameters, Interactions and Model Selection. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2, 531–546. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G. N. (1974). Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H., Baayen, R. H., Grainger, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2008). Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 12–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lenci, A. (2018). Distributional Models of Word Meaning. Annual Review of Linguistics, 4(1), 151–171. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lent, J. R. (2017). The patterning instinct: A cultural history of humanity’s search for meaning. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leong, C. W., Klebanov, B. B., & Shutova, E. (2018). A Report on the 2018 VUA Metaphor Detection Shared Task. Proceedings of the Workshop on Figurative Language Processing. NAACL 2018 Workshop on Figurative Language Processing. New Orleans, Louisiana. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Language and mind: Let’s get the issue straight! In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, pp. 25–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levy, O., & Goldberg, Y. (2014). Linguistic Regularities in Sparse and Explicit Word Representations. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 171–180. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levy, O., Goldberg, Y., & Dagan, I. (2015). Improving Distributional Similarity with Lessons Learned from Word Embeddings. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3, 211–225. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liberman, V., Samuels, S. M., & Ross, L. (2004). The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1175–1185. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Figurative Thinking and Foreign Language Learning. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Louwerse, M. M. (2007). Symbolic or embodied representations: A case for symbol interdependency. In T. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.). In Handbook of latent semantic analysis (T. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis, W. Kintsch, pp. 107–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Louwerse, M. M. (2008). Embodied relations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 838–844. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition: Topics in Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 273–302. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Louwerse, M. M. (2018). Knowing the Meaning of a Word by the Linguistic and Perceptual Company It Keeps. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 573–589. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Louwerse, M. M., & Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Language Encodes Geographical Information. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 51–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lowder, M. W., & Gordon, P. C. (2013). It’s hard to offend the college: Effects of sentence structure on figurative-language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 993–1011. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lupyan, G. (2008). The conceptual grouping effect: Categories matter (and named categories matter more). Cognition, 108(2), 566–577. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lupyan, G. (2012). Linguistically Modulated Perception and Cognition: The Label-Feedback Hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2013). Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: The relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 516–526. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mahon, B. Z. (2015). What is embodied about cognition? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(4), 420–429. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1–3), 59–70. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malt, B. C., Gennari, S., Imai, M., Ameel, E., Tsuda, N., & Majid, A. (2008). Talking About Walking: Biomechanics and the Language of Locomotion. Psychological Science, 19(3), 232–240. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 57–78. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markman, E. M. (1990). Constraints Children Place on Word Meanings. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 57–77. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F. (1988). Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 121–157. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCormick, C. & Ryan, N. (2019). BERT Word Embeddings Tutorial. Retrieved from [URL]
McDonald, S., & Brew, C. (2004). A distributional model of semantic context effects in lexical processing. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics – ACL ’04, 17-es. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McElree, B., & Nordlie, J. (1999). Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(3), 486–494. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McElree, B., Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2006). Deferred Interpretations: Why Starting Dickens is Taxing but Reading Dickens Isn’t. Cognitive Science, 30(1), 181–192. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McElree, B., M. Traxler, M. Pickering, R. Seely, and R. Jackendoff (2001). Reading time evidence for enriched composition. Cognition 78(1), B17–B25. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2012). Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning. Psychological Review, 119(4), 831–877. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K. (2012). Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning. Psychological Review, 119(4), 831–877. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., Toscano, J. C., & Samuelson, L. K. (2009). Integrating Connectionist Learning and Dynamical Systems Processing: Case Studies in Speech and Lexical Development. In J. Spencer (Ed.), Toward a Unified Theory of Development Connectionism and Dynamic System Theory Re-Consider (pp. 218–250). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306(21), 1259–1262. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McRae, K., & Jones, M. (2013). Semantic Memory. In D. Reisberg (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 547–559. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McRae, K., Nedjadrasul, D., Pau, R., Lo, B. P.-H., & King, L. (2018). Abstract Concepts and Pictures of Real-World Situations Activate One Another. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 518–532. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Medin, D., & Ortony, A. (1989). Comments on Part I: Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–196). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Medina, T. N., Snedeker, J., Trueswell, J. C., & Gleitman, L. R. (2011). How words can and cannot be learned by observation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(22), 9014–9019. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meng, Y., Huang, J., Wang, G., Wang, Z., Zhang, C., Han, J. (2020). Unsupervised Word Embedding Learning by Incorporating Local and Global Contexts. Frontiers in Big Data, 3, ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mesquita, B., Barrett, L. F., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.). (2010). The mind in context. New York: Guilford Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. ArXiv:1301.3781 [Cs]. Retrieved from [URL]
Mikolov, T., Yih, S. W., & Zweig, G. (2013). Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT-2013). Retrieved from [URL]
Miller, G. A. (1998). Nouns in wordnet. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, 23–46.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mitchell, M. (2020). On Crashing the Barrier of Meaning in Artificial Intelligence. AI Magazine, 41(2), 86–92. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monaghan, P., & Mattock, K. (2012). Integrating constraints for learning word–referent mappings. Cognition, 123(1), 133–143. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 863–883. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Munakata, Y., & McClelland, J. L. (2003). Connectionist models of development. Developmental Science, 6(4), 413–429. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Murphy, G. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nassaji, H. (2003). L2 Vocabulary Learning from Context: Strategies, Knowledge Sources, and Their Relationship with Success in L2 Lexical Inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 645. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Navigli, R. (2009). Word sense disambiguation: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(2), 1–69. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noble, W., & Davidson, I. (1991). The Evolutionary Emergence of Modern Human Behaviour: Language and its Archaeology. Man, 26(2), 223. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noble, W., & Davidson, I. (1993). Tracing the emergence of modern human behavior: Methodological pitfalls and a theoretical path. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 12(2), 121–149. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noppeney, U., & Price, C. J. (2004). An fMRI Study of Syntactic Adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 702–713. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification–categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115(1), 39–61. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nunberg, G. (1995). Transfers of Meaning. Journal of Semantics, 12(2), 109–132. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortony, A., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Antos, S. J. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(4), 465–477. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osgood, C. E. (1952). The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49(3), 197–237. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padó, S., & Lapata, M. (2007). Dependency-Based Construction of Semantic Space Models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2), 161–199. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paivio, A. (1983). The mind’s eye in arts and science. Poetics, 12(1), 1–18. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental Representations. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parel, R. (2004). The impact of lexical inferencing strategies on second language reading proficiency. Reading and Writing, 17(6), 847–873. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Park, S., Bak, J., & Oh, A. (2017). Rotated word vector representations and their interpretability. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pecher, D. (2018). Curb Your Embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 501–517. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.). (2005). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., & Michelizzi, J. (2004). Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artifical Intelligence, 1024–1025. AAAI Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D. (2006). Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Piñango, M. M., Zhang, M., Foster-Hanson, E., Negishi, M., Lacadie, C., & Constable, R. T. (2017). Metonymy as Referential Dependency: Psycholinguistic and Neurolinguistic Arguments for a Unified Linguistic Treatment. Cognitive Science, 41, 351–378. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science 253.530–35. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S. (1995). The language instinct: The new science of language and mind. London: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S. (2004). Clarifying the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 31.949–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pirrelli, V., Marzi, C., Ferro, M., Cardillo, F. A., Baayen, H. R., & Milin, P. (2020). Psycho-computational modelling of the mental lexicon. In V. Pirrelli, I. Plag, and W. Dressler (eds.) Word Knowledge and Word Usage, pages: 23–82. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plat, R., Lowie, W. & de Bot, K. (2018). Word Naming in the L1 and L2: A Dynamic Perspective on Automatization and the Degree of Semantic Involvement in Naming. Frontiers in Psychology 8. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plunkett, K., Hu, J.-F., & Cohen, L. B. (2008). Labels can override perceptual categories in early infancy. Cognition, 106(2), 665–681. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(2), 421–435. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2017). How do children process abstract concepts? Evidence from a lexical decision task. Developmental Science, 10, 10–11. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ponniah, J. (2011). The Effectiveness of the Comprehension Hypothesis: A Review on the Current Research on Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition. Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(2), 1–4.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22:1, pp1–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Neurobiological Mechanisms for Semantic Feature Extraction and Conceptual Flexibility. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 590–620. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pustejovsky, James. (1991). The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17(4), 409–441.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F.-H., & Poli, J. (1996). The Time-Course of Metaphor Comprehension: An Event-Related Potential Study. Brain and Language, 55(3), 293–316. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quine, W. V. O. (2013). Word and object. Place of publication not identified: Martino Fine Books. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quinn, P. C., Eimas, P. D., & Rosenkrantz, S. L. (1993). Evidence for Representations of Perceptually Similar Natural Categories by 3-Month-Old and 4-Month-Old Infants. Perception, 22(4), 463–475. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raganato, A., Camacho-Collados, J., & Navigli, R. (2017). Word Sense Disambiguation: A Unified Evaluation Framework and Empirical Comparison. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers, 99–110. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & Klein, J. (2013). Children value informativity over logic in word learning. Psychological Science 24, 6, 1017–1023. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & McCauley, S. M. (2013). Error and expectation in language learning: The curious absence of mouses in adult speech. Language, 89(4), 760–793. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2009). Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 388–396. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rapp, R. (2004). A Freely Available Automatically Generated Thesaurus of Related Words, 395–398.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reines, M. F., & Prinz, J. (2009). Reviving Whorf: The Return of Linguistic Relativity. Philosophy Compass, 4(6), 1022–1032. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy, Eds., Classical Conditioning II, pp. 64–99. Appleton-CenturyCrofts.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43(3), 151–160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Restrepo Ramos, F. D. (2015). Incidental Vocabulary Learning in Second Language Acquisition: A Literature Review. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 17(1), 157–166. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Riordan, B., & Jones, M. N. (2011). Redundancy in Perceptual and Linguistic Experience: Comparing Feature-Based and Distributional Models of Semantic Representation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 303–345. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberson, D., Hanley, J. R., & Pak, H. (2009). Thresholds for color discrimination in English and Korean speakers. Cognition, 112(3), 482–487. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, C. W., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2007). Linguistic Labels and Categorization in Infancy: Do Labels Facilitate or Hinder? Infancy, 11(3), 233–253. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 245–266. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosenblatt, F. (1957). The perceptron, a perceiving and recognizing automaton (Project Para Report No. 85-460-1). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory (CAL).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65(6), 386. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rothe, S., Ebert, S., & Schütze, H. (2016). Ultradense word embeddings by orthogonal transformation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rubenstein, H., & Goodenough, J. B. (1965). Contextual correlates of synonymy. Communications of the ACM, 8(10), 627–633. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Brass, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2007). Comprehending Prehending: Neural Correlates of Processing Verbs with Motor Stems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 855–865. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M., & Binder, J. R. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. NeuroImage, 27(1), 188–200. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word Segmentation: The Role of Distributional Cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 606–621. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sahlgren, M. (2006). The word-space model: Using distributional analysis to represent syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations between words in high-dimensional vector spaces. Stockholm: Dep. of Linguistics, Stockholm Univ. [unpublished thesis].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sahlgren, M., & Lenci, A. (2016). The Effects of Data Size and Frequency Range on Distributional Semantic Models. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 975–980. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(1), 82–102. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 499–520. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schütze, H. (1993). Word Space. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5, 895–902.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schütze, H. (1992). Dimensions of meaning. In Proceedings of Supercomputing ’92, 787–796. IEEE Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schütze, H. (1998). Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24(1), 97–124.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scott, S. K., Blank, C., Rosen, S., & Wise, R. (2000). Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain, 123(12), 2400–2406. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J. R. (1975). Speech acts and recent linguistics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 263(1 Developmental), 27–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sejnowski, T. J. (2018). The deep learning revolution. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shutova, Ekaterina. 2010. Automatic metaphor interpretation as a paraphrasing task. In Proceedings of NAACL 2010, pp. 1029–1037, Los Angeles, USA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shutova, E., Kaplan, J., Teufel, S., & Korhonen, A. (2013). A computational model of logical metonymy. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing, 10(3), 1–28. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shutova, E., Kiela, D., and Maillard, J. (2016). Black holes and white rabbits: Metaphor identification with visual features. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (San Diego, CA), 160–170.
Shutova, E., Sun, L., Korhonen, A. (2010). Metaphor Identification Using Verb and Noun Clustering. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2010), pages 1002–1010, Beijing, China.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sikos, J. & Padó, S. (2019). Frame Identification as Categorization: Exemplars vs Prototypes in Embeddingland. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Semantics. Gothenburg, Sweden. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions (pp. 195–219). Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, L., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106(3), 1558–1568. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spitsyna, G., Warren, J. E., Scott, S. K., Turkheimer, F. E., & Wise, R. J. S. (2006). Converging Language Streams in the Human Temporal Lobe. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(28), 7328–7336. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spivey, M. (2006). The Continuity of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swingley, D. (2009). Contributions of infant word learning to language development. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3617–3632. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17(1), 480. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, L. (2000). Typology and process in concept structuring (1. MIT Press paperback ed). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, D. (1993). What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 14–56). New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thaler, S., Simperl, E., Siorpaes, K., & Hofer, C. (2011). A survey on games for Knowledge acquisition. STI Technical Report, May 2011, 19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomas, D. G., Campos, J. J., Shucard, D. W., Ramsay, D. S., & Shucard, J. (1981). Semantic Comprehension in Infancy: A Signal Detection Analysis. Child Development, 52(3), 798. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thornbury, S. (2013). How to teach vocabulary (13. impr). Harlow: Longman, Pearson Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M. (2003). The cultural origins of human cognition (4. print). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M., & Barton, M. E. (1994). Learning words in nonostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 639–650. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M., Strosberg, R., & Akhtar, N. (1996). Eighteen-month-old children learn words in non-ostensive contexts. Journal of Child Language, 23(1), 157–176. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trask, A., Michalak, M., & Liu, J. (2015). Sense2vec – a fast and accurate method for word sense disambiguation in neural word embeddings. ArXiv e-prints.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 69–90. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trueswell, J. C., Medina, T. N., Hafri, A., & Gleitman, L. R. (2013). Propose but verify: Fast mapping meets cross-situational word learning. Cognitive Psychology, 66(1), 126–156. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turney, P. D. (2001). Mining the Web for Synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. In L. De Raedt & P. Flach (Eds.), Machine Learning: ECML 2001 (Vol. 2167, pp. 491–502). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Utsumi, A. (2011). Computational Exploration of Metaphor Comprehension Processes Using a Semantic Space Model. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 251–296. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van den Bos, G. R. (Ed.). (2007). APA dictionary of psychology (1st ed). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Veale, T. (2012). Exploding the creativity myth: The computational foundations of linguistic creativity. London; New York: Continuum International Pub. Group.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Veale, T., Shutova, E., & Klebanov, B. B. (2016). Metaphor: A Computational Perspective. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 9(1), 1–160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vigliocco, G., Filipovic Kleiner, L. (2004). From mind in the mouth to language in the mind: Language in Mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (1), 5–7. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. P. (2007). Semantic representation. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vigliocco, G., Ponari, M., & Norbury, C. (2018). Learning and Processing Abstract Words and Concepts: Insights From Typical and Atypical Development. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(3): 533–549. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vivas, L., Montefinese, M., Bolognesi, M., and Vivas, G. (2020). Core features: measures and characterization for different languages. Cognitive Processing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
von Ahn, L., & Dabbish, L. (2004). Labeling images with a computer game. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ’04, 319–326. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vouloumanos, A. (2008). Fine-grained sensitivity to statistical information in adult word learning. Cognition, 107(2), 729–742. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, J., Conder, J. A., Blitzer, D. N., & Shinkareva, S. V. (2010). Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31(10), 1459–1468. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warrington, E. K., & Cipolotti, L. (1996). Word comprehension: The distinction between refractory and storage impairments. Brain, 119(2), 611–625. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1979). Semantic access dyslexia. Brain, 102(1), 43–63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waxman, S. R., & Markow, D. B. (1995). Words as Invitations to Form Categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-Month-Old Infants. Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 257–302. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weaver, W. (1949). Translation. In Locke, W. N.; Booth, A. D. (eds.). Machine Translation of Languages: Fourteen Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webb, S. (2008). The Effects of Context on Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 232–245.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weber, I., Robertson, S., & Vojnovic, M. (2009). Rethinking the ESP Game. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 11. Retrieved from [URL]
Weiland, H., Bambini, V., & Schumacher, P. B. (2014). The role of literal meaning in figurative language comprehension: Evidence from masked priming ERP. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Werkmann Horvat, A., Bolognesi, M., and Lahiri, A. (forth.). Processing of literal and metaphorical meanings in polysemous verbs: An experiment and its methodological importance.
Werkmann Horvat, A., Bolognesi, M., and Kohl, K. (forth.). Demolishing walls and myths: On the status of conventional metaphorical meaning in the L2 lexicon.
Westermann, G., & Mareschal, D. (2014). From perceptual to language-mediated categorization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), 20120391. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilks, Y. (1975). A Preferential, Pattern-Seeking, Semantics for Natural Language Inference. Artificial Intelligence 6, 53–74. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilks, Y. (1978). Making preferences more active. Artificial Intelligence 11(3), 197–223. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wheeler, D. J. (1952). The use of sub-routines in programmes. ACM ‘52: Proceedings of the 1952 ACM national meeting, 235–236. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Xu, X. (2005). Content Differences for Abstract and Concrete Concepts. Cognitive Science, 29(5), 719–736. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(19), 7780–7785. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, P., & Holmes, K. J. (2011). Linguistic relativity: Linguistic relativity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), 253–265. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yu, C. (2008). A Statistical Associative Account of Vocabulary Growth in Early Word Learning. Language Learning and Development, 4(1), 32–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Rapid Word Learning Under Uncertainty via Cross-Situational Statistics. Psychological Science, 18(5), 414–420. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2012). Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers. Cognition, 125(2), 244–262. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yu, C., Zhong, Y., & Fricker, D. (2012). Selective Attention in Cross-Situational Statistical Learning: Evidence From Eye Tracking. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yurovsky, D., Fricker, D. C., Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2014). The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 1–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zarcone, A., Lenci, A., Padó, S., & Utt, J. (2013). Fitting, Not Clashing! A Distributional Semantic Model of Logical Metonymy. Proceedings of IWCS, 404–410.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zarcone, A., Padó, S., & Lenci, A. (2014). Logical Metonymy Resolution in a Words-as-Cues Framework: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading and Probe Recognition. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 973–996. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 229–234. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwaan, R. A. (2016). Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1028–1034. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)