Article published in:On the Interaction of Constructions with Register and Genre
Edited by Kerstin Fischer and Kiki Nikiforidou
[Constructions and Frames 7:2] 2015
► pp. 258–288
Situation in grammar or in frames?
Evidence from the so-called baby talk register
This paper addresses the conditions under which knowledge of situation-specific language use should be part of a construction grammatical representation and under which it should, rather, be part of a frame semantic representation. Using child-directed speech as an example, which has been suggested to constitute a good candidate for a register, it is shown that a conventional association between grammatical form and situation is implausible. Instead, the relationship between grammar and situation is mediated by speakers’ understandings of the functional affordances of the respective situation, to which the communication partner may contribute considerably. In the case of the so-called baby talk register, situational knowledge is thus stored best in semantic frames as a set of functions that can be demonstrated to be commonly attended to, whereas construction grammar remains an inventory of general form-function pairs.
Keywords: register, motherese, usage-based model, construction grammar, child-directed speech, frame semantics
Published online: 24 March 2016
Cited by 9 other publications
Fischer, Kerstin & Morgan Aarestrup
Kaneyasu, Michiko & Minako Kuhara
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Alley, Th. R.
Antonopoulou, E., & Nikiforidou, K.
Bard, E.C., & Anderson, A.H.
Bateman, J.A., Delin, J., & Henschel, E.
Biersack, S., Kempe, V., & Knapton, L.
Brent, M.R., & Siskind, J.M.
Cartwright, T.A., & Brent, M.R.
Clark, E.V., & Estigarribia, B.
Conti-Ramsden, G., & Friel-Patti, S.
Cross, T., Johnson-Morris, J.E., & Nienhuys, T.G.
Cross, T.G., Nienhuys, T.G., & Kirkman, M.
DePaulo, B.M., & Coleman, L.
Fernald, A., & Hurtado, N.
Fernald, A., Marchman, E., & Weisleder, A.
Fernald, A., & Mazzie, C.
Fernald, A., & Weisleder, A.
(1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech , 280, 20–32.
Fillmore, C.J., & Atkins, B.T.
(2011) Interpersonal variation in understanding robots as social actors. In Proceedings of HRI’11 ( pp. 53–60). March 6-9th, 2011. Lausanne, Switzerland.
Fischer, K., Foth, K., Rohlfing, K., & Wrede, B.
Fischer, K., Lohan, K., & Foth, K.
(2012) Levels of embodiment. Linguistic analyses of factors influencing HRI. In Proceedings of HRI’12 , Boston.
Fischer, K., Lohan, K.S., Rohlfing, K., & Foth, K.
(2014) Partner orientation in asymmetric communication: Evidence from contingent robot response. HRI ’14 Workshop on Humans and Robots in Asymmetric Interactions , March 3rd, 2014, Bielefeld, Germany.
French, L., & Pak, M.K.
Gleitman, L.R., Newport, E.L., & Gleitman, H.
Groom, V., Takayama, L., Ochi, P., & Nass, C.
(2009) I am my robot: The impact of robot-building and robot form on operators. In Proceedings of the Human-Robot Interaction Conference: HRI 2009 (pp. 31–36). San Diego, CA.
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C.
Kaplan, P.S., Bachorowski, J.-A., & Zarlengo-Strouse, P.
Kay, P., & Michaelis, L.A.
Kempe, V., Brooks, P.J., & Pirott, L.
Kitamura, C., Thanavishuth, C., Burnham, D., & Luksaneeyanawin, S.
Kraljic, T., Samuel, A.G., & Brennan, S.E.
Küntay, A., & Slobin, D.I.
Küntay, A., & Slobin, D.A.
(2001) Discourse behavior of lexical categories in Turkish child-directed speech: nouns vs. verbs. In M. Almgren, A. Barrena, M. Ezeizabarrena, I. Idiazabal, & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Research on child language acquisition: Proceedings for the 8th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language (pp. 928–946). Cascadilla Press.
Laakso, A., & Smith, L.
Liu, H.-M., Feng-Ming, T., & Kuhl, P.K.
(2011) A model of contingency detection to spot tutoring behavior and to respond to ostensive cues in human-robot interaction. PhD Thesis, Bielefeld University.
Mannle, S., & Tomasello, M.
Metta, G., Natale, L., Nori, F., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., Fadiga, L., Von Hofsten, C., Rosander, K., Lopes, M. Santos-Victor, J.. et al.
Nass, C., & Moon, Y.
Newman-Norlund, S.E., Noordzij, M.L., Newman-Norlund, R.D., Volman, I.A., de Ruiter, J.P., Hagoort, P., & Toni, I.
Newport, E.L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L.R.
Nomikou, I., Lohan, K.S., & Rohlfing, K.
(2012) Adaptive maternal synchrony: Multimodal practices are tailored to infants’ attention. CEU Conference on Cognitive Development , Budapest, Hungary.
Papousek, M., Papousek, H., & Haekel, M.
Quam, C., Yuan, J., & Swingley, D.
(2008) Relating intonational pragmatics to the pitch realizations of highly frequent words in English speech to infants. In Proceedings of the CogSci’08 Conference.
Redford, M.A., Davis, B.L., & Miikkulainen, R.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C.
Roy, B.C., Frank, M.C., & Roy, D.
(2009) Exploring word learning in a high-density longitudinal corpus. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society .
(2012) Relating activity contexts to early word learning in dense longitudinal data. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Cognitive Science Conference . Sapporo, Japan.
Snow, C.E., & Goldfield, B.A.
Soderstrom,M., Seidl, A., Kemler Nelson, D.G., & Jusczyk, P.W.
Sylvester-Bradley, B., & Trevathen, C.
Trainor, L.J., & Desjardins, R.N.
Uther, M., Knoll, M., & Burnham, D.
Vogt, P., & Mastin, J.D.
Walker, K., & Armstrong, L.
Yont, K.M., Snow, C.E., & Vernon-Feagans, L.