Article published in:
Asymmetries, Mismatches and Construction Grammar
Edited by Nikos Koutsoukos, Kristel Van Goethem and Hendrik De Smet
[Constructions and Frames 10:2] 2018
► pp. 210233
References

References

Altshuler, D.
(2016) Events, states and times: An essay on narrative discourse in English. De Gruyter Open. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bary, C.
(2009) Aspect in Ancient Greek: A semantic analysis of the aorist and the imperfective. Phd Dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Birner, B. J.
(1994) Information status and word order: An analysis of English inversion. Language, 70, 233–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Pragmatic constraints on the verb in English inversion. Lingua, 97, 233–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birner, B. J., & Ward, G.
(1992) On the interpretation of VP inversion in American English. Journal of Linguistics, 28, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Information status and noncanonical word order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D.
(1977) Meaning and form. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Brisard, F.
(2002) The English present. In F. Brisard (Ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (pp. 251–297). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calver, E.
(1946) The uses of the present tense forms in English. Language, 22(4), 317–325.Google Scholar
Celle, A., & Smith, N.
(2010) Beyond aspect: Will be -ing and shall be -ing . English Language and Linguistics, 14, 239–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, R.
(2003) English inversion. A ground-before-figure construction. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.
(1986) Tense and discourse location in Situation Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 17–36.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2007) Construction grammar. In Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 463–508). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. D.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, H., & Heyvaert, L.
(2011) The meaning of the English present participle. English Language and Linguistics, 15, 473–498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Swart, H.
(1998) Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 347–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Wit, A.
(2016) The relation between aspect and inversion in English. English Language and Linguistics, 20(1), 107–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) The present perfective paradox across languages. Oxford studies of time in language and thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Wit, A., & Brisard, F.
(2014) A Cognitive Grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive. Journal of Linguistics, 50, 49–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Wit, A., Brisard, F., & Meeuwis, M.
(2018) The epistemic import of aspectual constructions: The case of performatives. Language and Cognition. First view online. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Wit, A., Petré, P. & Brisard, F.
ms.). Standing out with the progressive.
Dorgeloh, H.
(1997) Inversion in Modern English: Form and function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drubig, H.-B.
(1988) On the discourse function of subject-verb inversion. In J. Klegraf & D. Nehls (Eds.), Essays on the English language and applied linguistics on the occasion of Gerhard Nickel’s 60th birthday (pp. 83–95). Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J., & Woisetschlaeger, E. F.
(1982) The logic of the English progressive. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 79–89.Google Scholar
Güldemann, T.
(2003) Present progressive vis-à-vis predication focus in Bantu: A verbal category between semantics and pragmatics. Studies in Language, 27, 323–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kay, P., & Michaelis, L. A.
ms.), Partial inversion in English.
Kreyer, R.
(2006) Inversion in modern written English: Syntactic complexity, information status and the creative writer. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) Nouns and verbs. Language, 63, 53–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) The English present tense. English language and linguistics, 5, 251–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The English present. In A. Patard & F. Brisard (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect and epistemic modality (pp. 45–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lauwers, P., & Willems, D.
(2011) Coercion: Definition and challenges, current approaches, and new trends. Linguistics, 49, 1219–1235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ljung, M.
(1980) Reflections on the English progressive. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Los, B., & Starren, M.
(2012) A typological switch in early Modern English – and the beginning of one in Dutch? Leuvense Bijdragen, 98, 98–126.Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. A.
(2004) Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive linguistics, 15, 1–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Stative by construction. Linguistics, 49, 1359–1399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partee, B., & Borschev, V.
(2007) Existential sentences, BE and the genitive of negation in Russian. In K. von Heusinger & I. Comorovski (Eds.), Existence: Semantics and syntax (pp. 147–190). Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Petré, P.
(2017) The extravagant progressive. An experimental corpus study on the grammaticalization history of [BE Ving]. English Language and Linguistics, 21, 227–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prado-Alonso, C.
(2011) Full-verb inversion in written and spoken English. Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) A constructional analysis of obligatory XVS syntactic structures. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 51, 51–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, J., & Bouillon, P.
(1995) Aspectual coercion and logical polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 12, 133–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B.
(1998) Building verb meanings. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors (pp. 97–134). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Ziegeler, D.
(2007) A word of caution on coercion. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 990–1028. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

DE WIT, ASTRID & FRANK BRISARD
2020. Aspect beyond time: Introduction. Journal of Linguistics 56:3  pp. 459 ff. Crossref logo
Morin, Cameron, Guillaume Desagulier & Jack Grieve
2020. Dialect syntax in Construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 248 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.