Clause combining across grammars
A contrastive analysis of L1 and L2 construal of discourse organization
The goal of the present study is to examine whether clause-combining rhetorical preferences that differentiate between Hebrew and English are maintained across grammars, specifically, in the context of text production in a non-native language. It examines the usage of various bi-clausal constructions marking different levels of event integration in texts written by advanced speakers of English, all native monolingual Hebrew speakers. The data analyzed consist of personal experience narratives that were collected from high-school and university-level students. These texts are compared to narratives that were collected from native speakers of both languages following the same design of study. Quantitative and qualitative analyses show differences and similarities between the three populations in terms of clause-combining strategies. They reveal that not only the constraints of the L1 but mainly those of the L2 guide non-native speakers in their choice of bi-clausal constructions, as devices expressing event integration. Results further show that event integration is reflected by constructions at different levels of the grammatical system, and that constraints on bi-clausal constructions at the more local, morpho-syntactic level are echoed by constraints at the level of discourse itself as a construction.
References (72)
Achard, M
(
1998)
Representation of cognitive structures: Syntax and semantics of French sentential complements [
Cognitive Linguistics Research Series 11]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Achard, M
(
2008)
Teaching construal: Cognitive pedagogical grammar. In
P. Robinson &
N. Ellis (Eds.),
Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 432–456). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Akinci, M.A., & Jisa, H
(
2001)
Développement de la narration en langue faible et forte: le cas des connecteurs.
AILE, 141, 87–110.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auer, P., & Pfänder, S
(Eds.) (
2011)
Constructions. Emerging and emergent. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, R.A
(
1978)
Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv: University Pub. Projects.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, R.A
(
1980)
The case of an (S)VO language: Subjectless constructions in modern Hebrew.
Language, 561, 759–776.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, R.A
(
1998)
Typological perspectives on connectivity. In
N. Dittmar &
Z. Penner (Eds.),
Issues in the theory of language acquisition (pp. 203–224). Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, R.A., & Nir, B
(
2009)
Clause–packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In
J. Guo,
E. Lieven,
S. Ervin–Tripp,
N. Budwig,
S. Özçalişkan &
K. Nakamura (Eds.),
Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan I. Slobin. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, R.A., & Slobin, D.I
(
1994)
Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, R.A., & Verhoeven, L
Bylund, E
(
2011)
Language-specific patterns in event conceptualization: Insights from bilingualism. In
A. Pavlenko (Ed.),
Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 108–142). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bylund, E., & Jarvis, S
(
2011)
L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 141, 47–59.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cadierno, T
(
2008)
Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In
P. Robinson &
N.C. Ellis (Eds.),
Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 239–275). New York / London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carroll, M., Roßdeutscher, A., von Stutterheim, C., & Lambert, M
Cristofaro, S
(
2003)
Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W
(
2001)
Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W., Barddal, J., Hollmann, W.B., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C
De Knop, S., & Dirven, R
(
2008)
Motion and location events in German, French and English: A typological, contrastive and pedagogical approach. In
S. De Knop &
T. De Rycker (Eds.),
Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar: A volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 298–327). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Degand, L
(
2000)
Causal connectives or causal prepositions? Discursive constraints.
Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 687–707.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duffield, C.J., Hwang, J.D., & Michaelis, L.A
(
2010)
Identifying assertions in text and discourse: The presentational relative clause construction.
Proceedings of the NAACL HLT Workshop on Extracting and Using Constructions in Computational Linguistics
, 17–24.
Ellis, N.C., & Cadierno, T
Fauconnier, G
(
1998)
Mental spaces, language modalities, and conceptual integration. In
M. Tomasello (Ed.),
The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, Volume 1 (pp. 251–280). Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C.J
(
1977)
The case for case reopened. In
P. Cole &
J.M. Saddock (Eds.),
Syntax and semantics, 81, 59–81.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C
(
2003)
Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of Let Alone
. In
M. Tomasello (Ed.),
The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, Volume 2 (pp. 243–270). Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, K
(
2010)
Accounting for the role of situation in language use in a cognitive semantic representation of sentence mood. In
D. Glynn &
K., Fischer (Eds.),
Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches (pp. 179–200). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fried, M., & Östman, J.–O
(
2005)
Construction Grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles.
Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1752–1778.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fujii, S.Y
(
1993)
On the clause-linking to construction in Japanese. In
P.M. Clancy (Ed.),
Japanese / Korean linguistics, volume 2 (pp. 3–19). Stanford, California.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, T
(
1990)
Syntax: A functional typological introduction. Volume 21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, T
(
2009)
The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A.E
(
1995)
Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, M
(
2010)
The force dynamics of English complement clauses: A usage-based account. In
K. Fischer &
D. Glynn (Eds.),
Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics (pp. 155–178). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keenan, E.L
(
1985)
Relative clauses. In
T. Shopen (Ed.),
Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions. Volume 21 (pp. 141–170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, K
(
1990)
‘What me worry?’ — Mad Magazine sentences revisited.
BLS, 61, 215–228.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, K
(
2001)
A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions.
Linguistics, 391, 463–516.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R
(
2010)
Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liamkina, O
(
2008)
Making dative a case for semantic analysis: Differences in use between native and non-native speakers of German. In
A. Tyler,
M. Takada &
Y. Kim (Eds.),
Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language (pp. 145–166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B
(
2000)
The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Third Edition. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mann, W.C., & Thompson, S.A
(
1986)
Relational propositions in discourse.
Discourse Processes, 91, 57–90.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Niemeier, S., & Reif, M
(
2008)
Making progress simpler? Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching in the German EFL classroom. In
S. De Knop, &
T. De Rycker (Eds.),
Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar: A Volume in Honour of René Dirven (pp. 325–356). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nir, B
(
2008)
Clause packages as constructions in developing narrative discourse. PhD Dissertation, Tel Aviv University.
Nir, B
(
2014)
Complementizers in Hebrew. In
G. Khan (Ed.),
Encyclopedia of Hebrew language and linguistics. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nir, B., & Berman, R.A
(
2010a)
Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric.
Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 744–765.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noonan, M
(
1985)
Complementation. In
T. Shopen (Ed.),
Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions. Volume 21 (pp. 42–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Östman, J.–O
(
2005)
Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In
J.–O. Östman &
M. Fried (Eds.),
Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 121–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T
(
1984)
Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts.
Linguistics, 221, 779–809.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N
(
2008)
Conclusion: Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and L2 instruction — Issues for research. In
P. Robinson &
N. Ellis (Eds.),
Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 489–546). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruppenhofer, J., & Michaelis, L.A
Schmiedtová, B., & Flecken, M
(
2008)
Aspectual concepts across languages: Some considerations for second language learning. In
S. De Knop &
T. De Rycker (Eds.),
Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar: A volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 357–384). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmiedtová, B., v. Stutterheim, C., & Carroll, M
(
2011)
Implications of language-specific patterns in event construal of advanced L2 speakers. In
A. Pavlenko (Ed.),
Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 66–107.). Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slobin, D.I
(
1993)
Adult language acquisition: A view from child language study. In
C. Perdue (Ed.),
Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 239–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slobin, D.I
(
1996)
From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In
J.J. Gumperz &
S.C. Levinson (Eds.),
Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
von Stutterheim, C
(
1998)
Global principles of information organisation in texts of L2 speakers.
Studi italiani di linguistica teoretica a applicata, XXVII, 1. S, 89–111.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
von Stutterheim, C., & Lambert, M
(
2005)
Crosslinguistic analysis of temporal perspective in text production. In
H. Hendricks (Ed.),
The structure of learner varieties (pp. 203–230). Berlin: de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
von Stutterheim, C., & Nüse, R
(
2003)
Processes of conceptualisation in language production.
Linguistics, 41(5), 851–881.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, L
(
1978)
Figure and ground in complex sentences. In
J.H. Greenberg,
C. Ferguson &
J. Moravcsik (Eds.),
Universals of human language. Volume 4: Syntax (pp. 625–649). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, L
(
2000)
Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, S.A., & Longacre, R.E
(
1985)
Adverbial clauses. In
T. Shopen (Ed.),
Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions. Volume 21 (pp. 171–234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tyler, A
(
2008)
Cognitive Linguistics and second language instruction. In
N. Ellis &
P. Robinson (Eds.),
The handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 456–488). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin, R.D., & LaPolla, R
(
1997)
Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waara, R
(
2004)
Construal, convention, and constructions in L2 Speech. In
M. Achard &
S. Niemeier (Eds.),
Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language pedagogy (pp. 51–75). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Webelhuth, G
(
2012)
The Distribution of that-Clauses in English: An SBCG Account. In
H.C. Boas &
I.A. Sag (Eds.),
Sign-based Construction Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.