This corpus-based study tests the Principle of No Synonymy across levels of abstraction by examining the syntactic
realizations of subject extraposition (e.g., it is important to, it seems that), and by investigating at which
level(s) of formal description a difference in form also entails a difference in function. The results show that distinct pairs of
form and function, i.e. constructions, can be found at different levels of abstraction, but that these constructions also subsume
formal realization patterns that do not encode a difference in function. This suggests that the Principle of No Synonymy largely
breaks down at low levels of formal description. The study also offers a constructional account of subject extraposition by
identifying a number of subject extraposition constructions, thereby showing that this is a syntactic phenomenon that is best
analyzed as a family of constructions.
Ädel, A. (2014). Selecting
quantitative data for qualitative analysis: A case study connecting a lexicogrammatical pattern to rhetorical
moves. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes 161: 68–80.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman
grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning
and form. Longman.
Boas, H. (2003). A
Constructional approach to resultatives. CSLI Publications.
Bresnan, J. (2007). Is
syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative
alternation. In Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential
base, S. Featherston & W. Sternefeld (Eds.), 75–96. Mouton de Gruyter.
Burnard, L. (2007). Reference
guide for the British National Corpus (XML Edition). [URL] (7July 2020)
Cappelle, B. (2006). Particle
placement and the case for ‘allostructions’. Constructions
online sv1–71: 1–28.
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge
grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge University Press.
De Vaere, H., Kolkmann, J. & Belligha, T. (2020). Allostructions
revisited. Journal of
Pragmatics 1701, 96–111.
Depraetere, I. & Langford, C. (2020). Advanced
English grammar: A linguistic approach. 2nd
edition. Bloomsbury.
Flach, S. (2017). Serial
verb constructions in English: A usage-based perspective. PhD
dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.
Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. (2019). An
R companion to applied regression, 3rd edition. Sage.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions:
A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Corpus
evidence of the viability of statistical preemption. Cognitive
Linguistics 22(1):131–153.
Gries, S. Th. (2003). Multifactorial analysis in corpus
linguistics: A study of particle
placement. Continuum.
Gries, S. Th. & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Covarying
collexemes in the into-causative. In Language, culture, and
mind, M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), 225–236. CSLI Publications.
Groom, N. (2005). Pattern
and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for
Academic
Purposes 4 (3): 257–277.
Hampe, B. (2014). More
on the as-predicative: Granularity issues in the description of construction
networks. In Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics
Association, S. Flach & M. Hilpert (Eds.), 207–234. Mouton de Gruyter.
Herbst, T. (2014). The
valency approach to argument structure
constructions. In Constructions, collocations,
patterns, T. Herbst, H.-J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), 159–207. De Gruyter Mouton.
Herriman, J. (2000). Extraposition
in English: A study of the interaction between the matrix predicate and the type of extraposed
clause. English
Studies 81 (6): 582–599.
Hewings, M. & Hewings, A. (2002). “It
is interesting to note that…”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published
writing. English for Specific
Purposes 21 (4): 367–383.
Hilpert, M. (2012). Diachronic
collostructional analysis meets the noun phrase: Studying many a noun in
COHA. In The Oxford handbook of the history of
English, T. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), 233–244. Oxford University Press.
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction
Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh University Press.
Huddleston, R. D., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The
Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (1996). Talking
to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written
Communication 13 (2): 251–281.
Kaatari, H. (2017). Adjectives
complemented by that- and to-clauses: Exploring semantico-syntactic relationships and genre
variation. PhD dissertation, Uppsala University.
Larsson, T. (2016). The
introductory it pattern: Variability explored in learner and expert
writing. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes 221: 64–79.
Larsson, T. (2017). A
functional classification of the introductory it pattern: Investigating academic writing by non-native-
speaker and native-speaker students. English for Specific
Purposes 481: 57–70.
Larsson, T. (2018). Is
there a correlation between form and function? A syntactic and functional investigation of the introductory
it pattern in student writing. ICAME
journal 42(1): 13–40.
Larsson, T. (2019). A
syntactic analysis of the introductory it pattern in non-native-speaker and native-speaker student
writing. In Corpus Linguistics, context and
culture, M. Mahlberg & V. Wiegand (Eds.), 307–338. De Gruyter Mouton.
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A. & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated
choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge University Press.
Mak, K. T. (2005). The
dynamics of collocation: A corpus-based study of the phraseology and pragmatics of the introductory
it-construction. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Michaelis, L. A. & Lambrecht, K. (1994). On
nominal extraposition: A constructional analysis. In Proceedings of
the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session dedicated to the contributions of Charles J.
Fillmore, K. E. Moore, D. A. Peterson & C. Wentum (Eds.), 362–373. Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Patten, A. (2012). The
English It-Cleft: A constructional account and a diachronic investigation. De Gruyter Mouton.
Perek, F. (2018). Recent
change in the productivity and schematicity of the way-construction: A distributional semantic
analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic
Theory 14(1): 65–97.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A
comprehensive grammar of the English
language. Longman.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and
environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL] (7July 2020)
Ramhöj, R. (2016). On
clausal subjects and extraposition in the history of English. PhD
dissertation, University of Gothenburg.
Röthlisberger, M., Grafmiller, J. & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2017). Cognitive
indigenization effects in the English dative alternation. Cognitive
Linguistics 28(4): 673–710.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus,
concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.
Stefanowitsch, A. (2001). Constructing
Causation: A Construction Grammar Approach to Analytic Causatives. PhD
dissertation, Rice University.
Tummers, J., Heylen, K. & Geeraerts, D. (2005). Usage-based
approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and
Linguistic
Theory 1(2): 225–261.
Uhrig, P. (2015). Why
the principle of no synonymy is overrated. Zeitschrift Für Anglistik Und
Amerikanistik 63(3): 323–337.
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern
applied statistics with S, Fourth
edition. Springer.
Wierzbicka, Anna. (1986). The
semantics of the ‘Internal Dative’: A Rejoinder. Quaderni di
Semantica 71: 155–165.
Wulff, S. (2006). Go-V
vs. go-and-V in English: A case of constructional
synonymy? In Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based
approaches to syntax and lexis, S. Th. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), 101–126. De Gruyter Mouton.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Cai, Yingying & Hendrik De Smet
2024. Are categories’ cores more isomorphic than their peripheries?. Frontiers in Communication 9
2022. Communicative efficiency and the Principle of No Synonymy: predictability effects and the variation ofwant toandwanna. Language and Cognition 14:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.