Article published in:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 11:1 (2019) ► pp. 79106
References

References

Boas, H. C.
(2003) A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D.
(1968) Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa, 2(2), 119–127.Google Scholar
(1976) Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum, I, 1–14.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1964) Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Clark, E.
(1987) The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. (pp. 1–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
(2009) Words as constructions. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 201–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2010) The News on the Web Corpus (NOW): 4.8 billion words 2010–2017 Available at: http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/now/
Fillmore, C. J.
(1979) On fluency. In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & S.-Y. W. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85–101). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 104 ]
Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O.
(2004) Construction Grammar. A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2004) Covarying collexemes in the into-causative. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 225–236). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Haiman, J.
(1985) Natural syntax: Iconicity and erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. R.
(2008) Implicature. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
(2013)  I love me some datives: Expressive meaning, free datives, and F-implicature. In D. Gutzmann & H.-M. Gärtner (Eds.) Beyond expressives: Explorations in use-conditional meaning (pp. 153–201). Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S., & Francis, G.
(2000) Pattern grammar. A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Israel, M.
(1996) The way constructions grow. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 217–230). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(1990) Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Louw, B.
(1993) Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, J. E.
(2008) The syntactic nature of inner aspect: A minimalist perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. J.
(1989) Competition and lexical categorization. In R. Corrigan, F. Eckman, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Current issues in linguistic theory. Vol. 61: Linguistic categorization. [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science] (pp. 195–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mondorf, B.
(2011) Variation and change in English resultative constructions. Language Variation and Change, 22, 397–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, K.
(2009) Constructional analysis. In F. Brisard, J.-O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Grammar, meaning and pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 5] (pp. 16–32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
(1981) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perek, F.
(2015) Argument structure in usage-based Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N.
(2000) Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J.
(1983) Resultatives. In L. Levin, M. Rappaport, & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar (pp. 143–157). Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1996) The search for units of meaning. Textus, 9(1), 75–106.Google Scholar
Szczesniak, K.
(2013) You can’t cry your way to candy: Motion events and paths in the x’s way construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 24, 159–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
(2012) The mental corpus. How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 105 ]
Uhrig, P.
(2015) Why the Principle of No Synonymy is overrated. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 63(3), 323–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(1998) The semantics of English causative constructions in a universal‑typological perspective. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 113–153). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wiliński, J.
(2017)  On the brink of-noun vs. on the verge of-noun: A distinctive-collexeme analysis. Research in Language, 15(4), 425–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A.
(2002) Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S.
(2006)  Go-V vs. go-and-V in English: A case of constructional synonymy? In S. T. Gries, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis (pp. 101–126). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar