Chapter published in:
Sensory Experiences: Exploring meaning and the senses
Danièle Dubois, Caroline Cance, Matt Coler, Arthur Paté and Catherine Guastavino
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 24] 2021
► pp. 475504
References
Balez, S.
(2001) Ambiances olfactives dans l’espace construit (PhD Thesis). Université de Nantes.
Bild, E., Coler, M., Dubois, D., & Pfeffer, K.
(2015) A pilot experiment on effects of motor and cognitive activities on memories of soundscapes. In Proceedings of the 10th European Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering (pp. 1529–1533). Maastricht, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bild, E., Steele, D., Pfeffer, K., Bertolini, L., & Guastavino, C.
(2018) Activity as a mediator between users of public spaces and their interpretation of the auditory environment. Lessons from the Musikiosk soundscape intervention. In F. Aletta & J. Xiao (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Perception-driven approaches to urban assessment and design (pp. 100–125). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, S. J., & Banerji, I.
(2016) Evidence-based recommendations for designing free-sorting experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1318–1336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, B. S.
(1953) Thought-processes in lectures and discussions. The Journal of General Education, 7 (3), 160–169.Google Scholar
Boyer, N., & N. T.
(1999) Enquête par immersion interactive sur les procédures de maîtrise des ambiances sonores dans le projet architectural (Tech. Rep.). Nantes, France: Jean-François Augoyard, Cresson, Ministère de la culture et de la communication.Google Scholar
Calderhead, J.
(1981) Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. British journal of educational psychology, 51 (2), 211–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cance, C.
(2018) Documenter le soin en psychiatrie. Retours d’expérience sur une immersion au sein de l’EPSM Georges Daumezon. In Journée d’étude interdisciplinaire “Vers une modélisation de l’interaction de soin”. Orléans, France.Google Scholar
Cance, C., Pras, A., & Cloiseau, G.
(2014) Catching the waves and surfing your way out of them or into them — Creativity in musicians’ discourse about free improvisation. In Proceedings of conference LCM6 (Language, Culture and Mind). Lublin.Google Scholar
Clark, H., & Schober, M.
(1992) Asking Questions and Influencing Answers. In J. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about Questions. Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys (pp. 15–48). Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Course-of-action analysis and course-of-action centered design
(2003) In E. Hollnagel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design (pp. 55–81). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Degel, J., & Köster, E. P.
(1999) Odors: implicit memory and performance effects. Chemical senses, 24 (3), 317–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degel, J., Piper, D., & Köster, E. P.
(2001) Implicit learning and implicit memory for odors: the influence of odor identification and retention time. Chemical senses, 26 (3), 267–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delepaut, G.
(2002) Mise en discours d’un parcours olfactif (Unpublished master’s thesis). Université de Paris III.
(2007) Contribution de la linguistique cognitive à l’identification du confort: analyse des discours des passagers sur le confort en train (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université Paris 3.
(2009) Questionner : comment et pourquoi ? Le choc des questions, le poids des mots ! In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le Sentir et le Dire : concepts et méthodologies en linguistique et psychologie cognitive (pp. 157–188). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., & Vermersch, P.
(2003) On becoming aware: a pragmatic of experiencing. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Singly, F.
(1992) L’enquête et ses méthodes : le questionnaire. Paris, France: Nathan université.Google Scholar
Despret, V.
(2007a) Animal et Humain, d’individu à individu. La recherche, 405, 64–67.Google Scholar
(2007b) Bêtes et hommes. Paris, France: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Donin, N., & Theureau, J.
(2007) Theoretical and methodological issues related to long term creative cognition: the case of musical composition. Cognition, Technology & Work, 9(4), 233–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dos Santos Mamed, M., Grossen, M., & Cauderey, M.
(2017) Analysing therapeutic education in context: When practitioners take a reflexive stance on their practices. In International Conference Knowledge translation and self-management in chronic diseases — Contexts, tools and practices. Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Dubois, D.
(2009) Le Sentir et le Dire – Concepts et méthodes en psychologie et linguistique cognitives. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Duchesne, S., & Haegel, F.
(2004) L’entretien collectif; special issue, “Les groupes centrés (focus groups)”. L’enquête et ses méthodes : les entretiens collectifs, 128.Google Scholar
Gaspar, L., Garrel, C., & Cance, C.
(2017) La place du visuel dans l’expérience de dégustation de champagne : une étude linguistique de discours de consommateurs. In Actes de la 15ème journée du Sensolier. Paris, France.Google Scholar
Grossen, M.
(1989) Le contrat implicite entre l’expérimentateur et l’enfant en situation de test. Revue suisse de psychologie, 48(3), 179–189.Google Scholar
Guillemette, F., Luckerhoff, J., & Baribeau, C.
(2010) Entretiens de groupe : concepts, usages et ancrages. Recherches qualitatives, 29(1).Google Scholar
Hutchins, E.
(2008) The role of cultural practices in the emergence of modern human intelligence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 363(1499), 2011–2019. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. M., & Karin-D’Arcy, M. R.
(2006) Social attention in nonhuman primates: a behavioral review. Aquatic Mammals, 32(4), 423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, J., Markova, I., & Kalampalikis, N.
(2004) Qu’est-ce que les focus groups? Bulletin de psychologie, 57(3), 237–244.Google Scholar
Köster, E., Moller, P., & Mojet, J.
(2014) A “misfit” theory of spontaneous conscious odor perception (mitscop): Reflections on the role and function of odor memory in everay day life. Frontiers in Psychology, cognitive science, 5 (Special issue “Applied olfactory cognition”), 29–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, H. T., & Heymann, H.
(1998) Sensory evaluation of food: principle and practices. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P., & Stanton, F. N.
(1944) Radio research 1942–43. New York, NY, USA: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.Google Scholar
Maffiolo, V., Castellengo, M., & Dubois, D.
(1998) Qualité sonore de l’environnement urbain : sémantique et intensité. Acoustique et technique, 16, 14–21.Google Scholar
Maffiolo, V., Dubois, D., David, S., Castellengo, M., & Polack, J.-D.
(1998) Loudness and pleasantness in structuration of urban soundscapes. In Proceedings of Internoise. Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Maffiolo, V., Mzali, M., Dubois, D., David, S., & Resche-Rigon, P.
(1998) Étude de la qualité sonore des espaces verts de la Ville de Paris (Tech. Rep.). Paris, France: LCPE.Google Scholar
Mindak, W. A.
(1961) Fitting the semantic differential to the marketing problem. The Journal of Marketing, 25(4), 28–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moles, A. A.
(1990) Les sciences de l imprécis, Paris. Seuil.Google Scholar
Myers, M.
(2011) Walking again lively: Towards an ambulant and conversive methodology of performance and research. Mobilities, 6(2), 183–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mzali, M.
(2002) Perception de l’ambiance sonore et évaluation du confort acoustique dans les trains (PhD Thesis). Université Paris 6.
Mzali, M., Dubois, D., Polack, J.-D., Létourneaux, F., & Poisson, F.
(2001) Mental representation of auditory comfort inside trains: Methodological and theoretical issues. In Proceedings of Internoise (pp. 1691–1696). The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Neisser, U.
(1987) Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, G.
(1964) Studies in self confrontation. Viewing a sound motion picture of self and another person in a stressful dyadic interaction. Copenhague, Denmark: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Noë, A.
(2002) Is the visual world a grand illusion? Journal of consciousness studies, 9 (5–6), 1–12.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E.
(1964) Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures. American Anthropologist, 66(3), 171–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H.
(1957) The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL, USA: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Paté, A.
(2011) Étude vibroacoustique et perceptive de guitares électriques (Unpublished master’s thesis). Université Pierre et Marie Curie.
Paté, A., Le Carrou, J.-L., Navarret, B., Dubois, D., & Fabre, B.
(2012) A vibro-acoustical and perceptive study of the neck-to-body junction of a solid-body electric guitar. In Proceedings of Acoustics. Nantes, France.Google Scholar
Petitmengin, C.
(2006) Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive sciences, 5 (3–4), 229–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B., & Roy, J.-M.
(1999) Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Raimbault, M.
(2003) Simulation des ambiances sonores urbaines : intégration des aspects qualitatifs (PhD Thesis). Université de Nantes.
(2006) Qualitative judgments of urban soundscapes: Questionning questionnaires and semantic scales. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 92(6), 929–937.Google Scholar
Richard-Zapella, J.
(1991) Mise en mots et sondages d’opinion : les questions en question. Langage et société, 55, 41–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, S.
(2018) Semiotics and Sensory Sciences: Meaning Between Texts and Numbers. In Quantitative Semiotic Analysis (pp. 75–100). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanur, J. M.
(1992) Questions about Questions: inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Theureau, J.
(1992) Le cours d’action : analyse sémio-logique : essai d’une anthropologie cognitive située. Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2003) Course-of-action analysis and course-of-action centered design, in Hollnagel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 55–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Les entretiens d’autoconfrontation et de remise en situation par les traces matérielles et le programme de recherche “cours d’action”. Revue d’anthropologie des con-naissances, 42(2), 287–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thibaud, J.-P.
(2013) Commented City Walks. Wi: Journal of Mobile Culture, 7(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., & Shear, J.
(1999) The view from within: First person approaches to the study of consciousness. Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Vermersch, P.
(1994) L’entretien d’explicitation. Paris, France: ESF.Google Scholar
(2016) L’entretien d’explicitation, une superbe imprudence méthodologique ! remémoration et explicitation. Recherches qualitatives, Hors-série, 20, 559–579.Google Scholar
Vion, R.
(2009) De la subjectivité en discours aux discours sur la subjectivité. In D. Dubois (Ed.), Le sentir et le dire (pp. 367–391). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Von Cranach, M.
(1982) Goal directed action. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wald, P., Daoudi, A., & Sefta, K.
(1991) Enchaînement question-réponse et dénomination des couleurs. Langage et société, 55, 61–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yinger, R. J.
(1986) Examining thought in action: A theoretical and methodological critique of research on interactive teaching. Teaching and teacher education, 2(3), 263–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar