Chapter published in:Speaking of Colors and Odors
Edited by Martina Plümacher and Peter Holz
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 8] 2007
► pp. 155–165
9. Odor memory
The unique nature of a memory system
Olfactory memory has some important distinguishing characteristics which may suggest its uniqueness in cognition. Evidence to support this hypothesis is the following: (a) odor memory is only slightly affected by the length of the retention intervals; (b) it is very resistant to retroactive interference (i.e., to forgetting produced by subsequent learning experiences); (c) odor memory presents a lower initial acquisition level compared to visual and verbal material (this led some authors to assume that odors are represented in memory as distinctive events and learned in an all or none fashion); (d) the relationship between odorants and words seems to be very weak; (e) no differences appear in recognition tasks for odorants learned intentionally or incidentally; (f) neither strategies nor interferences seem to affect recognition memory for odorants. Such peculiarities of odor memory will be discussed and tentatively integrated in a single model. The main assumption is that people lack a conscious representation for odorants, which are stored in memory at an implicit – unconscious – level of knowledge.
Published online: 26 July 2007
Cited by 6 other publications
No author info given
Heckel, Maria, David Rester & Bernd Seeberger
Prehn-Kristensen, Alexander, Kristin Lotzkat, Eva Bauhofer, Christian D. Wiesner, Lioba Baving & Nadine Ravel
Sugiyama, Haruko, Akiko Oshida, Paula Thueneman, Susan Littell, Atsushi Katayama, Mitsuyoshi Kashiwagi, Satoshi Hikichi & Rachel S. Herz
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 june 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.