Cover not available
Article published In:
Constructions and Frames
Vol. 7:1 (2015) ► pp.47–78

Non-quantifying líγo constructions in Modern Greek

| University of the Aegean, Mytilene, Greece

In this paper I focus on MGr lίγo ‘(a) little’ in non-quantifying constructions codifying affect and argue that it has grammaticalized from a quantifier to an (inter)subjective metalinguistic hedging device: i.e., a positive politeness marker in the hedged directive construction and a marker of attitude to one’s own utterance in the hedged statement construction. Motivation for this development is provided by MGr interactional ethos and the importance attached to the friendly, informal “politeness of involvement”, a factor discussed in the context of universal tendencies in the semantics of diminutives and affective language. I argue that non-quantifying lίγo is a case of semantic change motivated by sociopragmatic considerations which are anchored to specific constructions.

Keywords: verbal diminutivization, non-quantifying constructions, hedging devices, (inter)subjectification, Greek, affect, positive politeness
Published online: 28 January 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.7.1.02can
References (70)
Antonopoulou, E., & Nikiforidou, K
(2011) Construction grammar and conventional discourse: A construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(10), 2594–2609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Athanasiadou, A
(2006) Adjectives and subjectivity. In A. Athanadiadou, C. Canakis, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectivity: Various paths to subjectification (pp. 209–239). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Athanasiadou, A., Canakis, C., & Cornillie, B
(2006) Introduction. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectivity: Various paths to subjectification (pp. 1–10). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badarneh, M.A
(2010) The pragmatics of diminutives in colloquial Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(1), 153–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besnier, N
(1990) Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 191, 419–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711- 33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Pagliuca, W
(1985) Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical semantics, historical word-formation (pp. 59–83). The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W
(1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, L
(2001) What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences, 231, 113–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L., & Janda, R
(2001) Introduction: Conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences, 231, 95–112.Google Scholar
Canakis, C
(2012) Towards grammaticalized verbal diminutivization? In Z. Gavriilidou, A. Efthymiou, E. Thomadaki, & P. Kambakis-Vougiouklis (Eds.), Selected papers of the 10th International Conference of Greek Linguistics (pp. 177–185). Komotini: Democritus University of Thrace.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, H., Davidse, K., & Vandelanotte, L
(2010) Introduction. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp. 1–25). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’ Connor, M.C
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 641, 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finegan, E
(1995) Subjectivity and subjectivisation: An introduction. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives (pp. 1–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, M
(2015) Construction grammar. In A. Alexiadou & T. Kiss (Eds.), Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science. 42.1–3 (pp. 974–1003). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [URL]Google Scholar
Fried, M., & Östman, J-O
(2004) A thumbnail sketch of construction grammar. In M. Fried & J-O. Östman (Eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Construction grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1752–1778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D
(2005) Lectal variation and empirical data in cognitive linguistics. In F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & M. Sandra Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 163–189). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y
(2010) Introduction: Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. In D. Geeraerts, G. Kristiansen, & Y. Peirsman (Eds.), Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics (pp. 1–19). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Speelman, D
(2010) Hetrodox concept features and onomasiological heterogeneity in dialects. In D. Geeraerts, G. Kristiansen, & Y. Peirsman (Eds.), Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics (pp. 23–40). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannaris, T., & Karatsareas, P
(2013) On the morphosyntax of quantificational adjectives in modern Greek. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Greek Linguistics . University of the Aegean, Rhodes, 28 September 2013.
Goldberg, A.E
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2007/2003) Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. In V. Evans, B. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The cognitive linguistics reader (pp. 589–600). London & Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar
Goutsos, D
(2003) Soma ellinikon keimenon: Sxediasmos kai ilopoiisi [Greek text corpus: Design and implementation]. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greek Linguistics , University of Crete, 18-21 September 2003, cd-rom.
(2014) Sindeondas to keimeno me to sistima: Glossikes prakseis kai somata keimenon [Connecting the text with the system: Speech acts and corpora]. In M. Georgalidou, M. Sifianou, & V. Tsakona (Eds.), Analisi logou: Theoria kai efarmoges [Discourse analysis: Theory and applications] (pp. 189–223). Athens: Nisos.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M., & Östman, J-O
(2014) Reflections on constructions across grammars. Constructions and Frames, 6(2), 137–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J., & Traugott, E. Closs
(2003/1993) Grammaticalization (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, D., Mackridge, P., & Philippaki-Warburton, I
(1999) Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R
(1991) Parts and boundaries. Cognition, 411, 9–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B.D
(1983) The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive: A study in areal, general, and historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Is there such a thing as grammaticalization? Language Sciences, 231, 163–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, D
(1996) Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language, 72(3), 533–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kailoglou, E
(2010) Style and sociolinguistic variation in Athens. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Essex.Google Scholar
Klairis, C., Babiniotis, G., et al.
(2011) Grammatiki tis neas ellinikis: Domoleitourgiki - epikoinoniaki [Structural-functional – communicative grammar of Modern Greek]. Athens: Kentro Leksikologias.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R
(Eds.) (2008) Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W
(1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Subjectification, grammaticization, and conceptual archetypes. In A. Athanadiadou, C. Canakis, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectivity: Various paths to subjectification (pp. 17–40). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C
(1992) Word order change by grammaticalization. In M. Gerritsen & D. Stein (Eds.), Internal and external factors in syntactic change (pp. 395–416). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makri-Tsilipakou, M
(2003) Greek diminutive use problematized: Gender, culture and common sense. Discourse and Society, 14(6), 699–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, A
(1912/1926) L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza), 12(26), 384–400. Reprinted in his Linguistique historique et linguistique générale [Collection linguistique publiée par la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 8] (pp. 130-148). Champion: Paris, 1926 (2nd, enlarged ed.; 1st ed. 1921; reprinted by Klincksieck, Paris, 1951).Google Scholar
Michaelis, L.A
(2003) Word meaning, sentence meaning, and syntactic meaning. In H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven, & J.R. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on lexical semantics (pp. 163–210). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Entity and event coercion in a symbolic theory of syntax. In J-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 45–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, K
(2009) Constructional analysis. In F. Brisard, J-O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Grammar, meaning, and pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 5] (pp. 16–32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F.J
(2001) Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences, 231, 187–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noël, D
(2007) Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language, 14(2), 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L.L
(2009) From syntactic coordination to conceptual modification: The case of the nice and Adj construction. Constructions and Frames, 1(1), 56–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perek, F., & Hilpert, M
(2014) Constructional tolerance: Cross-linguistic differences in the acceptability of non-conventional uses of constructions. Constructions and Frames, 6(2), 266–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandfeld, K
(1930) Linquistique balcanique: Problèmes et résultats. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Schneider, K.P
(2003) Diminutives in English. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, M
(1992a) The use of diminutives in expressing politeness: Modern Greek versus English. Journal of Pragmatics, 171, 155–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992b) Politeness phenomena in England and Greece: A cross-cultural perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(2014) Evgeneia sto logo [Politeness in discourse]. In M. Georgalidou, M. Sifianou, & V. Tsakona (Eds.), Analisi logou: Theoria kai efarmoges [Discourse analysis: Theory and applications] (pp. 261–294). Athens: Nisos.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M., & Antonopoulou, E
(2005) Politeness in Greece: The politeness of involvement. In L. Hickey & M. Stewart (Eds.), Politeness in Europe (pp. 263–276). Toronto: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. Closs
(1995) Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives (pp. 31–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003a) From subjectification to intersubjectification. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Motives for language change (pp. 124–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003b) Constructions in grammaticalization. In B.D. Joseph & R.D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 624–647). London: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp. 29–71). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. Closs, & Dasher, R.B
(2002) Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. Closs, & König, E
(1991) The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E. Closs Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. 11, pp. 189–218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Triantaphyllidis, M
(1978/1941) Neolliniki grammatiki (tis dimotikis) [Modern Greek grammar (of the demotic)]. Thessaloniki: Institouto Neoellinikon Spoudon.Google Scholar
Trousdale, G., & Traugott, E. Closs
(2010) Preface. In E. Closs Traugott & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsopanakis, A
(1994) Neohelliniki grammatiki [Modern Greek grammar]. (2nd edition). Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis Bros.Google Scholar
Veloudis, Y
(2005) I simasia prin, kata kai meta ti glossa [Meaning before, during, and after language]. Athina: Kritiki.Google Scholar
Verhagen, A
(2005) Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Vassilaki, Evgenia & Stathis Selimis
2020. Children’s Requestive Behavior in L2 Greek: Beyond the Core Request. Corpus Pragmatics 4:3 ► pp. 359 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.