Cover not available
Article published In:
Verb Phrase and Fluid Construction Grammar
Edited by Luc Steels and Katrien Beuls
[Constructions and Frames 9:2] 2017
► pp. 226–250

Robust processing of the Dutch verb phrase

| AI Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

The Dutch verb phrase (VP) is notorious for its syntactic intricacies. There are three main reasons why it is difficult to robustly handle its complexity in a processing model. First of all, a single VP can contain multiple modal auxiliaries (‘modal stacking’). Second, perfect auxiliaries can not only take a past participle as their argument but also a modal auxiliary in the infinitive form. Finally, there are various word orders in which the verb forms can appear. The first part of this paper presents a fully operational precision processing model of the Dutch VP in Fluid Construction Grammar. The model shows that the aforementioned challenges can be overcome by carefully managing the hierarchical relations between the elements of the VP. The second part introduces a robust comprehension method, which can process VPs containing morphological and word order errors. This method allows in many cases to recover the intended meaning of an erroneous VP, as well as to correct its form, using a strategy that exploits the deep semantic analyses and the bidirectional nature of the model.

Keywords: Construction Grammar, Dutch verb phrase, robustness, Fluid Construction Grammar, language comprehension, language production, bidirectionality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A meaning representation for the Dutch VP
  • 3.A bidirectional grammar of the Dutch VP
    • 3.1The grammar explicated
    • 3.2The grammar at work
    • 3.3Handling the syntactic intricacies of the Dutch VP
      • Modal stacking
      • Perfect auxiliaries
      • Word order variation
  • 4A robust comprehension method
    • 4.1The robust comprehension algorithm
    • 4.2An example of robust comprehension
    • 4.3A first validation
  • 5.Further research
  • 6. Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00003.van
References
Allen, J.
(1984) Towards a general theory of action and time. Artificial intelligence, 23(2), 123–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boogaart, R.
(2013) De modaliteit van temporaliteit. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 18(3), 324–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J., & van den Toorn, M.
(1997) Algemene Nederlands Spraakkunst. Martinus Nijhoff/Wolters Plantyn, 2nd, revised edition.Google Scholar
Pani, A., & Bhattacharjee, G.
(2001) Temporal representation and reasoning in artificial intelligence: A review. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 34(1–2), 55–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pardoen, J.
(1986) Werkwoordclustering in de voltooide tijd. Voortgang, 71, 49–76.Google Scholar
Pickering, M., & Garrod, S.
(2007) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 105–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 329–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H.
(1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic. Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Steels, L. (2003) Language re-entrance and the inner voice. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(4–5), 173–185.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (2011) Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2012) Computational issues in Fluid Construction Grammar. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H., & Broekhuis, H.
(2013) Temporaliteit en modaliteit. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 18(3), 306–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023. Constructionist Approaches, DOI logo
van Trijp, Remi, Katrien Beuls, Paul Van Eecke & Andrew Kehler
2022. The FCG Editor: An innovative environment for engineering computational construction grammars. PLOS ONE 17:6 ► pp. e0269708 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.