Cover not available
Part of
Sensory Experiences: Exploring meaning and the senses
Danièle Dubois, Caroline Cance, Matt Coler, Arthur Paté and Catherine Guastavino
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 24] 2021
► pp. 577–586

Further readings

References

Synesthesia & holysensoriality

Werner, H.
(1934) Unity of the senses. Developmental Processes: Heinz Werner’s Selected Writings, edited by S. S. Barten & M. B. Franklin, 1: 1865–1954.Google Scholar
Proust, J.
(1997) Perception et intermodalité : approches actuelles de la question de Molyneux, Paris: PUF. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., Hubbard, E. M.
(2001) Synesthesia, A window into Perception, Thought and Language, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12): 3–34.Google Scholar
Calvert, G., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E.
(2004) The handbook of multisensory processes, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Howes, D.
(2005) Scent, sound, and synaesthesia: intersensoriality and Material culture theory. In Handbook of material culture, 161–172.Google Scholar
Diaconu, M.
(2006) Reflections on an aesthetics of touch, smell and taste, Contemporary aesthetics, 4(1), p. 8.Google Scholar
Serres, M.
(2008) The five senses: A philosophy of mingled bodies. London & New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. Translation by M. Sankey & P. Cowley. Originally published in French as Les Cinq Sens 1985, Paris: Grasset & Fasquelle.Google Scholar
Gélard, M-L., Sirost, O.
(2010) Langages des sens, special issue of Communications , 86.Google Scholar
Macpherson, F.
(2010) Taxonomising the senses. Philosophical Studies, 153(1):123–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bremner, A., Lewkowicz, D., Spence, C.
(2012) Multisensory development, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holley, A.
(2015) Le sixième sens : une enquête neurophysiologique. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Matthen, M.
(2015) The Individuation of the Senses. In M. Matthen (ed.) Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Perception, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 567–586.Google Scholar
Murari, M., Rodà, A., Canazza, S., De Poli, G., & Da Pos, O.
(2015) Is Vivaldi smooth and takete? Non-verbal sensory scales for describing music qualities, Journal of New Music Research, 44(4), 359–372.Google Scholar

Cognition

General

Varela, F.
(1989) Connaître : les sciences cognitives; tendances et perspectives. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J.
(1991) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (Vol. 42), New York, NY, USA: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Sinha, C.
(2007) Cognitive linguistics, psychology and cognitive science. The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1266–1294.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E., & Johnson, C.
(2009) Modeling the emergence of language as an embodied collective cognitive activity, Topics in Cognitive Science, 1:523–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. R., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. A.
(Eds.) (2010) Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malt, B., Wolff, P., & Wolff, P. M.
(Eds.) (2010) Words and the mind: How words capture human experience. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

The phenomenological approach of cognition

Noë, A., & Thompson, E.
(Eds.) (2002) Vision and mind: Selected readings in the philosophy of perception, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petitmengin, C., & Bitbol, M.
(2009) Listening from within, Journal of Consciousness studies 16(10–11): 363–404.Google Scholar
Varela, F. & Shear, J.
(1999) The View from Within: First-person Approaches to the Study of Consciousness, special issue of Journal Consciousness Studies, 6. Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Situated and ecological/cultural approach of cognition

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P.
(1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning, Educational researcher, 18(1): 32–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E.
(2000) Distributed cognition, in International Encyclopedia ofthe Social and Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
(2008) The role of cultural practices in the emergence of modern human intelligence, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1499): 2011–2019. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Cognitive ecology, Topics in cognitive science 2(4): 705–715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Challenges for psychology

Brunswik, E.
(1937) Psychology as a science of objective relations, Philosophy of Science, 4(2): 227–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cosnier, J.
(1998) Le retour de Psyché : critique des nouveaux fondements de la psychologie, Paris, France: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Parrot, F.
(2002) La psychologie : les conditions de la survie, Université de tous les savoirs, Paris, France: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Loken, B., Barsalou, L. W., & Joiner, C.
(2008) Category Representation and Category-Based Inference, in Haugtvedt, C. P., Herr, P. M. & Kardes, F. R. (eds) Categorization theory and research in consumer psychology, 133–163.Google Scholar

Semiotics

General

Pierce, C. S.
(1931) Collected Papers. Vol. 2. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eco, U.
(1986) Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language (Vol. 398). Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rastier, F.
(1997) Meaning and Textuality, trans. Frank Collins & Paul Perron, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Semantics and cognitive research, translation, by Larry Marks, from Sémantique et recherches cognitives, 2e édition corrigée et augmentée, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Available online at [URL], consulted on December 4th 2020.

Semiotics & the senses

Urdapilleta, I., Nu, C. T., Denis, C. S., & Kermadec, F. H. D.
(2001) Traité d’évaluation sensorielle. Paris, France: Dunod.Google Scholar
Chouvel, J.-M.
(2006) Analyse musicale : Sémiologie et Cognition des formes temporelles, Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Ares, G., & Varela, P.
(2011) Semiotics and perception: Do labels convey the same messages to older and younger consumers?, Journal of Sensory Studies, 26(3), 197–208.Google Scholar
Schifferstein, H., & Hekkert, P.
(2008) Product experience. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., & Cance, C.
(2012) Vers une sémiotique du sensible : des couleurs en discours et en pratiques, Histoire épistémologie Langage 34(1):63–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farina, A. & Pieretti, N.
(2014) From umwelt to soundtope: an epistemological Essay on Cognitive Ecology, Biosemiotics, 7: 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielbo, F. L.
(2015) From soundscape to meaningscape, in Proceedings of Euronoise, Maastricht, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Manoury, P.
(2017) Musiques, Sons et Signes, a series of lectures given at Collège de France, Paris, France. Available online at [URL], consulted on December 4th 2020.
Spinelli, S.
(2018) Semiotics and Sensory Sciences: Meaning Between Texts and Numbers. In Compagno, D. (Ed.), Quantitative Semiotic Analysis, pp. 75–100. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar

Linguistics

Linguistics fieldwork

Mondada, L.
(1998) Technologies et interactions dans la fabrication du terrain du linguiste, in Mahmoudian, M. & Mondada, L., Le travail du chercheur sur le terrain. Ques-tionner les pratiques, les méthodes, les techniques de l’enquête, Cahiers de l’ILSL 10, 39–68Google Scholar
Grinevald, C.
(2007) Linguistic fieldwork among speakers of endangered languages. The vanishing languages of the Pacific rim, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 35–76.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T.
(2013) Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Bowern, C.
(2015) Linguistic fieldwork: A practical guide. Springer.Google Scholar
Grinevald, C., & Sinha, C.
(2016) North-South relations in linguistic science. In L. Filipovic & M. Putz (Eds.) Endangered Languages and Languages in Danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights, 42, 25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Linguistics and sensory experience

Korzybski, A.
(1951) The role of language in the perceptual process. In Blake, R. R., & Ramsey, G. V. (Eds.), Perception: An approach to personality, New York: Ronald Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenko, A., Otten, J., & Shifferstein, H.
(2010) Describing product experience in different languages: the role of sensory modalities, Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3314–3327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, A., & Storch, A.
(Eds.) (2013) Perception and cognition in language and culture (Vol. 3). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C., & Eeg-Olofsson, M.
(2013) Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews, Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1):22–40.Google Scholar
Verine, B.
(Ed.) (2014) Dire le Non-Visuel, Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège.Google Scholar
Diederich, C.
(2015) Sensory Adjectives in the Discourse of Food: A frame-semantic approach to language and perception (Vol. 16). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R., & Paradis, C.
(2015) Making sense of sensory perceptions across languages and cultures, Functions of language, 22(1):1–19.Google Scholar
Winter, B.
(2019) Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor (Vol. 20). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Discourse analysis and cognition

Schegloff, E. A.
(1991) Conversation Analysis and Socially Shared Cognition. In Resnick, L., Levine, J., & Teasley, S. (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington: Amer. Psychol. Ass., 150–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D.
(1997) Discourse and cognition, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Mushin, I.
(2000) Evidentiality and deixis in narrative retelling, Journal of Pragmatics, 32: 927–957. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D.
(2005) Discursive Psychology. In Fitch, K. L. & Sanders, R. E. (Eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 257–273.Google Scholar
Deppermann, A.
(2012) How does “Cognition” Matter to the Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction?, Language Sciences 34(6): 746–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Lexicon and terminology

Hutchins, E., & Hazlehurst, B.
(1995) How to invent a lexicon: The development of shared symbols in interaction. In Gilbert, N. & Conte, R. (Eds.), Artificial Societies: The computer simulation of social life, London: UCL Press, 157–189.Google Scholar
Temmerman, R.
(2000) Towards New Ways of Terminology Description. The Sociocognitive Approach, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Expression of subjectivity

Ouellet, P.
(1984) La désénonciation : les instances de la subjectivité dans le discours scientifique, Protée 12(2):43–53.Google Scholar
Boutet, J.
(1986) La référence à la personne en français parlé, le cas de “on”, Langage et société 38:19–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Souchard, M.
(1989) Le discours de presse, Montréal, CA: le Préambule.Google Scholar
Guentchéva, Z.
(1996) L’énonciation médiatisée, (Vol. 35). Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A.
(2004) Evidentiality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larsson, B.
(2008) Le sens commun ou la sémantique comme science de l’intersubjectivité humaine, Langages, 170:28–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, H., Davidse, K., & Vandelanotte, L.
(2010) Introduction. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Davídse, K., Vandelanotte, L., & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.), Topics in English Linguistics 66, Berlin/New York: De Gruyter/Mouton, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, T.
(2016) Nous, Paris, France: Grasset.Google Scholar

Ideophones and phonosymbolism

Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P.
(2015) Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in languages, Trends in cognitive sciences, 19(10):603–615.Google Scholar
Haiman, J.
(2018) Ideophones and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voeltz, F. E. & Kilian-Hatz, C.
(Eds.) (2001) Ideophones (Vol. 44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Sensory Sciences

Martens, M.
(1999) A philosophy for sensory science, Food quality and preference, 10(4–5):233–244.Google Scholar
Ares, G., & Varela, P.
(2018) Methods in Consumer Research: New approaches to Classic Methods (Vol. 1). Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing.Google Scholar
Ares, G.
(2018) Methodological issues in cross-cultural sensory and consumer research, Food Quality and Preference, 64:253–263.Google Scholar

Anthropology, ethnology, history

Simmel, G.
(1912–1981) Essai sur une sociologie des sens. In Sociologie et épistémologie, Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T.
(1966) The Hidden Dimension, New York: Doubleday/Anchor Book. French translation: La Dimension cachée, Paris: Seuil (1971).Google Scholar
Sahlins, M.
(1976) Colors and culture, Semiotica 1: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howes, D.
(Ed.) (2004) Empire of the Senses: The sensual culture Reader, Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Howes, D. & Classen, C.
(2013) Ways of sensing: Understanding the senses in society. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, C.
(2014) Histoire des sensibilités au 20ème siècle, Vingtième Siècle, 123.Google Scholar
Le Breton, D.
(2017) Sensing the World: An Anthropology of the Senses. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Howes, D.
(Ed.) (2018) Senses and sensation: Critical and primary sources. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar

Ethology: Umwelt and related concepts of “milieu” and “Fudo”

Tetsuro, W.
(1935) Fudo, Tokyo, Japan: Iwanami. French translation, Paris: Editions du CNRS (2011).Google Scholar
Feuerhahn, W.
(2009) Du milieu à l’Umwelt : enjeux d’un changement terminologique, Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 134(4): 419–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergue, A.
(2010) Écoumène: Introduction à l’étude des milieux humains, Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
Koenderink, J. J.
(2013) World, environment, Umwelt, and innerworld: A biological perspective on visual awareness. In Proceedings of Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVIII (Vol. 8651, p. 865103), International Society for Optics and Photonics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergue, A.
(2014) La mésologie : pourquoi et pour quoi faire ?, Paris: PUF.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koenderink, J. J.
(2015) Ontology of the mirror world, Gestalt Theory, 37(2): 119–140.Google Scholar

Epistemology and methodologies

Le Moigne, J. L.
(1995) Epistemology of complex systems and pluridisciplinarity, The Journal of Socio-Economics 24(3): 477–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, B.
(1996) Cogito ergo sumus! Or psychology swept inside out by the fresh air of the upper deck, Mundo científico 167(337). Also in: “A review of Ed Hutchins Cognition in the Wild” (1995), Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal 3(1):54–63.Google Scholar
Avenier, M. J.
(2011) Les paradigmes épistémologiques constructivistes: post-modernisme ou pragmatisme ?, Management & avenir 3: 372–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avenier, M. J., & Thomas, C.
(2011) Mixer quali et quanti pour quoi faire ? Méthodologie sans épistémologie n’est que ruine de réflexion. In Journée de l’atelier méthodologie de recherche de l’AIMS, Caen, France.Google Scholar
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V.
(2011) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. New York City, NY, USA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A.
(2015) Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. New York City, NY, USA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P.
(2015) Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Material culture

General

Norman, D.
(1993) Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine, New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
(1998) The invisible Computer, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, A. & Fujimura, J.
(Eds.) (1992) The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth Century Life Sciences, Princeton: Princeton University Press. French translation: La Matérialité des Sciences : Savoir-faire et Instruments dans les Sciences de la Vie, Paris: Les empêcheurs de penser en rond (1999) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griesemer, J. R.
(1992) The Role of Instruments in the Generative Analysis of Science. In Clarke, A., & Fujimura, J. (Eds.), The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth Century Life Sciences, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 47–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. & Chalmers, D.
(1998) The extended mind, Analysis 58(1): 10–23.Google Scholar
Warnier, J.-P.
(1999) Construire la culture matérielle. L’homme qui pensait avec ses doigts, Paris: PUF. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, B.
(1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Howes, D., & Marcoux, J.-S.
(2006) Introduction à la culture du sensible, Anthropologie & Sociétés, 30(3):7–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agamben, G.
(2007) Qu’est-ce qu’un dispositif?, French translation by M. Rueff, Paris: Payot & Rivages.Google Scholar
Havelange, V., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J.
(2015) Les représentations : Mémoire externe et Objets techniques, Revista Educaão & Tecnologia 4: 132–143.Google Scholar
Japyassu, H. F., & Laland, K. N.
(2017) Extended spider cognition, Animal cognition 20(3): 375–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Visualization

Ivins, W. M.
(1953) Prints and visual communications, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yates, F. A.
(1966) The Art of Memory, New York: Routledge Kegan.Google Scholar
Ivins, W. M.
(1973) On the rationalization of sight, New York: Plenem Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J.
(1977) The domestication of the savage mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, E.
(1977) The mind’s eye: nonverbal thought in technology, Science, 197(4306), 827–836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M.
(1985) Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility, Social studies of science 15: 37–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christin, A.-M.
(1995) L”image écrite, Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Latour, B.
(2003) Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together. In Kuklick, H. (Ed.), Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, vol. 6, Greenwich: Jai Press, 1–40.Google Scholar
(2006) Les “vues” de l’esprit. Une introduction à l’anthropologie des sciences et des techniques, Sociologie de la traduction. Textes fondateurs, 33–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrenschmidt, C.
(2007) Les Trois Écritures: Langue, Nombre, Code, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Development of technologies and political consequences

Crawford, T. H.
(1999) Conducting technologies Virillo’s and Latour’s philosophies of the present state, Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 4(2):171–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellner, D.
(1999) Virilio, war and technology: Some critical reflections, Theory, Culture & Society 16(5–6):103–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, K.
(2002) Into the image: Culture and politics in the field of vision, New York City, NY, USA: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arvanitis, R., Grossetti, M., Raj, K., Renaud, P., & Thomas, F.
(2008) Sciences, savoirs et mondialisations, Science et devenir de l’homme 57–58, fascicule thématique “Sciences technologies savoirs en sociétés”.Google Scholar

Touch

… as a starter for exploring this new field (at least for us) …

Gibson, J. J.
(1962) Observations on active touch, Psychological Review 69(6):477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, D.
(1989) The world of touch (Krueger, L. E., Ed. & translation), Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., & Kamuf, P.
(1993) Le toucher: Touch/to touch him, Paragraph 16(2):122–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaczmarek, K. A. & Bach y Rita, P.
(1995) Tactile displays, in Barfield, W. & Furness, T. A. (Eds.), Virtual environments and advanced interface design, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genevois, H., & De Vivo, R.
(1999) Les nouveaux gestes de la musique, Paris, France: Parenthèses.Google Scholar
Hatwell, Y., Streri, A., & Gentaz, É., Toucher pour connaître. Psychologie cognitive de la perception tactile manuelle
(2000) Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Wanderley, M. M., & Battier, M.
(2000) Trends in Gestural Control of Music, Paris, France: IRCAM/Centre Pompidou.Google Scholar
Field, T.
(2003) Touch, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brewster, S. A., & Brown, L. M.
(2004) Non-Visual Information Display Using Tactons, in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Vienna, Austria. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghedighian-Courier, J.-J.
(2006) Le toucher, un sens aux multiples avatars, Cahiers jungiens de psychanalyse, 2:17–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paterson, M.
(2007) The Senses of Touch — Haptics, Affects and Technologies, New York City, NY, USA: Berg.Google Scholar
Foulke, E.
(2010) Reading braille, in Schiff, W., & Foulke, E. (Eds) Tactual Perception: A Sourcebook, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gallace, A., & Spence, C.
(2010) The science of interpersonal touch: An overview, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 34:246–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatwell, Y., and Gentaz, É.
(2011) Origine et évolution des recherches psychologiques sur le toucher en France, L’année psychologique 111:701–723. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watsuji, T.
(2011) Fûdo, le milieu humain – Commentaire et traduction par Augustin Berque. Paris, France: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Classen, C.
(2012) The Deepest Sense: A Cultural History of Touch, Series Studies in Sensory History, Champagne, IL, USA: University of Illinois Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frissen, I., & Guastavino, C.
(2014) Do whole-body vibrations affect spatial hearing? Ergonomics 57(7):1090–1101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verine, B.
(2014) Les modalisations d’(in)certitude et d’(im)précision comme instruments d’analyse qualitative d’un objet de discours à la marge : les perceptions tactiles, Cahiers de praxématique 62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genevois, H., & Eleftheria, M.
(2015) The Pallophone, in Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress on the Education of the Deaf, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M.
(Ed.) (2015) The linguistics of temperature (Vol. 107). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verine, B.
(2015) Séquentialité de la perception haptique et opérations descriptives : analyse qualitative du discours de trente locuteurs francophones sur quatre objets courants, in Muryn, T., & Mejri, S., Linguistique du discours : de l’intra- à l’interphrastique (Vol. 8, Series Études de linguistique, littérature et arts ), pp. 219–231, Berne, CH: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Paté, A., Givois, A., Le Carrou, J.-L., Le Conte, S., & Vaiedelich, S.
(2016) Harpsichord voicing: The player’s auditive and tactile perception, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Musical and Room Acoustics, La Plata, Argentina.Google Scholar
Verine, B.
(2016) Le vocabulaire tactile existe, je l’ai entendu, in Proceedings of the 3ème colloque Sensorialité et handicap — Toucher pour apprendre, toucher pour communiquer, Lewi-Dumont, N. et al. (Eds.), Paris, France.Google Scholar
Paté, A., Givois, A., Le Carrou, J.-L., Le Conte, S., Castellengo, M., & Vaiedelich, S.
(2017) Perception of Harpsichord Plectra Voicing, Acta Acustica united with Acustica 103:685–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayachi, F. S., Drouet, J-M., Champoux, Y., & Guastavino, C.
(2018) Perceptual thresholds for vibration transmitted to road cyclists. Human Factors 60(6):844–854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papetti, S., and Saitis, C.
(2018) Musical haptics, Cham, CH: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verine, B.
(2019) Expertise d’usage versus dévalorisation de soi : vingt informateurs aveugles face å une enquête sur le toucher, Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique 70:75–88.Google Scholar
Cambourian, P., Paté, A., Cance, C., Navarret, B., & Vasseur, J. O.
(2020) Investigating the vocabulary used by electric guitar players to speak about touch, in Proceedings of Forum Acusticum, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
Classen, C.
(2020) The book of touch, New York City, NY, USA: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patiño-Lakatos, G., Navarret, B., Lindenmeyer, C., Genevois, H., Barbosa-Magalhaes, I., and Corcos, M.
(2020) Music, vibrotactile mediation and bodily sensations in anorexia nervosa: “It’s like I can really feel my heart beating”, Human Technology 16(3):372–405.Google Scholar
Racat, M., & Capelli, S.
(2020) Haptic Sensation and Consumer Behaviour — The Influence of Tactile Stimulation in Physical and Online Environments. Cham, CH: Springer/Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turchet, L., West, T., and Wanderley, M. M.
(2020) Touching the audience: musical haptic wearables for augmented and participatory live music performances, Personal and ubiquitous computing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar