Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 15:1 (2023) ► pp.119144
References
ARTFL-Frantext corpus
(2022) ATILF – CNRS & Université de Lorraine. [URL]
Bainville, J.
(1931) Napoléon. Fayard.Google Scholar
Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., & Lowe, J. B.
(1998) The Berkeley FrameNet Project. In P. Isabelle, L. Da Sylva, F. Fauteux, R. Kittredge, G. Lapalme, M.-C. L’Homme, & A. Thériault (Eds.), COLING-ACL ’98: Proceedings of the Conference, held at the University of Montréal (pp. 86–90). Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouso, T.
(2020) The growth of the transitivising Reaction Object Construction. Constructions & Frames, 12 (2), 239–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candito, M., Amsili, P., Barque, L., Benamara, F., de Gael, C., Djemaa, M., & Vieu, L.
(2014) Developing a French FrameNet: Methodology and first results. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, H. Loftsson, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Edition of the Language, Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 1372–1379). Reykjavik, Iceland: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Coleman, J.
(2005) Public reading and the reading public in Late Medieval England and France. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2001) Radical construction grammar. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Construction Grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 463–508). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Clari, R.
(1924) La conquête de Constantinople. Paris: Champion. (Original work published 1216)Google Scholar
de Joinville, J.
(1998) Mémoires ou Vie de saint Louis. Garnier Flammarion. (Original work published 1305)Google Scholar
de Livoy, T.
(1788) Dictionnaire de synonymes françois. Second edition. N. Beauzée (Ed.). Nyon.Google Scholar
Djemaa, M., Candito, M., Muller, P., & Vieu, L.
(2016) Corpus annotation within the French FrameNet: A domain-by-domain methodology. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, M. Grobelnik, B. Maegaard, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Edition of the Language, Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 3794–3801). European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, E. L.
(1980) The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Hanshin.Google Scholar
(1989) Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. In R. Dietrich & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Language processing in social context (pp. 17–38). Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Johnson, C. R., & Petruck, M. R. L.
(2003) Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16 (3), 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, M.
(2007) A Frame Semantic account of morphosemantic change: The case of Old Czech věřící. In D. Divjak & A. Kochanska (Eds.), Cognitive paths into the Slavic domain (pp. 291–328). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames, 1 (2), 261–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Froissart, J.
(1962) Chroniques, livre premier. Droz. (Original work published 1399)Google Scholar
Georgakopoulos, T.
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamunen, M. V. J.
(2017) On the grammaticalization of Finnish colorative construction. Constructions and Frames, 9 (1), 101–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. & Reichl, K.
(2012) Performance and performers. In K. Reichl (Ed.), Medieval oral literature (pp. 141–202). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2016) Change in modal meanings. Constructions and Frames, 8 (1), 66–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, M. & Bourgeois, S.
Koch, P.
(1999) Cognitive aspects of semantic change and polysemy: The semantic space HAVE/BE. In A. Blank (Ed.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 279–305). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Pour une approche cognitive du changement sémantique lexical: aspect onomasiologique. In J. François (Ed.), Théories contemporaines du changement sémantique (pp. 75–97). Peeters.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Law, J.
(2019) Diachronic frame analysis: The Purpose frame in French. Constructions and Frames, 11 (1), 42–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martineau, F.
(2008) Un Corpus pour l’analyse de la variation et du changement linguistique. Corpus, 7 (1), 135–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martineau, F., Diaconescu, R., & Hirschbühler, P.
(2007) Le Corpus Voies du français: de l’élaboration à l’annotation. In P. Kunstmann & A. Stein (Eds.), Le Nouveau Corpus d’Amsterdam (pp. 121–142). Steiner.Google Scholar
Mousket, P.
(1836) Chronique. P. F. Dembowski (Ed.). Commission Royale d’Histoire. (Original work published 1243)Google Scholar
Noël, D.
(2007) Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language, 14 (2), 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) The nominative and infinitive in Late Modern English: A diachronic constructionist approach. Journal of English Linguistics, 36 (4), 314–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Reybaud, L.
(1844) Jérôme Paturot à la recherche d’une position sociale. Paulin. (Original work published 1842)Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R., Baker, C. F., & Scheffczyk, J.
(2016) FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley, California. [URL]
Scarlini, B., Pasini, T., & Navigli, R.
(2020) Sense-annotated corpora for word sense disambiguation in multiple languages and domains. In N. Calzolari, F. Béchet, P. Blache, K. Choukri, C. Cieri, T. Declerck, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 5905–5911). European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(2016) Do semantic modal maps have a role in a constructionalization approach to modals? Constructions and Frames, 8 (1), 98–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, G., & Norde, M.
(2013) Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: two case studies. Language Sciences, 36 1, 32–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar