Introduction
Issues in Diachronic Construction Morphology
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The framework
- 2.1Construction Morphology
- 2.2Morphological schemas
- 2.3Morphological networks
- 2.4Paradigms in CxM
- 2.5Productivity and CxM
- 3.Summary of the articles
- Note
-
References
References (57)
References
Ackerman, F., Blevins, J. P., & Malouf, R. (2009). Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In J. P. Blevins & J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition (pp. 54–82). Oxford University Press.
Arnaud, P. J. L. (2013). Word-formation and word-creation: A data-driven exploration of inventiveness in neologisms. Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis lingüístics,
18
1, 97–113.
Bauer, L. (2001). Morphological productivity. Cambridge University Press.
Bauer, L. (2021). ‘What is the plural of mouse?’ and other unhelpful questions for morphologists. Cadernos de linguística,
2
(1), 1–16.
Beliaeva, N. (2019). Blending creativity and productivity: On the issue of delimiting the boundaries of blends as a type of word formation. Lexis, 141.
Blevins, J. P. (2016). The minimal sign. In A. Hippisley & G. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology (pp. 50–69). Cambridge University Press.
Booij, G. (2010). Construction Morphology. Oxford University Press.
Booij, G. (2013). Morphology in construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 255–273). Oxford University Press.
Booij, G. (2016). Construction Morphology. In A. Hippisley & G. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology (pp. 424–448). Cambridge University Press.
Booij, G. (2018). The construction of words: Introduction and overview. In G. Booij (Ed.), The construction of words: Advances in construction morphology (pp. 3–16). Springer.
Booij, G., & Audring, J. (2018). Partial motivation, multiple motivation: The role of output schemas in morphology. In G. Booij (Ed.), The construction of words: Advances in construction morphology (pp. 59–80). Springer.
Booij, G., & Masini, F. (2015). The role of second order schemas in the construction of complex words. In L. Bauer, L. Kőrtvélyessy & P. Štekauer (Eds.), Semantics of complex words (pp. 47–66). Springer.
Brinton, L. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2005). Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, D., & Hippisley, A. (2012). Network morphology: A defaults-based theory of word structure. Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. (2020). Ten lectures on Construction Grammar and typology. Brill.
Dąbrowska, E. (2016). Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics,
27
(4), 479–491.
Dancygier, B. (2017). Introduction. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1–10). Cambridge University Press.
Diessel, H. (2019). The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge University Press.
Diewald, G., & Politt, K. (Eds.). (2022). Paradigms regained: Theoretical and empirical arguments for the reassessment of the notion of paradigm. Language Science Press.
Eitelmann, M., Haugland, K., & Haumann, D. (2020). From engl-isc to whatever-ish: A corpus-based investigation of –ish derivation in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics,
24
(4), 801–831.
Fertig, D. (2013). Analogy and morphological change. Edinburgh University Press.
Freywald, U., & Finkbeiner, R. (2018). Exact repetition or total reduplication? Exploring their boundaries in discourse and grammar. In R. Finkbeiner & U. Freywald (Eds.), Exact repetition in grammar and discourse (pp. 3–28). Mouton de Gruyter.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2016). Partial productivity of linguistic constructions: Dynamic categorization and statistical preemption. Language and Cognition,
8
1, 369–390.
Goldberg, A. E. (2019). Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.
Hartmann, S. (2021). Past, present, and future. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association,
9
(1), 1–34.
Hilpert, M. (2015). From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics,
26
(1), 113–147.
Himmelmann, N. P. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and components (pp. 21–42). Mouton de Gruyter.
Hudson, R. (2007). Language networks: The new word grammar. Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2017). In defense of theory. Cognitive Science,
41
1, 185–212.
Jakubíček, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovář, V., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2013). TheTenTen corpus family. 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference CL, 125–127.
Kempf, L., & Hartmann, S. (2018). Schema unification and morphological productivity: A diachronic perspective. In Booij, G. (Ed.), The construction of words: Advances in construction morphology (pp. 441–474). Springer.
Kemps, R. J. J. K., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns. Memory and Cognition,
33
(3), 430–46.
Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?
1
(1), 39–74.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. Mouton de Gruyter.
Lehmann, C. (2015 [1982]). Thoughts on grammaticalization. Language Science Press.
Lensch, A. (2018). Fixer-uppers. Reduplication in the derivation of phrasal verbs. In R. Finkbeiner & U. Freywald (Eds.), Exact repetition in grammar and discourse (pp. 158–181). Mouton de Gruyter.
Masini, F., & Audring, J. (2019). Construction Morphology. In J. Audring & F. Masini (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory (pp. 365–389). Oxford University Press.
Norde, M., & Sippach, S. (2019).
Nerdalicious scientainment: A network analysis of English libfixes. Word Structure,
12
(3), 353–384.
Norde, M., & Van Goethem, K. (2018). Debonding and clipping of prefixoids in Germanic: Constructionalization or constructional Change? In G. Booij (Ed.), The construction of words: Advances in construction morphology (pp. 475–518). Springer.
Pijpops, D., & Van de Velde, F. (2016). Constructional contamination: How does it work and how do we measure it? Folia Linguistica,
50
(2), 543–581.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press.
Van de Velde, F., & Van der Horst, J. (2013). Homoplasy in diachronic grammar. Language Sciences, 361, 66–77.
Zimmer, B. (2006). The surreptitious history of -licious
. Language Log [URL]
Zwicky, A. M. (2010). ‘Libfixes’ post on Arnold Zwicky’s Blog. [URL]