Article published in:
Constructional Approach(es) to Discourse-Level Phenomena: Theoretical challenges and empirical advances
Edited by Renata Enghels and María Sol Sansiñena
[Constructions and Frames 13:1] 2021
► pp. 82–125

Semantic polyfunctionality and constructional networks

On insubordinate subjunctive complement constructions in Spanish

| University of Antwerp
| University of Antwerp
| University of Antwerp

This paper offers an analysis of insubordinate subjunctive complement clauses (ISCs) in Spanish and aims to contribute to the general debate in Construction Grammar on how to deal with a highly pragmatically specified surface form that expresses several meanings. We explore whether the meanings expressed by ISCs are encoded in the construction or can be derived via independently existing principles of pragmatic interpretation. The results of the analysis are represented in a constructional network.

Keywords: Construction Grammar, insubordination, complement clauses, syntax, interactional linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Insubordinate subjunctive complement constructions
  • 3.Data and methodology
    • 3.1Semantic categories
      • 3.1.1Strong directives
      • 3.1.2Weak directives
      • 3.1.3Wishes
      • 3.1.4Quoted directives
    • 3.2Grammatical features
    • 3.3Discourse features
    • 3.4Pragmatic features
      • 3.4.1Agentivity
      • 3.4.2Presence of the agent in the conversation
      • 3.4.3Force exertion
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Frequency distribution
    • 4.2Strong directives
    • 4.3Weak directives
    • 4.4Wishes
    • 4.5Quoted directives
  • 5.The constructional network of ISCs
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 02 August 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00048.fer
References
Barberá, P.
(2018) streamR: Access to Twitter streaming API via R. R package version 0.4.4.Google Scholar
Corr, A. V.
(2016) Ibero-Romance and the Syntax of the Utterance. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
(2018) The syntax of Ibero-Romance quotation. In G. Pană Dindelegan, A. Dragomirescu, I. Nicula & A. Nicola (Eds.), Comparative and Diachronic Perspectives on Romance Syntax (pp. 255–288). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Demonte, V. & Fernández Soriano, O.
(2007) La periferia izquierda oracional y los complementantes del español. In J. Cuartero & M. Emsel (Eds.), Vernetzungen: Kognition, Bedeutung, (kontrastive) Pragmatik (pp. 133–147). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2009) Force and finiteness in the Spanish complementizer system. Probus, 211, 23–49.Google Scholar
(2013) El que citativo, otros elementos de la periferia izquierda oracional y la recomplementación: Variación inter e intralingüística. In D. Jakob & K. Plooj (Eds.), Autour de que – El entorno de que (pp. 47–69). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2014) Evidentiality and illocutionary force: Spanish matrix “que” at the syntax-pragmatics interface. In A. Dufter & Á. S. Octavio de Toledo (Eds.), Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, variationist, and typological perspectives (pp. 217–252). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
D’Hertefelt, S.
(2018) Insubordination in Germanic: A typology of complement and conditional constructions. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Hertefelt, S. & Verstraete, J. C.
(2014) Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift? Journal of Pragmatics, 601, 89–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Rycker, T.
(1990) Imperative Subtypes in Conversational British English: An empirical investigation. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Elvira García, W.
(2016) La prosodia de las construcciones insubordinadas conectivo-argumentativas del español. PhD dissertation, University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
Etxepare, R.
(2010) From hearsay evidentiality to samesaying relations. Lingua, 1201, 604–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N.
(2007) Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 366–431). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1996) The pragmatics of constructions. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & J. Guo (Eds.), Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 53–69). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ford, C., Fox, B. & Thompson, S.
(2002) The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gagolewski, M. & Tartanus, B.
(2016) R Package Stringi: Character String Processing Facilities. http://​www​.gagolewski​.com​/software​/stringi/
Gras, P.
(2011) Gramática de construcciones en interacción: Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. PhD dissertation, University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
(2016a) Revisiting the functional typology of insubordination: Que-initial sentences in Spanish. In N. Evans & H. Watanabe (Eds.), Insubordination (pp. 113–144). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2016b) Entre la codificación y la inferencia: Los valores citativos de que inicial átono en español. In R. González Ruiz, D. Izquierdo Alegría & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), La evidencialidad en español: Teoría y descripción (pp. 200–223). Vervuert/Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, A. M.
(Ed.) (2016) Corpus Oral del Lenguaje Adolescente (COLA). http://​www​.colam​.org​/om​_prosj​-espannol​.html
Kay, P. & Michaelis, L.
(2012) Constructional meaning and compositionality. In C. Maienborn, K von Heusinger & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp. 2271–2296). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K. & Thornburg, L.
(2011) Emotion and desire in independent complement clauses: A case study from German. In M. Brdar, S. Gries & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 87–114). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PRESEEA
(2014–) Corpus del Proyecto para el estudio sociolingüístico del español de España y de América. Universidad de Alcalá. http://​preseea​.linguas​.net
R Core Team
(2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://​www​.R​-project​.org
Real Academia Española
(2018) Gramática de la lengua Española. Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1997) The fine structure of Left Periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of Grammar (pp. 281–336). Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ronan, P.
(2015) Categorizing expressive speech acts in the pragmatically annotated SPICE Ireland corpus. ICAME Journal, 391, 25–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 501, 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samper, J. A., Hernández Cabrera, C. E. & Troya, M.
(Eds.) (1998) Macrocorpus de la norma lingüística culta de las principales ciudades del mundo hispánico (MC-NLCH). CD-ROM. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria.Google Scholar
Sansiñena, M. S.
(2015) The multiple functional load of que. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
(2017) Eliciting evidence of functional differences: The imperative versus free-standing que-clauses in Spanish. In D. Van Olmen & S. Heinold (Eds.), Imperatives and Directive Strategies (pp. 265–289). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sansiñena, M. S., De Smet, H. & Cornillie, B.
(2015) Displaced directives: Subjunctive free-standing que-clauses vs. imperatives in Spanish. Folia Linguistica, 491, 257–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R.
(1969) Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, S. Thompson & E. Schegloff (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siemund, P.
(2018) Speech Acts and Clause Types: English in a cross-linguistic context. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sommerer, L. & Smirnova, E.
Introduction: The nature of the node and the network. Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar . In L. Sommerer & E. Smirnova (Eds.) (2020) Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Takahashi, H.
(2012) A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of the English Imperative: With special reference to Japanese imperatives. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.
(2018) Modeling language change with constructional networks. In S. Pons Bordería & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New issues in the study of language change (pp. 17–50). Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, F.
(2014) Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar (pp. 141–179). Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Olmen, D.
(2011) The Imperative in English and Dutch: A functional analysis in comparable and parallel corpora. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Verstraete, J. C., D’Hertefelt, S. & Van linden, A.
(2012) A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language, 361, 123–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar