Article in:
Constructional Approach(es) to Discourse-Level Phenomena: Theoretical challenges and empirical advances
Edited by Renata Enghels and María Sol Sansiñena
[Constructions and Frames 13:1] 2021
► pp. 126159
References

References

Aelbrecht, L.
(2006) IP-ellipsis in Dutch dialects: X + that-clause. In J. Van de Weijer & B. Los (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2006 (pp. 1–14). Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ariel, M.
(2008) Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beijering, K. & Norde, M.
(2019) Adverbial semi-insubordination constructions in Swedish: Synchrony and diachrony. In K. Beijering, G. Kaltenböck & M. S. Sansiñena (Eds.), Insubordination: Theoretical and empirical issues (pp. 79–106). De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beijering, K.
(2017) Semi-insubordinate dat-constructions in Dutch. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 22(3), 333–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beyssade, C. & Marandin, J.-M.
(2006) The speech act assignment problem revisited: disentangling speaker’s commitment from speaker’s call on addressee. In O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (Eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, 6, 37–68. http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr​/eiss6​/index​_en​.html
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L.
(1977) Meaning and form. Longman.Google Scholar
Boogaart, R. & Verheij, K.
(2013) Als dát geen insubordinatie is! De pragmatiek van zelfstandige conditionele zinnen. In T. Janssen & J. Noordegraaf (Eds.), Honderd jaar taalewetenschap. Artikelen aangeboden aan Saskia Daalder bij haar afscheid van de Vrije Universiteit (pp. 13–28). Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar
Bos, G.
(1963) Een verwaarloosd zinstype, In A. W. De Groot & H. Schulting (Eds.), Studies op het gebied van het hedendaagse Nederlands (pp. 174–194). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cappelle, B.
(2017) What’s pragmatics doing outside constructions? In I. Depraetere & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line (pp. 115–151). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P.
(1994) Extraposition in English. Functions of Language, 1(1), 7–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Exclamative clauses in English. Word, 56(1), 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(2001) Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Hertefelt, S. & Verstraete, J.-C.
(2014) Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift? Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 89–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Hertefelt, S.
(2018) Insubordination in Germanic: A Typology of Complement and Conditional Constructions. De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2004–) British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). Available online at https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/bnc/
(2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): One billion words, 1990–2019. Available online at https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/coca/
(2011–) Corpus of American Soap Operas: 100 million words. Available online at https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/soap/
Diessel, H.
(2019) The grammar network. How language structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, N.
(2007) Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness. Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 366–431). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.
(1982) Toward a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 31–59). J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, R.
(2019) Reflections on the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames, 11(2) (Special issue: On the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar), 171–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M. & Östman, J.-O.
(2004) Construction Grammar: a thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, E. J.
(2001) Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. Unpublished Phd dissertation University of California, Los Angeles. (available at https://​linguistics​.ucla​.edu​/general​/dissertations​/GarrettEdwardDissertationUCLA2001​.pdf)
Ginzburg, J. & Kolliakou, D.
(2009) The emergence of fragments in child language. Journal of Linguistics, 45(3), 541–673. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. & Perek, F.
(2019) Ellipsis in Construction Grammar. In J. van Craenenbroeck & T. Temmer Timmerman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis (pp. 188–204). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) The nature of generalization in language. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(1), 93–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Explain me this. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, A.
(2019) Fragments. In J. van Craenenbroeck & T. Temmer Timmerman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis. Oxford University Press, 605–623.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2014) Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K.
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R.
(1984) Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, G.
(2003) On the syntactic and semantic status of anticipatory it . English Language and Linguistics, 7(2), 235–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) “ It-extraposition in English: a functional view.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(2), 119–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Semi-insubordination im Englischen und Deutschen: zur Verwendung einer kommentierenden Konstruktion. Paper given at Symposium ‘Die kommentative Funktion’, Université de Lille, 4–5 November 2016.
(2019) Delimiting the class: A typology of English insubordination. In K. Beijering, G. Kaltenböck & M. S. Sansin͂ena (Eds.), Insubordination: theoretical and empirical issues (pp. 167–168): De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. & Kiparsky, C.
(1970) Fact. In M. Bierwisch & K. E. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in Linguistics: A collection of Papers (pp. 143–173). The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, E. & Siemund, P.
(2007) Speech act distinctions in grammar. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 1. Clause structure (pp. 276–324). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
(2006) Deixis. In L. R. Horn & G. L. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 87–120). Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, J.
(2019) Ellipsis. A survey of analytical approaches. In J. van Craenenbroeck & T. Temmer Timmerman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis (pp. 19–45). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. A. & Lambrecht, K.
(1996a) Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 73(2), 215–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996b) The exclamative sentence type in English. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 375–390). CSLI.Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. A.
(2001) Exclamative constructions. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals 2. (pp. 1038–1050). Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mithun, M.
(2016) How fascinating! Insubordinate exclamations. In N. Evans & H. Watanabe (Eds.), Insubordination (pp. 367–392). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morel, M.-A.
(1995) L’intonation exclamative dans l’oral spontane. Faits de Langues, 6, 63–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J.
(2003) Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language, 79, 682–707. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H. & Gibson, E.
(2012) The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition, 122, 280–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Postal, P. M.
(1974) On Raising. M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Prince, E. F.
(1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 223–255). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Progovac, L., Paesani, K., Casielles, E. & Barton, E.
(Eds.) (2006) The syntax of nonsententials: Multidisciplinary perspectives. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.Google Scholar
Ramat, P., & Ricca, D.
(1998) Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In J. van der Auwera & D. P. Ó Baoill (Eds.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe (pp. 187–273). Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riddle, E.
(1975) Some pragmatic conditions on complementizer choice. Papers from the 11th Regional Meeting. April 18–20, 1975. Linguistic Society, 467–474.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. & Zwicky, A.
(1985) Speech act distinctions in syntax. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 1. Clause structure (pp. 155–196) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sansiñena, M. S.
(2015) The multiple functional load of que. An interactional approach to insubordinate complement clauses in Spanish. University of Leuven dissertation.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E.
(1993) C. E. Shannon: Collected papers. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Siemund, P.
(2015) Exclamative clauses in English and their relevance for theories of clause type. Studies in Language, 39(3), 697–727. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Trousdale, G.
(2010) Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In E. C. Traugott & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (pp. 19–44). Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
forthc.). The development of metatextual connectors in English. A historical constructionalist perspective on pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Van linden, A. & Van de Velde, F.
(2014) (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic-pragmatic values. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 226–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A.
(2005) Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, R. & Portner, P.
(2003) Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language, 79(1), 39–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar