Article published In:
Modal Meaning in Construction GrammarEdited by Bert Cappelle and Ilse Depraetere
[Constructions and Frames 8:1] 2016
► pp. 1–6
Edited by Bert Cappelle and Ilse Depraetere
[Constructions and Frames 8:1] 2016
► pp. 1–6
Modal meaning in Construction Grammar
References
Bergs, A
(2010) Expression of futurity in contemporary English: A Construction Grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics, 14(2), 217–238. 
Biber, D
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boogaart, R
(2009) Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar: The case of modal verbs. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp. 213–241). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Boogaart, R., & Fortuin, E
. ( 2016) Modality and mood in cognitive linguistics and construction grammars. In J. Nuyts & J. Van der Auwera (Eds.), Oxford handbook of modality and mood (pp. 514–533). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, J
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cappelle, B., & Depraetere, I
(2013) Modal verbs from a Construction Grammar perspective.
Fifth International AFLiCo Conference, Empirical approaches to multi-modality and to language variation
, Université Lille 3, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France, 15-17 May 2013.
Cappelle, B., & De Sutter, G
(2010)
Should vs. ought to: A corpus-based multivariate analysis.
Sixth International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG-6)
, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 3-5 September 2010.
De Haan, F
(2012) The relevance of constructions for the interpretation of modal meaning: The case of must
. English Studies, 93(6), 700–728.
Diewald, G
(2006) Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. Constructions, SV1(9).
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E
(Eds.) (2011a) Modalität und Evidentialität. Fokus 37. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
(2011b) The German evidential constructions and their origins. A corpus based analysis. In T. Mortelmans, J. Mortelmans, & W. De Mulder (Eds.), In the mood for mood (pp. 81–100). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi (Cahiers Chronos 23).
Goldberg, A., & Van der Auwera, J
(2012) This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica, 461, 109–132.
Hilpert, M
(2008) Germanic future constructions. A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2013a) Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2013b) Die englischen Modalverben im Daumenkino: Zur dynamischen Visualisierung von Phänomenen des Sprachwandels. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 421, 67–82.
Morgan, J.L
(1977) Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. Technical report No. 52. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. [URL].
Mortelmans, T
(2000) Konjunktiv II and epistemic modals in German: A division of labour. In A. Foolen & F. van der Leek (Eds.), Constructions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 191–215). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Narrog, H
(2012) Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stefanowitsch, A
(2003) A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts. In K.-U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp.105–126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V
(1998) Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 21, 79–124.
Wärnsby, A
(2002) Modal constructions? Lund Working Papers in Linguistics, 21. Lund: Department of English Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
FLACH, SUSANNE
2021. Beyond modal idioms and modal harmony: a corpus-based analysis of gradient idiomaticity inmod+advcollocations. English Language and Linguistics 25:4 ► pp. 743 ff. 
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023. Constructionist Approaches,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.