Article published In:
On the Interaction of Constructions with Register and Genre
Edited by Kerstin Fischer and Kiki Nikiforidou
[Constructions and Frames 7:2] 2015
► pp. 315347
References
Aijmer, K
(1977) Partiklarna ju och väl. [The particles ju and väl]. Nysvenska studier, 571, 205–216. Uppsala: Adolf Noreen-sällskapet,Google Scholar
(1996) Swedish modal particles in a contrastive perspective. Language Sciences, 181, 393–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alm, M
(2012) Why not Swedish modal particles? In J. Brandtler, D. Håkansson, S. Huber, & E. Klingvall (Eds.), Discourse and pragmatics: A festschrift in honor of Valéria Molnár (pp. 29–52). Lund University.Google Scholar
Bergman, B
(2007) Ordens ursprung: etymologisk ordbok över 2200 ord och uttryck. [The origin of the words: etymological dictionary of 2200 words and expressions]. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S
(2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G
(2006) Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (pp. 403–425). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
(2008) Die Funktion “idiomatischer“ Konstruktionen bei Grammatikal­i­sierungs­prozessen: illustriert am Beispiel der Modalpartikel ruhig . [The function of “idiomatic” constructions in grammaticalization processes: Using the example of ruhig ]. In A. Stefanowitsch & K. Fischer (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik II: Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik (pp. 33–57). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Diewald, G., & Fischer, K
(1998) Zur diskursiven und modalen Funktion der Partikeln aber, auch, doch und ja in Instruktionsdialogen. [On the discourse and modal function of the particles aber, auch, doch and ja in instruction dialogues]. Linguistica, 381, 75–99.Google Scholar
Doherty, M
(1985) Epistemische Bedeutung. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J
(2006 [1982]) Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Fischer, K
(2000) From cognitive semantics to lexical pragmatics: The functional polysemy of discourse particles. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Frames, constructions, and invariant meanings: The functional polysemy of discourse particles. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (pp. 427–447). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
(2007) Grounding and common ground: Modal particles and their translation equivalents. In A. Fetzer & K. Fischer (Eds.), Lexical markers of common grounds (pp. 47–66). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
(2014) Discourse markers. In K.P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 271–294). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K., & Alm, M
(2013) A radical construction grammar perspective on the modal particle-discourse particle distinction. In L. Degand, B. Cornillie, & P. Pietrandrea (Eds.), Discourse markers and modal particles: Categorization and description (pp. 47–87). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foolen, A
(1989) Beschreibungsebenen für Partikelbedeutungen. [Description levels for particle meanings]. In H. Weydt (Ed.), Sprechen mit Partikeln (pp. 305–317). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.E
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hellquist, E
(1970) Svensk etymologisk ordbok. [Swedish etymological dictionary]. 3rd edition. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Hentschel, E
(1986) Funktion und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln: Ja, doch, halt und eben. [The function and history of German particles: ja, doch, halt and eben ]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J
(2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindner, K
(1991) Wir sind ja doch alte Bekannte. The use of German ja and doch as modal particles. In W. Abraham (Ed.), Discourse particles: Descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German (pp. 163–202). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, J
(2008) Tur och ordning: Introduktion till svensk samtalsgrammatik. [According to turn: Introduction to Swedish discourse grammar.] Stockholm: Norstedts akademiska förlag.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B
(2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nilsson, J
(2005) Adverb i interaktion. [Adverbs in interaction]. Göteborg: Institutionen för svenska språket, Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
Saari, M
(1979) Om adverben ju, nog och väl . [On the adverbs ju, nog and väl ]. In Festskrift till Björn Pettersson 29.12.1979. (pp. 219–243). Tammerfors: Skrifter utgivna vid institutionen för filologi II vid Tammerfors Universitet, nordisk filologi. 4.Google Scholar
(1995) “Jo, nu kunde vi festa nog”: Synpunkter på svenskt språkbruk i Sverige och Finland. [PRT we knew how to party PRT]. Folkmålstudier, 361, 75–108.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, S., Richthoff, U., & Andersson, A.-B
(1993) Strömqvist’s and Richthoff’s corpora: A guide to longitudinal data from four Swedish children. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 661.Google Scholar
Teleman, U., Hellberg, S., & Andersson, E
(Eds.) (1999) Svenska Akademiens grammatik IV. Satser och meningar. [The Grammar of the Swedish Academy. IV. Clauses and sentences]. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.Google Scholar
Thurmair, M
(1989) Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. [Modal particles and their combinations]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weydt, H
(2006) What are particles good for? In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (pp. 205–217). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wirdenäs, K
(2002) Ungdomars argumentation: Om argumentationstekniker i gruppsamtal. [Teenager’s argumentation: About argumentation techniques in group discussions]. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Zeevat, H
(2006) A dynamic approach to discourse particles. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (pp. 133–148). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionaries. English
SAOB Svenska Akademiens ordbok
Extensive Dictionary of the Swedish Academy]: [URL]
SAOL Svenska Akademiens ordlista
Simple Dictionary of the Swedish Academy], 13th edition: [URL]
NE Nationalencyklopedins svenska ordbok
Nationalencyklopedin’s Swedish Dictionary] (only available with subscription): [URL]