Count-mass coercion, and the perspective of time and variation
Debra Ziegeler | National University of Singapore, University of Montpellier
In an earlier study (Ziegeler 2007), it was emphasised that it was redundant to discuss construction coercion in the face of more transparent mechanisms of cognitive pragmatics such as metonymy, and within the sphere of grammaticalisation studies. The present paper extends such arguments, including examples of (apparent) coercion of count-to-mass nouns in Colloquial Singaporean English, and, comparing the data with examples of noun referentiality in earlier historical English, illustrates that what on the surface may appear to be coercion is just a sub-type of metonymy, involved in the metaphorical generalisation of constructions across lexical-syntactic boundaries. Comparison with retention and unresolved mismatch in grammaticalisation is also considered.
Keywords: metaphor, coercion, count/mass noun distinction, Singapore English, metonymy, construction generalisation
Published online: 30 July 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.2.1.02zie
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.2.1.02zie
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
No author info given
2014.
In Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Language Companion Series, 157],
Corbett, Greville G.
2019. Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features: a typology of nouns with non-canonical number properties.
Morphology 29:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2020.
In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],
► pp. 152 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2020. Maximizing the explanatory power of constructions in Cognitive Construction Grammar(s).
Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 110 ff.
Hundt, Marianne
2018. Debra Ziegeler. 2015. Converging Grammars: Constructions in Singapore English
.
English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 39:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Peña Cervel, María Sandra
2015. A constructionist approach to causative frighten verbs.
Linguistics 53:6
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.