(2007) Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(3), 242–275.
Ahmad, J.
(2012) Intentional vs. Incidental vocabulary learning. ELT Research Journal, 1(1), 71–79.
Althaus, N., & Westermann, G.
(2016) Labels constructively shape object categories in 10-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 151, 5–17.
Amrami, A., & Goldberg, Y.
(2019) Towards better substitution-based word sense induction. arXiv:1905.12598v2.
Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D.
(2009) Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116(3), 463–498.
Apresjan, Ju. D.
(1974) Regular Polysemy. Linguistics, 12(142).
Asher, N.
(2011) Lexical meaning in context: A web of words. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Asher, N., & Pustejovsky, J.
(2013) A Type Composition Logic for Generative Lexicon. In James Pustejovsky, P. Bouillon, H. Isahara, K. Kanzaki, & C. Lee (Eds.), Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory (Vol. 46, pp. 39–66).
Asmuth, J., & Gentner, D.
(2017) Relational Categories are More Mutable than Entity Categories. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(10), 2007–2025.
Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O.
(1985) Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics, 38(1), 226–254.
(2013) Sidestepping the combinatorial explosion: An explanation of ngram frequency effects based on naïve discriminative learning. Lang Speech, 56(3), 329–347.
Baker, C.
(1979) Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 10. 533–81.
Balaban, M. T., & Waxman, S. R.
(1997) Do Words Facilitate Object Categorization in 9-Month-Old Infants?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64(1), 3–26.
Baldwin, D. A.
(1991) Infants’ Contribution to the Achievement of Joint Reference. Child Development, 62(5), 875–890.
Baltrušaitis, T., Ahuja, C., Morency, L.
(2019) Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. February 2019.
Bambini, V., Bertini, C., Schaeken, W., Stella, A., & Di Russo, F.
(2016) Disentangling Metaphor from Context: An ERP Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.
Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S.
(2002) Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(3), 424–434.
Barcelona, A.
(2000) On the plausibility of claiming a métonymie motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (pp. 31–58).
Baroni, M., & Lenci, A.
(2010) Distributional Memory: A General Framework for Corpus-Based Semantics. Computational Linguistics, 36(4), 673–721.
Baroni, M., & Lenci, A.
(2011) How we BLESSed distributional semantic evaluation, 1–10.
Baroni, M., Dinu, G., & Kruszewski, G.
(2014) Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. Context-predicting semantic vectors. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 238–247.
Baroni, M., Evert, S., & Lenci, A.
(Eds.) (2008) Lexical semantics: Bridging the gap between semantic theory and computational simulation. Retrieved from [URL]
Barrett, L. F.
(2017) How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain (Paperback edition). London: PAN Books.
Barsalou, L. W.
(1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(04).
Barsalou, L. W.
(2003) Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1177–1187.
Barsalou, L. W.
(2008) Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645.
Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K.
(2005) Situating Abstract Concepts. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding Cognition (pp. 129–163).
Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, K., & Wilson, C.
(2008) Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition (pp. 245–283). Retrieved from [URL].
Beigman Klebanov, B., Wee Leong, C., Gutierrez, D., Shutova, E. & Flor, M.
(2016) Semantic classifications for detection of verb metaphors. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp. 101–106.
Bengio, Y., Schwenk, H., Senécal, J.-S., Morin, F., & Gauvain, J. L.
(2006) Neural Probabilistic Language Models. In D. E. Holmes & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Innovations in Machine Learning (Vol. 194, pp. 137–186).
Beretta, A., Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D.
(2005) The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: An MEG study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 57–65.
Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D.
(2012) At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3253–3258.
Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., & Raven, P. H.
(1973) General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology. American Anthropologist, 75(1), 214–242.
Bialystok, E.
(2011) Reshaping the mind: The benefits of bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 65(4), 229–235.
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L.
(2009) Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767–2796.
Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M.
(1993) Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 19(2), 295–308.
Blythe, R. A., Smith, K., & Smith, A. D. M.
(2010) Learning Times for Large Lexicons Through Cross-Situational Learning. Cognitive Science, 34(4), 620–642.
Bolognesi, M.
(2011) Il lessico mentale bilingue e gli spazi semantici distribuzionali: E similarità tra i verbi in L1, in L2 e nei corpora. Studi di Glottodidattica, 5(2), 51–72.
Bolognesi, M.
(2014) Distributional Semantics meets Embodied Cognition: Flickr® as a database of semantic features. Selected Papers from the 4th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 18–35.
(2016b) Modeling Semantic Similarity between Metaphor Terms of Visual vs. Linguistic Metaphors through Flickr Tag Distributions. Frontiers in Communication, 1.
Bolognesi, M.
(2017a) Flickr® distributional tagspace: Evaluating the semantic spaces emerging from Flickr® tag distributions. In (ed.). M. Jones, Big data in cognitive science. (pp. 144–173). New York, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Bolognesi, M.
(2017b) Using semantic feature norms to investigate how the visual and verbal modes afford metaphor construction and expression. Language and Cognition, 9(3), 525–552.
Bolognesi, M., & Aina, L.
(2019) Similarity is closeness: Using distributional semantic spaces to model similarity in visual and linguistic metaphors. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 15(1), 101–137.
Bolognesi, M., Burgers, C., & Caselli, T.
(2020) On Abstraction: Decoupling conceptual concreteness and categorical specificity. Cognitive Processing.
Bolognesi, M., & Steen, G.
(2018) Editors’ Introduction: Abstract Concepts: Structure, Processing, and Modeling. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 490–500.
(2002) Metaphorical and non-metaphorical links: A behavioral and ERP study in young and elderly adults. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 32(4), 258–268.
Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F.
(2014) Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. New York: Springer.
Boroditsky, L.
(2001) Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.
Boroditsky, L.
(2011) How Language Shapes Thought. Scientific American, 304(2), 62–65.
Boroditsky, L., & Prinz, J.
(2008) What Thoughts Are Made Of. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied Grounding (pp. 98–116).
Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J.
(1996) Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 63–85.
Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F.
(2009) Grasping Ideas with the Motor System: Semantic Somatotopy in Idiom Comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19(8), 1905–1914.
Bouma, G.
(2009) Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. Processing texts automatically. In Proceedings of the Biennial GSCL Conference.
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.
(2005) The Career of Metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216.
(2010) Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 359–371.
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V.
(2014) Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911.
Bullinaria, J. A., & Levy, J. P.
(2007) Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 510–526.
Bullinaria, J. A., & Levy, J. P.
(2012) Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: Stop-lists, stemming, and SVD. Behavior Research Methods, 44(3), 890–907.
Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B.
(2013) There Are Many Ways to See the Forest for the Trees: A Tour Guide for Abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 501–520.
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C.
(1998) Social Cognition, Joint Attention, and Communicative Competence from 9 to 15 Months of Age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(4), i.
Casasanto, D.
(2008) Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought. Language Learning, 58, 63–79.
Casasanto, D., & Gijssels, T.
(2015) What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor?Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1).
Cassani, G., Grimm, R., Gillis, S., & Daelemans, W.
(2016) Constraining the search space in cross-situational word learning: different models make different predictions. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1152–1157). Cognitive Science Society.
Çetinavcı, B. M.
(2014) Contextual Factors in Guessing Word Meaning from Context in a Foreign Language. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2670–2674.
Chandler, S.
(2017) The analogical modeling of linguistic categories. Language and Cognition, 9(1), 52–87.
Chersoni, E., Lenci, A., & Blache, P.
(2017) Logical Metonymy in a Distributional Model of Sentence Comprehension. Proceedings of the 6th Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM 2017), 168–177.
Chomsky, N.
(1957) Syntactic structures. Retrieved from.
Chomsky, N.
(1975) The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum Press.
Chomsky, N.
(1980) Rules and representations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Church, K. W., & Hanks, P.
(1989) Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -, 76–83.
Clark, E.
(1995) Language acquisitionThe lexicon and syntax. In Speech, Language, and Communication (pp. 304–337).
Clark, H. H., & Lucy, P.
(1975) Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(1), 56–72.
Collobert, R., & Weston, J.
(2008) A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning – ICML ’08, 160–167.
Collobert, R., Weston, J., Bottou, L., Karlen, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Kuksa, P.
(2011) Natural Language Processing (almost) from Scratch. ArXiv:1103.0398 [Cs]. Retrieved from [URL]
Connell, L.
(2018) What have labels ever done for us? The linguistic shortcut in conceptual processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–11.
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M.
(2004) Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511.
Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C.
(2002) Conceptual integration and metaphor: an event-related potential study. Memory & Cognition 30, 958–968.
Cox, T. F., & Cox, M. A. A.
(2001) Multidimensional Scaling. Chapman & Hall.
Cruse, D. A.
(1986) Lexical semantics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crutch, S. J., & Jackson, E. C.
(2011) Contrasting Graded Effects of Semantic Similarity and Association across the Concreteness Spectrum. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(7), 1388–1408.
Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E.
(2005) Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain, 128(3), 615–627.
Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K.
(2010) The differential dependence of abstract and concrete words upon associative and similarity-based information: Complementary semantic interference and facilitation effects. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(1), 46–71.
Crutch, S. J., Connell, S., & Warrington, E. K.
(2009) The different representational frameworks underpinning abstract and concrete knowledge: Evidence from odd-one-out judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(7), 1377–1390.
Crutch, S. J., Ridha, B. H., & Warrington, E. K.
(2006) The Different Frameworks Underlying Abstract and Concrete Knowledge: Evidence from a Bilingual Patient with a Semantic Refractory Access Dysphasia. Neurocase, 12(3), 151–163.
De Grauwe, S., Swain, A., Holcomb, P. J., Ditman, T., & Kuperberg, G. R.
(2010) Electrophysiological insights into the processing of nominal metaphors. Neuropsychologia, 48(7), 1965–1984.
De Vega, M., Glenberg, A., & Graesser, A.
(2008) Symbols and EmbodimentDebates on meaning and cognition.
Desai, R. H., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Park, H., & Seidenberg, M. S.
(2013) A piece of the action: Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors. NeuroImage, 83, 862–869.
De Saussure, F.
(1916) Cours de linguistique générale, ed. C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger, Lausanne and Paris: Payot.
Dove, G.
(2009) Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110(3), 412–431.
Dove, G.
(2016) Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1109–1121.
Dufter, P., & Schütze, H.
(2019) Analytical Methods for Interpretable Ultradense Word Embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08654.
Egorova, N., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F.
(2016) Brain basis of communicative actions in language. NeuroImage, 125, 857–867.
Elman, J. L.
(2009) On the Meaning of Words and Dinosaur Bones: Lexical Knowledge Without a Lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 547–582.
Erk, K., & Pado, S.
(2010) Exemplar-based models for word meaning in context. In ’Proceedings of ACL, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 92–97.
Falkum, I. L., Recasens, M., & Clark, E. V.
(2017) “ The moustache sits down first”: On the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language, 44(1), 87–119.
Fellbaum, C.
(1998) A Semantic Network of English: The Mother of All WordNets. Computers and the Humanities, 32(2/3), 209–220.
Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D.
(2002) Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States.
Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K.
(2007) Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 182–196.
Ferretti, T. R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A.
(2001) Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 516–547.
Ferry, A. L., Hespos, S. J., & Waxman, S. R.
(2010) Categorization in 3- and 4-Month-Old Infants: An Advantage of Words Over Tones. Child Development, 81(2), 472–479.
Finkelstein, L., Gabrilovich, E., Matias, Y., Rivlin, E., Solan, Z., Wolfman, G., & Ruppin, E.
(2001) Placing search in context: The concept revisited. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on World Wide Web – WWW ’01, 406–414.
Firth, J.
(1957) A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. Tudies in Linguistic Analysis, 1–32.
Fitneva, S. A., & Christiansen, M. H.
(2011) Looking in the Wrong Direction Correlates With More Accurate Word Learning. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 367–380.
Fodor, J. A.
(1983) The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J.
(1999) The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1366–1383.
Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J.
(2007) The processing of familiar and novel senses of a word: Why reading Dickens is easy but reading Needham can be hard. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 595–613.
Fulkerson, A. L., & Waxman, S. R.
(2007) Words (but not Tones) facilitate object categorization: Evidence from 6- and 12-month-olds. Cognition, 105(1), 218–228.
Garcia, J., & Koelling, R. A.
(1966) Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychon Sci 4, 123–124.
Gass, S.
(1999) DISCUSSION: Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 319–333.
Gentner, D.
(1978) On Relational Meaning: The Acquisition of Verb Meaning. Child Development, 49(4), 988.
Gentner, D.
(1983) Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy*. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170.
Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L.
(2001) Individuation, relativity and early word learning. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 215–256). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2003) Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gerlach, P.
(2018) The Social Framework of Individual Decisions.
Gibbs Jr., R. W., & Gerrig, R. J.
(1989) How Context Makes Metaphor Comprehension Seem “Special.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4(3), 145–158.
Gibbs, R. W.
(1984) Literal Meaning and Psychological Theory*. Cognitive Science, 8(3), 275–304.
Gibbs, R. W.
(2006a) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W.
(2006b) Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation. Mind & Language, 21(3), 434–458.
(2005) Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1595–1614.
Green, D. W.
(1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81.
Grice, P.
(1975) Logic and Conversation. Reprinted from Syntax and semantics 3: Speech arts, Cole et al. “Logic and conversation”, pp. 41–58 (1975), with permission from Elsevier.
Guida, A., & Lenci, A.
(2007) Semantic Properties of Word Associations to Italian Verbs. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 19(2), 293–326.
Haastrup, K.
(1989) Lexical inferencing procedures, Part 1 and Part 2. Copenhagen: Handelshojskolen i Kobenhavn.
Hampe, B.
(Ed.) (2017) Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse.
Harley, B., & Hart, D.
(2000) Vocabulary Learning in the Content-oriented Second-language Classroom: Student Perceptions and Proficiency. Language Awareness, 9(2), 78–96.
Harnad, S.
(1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346.
Harris, R. J.
(1976) Comprehension of metaphors: A test of the two-stage processing model. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8(4), 312–314.
Harris, Z. S.
(1954) Distributional Structure. Word, 10(2–3), 146–162.
Harris, Z. S.
(1973) A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Charles F. Hockett. International Journal of American Linguistics, 39(4), 252–255.
Harris, Zellig S., & Mandelbaum, D. G.
(1951) Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality. Language, 27(3), 288.
(2016) The meaning of ‘life’ and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology. Journal of Neuropsychology, 10(2), 317–343.
Hoffman, P., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A.
(2010) Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Plays an Executive Regulation Role in Comprehension of Abstract Words: Convergent Neuropsychological and Repetitive TMS Evidence. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(46), 15450–15456.
Hoffman, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T.
(2013) Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 718–730.
Hollis, G.
(2019) Learning about things that never happened: a critique and refinement to the Rescorla-Wagner update rule when many outcomes are possible, Memory & Cognition, 1–16.
Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K.
(2008) Fast Mapping but Poor Retention by 24-Month-Old Infants. Infancy, 13(2), 128–157.
Huang, T. H.
(2014) Social Metaphor Detection via Topical Analysis. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 19(2), 1–16.
Huckin, T., & Coady, J.
(1999) Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: A Review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 181–193.
Humphries, C., Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., & Liebenthal, E.
(2006) Syntactic and Semantic Modulation of Neural Activity during Auditory Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(4), 665–679.
Indefrey, P.
(2006) A Meta-analysis of Hemodynamic Studies on First and Second Language Processing: Which Suggested Differences Can We Trust and What Do They Mean?: Hemodynamic Studies of L1 and L2 Processing. Language Learning, 56, 279–304.
Inhoff, A. W., Lima, S. D., & Carroll, P. J.
(1984) Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading. Memory & Cognition, 12(6), 558–567.
Jackendoff, R.
(1997) The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Jung, K., Shavitt, S., Viswanathan, M., & Hilbe, J. M.
(2014) Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8782–8787.
Kachergis, G., Yu, C., & Shiffrin, R. M.
(2014) Cross-situational word learning is both implicit and strategic. Frontiers in Psychology, 5.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.
(1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263.
Kalgren, I., & Sahlgren, M.
(2001) From Words to Understanding, 294–308. CSLI publications.
Kamin, L. J.
(1968) “Attention-like” processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior, 1967: Aversive Stimulation. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
Kiela, D., & Clark, S.
(2014) A Systematic Study of Semantic Vector Space Model Parameters. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and Their Compositionality (CVSC), 21–30.
Kiela, D., Bulat, L., & Clark, S.
(2015) Grounding semantics in olfactory perception. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers) (pp. 231–236). Beijing, China: ACL.
Kiela, D., & Clark, S.
(2015) Multi-and cross-modal semantics beyond vision: Grounding in auditory perception. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2015) (pp. 2461–2470). Lisbon, Portugal: ACL.
(2001) The Representation of Polysemous Words. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(2), 259–282.
Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L.
(2002) Paper has been my ruin: Conceptual relations of polysemous senses. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 548–570.
Kövecses, Z.
(2013) The Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88.
Kövecses, Z.
(2017) Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347.
Krennmayr, T., Steen, G.
(2017) VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus. In: Ide, N., Pustejovsky, J. (eds) Handbook of Linguistic Annotation pp. 1053–1071 Springer, Dordrecht.
Krishnakumaran, S., & Zhu, X.
(2007) Hunting Elusive Metaphors Using Lexical Resources. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language (pp. 13–20). Rochester, New York.
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E.
(1994) Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174.
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z.
(2006) Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 119–135.
Kuhl, P. K.
(2004) Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831–843.
Kurzweil, R.
(2012) How to create a mind: The secret of human thought revealed. New York: Viking.
Lai, V. T., Curran, T., & Menn, L.
(2009) Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1284, 145–155.
Lai, V. T., & Curran, T.
(2013) ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors. Brain and language, 127(3), 484–496.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by (5. [Dr.]). Chicago, Ill.: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T.
(1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240.
Lapesa, G., & Evert, S.
(2014) A Large Scale Evaluation of Distributional Semantic Models: Parameters, Interactions and Model Selection. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2, 531–546.
Leech, G. N.
(1974) Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H., Baayen, R. H., Grainger, J., & Zwitserlood, P.
(2008) Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 12–31.
Lenci, A.
(2018) Distributional Models of Word Meaning. Annual Review of Linguistics, 4(1), 151–171.
Lent, J. R.
(2017) The patterning instinct: A cultural history of humanity’s search for meaning. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.
Leong, C. W., Klebanov, B. B., & Shutova, E.
(2018) A Report on the 2018 VUA Metaphor Detection Shared Task. Proceedings of the Workshop on Figurative Language Processing. NAACL 2018 Workshop on Figurative Language Processing. New Orleans, Louisiana.
Levinson, S. C.
(2003) Language and mind: Let’s get the issue straight! In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, pp. 25–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levy, O., & Goldberg, Y.
(2014) Linguistic Regularities in Sparse and Explicit Word Representations. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 171–180.
Levy, O., Goldberg, Y., & Dagan, I.
(2015) Improving Distributional Similarity with Lessons Learned from Word Embeddings. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3, 211–225.
Liberman, V., Samuels, S. M., & Ross, L.
(2004) The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1175–1185.
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Littlemore, J., & Low, G.
(2006) Figurative Thinking and Foreign Language Learning.
Louwerse, M. M.
(2007) Symbolic or embodied representations: A case for symbol interdependency. In T. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.). In Handbook of latent semantic analysis (T. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis, W. Kintsch, pp. 107–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Louwerse, M. M.
(2008) Embodied relations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 838–844.
Louwerse, M. M.
(2011) Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition: Topics in Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 273–302.
Louwerse, M. M.
(2018) Knowing the Meaning of a Word by the Linguistic and Perceptual Company It Keeps. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 573–589.
Louwerse, M. M., & Zwaan, R. A.
(2009) Language Encodes Geographical Information. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 51–73.
Lowder, M. W., & Gordon, P. C.
(2013) It’s hard to offend the college: Effects of sentence structure on figurative-language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 993–1011.
Lupyan, G.
(2008) The conceptual grouping effect: Categories matter (and named categories matter more). Cognition, 108(2), 566–577.
Lupyan, G.
(2012) Linguistically Modulated Perception and Cognition: The Label-Feedback Hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3.
Lynott, D., & Connell, L.
(2013) Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: The relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 516–526.
Lyons, J.
(1977) Semantics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mahon, B. Z.
(2015) What is embodied about cognition?Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(4), 420–429.
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A.
(2008) A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1–3), 59–70.
Malt, B. C., Gennari, S., Imai, M., Ameel, E., Tsuda, N., & Majid, A.
(2008) Talking About Walking: Biomechanics and the Language of Locomotion. Psychological Science, 19(3), 232–240.
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M.
(2017) Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 57–78.
Markman, E. M.
(1990) Constraints Children Place on Word Meanings. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 57–77.
Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F.
(1988) Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 121–157.
McCormick, C. & Ryan, N.
(2019) BERT Word Embeddings Tutorial. Retrieved from [URL]
McDonald, S., & Brew, C.
(2004) A distributional model of semantic context effects in lexical processing. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics – ACL ’04, 17-es.
McElree, B., & Nordlie, J.
(1999) Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(3), 486–494.
McElree, B., Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J.
(2006) Deferred Interpretations: Why Starting Dickens is Taxing but Reading Dickens Isn’t. Cognitive Science, 30(1), 181–192.
McElree, B., M. Traxler, M. Pickering, R. Seely, and R. Jackendoff
(2001) Reading time evidence for enriched composition. Cognition 78(1), B17–B25.
McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K.
(2012) Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning. Psychological Review, 119(4), 831–877.
McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., & Samuelson, L. K.
(2012) Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning. Psychological Review, 119(4), 831–877.
McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., Toscano, J. C., & Samuelson, L. K.
(2009) Integrating Connectionist Learning and Dynamical Systems Processing: Case Studies in Speech and Lexical Development. In J. Spencer (Ed.), Toward a Unified Theory of Development Connectionism and Dynamic System Theory Re-Consider (pp. 218–250).
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., & Tversky, A.
(1982) On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306(21), 1259–1262.
McRae, K., & Jones, M.
(2013) Semantic Memory. In D. Reisberg (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology.
McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C.
(2005) Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 547–559.
McRae, K., Nedjadrasul, D., Pau, R., Lo, B. P.-H., & King, L.
(2018) Abstract Concepts and Pictures of Real-World Situations Activate One Another. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 518–532.
(2020) Unsupervised Word Embedding Learning by Incorporating Local and Global Contexts. Frontiers in Big Data, 3,
Mesquita, B., Barrett, L. F., & Smith, E. R.
(Eds.) (2010) The mind in context. New York: Guilford Press.
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J.
(2013) Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. ArXiv:1301.3781 [Cs]. Retrieved from [URL]
Mikolov, T., Yih, S. W., & Zweig, G.
(2013) Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT-2013). Retrieved from [URL]
Miller, G. A.
(1998) Nouns in wordnet. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, 23–46.
Mitchell, M.
(2020) On Crashing the Barrier of Meaning in Artificial Intelligence. AI Magazine, 41(2), 86–92.
Monaghan, P., & Mattock, K.
(2012) Integrating constraints for learning word–referent mappings. Cognition, 123(1), 133–143.
Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(1995) Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 863–883.
Munakata, Y., & McClelland, J. L.
(2003) Connectionist models of development. Developmental Science, 6(4), 413–429.
Murphy, G.
(2004) The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
(2003) L2 Vocabulary Learning from Context: Strategies, Knowledge Sources, and Their Relationship with Success in L2 Lexical Inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 645.
Nation, I. S. P.
(2001) Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Navigli, R.
(2009) Word sense disambiguation: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(2), 1–69.
Noble, W., & Davidson, I.
(1991) The Evolutionary Emergence of Modern Human Behaviour: Language and its Archaeology. Man, 26(2), 223.
Noble, W., & Davidson, I.
(1993) Tracing the emergence of modern human behavior: Methodological pitfalls and a theoretical path. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 12(2), 121–149.
Noppeney, U., & Price, C. J.
(2004) An fMRI Study of Syntactic Adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 702–713.
Nosofsky, R. M.
(1986) Attention, similarity, and the identification–categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115(1), 39–61.
Nunberg, G.
(1995) Transfers of Meaning. Journal of Semantics, 12(2), 109–132.
Ortony, A., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Antos, S. J.
(1978) Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(4), 465–477.
Osgood, C. E.
(1952) The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49(3), 197–237.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H.
(1957) The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois press.
Padó, S., & Lapata, M.
(2007) Dependency-Based Construction of Semantic Space Models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2), 161–199.
Paivio, A.
(1983) The mind’s eye in arts and science. Poetics, 12(1), 1–18.
(2004) The impact of lexical inferencing strategies on second language reading proficiency. Reading and Writing, 17(6), 847–873.
Park, S., Bak, J., & Oh, A.
(2017) Rotated word vector representations and their interpretability. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
Pecher, D.
(2018) Curb Your Embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 501–517.
Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A.
(Eds.) (2005) Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., & Michelizzi, J.
(2004) Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artifical Intelligence, 1024–1025. AAAI Press.
Peirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D.
(2006) Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3).
Piñango, M. M., Zhang, M., Foster-Hanson, E., Negishi, M., Lacadie, C., & Constable, R. T.
(2017) Metonymy as Referential Dependency: Psycholinguistic and Neurolinguistic Arguments for a Unified Linguistic Treatment. Cognitive Science, 41, 351–378.
Pinker, S.
(1991) Rules of language. Science 253.530–35.
Pinker, S.
(1995) The language instinct: The new science of language and mind. London: Penguin.
Pinker, S.
(1999) Words and rules. New York: Basic Books.
Pinker, S.
(2004) Clarifying the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 31.949–53.
Pirrelli, V., Marzi, C., Ferro, M., Cardillo, F. A., Baayen, H. R., & Milin, P.
(2020) Psycho-computational modelling of the mental lexicon. In V. Pirrelli, I. Plag, and W. Dressler (eds.) Word Knowledge and Word Usage, pages: 23–82. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Plat, R., Lowie, W. & de Bot, K.
(2018) Word Naming in the L1 and L2: A Dynamic Perspective on Automatization and the Degree of Semantic Involvement in Naming. Frontiers in Psychology 8.
Plunkett, K., Hu, J.-F., & Cohen, L. B.
(2008) Labels can override perceptual categories in early infancy. Cognition, 106(2), 665–681.
Polka, L., & Werker, J. F.
(1994) Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(2), 421–435.
Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliocco, G.
(2017) How do children process abstract concepts? Evidence from a lexical decision task. Developmental Science, 10, 10–11.
Ponniah, J.
(2011) The Effectiveness of the Comprehension Hypothesis: A Review on the Current Research on Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition. Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(2), 1–4.
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22:1, pp1–39.
Pulvermüller, F.
(2018) Neurobiological Mechanisms for Semantic Feature Extraction and Conceptual Flexibility. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 590–620.
Pustejovsky, J.
(1995) The generative lexicon. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Pustejovsky, James
(1991) The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics, 17(4), 409–441.
Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F.-H., & Poli, J.
(1996) The Time-Course of Metaphor Comprehension: An Event-Related Potential Study. Brain and Language, 55(3), 293–316.
Quine, W. V. O.
(2013) Word and object. Place of publication not identified: Martino Fine Books.
Quinn, P. C., Eimas, P. D., & Rosenkrantz, S. L.
(1993) Evidence for Representations of Perceptually Similar Natural Categories by 3-Month-Old and 4-Month-Old Infants. Perception, 22(4), 463–475.
Raganato, A., Camacho-Collados, J., & Navigli, R.
(2017) Word Sense Disambiguation: A Unified Evaluation Framework and Empirical Comparison. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers, 99–110.
Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & Klein, J.
(2013) Children value informativity over logic in word learning. Psychological Science 24, 6, 1017–1023.
Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & McCauley, S. M.
(2013) Error and expectation in language learning: The curious absence of mouses in adult speech. Language, 89(4), 760–793.
Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K.
(2009) Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 388–396.
Rapp, R.
(2004) A Freely Available Automatically Generated Thesaurus of Related Words, 395–398.
Reines, M. F., & Prinz, J.
(2009) Reviving Whorf: The Return of Linguistic Relativity. Philosophy Compass, 4(6), 1022–1032.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R.
(1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy, Eds., Classical Conditioning II, pp. 64–99. Appleton-CenturyCrofts.
Rescorla, R. A.
(1988) Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43(3), 151–160.
Restrepo Ramos, F. D.
(2015) Incidental Vocabulary Learning in Second Language Acquisition: A Literature Review. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 17(1), 157–166.
Riordan, B., & Jones, M. N.
(2011) Redundancy in Perceptual and Linguistic Experience: Comparing Feature-Based and Distributional Models of Semantic Representation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 303–345.
Roberson, D., Hanley, J. R., & Pak, H.
(2009) Thresholds for color discrimination in English and Korean speakers. Cognition, 112(3), 482–487.
Robinson, C. W., & Sloutsky, V. M.
(2007) Linguistic Labels and Categorization in Infancy: Do Labels Facilitate or Hinder?Infancy, 11(3), 233–253.
Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W.
(2002) Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 245–266.
Rosch, E.
(1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P.
(1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439.
Rosenblatt, F.
(1957) The perceptron, a perceiving and recognizing automaton (Project Para Report No. 85-460-1). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory (CAL).
Rosenblatt, F.
(1958) The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65(6), 386.
Rothe, S., Ebert, S., & Schütze, H.
(2016) Ultradense word embeddings by orthogonal transformation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies.
Rubenstein, H., & Goodenough, J. B.
(1965) Contextual correlates of synonymy. Communications of the ACM, 8(10), 627–633.
Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Brass, M., & Friederici, A. D.
(2007) Comprehending Prehending: Neural Correlates of Processing Verbs with Motor Stems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 855–865.
Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M., & Binder, J. R.
(2005) Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. NeuroImage, 27(1), 188–200.
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L.
(1996) Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928.
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N.
(1996) Word Segmentation: The Role of Distributional Cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 606–621.
Sahlgren, M.
(2006) The word-space model: Using distributional analysis to represent syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations between words in high-dimensional vector spaces. Stockholm: Dep. of Linguistics, Stockholm Univ. [unpublished thesis].
Sahlgren, M., & Lenci, A.
(2016) The Effects of Data Size and Frequency Range on Distributional Semantic Models. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 975–980.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J.
(1983) Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(1), 82–102.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W.
(1988) Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 499–520.
Schütze, H.
(1993) Word Space. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5, 895–902.
Schütze, H.
(1992) Dimensions of meaning. In Proceedings of Supercomputing ’92, 787–796. IEEE Press.
Schütze, H.
(1998) Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24(1), 97–124.
Scott, S. K., Blank, C., Rosen, S., & Wise, R.
(2000) Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain, 123(12), 2400–2406.
Searle, J. R.
(1975) Speech acts and recent linguistics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 263(1 Developmental), 27–38.
Searle, J. R.
(1980) Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417–57.
Sejnowski, T. J.
(2018) The deep learning revolution. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Shutova, Ekaterina
2010Automatic metaphor interpretation as a paraphrasing task. In Proceedings of NAACL 2010, pp. 1029–1037, Los Angeles, USA.
Shutova, E., Kaplan, J., Teufel, S., & Korhonen, A.
(2013) A computational model of logical metonymy. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing, 10(3), 1–28.
Shutova, E., Kiela, D., and Maillard, J.
(2016) Black holes and white rabbits: Metaphor identification with visual features. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (San Diego, CA), 160–170.
Shutova, E., Sun, L., Korhonen, A.
(2010) Metaphor Identification Using Verb and Noun Clustering. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2010), pages 1002–1010, Beijing, China.
Sikos, J. & Padó, S.
(2019) Frame Identification as Categorization: Exemplars vs Prototypes in Embeddingland. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Semantics. Gothenburg, Sweden.
Slobin, D. I.
(1996) Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions (pp. 195–219). Clarendon Press.
(2009) Contributions of infant word learning to language development. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3617–3632.
Talmy, L.
(1991) Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17(1), 480.
Talmy, L.
(2000) Typology and process in concept structuring (1. MIT Press paperback ed). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Tannen, D.
(1993) What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 14–56). New York: Oxford University Press.
Thaler, S., Simperl, E., Siorpaes, K., & Hofer, C.
(2011) A survey on games for Knowledge acquisition. STI Technical Report, May 2011 19.
Thomas, D. G., Campos, J. J., Shucard, D. W., Ramsay, D. S., & Shucard, J.
(1981) Semantic Comprehension in Infancy: A Signal Detection Analysis. Child Development, 52(3), 798.
Thornbury, S.
(2013) How to teach vocabulary (13. impr). Harlow: Longman, Pearson Education.
Tomasello, M.
(2003) The cultural origins of human cognition (4. print). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
Tomasello, M., & Barton, M. E.
(1994) Learning words in nonostensive contexts. Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 639–650.
Tomasello, M., Strosberg, R., & Akhtar, N.
(1996) Eighteen-month-old children learn words in non-ostensive contexts. Journal of Child Language, 23(1), 157–176.
Trask, A., Michalak, M., & Liu, J.
(2015) Sense2vec – a fast and accurate method for word sense disambiguation in neural word embeddings. ArXiv e-prints.
Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E.
(2002) Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 69–90.
Trueswell, J. C., Medina, T. N., Hafri, A., & Gleitman, L. R.
(2013) Propose but verify: Fast mapping meets cross-situational word learning. Cognitive Psychology, 66(1), 126–156.
Turney, P. D.
(2001) Mining the Web for Synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. In L. De Raedt & P. Flach (Eds.), Machine Learning: ECML 2001 (Vol. 2167, pp. 491–502).
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D.
(1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
Utsumi, A.
(2011) Computational Exploration of Metaphor Comprehension Processes Using a Semantic Space Model. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 251–296.
Van den Bos, G. R.
(Ed.) (2007) APA dictionary of psychology (1st ed). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Veale, T.
(2012) Exploding the creativity myth: The computational foundations of linguistic creativity. London; New York: Continuum International Pub. Group.
Veale, T., Shutova, E., & Klebanov, B. B.
(2016) Metaphor: A Computational Perspective. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 9(1), 1–160.
Vigliocco, G., Filipovic Kleiner, L.
(2004) From mind in the mouth to language in the mind: Language in Mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (1), 5–7.
Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. P.
(2007) Semantic representation.
Vigliocco, G., Ponari, M., & Norbury, C.
(2018) Learning and Processing Abstract Words and Concepts: Insights From Typical and Atypical Development. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(3): 533–549.
Vivas, L., Montefinese, M., Bolognesi, M., and Vivas, G.
(2020) Core features: measures and characterization for different languages. Cognitive Processing.
von Ahn, L., & Dabbish, L.
(2004) Labeling images with a computer game. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ’04, 319–326.
Vouloumanos, A.
(2008) Fine-grained sensitivity to statistical information in adult word learning. Cognition, 107(2), 729–742.
Wang, J., Conder, J. A., Blitzer, D. N., & Shinkareva, S. V.
(2010) Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31(10), 1459–1468.
Warrington, E. K., & Cipolotti, L.
(1996) Word comprehension: The distinction between refractory and storage impairments. Brain, 119(2), 611–625.
(1995) Words as Invitations to Form Categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-Month-Old Infants. Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 257–302.
Weaver, W.
(1949) Translation. In Locke, W. N.; Booth, A. D. (eds.). Machine Translation of Languages: Fourteen Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Webb, S.
(2008) The Effects of Context on Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 232–245.
Weber, I., Robertson, S., & Vojnovic, M.
(2009) Rethinking the ESP Game. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 11. Retrieved from [URL]
Weiland, H., Bambini, V., & Schumacher, P. B.
(2014) The role of literal meaning in figurative language comprehension: Evidence from masked priming ERP. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8.
Werkmann Horvat, A., Bolognesi, M., and Lahiri, A.
forth.). Processing of literal and metaphorical meanings in polysemous verbs: An experiment and its methodological importance.
Werkmann Horvat, A., Bolognesi, M., and Kohl, K.
forth.). Demolishing walls and myths: On the status of conventional metaphorical meaning in the L2 lexicon.
Westermann, G., & Mareschal, D.
(2014) From perceptual to language-mediated categorization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), 20120391.
Wilks, Y.
(1975) A Preferential, Pattern-Seeking, Semantics for Natural Language Inference. Artificial Intelligence 6, 53–74.
Wilks, Y.
(1978) Making preferences more active. Artificial Intelligence 11(3), 197–223.
Wheeler, D. J.
(1952) The use of sub-routines in programmes. ACM ‘52: Proceedings of the 1952 ACM national meeting, 235–236.
Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Xu, X.
(2005) Content Differences for Abstract and Concrete Concepts. Cognitive Science, 29(5), 719–736.
Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L.
(2007) Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(19), 7780–7785.
(2011) Linguistic relativity: Linguistic relativity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), 253–265.
Yu, C.
(2008) A Statistical Associative Account of Vocabulary Growth in Early Word Learning. Language Learning and Development, 4(1), 32–62.
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B.
(2007) Rapid Word Learning Under Uncertainty via Cross-Situational Statistics. Psychological Science, 18(5), 414–420.
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B.
(2012) Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers. Cognition, 125(2), 244–262.
Yu, C., Zhong, Y., & Fricker, D.
(2012) Selective Attention in Cross-Situational Statistical Learning: Evidence From Eye Tracking. Frontiers in Psychology, 3.
Yurovsky, D., Fricker, D. C., Yu, C., & Smith, L. B.
(2014) The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 1–22.
Zarcone, A., Lenci, A., Padó, S., & Utt, J.
(2013) Fitting, Not Clashing! A Distributional Semantic Model of Logical Metonymy. Proceedings of IWCS, 404–410.
Zarcone, A., Padó, S., & Lenci, A.
(2014) Logical Metonymy Resolution in a Words-as-Cues Framework: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading and Probe Recognition. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 973–996.
Zipf, G. K.
(1949) Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA.
Zwaan, R. A.
(2014) Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 229–234.
Zwaan, R. A.
(2016) Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1028–1034.