Chapter published in:
Sensory Experiences: Exploring meaning and the senses
Danièle Dubois, Caroline Cance, Matt Coler, Arthur Paté and Catherine Guastavino
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 24] 2021
► pp. 439474
Arom, S., & Fürniss, S.
(1993) An interactive experimental method for the determination of musical scales in oral cultures: Application to the vocal music of the aka pygmies of central africa. Contemporary Music Review, 9(1–2), 7–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Augoyard, J.-F., & Torgue, H.
(1995) Répertoire des effets sonores, á l’écoute de l’environnement. Marseille, France: Parenthèses.Google Scholar
Ballas, J. A.
(1993) Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19 (2), 250–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barras, M.-C., & Gouiffès, A.-M.
(2007) The reception of overtone singing by an uniformed listener. In K. Maimets-Volk, R. Parncutt, M. Marin, & J. Ross (Eds.), Proceedings of the third Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology (CIM07) (pp. 59–70). Tallinn, Estonia.Google Scholar
Baus, O., & Bouchard, S.
(2010) The sense of olfaction: Its characteristics and its possible applications in virtual environments. Journal of Cyber Therapy and Rehabilitation, 3(1), 31–51.Google Scholar
Bensa, J., Dubois, D., Kronland-Martinet, R., & Ystad, S. L.
(2004, May). A cognitive approach to piano timbre. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on computer music modeling and retrieval. Esbjerg, Denmark.Google Scholar
Brahimi, B., Mareuil, P. B. D., & Gendrot, C.
(2004) Role of segmental and suprasegmental cues in the perception of maghrebian-acented French. In Eighth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.Google Scholar
Brunswik, E.
(1956) Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA (USA): University of California press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cance, C.
(2009) Stimuli, dispositifs experimentaux et mondes construits. In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le Sentir et le Dire (pp. 107–136). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
(2017) From Musical Instruments as Ontological Entities to Instrumental Quality: A Linguistic Exploration of Musical Instrumentality in the Digital Era. In T. Bovermann, A. D. Campo, H. Egermann, S.-I. Hardjowirogo, & S. Weinzierl (Eds.), Musical Instruments in the 21st Century (pp. 25–43). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cance, C., Genevois, H., & Dubois, D.
(2009) What is instrumentality in new digital musical devices? A contribution from cognitive linguistics and psychology. In Proceedings of the Congrès interdisciplinaire de musicologie (Interdisciplinary congress on musicology). Paris, France.Google Scholar
Cardenas, A.
(2009) Corrélation entre les propriétés acoustiques et perceptives du violon (Unpublished master’s thesis). University Paris VI, France.
Cardesín, A., Alobid, I., Benítez, P., Sierra, E., de Haro, J., Bernal-Sprekelsen, M., … Mullol, J.
(2006) Barcelona Smell Test-24 (BAST-24): validation and smell characteristics in the healthy Spanish population. Rhinology, 44 (1), 83–89.Google Scholar
Casati, R., & Varzi, A. C.
(2008) Event concepts. In T. Shipley & J. Zacks (Eds.), Understanding events: From perception to action (pp. 31–54). New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A., & Fujimura, J.
(1992) The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth Century Life Sciences. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Classen, C.
(1993) Worlds of senses: Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
CNRS and Université de Lorraine
(2020) Le trésor de la langue française informatisé (computerized treasure of french language). http://​www​.atilf​.fr​/tlfi
Cohen, G.
(1999) Étude de paramètres physiques et cognitifs influant sur le temps de reconnaissance et le temps d ’identification des bruits de l’environnement (Unpublished master’s thesis). Université Paris VI, France.
Dubois, D., Bourgine, R., & Resche-Rigon, P.
(1992) Connaissances et expertises finalisées de divers acteurs économiques dans la categorisation d’un objet perceptif. Intellectica, 15 (3), 241–271.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., & Fritz, C.
(2018) Projection du violon : analyse sémantique. In C. Fritz & S. Moraly (Eds.), Le violon en France du XIXe siéclé à nos jours (pp. 219–235). Paris, France: Collegium Musicae.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., & Sprenger-Charolles, L.
(1988) Perception/interprétation du langage écrit : contexte et identification des mots au cours de la lecture. Intellectica, 5(1), 113–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durand, K., & Lécuyer, R.
(2002) Object permanence observed in 4-month-old infants with a 2D display. Infant behavior and Development, 25(3), 269–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellen, P. S., & Bone, P. F.
(1998) Does it matter if it smells? Olfactory stimuli as advertising executional cues. Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 29–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engen, T.
(1987) Remembering odors and their names. American Scientist, 75(5), 497–503.Google Scholar
Frank, R. A., Dulay, M. F., & Gesteland, R. C.
(2003) Assessment of the Sniff Magnitude Test as a clinical test of olfactory function. Physiology & behavior, 78 (2), 195–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J.
(1960) The concept of the stimulus in psychology. American Psychologist, 15(11), 694–701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA, USA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. N., & Greenberg, M. S.
(1992) Stimulus selection in the design and interpretation of olfactory studies. In Science of olfaction (pp. 309–334). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, A. N., & Wysocki, C. J.
(1987) The National Geographic smell survey: results. National Geographic, 172, 515–525.Google Scholar
Gillan, M.
(2017) Song monuments in Okinawa — Intersections of sound, place and memory. Shima, 11 (2), 20–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J.
(1977) The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griesemer, J. R.
(1992) The Role of Instruments in the Generative Analysis of Science. In A. Clarke & J. Fujimura (Eds.), The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth Century Life Sciences (pp. 47–76). Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Le rôle des instruments dans l’analyse de la science. In A. Clarke & J. Fujimura (Eds.), La Matérialité des Sciences : Savoir-faire et Instruments dans les Sciences de la Vie (pp. 71–106). Paris, France: Les empêcheurs de penser en rond.Google Scholar
Guastavino, C., Katz, B. F. G., Polack, J.-D., Levitin, D. J., & Dubois, D.
(2005) Ecological validity of soundscape reproduction. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 50 (2), 333–341.Google Scholar
Guillaume, P.
(1937) La Psychologie de la Forme. Paris, France: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Harper, R. S., & Boring, E. G.
(1948) Cues. The American journal of psychology, 61 (1), 119–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Havelange, V., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J.
(2003) Les représentations.: mémoire externe et objets techniques. Intellectica, 35, 115–131.Google Scholar
Hock, H. S., & Schmelzkopf, K. F.
(1980) The abstraction of schematic representations from photographs of real-world scenes. Memory & Cognition, 8(6), 543–554. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howes, D.
(1991) The Varieties of Sensory experience: A source book in the Anthropology of the Senses. Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Isaacs, E. A., & Clark, H. H.
(1987) References in conversations between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(1), 26–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kang, J., Chourmouziadou, K., Sakantamis, K., Wang, B., & Hao, Y.
(2013) Soundscape of European Cities and Landscape. Oxford, UK: Soundscape-COST.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. J.
(2004) Making Scents: aromatic output for HCI. interactions, 11 (1), 48–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, W.
(1929) Gestalt psychology. New York, NY, USA: Liveright.Google Scholar
(1964) La psychologie de la forme. Paris, France: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
(1973) The boundaries of words and their meaning in CJN Bailiy and RW Shuy (eds.) New ways of Analizing Variation in English, vol. 1. Washington, Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lemaître, G., Houix, O., Misdariis, N., & Susini, P.
(2010) Listener expertise and sound identification influence the categorization of environmental sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 16 (1), 16–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C.
(1957) The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of experimental psychology, 54 (5), 358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lurçat, F.
(1995) L’autorité de la science: neurosciences. Espace et temps. Chaos. Cosmologie. Cerf.Google Scholar
Lwin, M. O., & Morrin, M.
(2012) Scenting movie theatre commercials: The impact of scent and pictures on brand evaluations and ad recall. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11 (3), 264–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mainland, J., & Sobel, N.
(2006) The sniff is part of the olfactory percept. Chemical senses, 31 (2), 181–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., & Kruspe, N.
(2018) Hunter-gatherer olfaction is special. Current Biology, 28 (3), 409–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C.
(2011) The Senses in Language and Culture. The Senses and Society, 6 (1), 5–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Roberts, S. G., Cilissen, L., Emmorey, K., Nicodemus, B., O’Grady, L.,… Levinson, S. C.
(2018) Differential coding of perception in the world’s languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11369–11376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Senft, G., & Levinson, S. C.
(2007) The language of olfaction. In Field Manual Volume 10 (pp. 36–41). Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Maldiney, H.
(1994) Regard, parole, espace. L’âge d’homme.Google Scholar
Mantovani, G., & Riva, G.
(1999) Real presence: how different ontologies generate different criteria for presence, telepresence, and virtual presence. Presence, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(5), 540–550. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marcell, M. M., Borella, D., Greene, M., Kerr, E., & Rogers, S.
(2000) Confrontation Naming of Environmental Sounds. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22 (6), 830–864. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M.
(1945) Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris, France: GallimardGoogle Scholar
(1964) The primacy of perception: And other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history, and politics. Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar
Mistre-Schaal, M., & Schaal, B.
(2016) Le flair en images, ou comment est donnée à voir la communication olfactive. Hermes, La Revue (1), 145–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morange, S.
(2005) Approches structurale, prosodique, psycho-cognitive de quelques propriétés linguistiques subjectives de la parole : l’exemple de trois Montmartrois âgés (PhD Thesis). Université Paris 3.
Morange, S., & Candea, M.
(2010) Aux frontières de l’écoute. Réflexions sur la construction des variables pertinentes dans la mise en place des tests de perception. In D. Delomier & M. A. Morel (Eds.), Frontières, du linguistiques au sémiotique (pp. 79–98). Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar
Morange, S., Dubois, D., & Fontaine, J.-M.
(2010) Perception of Recorded Singing Voice Quality and Expertise: cognitive linguistics and acoustics approaches. Journal of voice, 24 (4), 450–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morange, S., Fontaine, J.-M., Vogel, C., Poitevineau, J., & Dubois, D.
(2005) Appartenances catégorielles d’un objet complexe, la voix : approches linguistiques et psycho-cognitives. In Proceedings of the conference “Catégorisation et catégories : des théories cognitives aux pratiques en évaluation sensorielle” (pp. 14–17).Google Scholar
Mouélé, M.
(1997) L’apprentissage des odeurs chez les Wanzi : note de recherche. Enfance, 1, 209–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mzali, M., Dubois, D., Polack, J.-D., Létourneaux, F., & Poisson, F.
(2001) Mental representation of auditory comfort inside trains: Methodological and theoretical issues. In Proceedings of Internoise (pp. 1691–1696). The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Niessen, M., Cance, C., & Dubois, D.
(2010) Categories for soundscape: Toward a hybrid classification. In Proceedings of Internoise 2010.Google Scholar
Palmer, S. E.
(1975) Visual perception and world knowledge: Notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction. In D. A. Norman & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Explorations in cognition (pp. 279–307). San Francisco, CA, USA: Freeman.Google Scholar
(1978) Fundamental Aspects of cognitive representation. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 259–302). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pangborn, R. M., Guinard, J.-X., & Davis, R. G.
(1988) Regional aroma preferences. Food Quality and Preference, 1 (1), 11–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paté, A., Le Carrou, J.-L., Navarret, B., Dubois, D., & Fabre, B.
(2012) A vibro-acoustical and perceptive study of the neck-to-body junction of a solid-body electric guitar. In Proceedings of Acoustics. Nantes, France.Google Scholar
Pausch, R., Proffitt, D., & Williams, G.
(1997) Quantifying immersion in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 13–18). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raimbault, M.
(2006) Qualitative judgments of urban soundscapes : Questionning questionnaires and semantic scales. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 92 (6), 929–937.Google Scholar
Russolo, L.
(1913) L’Art des Bruits. Paris, France: Allia.Google Scholar
Schröder, M., Aubergé, V., & Cathiard, M.-A.
(1998) Can we hear smile? In Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.Google Scholar
Shafiro, V., & Gygi, B.
(2004) How to select stimuli for environmental sound research and where to find them. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 590–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, T. B., & Ferrell, W. R.
(1974) Man-machine systems; Information, control, and decision models of human performance. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Straus, E.
(1935) Vom Sinn der Sinne: ein Beitrag zur Grundlegung der Psychologie. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
(1989) Du sens des sens. Contribution à l’étude des fondements de la psychologie. Grenoble: Millon.Google Scholar
Truax, B.
(2013) The World Soundscape Project. World Soundscape Project, 15.Google Scholar
Tversky, B., & Baratz, D.
(1985) Memory for faces: Are caricatures better than photographs? Memory & cognition, 13(1), 45–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uexküll, J. V.
(1957) A Stroll Through the Worlds of Animals and Men: A Picture Book of Invisible Worlds. In C. H. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept (pp. 5–80). New York, NY, US: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Vasilescu, I., Candea, M., & Adda-Decker, M.
(2005) Perceptual salience of language-specific acoustic differences in autonomous fillers across eight languages. In Interspeech.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vieru-Dimulescu, B.
(2007) Aspects segmentaux et suprasegmentaux dans la perception d’un accent étranger (PhD Thesis). Université Paris 11.
Vogel, C.
(1999) Étude sémiotique et acoustique de l’identification des signaux sonores d’avertissement en contexte urbain (PhD Thesis). Université Paris 6.
Wages, R., Grünvogel, S. M., & Grützmacher, B.
(2004) How realistic is realism? considerations on the aesthetics of computer games. In International conference on entertainment computing (pp. 216–225). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallon, H.
(1963) Les origines de la pensée chez l’enfant. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Wood, J. B., & Harkins, S. W.
(1987) Effects of age, stimulus selection, and retrieval environment on odor identification. Journal of Gerontology, 42 (6), 584–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woodworth, R. S.
(1958) Dynamics of behavior. Holt.Google Scholar
Yonas, A., & Owsley, C.
(1987) Development of visual space perception. In P. Salapatek & L. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of infant perception (Vol. 2, pp. 79–122). Academic press.Google Scholar