Article published in:
Construction Grammar across BordersEdited by Tiago Timponi Torrent, Ely Edison da Silva Matos and Natália Sathler Sigiliano
[Constructions and Frames 12:1] 2020
► pp. 8–55
Trees, assemblies, chains, and windows
Ronald W. Langacker | University of California San Diego
For describing grammatical organization, metaphors based on a variety of source domains – including trees,
networks, chains, paths, and windows – all appear to have some validity. In Cognitive Grammar, they pertain to facets of
assemblies, where semantic and phonological structures are connected by relations of symbolization, composition, and
categorization. Assemblies have a temporal dimension; consisting in sequenced processing activity that runs concurrently on
different time scales, they involve both seriality and hierarchy. In their hierarchical aspect, they are comparable to
constituency trees, and in their connections, to dependency trees. Assembly elements, which can be characterized at any level of
specificity, are connected in both syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations. A person’s linguistic ability comprises a vast assembly
of conventional units, a portion of which are activated as part of the transient assembly constituting a particular expression.
Lexicon and grammar effect the implementation of semantic functions – affective, interactive, descriptive, and discursive – which
emerge with varying degrees of salience depending on their symbolization by segmental, prosodic, and other means. Assemblies thus
make possible a unified approach to processing, structure, function, and use.
Keywords: constituency, dependency, function, processing, symbolization
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Constituency in Cognitive Grammar
- 3.Constituency vs. dependency
- 4.Assemblies
- 4.1Connections
- 4.2Temporal dimension
- 4.3Functions
- 5.Architecture
- 6.Descriptive and discursive organization
- 7.From connection to constituent
- 8.Seriality
- 9.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 29 July 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00034.lan
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00034.lan
References
Anderson, J. M.
Chafe, W.
Croft, W. A.
Fauconnier, G.
Harder, P.
Israel, M.
Janssen, T. A. J. M.
Kirsner, R. S.
Langacker, R. W.
Li, C. N.
Osborne, T., & Gross, T.
Talmy, L.
van Hoek, K.