As if irony was in stock
The case of constructional ironies
The linguistic treatment of verbal irony [1] 1 has more often than not focused on novel, ad hoc ironies. Research in the last decade, however, suggests that there is a considerable number of utterances that are either schematic or lexically filled and interpreted as ironic by convention. By analyzing three of these, i.e. Tell me about it, XP pro BE not (A Michelangelo he is not) and stand-alone insubordinate as if (As if anyone could pronounce that), the present paper will show that these expressions are best analyzed as constructions (Goldberg 1995, 2006). The paper will further show that the Viewpoint account of irony (Dancygier 2017; Tobin & Israel 2012) describes the data at hand most adequately.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Explaining irony and its functions
- 2.1Pragmatic accounts of irony
- 2.2Cognitive accounts of irony
- 2.3The function(s) of irony
- 3.What makes a construction? A usage-based perspective
- 4.Constructional ironies
- 4.1Tell me about it
- 4.2XP pro BE not
- 4.3Stand-alone insubordinate as if
- 5.Implications for accounts of irony
- 6.Summary: Constructional ironies as space builders and perspective shifters
- 7.Concluding remarks
- Notes
-
References
References (50)
Athanasiadou, A.
(
2017)
Irony has a metonymic basis. In
A. Athanasiadou &
H. L. Colston (Eds.),
Irony in language use and communication (pp. 201–215). Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Athanasiadou, A.
(
2020)
Irony in constructions. In
A. Athanasiadou &
H. L. Colston (Eds.),
The diversity of irony. De Gruyter/Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Athanasiadou, A., & Colston, H. L.
(
2020)
Intorduction. On the Diversity of Irony. In
A. Athanasiadou &
H. L. Colston (Eds.),
The Diversity of Irony (pp. 1–11). De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Attardo, S.
(
2000)
Irony as relevant inappropriateness.
Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E.
(
2011)
Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production.
Language, 55–83.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bryant, G. A.
(
2010)
Prosodic Contrasts in Ironic Speech.
Discourse Processes, 47(7), 545–566.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J.
(
2010)
Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J.
(
2013)
Usage-based Theory and Exemplar Representations of Constructions. In
T. Hoffmann &
G. Trousdale (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford Univ. Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Camp, E.
(
2012)
Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction.
Noûs, 46(4), 587–634.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cappelle, B., Depraetere, I., & Lesuisse, M.
Carston, R.
(
1996)
Metalinguistic negation and echoic use.
Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 309–330.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheang, H. S., & Pell, M. D.
(
2008)
The sound of sarcasm.
Speech communication, 50(5), 366–381.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(
2004)
Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dancygier, B.
(
2017)
Viewpoint phenomena in constructions and discourse.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1), 1–22.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, M.
(
2010–)
The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): One billion words, 1990–2019. Retrieved from Available online at
[URL]
Dynel, M.
(
2013)
Irony from a neo-Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature.
Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(3), 403–431.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(
2002)
The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C.
(
1988)
Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone.
Language, 501–538.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garmendia, J.
(
2011)
She’s (not) a fine friend: “Saying” and criticism in irony.
Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(1), 41–65.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garmendia, J.
(
2018)
Irony. Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W.
(
2000)
Irony in talk among friends.
Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R.
(
1995)
On irony and negation.
Discourse Processes, 19(2), 239–264.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R.
(
2003)
On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R., Drucker, A., Fein, O., & Mendelson, I.
(
2015)
Default sarcastic interpretations: On the priority of nonsalient interpretations.
Discourse Processes, 52(3), 173–200.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R., & Fein, O.
(
1999)
Irony comprehension: The graded salience hypothesis.
Humor, 12(4), 425–436.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R., Fein, O., & Schwartz, T.
(
1998)
Irony: graded salience and indirect negation.
Metaphor and Symbol, 13(2), 83–101.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
1995)
Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E.
(
2006)
Constructions at work. The nature of generalizations in language. Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H. P.
(
1975)
Logic and conversation. In
P. Cole &
J. L. Morgan (Eds.),
Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Brill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, R. D., & Pullum, G. K.
(
2002)
The Cambridge grammar of the English language (1. publ. ed.). Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaltenböck, G.
(
2019)
Delimiting the class: A typology of English insubordination. In
K. Beijering,
G. Kaltenböck, &
M. S. Sansiñena (Eds.),
Insubordination. Theoretical and empirical issues (pp. 167–198). De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J.
(
1999)
Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the What’s X doing Y? construction.
Language, 1–33.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kreuz, R. J., & Link, K. E.
(
2002)
Asymmetries in the Use of Verbal Irony.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(2), 127–143.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G.
(
1987)
Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind. Univ. of Chicago Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, C.
(
2020)
Using Multimodal Corpora to Study the Ironic Tone of Voice. Opportunities and Challenges. Paper presented at ICAME41.
[URL]
Mauchand, M., Vergis, N., & Pell, M.
(
2018)
Ironic tones of voices. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Michaelis, L. A., & Feng, H.
Östman, J.-O., & Trousdale, G.
(
2013)
Dialects, Discourse, and Construction Grammar. In
T. Hoffmann &
G. Trousdale (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 476–489). Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rockwell, P.
(
2000)
Lower, Slower, Louder: Vocal Cues of Sarcasm.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(5), 483–495.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
(
2017)
Cognitive modeling and irony. In
A. Athanasiadou &
H. L. Colston (Eds.),
Irony in language use and communication (pp. 179–200). Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Lozano-Palacio, I.
(
2019a)
A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Complexity in Irony: Dissecting the Ironic Echo.
Metaphor and Symbol, 34(2), 127–138.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Lozano-Palacio, I.
(
2019b)
Unraveling irony: from linguistics to literary criticism and back.
Cognitive Semantics, 5(1), 147–173.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, F., & Turner, M. B.
(
2013)
Multimodal construction grammar. In
M. Borkent,
B. Dancygier, &
J. Hinnell (Eds.),
Language and the creative mind (pp. 255–274). CSLI Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tobin, V., & Israel, M.
(
2012)
Irony as a viewpoint phenomenon. In
B. Dancygier &
E. Sweetser (Eds.),
Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp. 25–46). Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, M.
(
2012)
Conceptual Integration. In
D. Geeraerts (Ed.),
The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford Univ. Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Veale, T., & Hao, Y.
(
2010)
Detecting ironic intent in creative comparisons. Paper presented at the 19th European conference on artificial intelligence – ECAI 2010, Lisboa, Portugal.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
(
2012)
Explaining irony. In
Meaning and relevance (pp. 123–145). Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
LEHMANN, CLAUDIA
2023.
As if that wasn't enough: Englishas ifclauses as multimodal utterance constructions.
English Language and Linguistics 27:1
► pp. 175 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.